Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content

  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Iraqi protest today

Jimsdandy

By Jimsdandy,
in Iraq & Dinar Related News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jimsdandy Newbie

Jimsdandy

Posted
Posted

Alsumaria News / Kirkuk

تظاهر العشرات من اهالي ناحية التون كوبري شمال كركوك، مساء الاثنين، وقطعوا الطريق العام بين كركوك-اربيل، مطالبين الحكومة العراقية بإنهاء معاناتهم من انقطاع التيار الكهربائي لاكثر من 20 ساعة يومياً، فيما عقد محافظ كركوك اجتماعا مع مسؤولي قطاع الكهرباء لمناقشة سبل توفير الطاقة للمدينة من ضمن مشروع البترو دولار. Dozens of people on the Walton Bridge north of Kirkuk, on Monday evening, and cut off the main road between Kirkuk - Erbil, demanding the Iraqi government to end their suffering from power outages for more than 20 hours per day, while a governor of Kirkuk, a meeting with officials of the electricity sector to discuss ways to provide energy for the city part of a project petro dollars.

وقال أحد المتظاهرين ويدعى بكر محمود خورشيد لـ"السومرية نيوز"، إن "العشرات من اهالي ناحية التون كوبري قاموا مساء اليوم، بقطع الطريق الرئيس بين كركوك واربيل، مطالبين الحكومة العراقية وحكومة كركوك المحلية بتوفير الطاقة الكهربائية التي نخجل من الحديث عن انقطاعها فيما تفتتح دول العالم محطات كهرباء تدار بالطاقة النووية"، متسائلاً "إلى متى يستمر هذا التهاون الحكومي بمصالح الناس؟". He said one of the demonstrators and called Bakr Mahmud Khurshid "Alsumaria News", "dozens of people on the Walton Bridge have this evening, cutting off the main road between Kirkuk and Arbil, demanding the Iraqi government and the Government of Kirkuk, the local energy-saving electrical shy away from talking about the interruption in open states the world's power stations, nuclear-powered, "and wondered" How long will this government tolerated the interests of the people? ".

ودعا خورشيد الحكومة "للعمل جدياً على حل هذه الأزمة"، مبيناً أن "ساعات قطع التيار تصل إلى 20 ساعة يومياً، مما يضطر أصحاب المحال التجارية كافة إلى إغلاقها في وقت مبكر". Khorshid called the government "to work seriously to resolve this crisis," noting that "the hours of power cuts of up to 20 hours a day, forcing shopkeepers to close them all in early."

وقال متظاهر آخر يدعى محمد حسن كوبرلو، "نحن نسمع منذ ما بعد عام 2003 بمشاريع بمليارات الدولارات من قبل وزارة الكهرباء، وذهبت على الأرجح الى جيوب المسؤولين المفسدين"، متسائلاً "أيعقل أن تختزن كركوك ربع الإنتاج النفطي في العراق فيما أهلها محرومون من الطاقة؟". He said protesters last named Mohammed Hassan Köpürlü, "We have been hearing that after the year 2003 projects worth billions of dollars by the Ministry of Electricity, and I went on probably into the pockets of those corrupt," and wondered "Is it rational that the stores of Kirkuk, a quarter of the oil in Iraq, the people are deprived of energy? ".

وحذر كوبرلو من أن "على الحكومة والبرلمان التعجيل في ايجاد الحلول لهذه المعاناة التي تعصف بجميع المحافظات العراقية قبل توسع الاحتجاجات لتشمل باقي مناطق كركوك والمحافظات الأخرى". Köpürlü and warned that "the government and parliament to accelerate in finding solutions to these suffering that beset all Iraqi provinces by the expansion of the protests to include the rest of the regions of Kirkuk and other provinces."

وفي شأن متصل، عقد محافظ كركوك عبد الرحمن مصطفى، اليوم، اجتماعا ضم نائبه ومديري قطاع الكهرباء في المحافظة تم في خلاله بحث اوضاع هذا القطاع الحيوي بخاصة بعد تفاقم الانقطاع في التيار الكهربائي بشكل كبير". In regard to the Post, a governor of Kirkuk, Abdul Rahman Mustafa, today, a meeting of deputy directors of the electricity sector in the province in which they discussed were the situation of this vital sector, especially after the worsening in the voltage drop significantly. "

وذكر بيان لمكتب اعلام المحافظة تلقت "السومرية نيوز" نسخة منه، إن"محافظ كركوك بحث في النتائج التي عاد بها الوفد الذي ارسله الى بغداد برئاسة نائب المحافظ راكان سعيد الجبوري، حول نصب وحدات توليد بطاقة 5 ميغا واط، كما تم التطرق في الاجتماع لتشجيع الاستثمار في قطاع الكهرباء". According to a statement to inform the Office to maintain received "Alsumaria News," a copy of it, that "the governor of Kirkuk, search results returned by the delegation, which sent him to Baghdad under the chairmanship of Deputy Governor, Rakan Saeed al-Jubouri, on the monument and the generating units card 5 mega-watts, also discussed at the meeting to encourage investment in the electricity sector. "

وأكد محافظ كركوك ان "الادارة تبذل جهوداً مضنية لتحسين واقع الكهرباء وتسعى من اجل تقديم افضل الخدمات لمواطنيها" مستدركاً بالقول "لكن المشكلة كما يعلم الجميع مشكلة عامة في العراق، والحكومة المركزية في بغداد هي التي تتحكم بكمية الكهرباء المخصصة للمحافظة". The governor of Kirkuk, said "The administration is making strenuous efforts to improve the reality of power and seeks to provide the best services to its citizens," but he also said, "but the problem is, as everyone knows is a general problem in Iraq, and the central government in Baghdad is that controls the amount of power allocated to the province."

واضاف مصطفى "لقد عقدنا اجتماعات موسعة بين مديري القطاع الكهربائي والمعنيين من جهة، مع مستثمرين في القطاع الخاص بهدف دراسة سبل تزويد المحافظة بالكهرباء من خلال مشروع يمول من تخصيصات البترو دولار"، مبيناً اننا "سنرسل مندوبنا الى بغداد لاكمال الاجراءات القانونية مع الجهات المخولة بالتعاقد في هذا المجال". He said Moustafa "We had meetings extended between the directors of the electricity sector and other stakeholders on the one hand, with investors in the private sector to examine ways to provide the province with electricity through a project funded from the allocations of petro-dollars," noting that "we will send our representative to Baghdad to complete the legal procedures with the authorized contract in this area. "

ودعا محافظ كركوك ايضا، المسؤولين في قطاع الكهرباء، الى "التنسيق وتحضير المواقع التي ستنصب فيها الوحدات الصغيرة لضمان الحصول على عدد وافر منها منها ليتسنى لأكبر عدد من الأهالي الاستفادة منها". And also called on the governor of Kirkuk, officials in the electricity sector, to the "coordination and preparation of sites that will be concentrated in small units to ensure access to a multitude of them so that the largest number of people take advantage of them."

وكان مجلس كركوك، دعا وزارة الكهرباء لزيادة حصة المحافظة من الطاقة الكهربائية، معلنا أنه قرر إعطاء الأولوية لاستيراد الكهرباء من دول الجوار، أو الاستفادة من الشركات المنتجة للطاقة في إقليم كردستان العراق. The Kirkuk council, called the Ministry of Electricity to increase the share of the province of electricity, declaring that he had decided to give priority to import electricity from neighboring countries, or take advantage of energy-producing companies in the Kurdistan region of Iraq.

من جهته، أكد مدير توزيع كهرباء في كركوك يالجين مهدي رشيد في حديث لـ"السومرية نيوز"، أن "كركوك تتسلم من الشبكة الوطنية نحو 170 ميغاواط وهي كمية تكفي لتزويد المواطنين ما بين 4 - 5 ساعات يومياً في مقابل انقطاع لمدة 20 ساعة". For his part, the Director of Electricity Distribution in Kirkuk Yaljehin Mehdi Rachid in an interview for "Alsumaria News", "Kirkuk is received from the national network of about 170 megawatts, enough to provide the citizens are between 4-5 hours per day in exchange for a break for 20 hours."

يذكر أن رئيس مجلس محافظة كركوك وكالة ريبوار طالباني كان أعلن في وقت سابق أن المجلس قرر بناء محطة كهربائية بسعة 400 ميغاوات، على أن تنفذ على مرحلتين لكل مرحلة 200 ميغاواط، كما تم تخصيص نحو 200 مليار دينار عراقي ضمن مخصصات مشروع البترو دولار للعام الماضي. The President of the provincial council in Kirkuk agency Rebwar Talabani had said earlier that the Council decided to build a power plant with a capacity of 400 MW, to be implemented in two stages for each stage 200 MW, has also been allocated 200 billion Iraqi dinars within the provisions of the draft petro dollars in the past.

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ar&u=http://www.alsumarianews.com/ar/3/16104/news-details-.html&prev=/search%3Fq%3Dnahrain%26hl%3Den%26client%3Dfirefox-a%26hs%3Dbh9%26rls%3Dorg.mozilla:en-US:official&rurl=translate.google.com&twu=1

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ceress Newbie

ceress

Posted
Posted

menaced for the past 100 years by collectivist trends, must seek Revival of Our Strength by re-Educating Ourselves in the Spiritual Foundations, Principles and Ideals which are the bedrock of our Republic, the Principle and Conviction of the Sacredness of every Human Life, and in the understanding of Our Responsibilities in the care and maintenance of those Foundations. To that end is this HTML Edition presented.

"Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action." ----George Washington, speech of January 7, 1790 in the Boston Independent Chronicle, January 14, 1790

"The establishment of our institutions," wrote President Monroe, "forms the most important epoch that history hath recorded. They extend unexampled felicity to the whole body of our fellow-citizens, and are the admiration of other nations. To preserve and hand them down in their utmost purity to the remotest ages will require the existence and practice of virtues and talents equal to those which were displayed in acquiring them. It is ardently hoped and confidently believed that these will not be wanting."

In this era of world-wide social and political change, it behooves us, as never before, to know the fundamentals of our Constitution which, in times of stress as well as in peace, has provided the American people with a more enduring and practical government, and a greater degree of prosperity that any other people have ever had.

It is well to remember the words of James Madison as we search for Truth in Self-Government and in Our Understanding of this Great Document of Liberty, Freedom, Justice and Prosperity.

"A popular government without popular information, or the means of acquiring it, is but a prologue to a farce or a tragedy, or perhaps both. Knowledge will forever govern ignorance, and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives." -- James Madison letter to W. T. Barry, August 4, 1822

"In proportion as the structure of a government gives force to public opinion," wrote Washington in his Farewell Address, "it is essential that public opinion should be enlightened."

Therefore, the purpose of this presentation is to make accessible to every citizen and his posterity such knowledge of the Constitution For The United States as will serve him well, in peace or war. But the means of acquiring the information essential to stalwart citizenship has never before been available to the mass of people in as practical and simple form as this presentation on the internet.

"Almost every provision in that instrument [The Constitution]," said a great jurist, " has a history that must be understood before the brief and sententious language employed can be comprehended in the relations its authors intended."

The simple plan of this presentation is to explain the Constitution by a note to every line or clause that has a story or drama from history back of it, or that has contributed during the 222 years of our life under this document to the welfare of mankind. This method leaves the test of the Constitution and the Amendments in unbroken connection, so that the whole design is plainly seen as the explanation appears immediately under the part to be explained. In addition to showing the historic sources of particular provisions of the Constitution examples are also given to the application of the clauses in great matters which have arisen during our nation's life. These decisions of the courts are brought down to the present day. They illustrate very clearly that the man in power has undergone no change and that without the prohibitions of the Constitution and the means of giving them immediate effect he would become as dangerous as he ever was to the safety of the government and to the rights and liberties of the people.

One who reads and studies closely the full explanation in the text will discover that each clause or word in the Constitution was carefully designed to protect the individual -- his life, his liberty and his property. By a few, the erroneous belief has been spread that the Constitution is a barrier in the way of American progress. Actually the Constitution is a coat of mail which man himself has fashioned for his own protection, and which he has changed from time to time that the protection might be the more complete -- protection against the abuse of power by his servants in the legislature or Congress, whom he may dismiss at election time or by impeachment, and against whose invasion of his rights he can appeal to the courts; against his executive officers, whom he may dismiss by impeachment or ballot; against his judges, whom he may remove for lack of "good behavior." His government is not his master, as the king or dictator has always been, but his servant."

"In questions of power then," wrote Jefferson, "let no more be heard of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution."

The Founders of the Republic feared parties of the people as much as they did a royal government. "Whenever there is an interest and power to do wrong," wrote Madison to Jefferson in 1788, "wrong will generally be done, and not less readily by a powerful and interested party than by a powerful and interested prince."

The notes which are to follow will disclose the truth of that statement. See Also "Undermining the Constitution - A History of Lawless Government"

There is no more interesting fact to be learned about our Constitution than that of its influence upon the nations of the world. While Americcans know in a general way that under their Constitution thirteen scattered agricultural communities have developed into a nation of fifty states of the most varied resources, with the highest social and educational advantages, they are not aware that our Constitution has been copied in whole or in part throughout the earth. "The Republic of the United States," states Lord Bryce, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary at Washington from Great Britain from 1907 to 1913, author of "The American Commonwealth" (1888) and professor of civil (Roman) law in the University of Oxford from 1870 to 1893, writing ("Studies in History and Jurisprudence", Vol. 1, p.168) of what he called a "rigid" constitution -- one like ours, which can be changed only by a method different from that whereby other laws are enacted or repealed -- "has not only presented the most remarkable instance of this type in the modern world, but has by its success become a pattern which other republics have imitated. . . . The constitutions of all the forty-five [now 50] States of the Union are rigid, being not alterable by the legislatures of those States respectively. This is also true of the Constitution of the Dominion of Canada, which is alterable only by the Imperial Parliament. Mexico and the five republics of Central America, together with the nine republics of South America, have all adapted constitutions which their legislatures have not received power to change."

The Commonwealth of Australia adopted a constitution (1900) following ours more closely even that that of Canada (1867) did; and in 1909, after the Boer War, the Union of South Africa adopted a similar constitution, but owing to the diversity of the races and interests which were united, it does not follow the American model so closely as do those of Canada and Australia. France, Belgium, and Switzerland have put in their constitutions many provisions first employed in ours; but to the extent that other countries have failed to follow the Constitution of the United States their governmental structures are weak, as the study of the notes will reveal. It is to be seen, further, that the underlying principles of our Constitution were not formulated in a day. When our forefathers declared their independence some of the colonists had lived under written charters from the English Crown for one hundred sixty-nine years, or three-fourths as long as the 222 years we have lived under the present Constitution. During that long term many of the Colonies were practically self-governed. The English historian Lecky ("England in the Eighteenth Century") says that all of them enjoyed greater privileges in this respect than did the English people themselves. It will be seen from a study of the notes that many leading principles of the Constitution were adoptions or adaptions of what the colonists had worked out in experience while they were subjects of the English government; and that after the Declaration of Independence the States framed constitutions of their own from which many important provisions were borrowed by the Constitutional Convention and made a part of our fundamental law. Many other provisions of our Constitution merely state principles of English law as the colonists thought that they should be applied in the new day.

Thus, in 1780, seven years before the Constitution was drafted, Massachusetts put in its Constitution what became the classic statement of the American theory of the division of governmental powers:

"In the government of this commonwealth the legislative department shall never exercise the executive and judicial powers, or either of them; the executive shall never exercise the legislative and judicial powers, or either of them; the judicial shall never exercise the legislative and executive powers, or either of them -- to the end that it may be a government of laws and not of men."

Nearly a year before the Constitutional Convention sat James Madison began working out what was called "the Virginia plan" of a form of government. Charles Pinckney of South Carolina took with him to the Convention a carefully drafted plan. Alexander Hamilton of New York had drawn such an elaborate scheme of government "that," says Taylor ("Origin and Growth of the American Constitution"), "it might have gone into effect the next day if it had been adopted." Other plans and suggestions almost without number were presented to the Convention. Taylor says that the three plans mentioned were the real basis of the Convention's work, that they were restatements of principles contained in a document published in Philadelphia by Pelatiah Webster in 1783.

In addition to this careful preparation after more than a century of self-government, there were in the Convention men of extraordinary natural ability and wide experience, like Washington, Franklin, Hamilton and Madison. There were men who had studied law at the Inner Temple in London, who had been educated in the University of Edinburgh, who had been graduated from American colleges, who had been governors of States, chief justices of supreme courts, and men who had achieved distinction at the bar and in business life. Edmund Burke stated in the House of Commons in March 1776, that more books of law were going to America than of any other kind. Of the fifty-five members of the Constitutional Convention, thirty-one were lawyers. Blackstone's Commentaries were taught by Chancellor Wythe in William and Mary College before the Declaration of Independence. John Marshall, Thomas Jefferson, and James Monroe were among his pupils.

When our Constitution was written Harvard College (1636) had been sending out educated young men for just a century and a half, William and Mary College (1693) had been graduating learned youths for almost a century, Yale College (1701) had been contributing to the education of the people for more than three quarters of a century, and Princeton (1746) had been teaching for half a century. The people were well prepared for their great endeavor.

The task of the Constitutional Convention was not to construct a government from the foundation up. There had already been firmly set by experience thirteen base-stones in the form of State republican governments. Upon these, and for the benefit of their population as a whole, the National structure was placed. This supergovernment was to deal with foreign nations, and also to administer at home all matters of National (as distinguished from State or local) character. The National government was to be supreme in its domain, and the State governments were to be sovereign in all affairs not National or foreign. As will be seen, this duality, while conducing to a happy balancing of governmental powers, has at the same time been the strongest force in political and material advancement. For the Nation has learned from the States, as they have learned from one another and from the Nation. Many changes have been brought about by the action of States which might never have resulted were action by the whole people called for in the first place. Of the numerous illustrations which might be given of the effect of State action upon National opinion perhaps the best is found in the laws (local option or prohibitory) restricting the manufacture and sale of intoxicating liquors. Without precedent action and demonstration by the States the Eighteenth Amendment would not been adopted. This observation may be repeated as womanhood suffrage, the trial of which in many States led to the Nineteenth Amendment. In many ways the competition of the States has been vitalizing and progressive. It is a question whether a vast republic not having such political subdivisions could long stand.

It is not generally mentioned that our present fundamental law is the second written form of government of the United States. The first was called the Articles of Confederation. The Articles went into effect as a government of "the United States of America" in 1781.. In 1777, less than a year after the Declaration of Independence, the Articles which had been drafted were adopted by the Convention chosen by the Continental Congress 1 to frame them. But owing mostly to disputes regarding western lands (the royal grants to the Colonies reaching westward indefinitely), the last State did not give its ratification until 1781. The Articles were so inadequate that within four years plans originated at Mount Vernon to remodel them. Washington and a company of statesmen recommended the calling of a convention the next year (1786) at Annapolis. Only five States sent representatives and, therefore, the Convention adjourned to the next year at Philadelphia. AII the States except Rhode Isand were then present by representatives. Washington, a delegate from Virginia, was chosen to preside. "Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair," he said; "the event is in the hand of God." The Convention, which was called to remodel the Articles of Confederation, cast them aside and drafted an entirely new instrument.

Pains have been taken in the notes to state everything simply and clearly, and as fully as the restricted space would permit.

It is recommended that the General Index, the Landmark Court Case Index and the Constitutional History of this presentation receive diligent study, and that as a matter of review, the Constitutional Quiz be taken.

For historical value the dates of the great decisions and of the leading acts of Congress have been given. Citations of volumes and pages have been omitted because they are not followed up by the run of readers and they are unpleasant to most eyes. But for the help of lawyers, and others who may wish to go beyond the text, a short table of the leading cases is presented.

Acknowledgment is due to Mr. Gardiner Lathrop of the Chicago Bar, to Mr. William DeForest Manice of the Bar of New York City, and to Mr. Blackburn Esterline of the Bar of the City of Washington for very helpful readings of the manuscript.

As stated at the outset, this explanation of the Constitution has been prepared under the conviction that the American never has had within reach the means of acquiring that knowledge which, as a citizen, he should first of all possess.

Note 1. The Continental Congress was the provisional or emergency government which was made up of delegates from the several States and which acted as their united authority from the time that the dispute with the English Government assumed its most serious aspect (1774) until the Articles of Confederation went into effect in 1781.

"In addition to the very important charge of managing the war," said President Monroe, discussing the Continental Congress, "that Congress had under consideration at the same time the declaration of independence, the adoption of a confederation for the States, and the propriety of instituting State governments, with the nature of those governments, respecting which it had been consulted by conventions of several of the Colonies. So great a trust was never reposed before in a body thus constituted."

Thomas James Norton.

Chicago, February, 1922

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY

"The question whether an act repugnant to the constitution can become the law of the land is a question deeply interesting to the United States; but, happily, not of an intricacy proportioned to its interest. It seems only necessary to recognize certain principles, supposed to have been long and well established, to decide it.

"That the people have an original right to establish for their future government such principles as, in their opinion, shall most conduce to their own happiness, is the basis on which the whole American fabric has been erected....

"This original and supreme will organizes the government, and assigns to different departments their respective powers. It may either stop here, or establish certain limits not to be transcended by those departments.

"The government of the United States is of the latter description. The powers of the legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken, or forgotten, the constitution is written. To what purpose are powers limited, and to what purpose is that limitation committed to writing, if these limits may, at any time, be passed by those intended to be restrained?

"If an act of the legislature, repugnant to the constitution, is void, does it, notwithstanding its invalidity, bind the courts, and oblige them to give it effect? Or, in other words, though it be not law, does it constitute a rule as operative as if it was a law? This would be to overthrow in fact what was established in theory; and would seem, at first view, an absurdity too gross to be insisted on." -- Chief Justice Marshall.

Whether the framers of the Constitution intended that the Supreme Court should in proper cases hold unconstitutional acts of Congress and acts of the legislatures of the States is answered Yes. (See p. 179) The subject was fully discussed not only in the Constitutional Convention, but also in the State ratifying conventions and in print. Oliver Ellsworth, in the Connecticut Convention, stated clearly the practice then intended precisely as it exists in the courts today:

"This Constitution defines the extent of the powers of the general government. If the general legislature [Congress should at any time overleap their limits the judicial department is a constitutional check. If the United States go beyond their powers, if they make a law which the Constitution does not authorize, it is void; and the judicial power, the National judges, who, to secure their impartiality, are to be made independent, will declare it to be void. On the other hand, if the States go beyond their limits, if they make a law which is a usurpation upon the Federal [National] government the law is void; and upright, independent judges will declare it to be so."

So there has been no usurpation of this power.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Do not separate text from historical background. If you do, you will have perverted and subverted the Constitution, which can only end in a distorted, bastardized form of illegitimate government." -- James Madison, Primary Author of the Constitution, President of the United States, Mainstream Militant and Revolutionary

In so many instances, fueled by greed, avarice, and self-aggrandizement, Our Elected Servants have subverted the Principles of the Constitution and Its strictures on the limitation of Government.

"Time has proven the discernment of our ancestors; for even these provisions, expressed in such plain English words that it would seem the ingenuity of man could not evade them, are now after the lapse of more than seventy years, sought to be avoided. Those great and good men foresaw that troublous times would arise, when rulers and people would become restive under restraint, and seek by sharp and decisive measures to accomplish ends deemed just and proper, and that the principles of constitutional liberty would be in peril unless established by irrepealable law. The history of the world had taught them that what was done in the past might be attempted in the future.

The Constitution of the United States is a law for rulers and people, equally in war and peace, and covers with the shield of its protection all classes of men, at all times, and under all circumstances. No doctrine involving more pernicious consequences was ever invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or despotism." -- The Supreme Court of the United States, 1866 c31

"They saw all the consequences in the principle and they avoided the consequences by denying the principle." -- James Madison

"Because if . . . [An Unalienable Natural Right of Free Men] . . . be exempt from the authority of the Society at large, still less can it be subject to that of the Legislative Body. The latter are but the creatures and vicegerents of the former. Their jurisdiction is both derivative and limited: It is limited with regard to the coordinate departments, more necessarily is it limited with regard to the constituents. The preservation of a free Government requires, not merely, that the metes and bounds which separate each department of power be invariably maintained: but more especially that neither of them be suffered to overleap the greater Barrier which defends the rights of the people. The Rulers who are guilty of such an encroachment, exceed the commission from which they derive their authority, and are Tyrants. The people who submit to it are governed by laws made neither by themselves nor by an authority derived from them, and are Slaves -- James Madison, June 1785.

". . . that the mass of mankind has not been born with saddles on their backs, nor a favored few booted and spurred, ready to ride them legitimately, by the grace of God." -- Thomas Jefferson's Last Letter, June 24, 1826

"Legislators have their authority measured by the Constitution, they are chosen to do what it permits, and NOTHING MORE, and they take solemn oath to obey and support it. . . To pass an act when they are in doubt whether it does or does not violate the Constitution is to treat as of no force the most imperative obligations any person can assume." --- Judge Thomas M. Cooley

The Great Barrier to the Alienation of the Unalienable Natural Rights of All Free Men, and the Metes and Bounds of the Government of the United States, is the Constitution for the United States.

"We the People" and OUR Elected Representatives MUST adhere to Principle, ALWAYS Placing Principles Before Personalities, Educating Ourselves to the Truth.

To save our Republic, all Americans must unite!!

"The last hope of human liberty in this world rests on us. . . . If we move in mass, be it ever so circuitously, we shall attain our object; but if we break into squads, every one pursuing the path he thinks most direct, we become an easy conquest to those who can now barely hold us in check.

I repeat again, that we ought not to schismatize on either men or measures. Principles alone can justify that. If we find our government in all its branches rushing headlong, like our predecessors, into the arms of monarchy, if we find them violating our dearest rights, the trial by jury, the freedom of the press, the freedom of opinion, civil or religious, or opening on our peace of mind or personal safety the sluices of terrorism, if we see them raising standing armies, when the absence of all other danger points to these as the sole objects on which they are to be employed, then indeed let us withdraw and call the nation to its tents. But while our functionaries are wise, and honest, and vigilant, let us move compactly under their guidance, and we have nothing to fear. Things may here and there go a little wrong. It is not in their power to prevent it. But all will be right in the end, though not perhaps by the shortest means." -- Thomas Jefferson to Colonel Wm. Duane, 1811

For two centuries of unexampled social, civil, and material advancement, in which it has been the controlling force, the Constitution has applied itself, adapted itself, developed itself, amended itself, and, through the stress and shock of civil and foreign wars the like of which no other constitution ever felt, it has maintained its equilibrium. The American citizen has reason to believe that his fundamental law contains inherently what the Scriptures call "the power of an endless life."

As the Nation enters the new Millennium the only danger seen is that which has always plagued nations, dishonest power hungry influence peddling politicians and bureaucrats whose influence is bought by the special interests,dishonest men who have, with impunity, forgotten they have taken a Sacred Oath to Defend the Constitution and the Nation against ALL enemies, Foreign and Domestic.

Against this danger, as ever, the Ultimate Defense of the Nation and the Constitution, as a Freedom Loving People and Sovereign Citizens, is entirely dependent on the resolve, the dedication and the faith of

We the People of the United States

Constitution for the United

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PrinceAbubu Newbie

PrinceAbubu

Posted
Posted

The UN is the biggest joke of all!!

I think if you just put their name before whatever they are claiming to do, you'll have the UN correct..

UN-protect the region

UN-secure the region

UN-restore electrical power

UN-fix whatever isn't broken yet..

Brings to mind another related joke.

Q: If Pro is the opposite of Con, what is the opposite of Congress..?

A: Progress :-:

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Halo9678 Newbie

Halo9678

Posted
Posted

IMHO,

A protest can be a good or a bad thing, depending on how it is handled. If the Iraqis stage a non-violent, yet tension producing, protest. Life will be good. If it is a violent, ie car bomb and assasinations, protest. that would be very bad as that would directly impact the "security" aspect of the country and threby the dinar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

    Take This Quiz

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept