DiiDii

Thanks dontlop. A good warning to all civilized countries., don't let these dogs don the black mask and wave their black flag. The Hague’s Mayor Jozias van Aartsen recently claimed on Dutch radio that no red lines were crossed by the protests, but such declarations are facing mounting incredulity when pictures circulate on the Web like one posted by an Iraqi-Dutch citizen in the IS-ruled Syrian city of Raqqa. It showed him surrounded by thesevered heads of seven men spiked on an iron fence. The photograph looks as if some parts of it may have been faked, but the sentiment is genuine enough. Beheadings, for ISIS, have become a kind of sport. Many of the young people who end up surviving this horrific war for the caliphate will haunt Europe when they come back home, and security services all over the continent and, indeed, in the United States, are concerned. On Friday the Dutch public prosecutor's office finally announced that an investigation into ISIS in The Netherlands is underway. One thing is certain, ignoring ISIS will not make it disappear and reasoning with people who want to spike the heads of their adversaries on fences should not be an option. http://pamelageller.com/2014/07/graphic-video-islamic-state-beheads-50-puts-heads-poles.html/

****** EXTREMELY GRAPHIC ********* http://pamelageller.com/2014/07/graphic-video-islamic-state-beheads-50-puts-heads-poles.html/ GRAPHIC VIDEO: Islamic State Beheads 50 And Puts Their Heads On Poles GLOBAL JIHAD 2014 SYRIA 24 Comments As much as I despise running this “jihad porn,” people must know what it is we are dealing with. Beheading is Islamic ritual slaughter. Obama was warned of this group well over a year ago. He told David Remick of the New Yorker that they were the JV team against the LA Lakers. Well, the JV team has taken over whole swaths of Syria (the Levant) and Iraq, and they have stated more than once that they are coming for Obama. The enemedia dishonestly downplays the threat of jihad — just as they describe the violent pro-terror riots across the world as “clashes.” They are dishonest and dangerous. This video might be too gruesome or graphic, but in a campaign against Islamic barbarism and savagery, people must know. Yesterday I published a news story about an Australian Muslim who went to Syria and was photographed proudly posing with five decapitated heads. A Western Muslim — no poverty, no illiteracy, no cultural misunderstanding. An Australian Muslim. The common thread? Islam. It’s coming to us ….. - See more at: http://pamelageller.com/2014/07/graphic-video-islamic-state-beheads-50-puts-heads-poles.html/#sthash.fWK45r9H.dpuf https://www.facebook.com/DarkSideofIslam https://www.facebook.com/Islamontrial2

https://www.facebook.com/JewishStandard/photos/a.10151243842133717.449519.19793423716/10152317624198717/?type=1&relevant_count=1

Excellent that the Australian government enforcing child protection laws and sending this message... Sharia law must not come before government law. Documents that formed part of a successful apprehended violence order application by police at the time against the girl’s “husband” state that the young girl “believed or had been informed that sharia law overrides the Australian law”. “When questioned on this he showed no remorse and was confident that in doing this he had committed no crime,” the police documents state. His matter is still before the courts and he is being held at Villawood Detention Centre after his student visa was revoked. The child and the Lebanese university student met at a mosque through the girl’s 62-year-old father who is a Muslim convert, police alleged. The girl’s father, who cannot be named for legal reasons, is charged with procuring a child for sex and accessory before the fact to sexual intercourse with a child. Dressed in a traditional Islamic tunic, the father-of-seven fronted Burwood Local Court yesterday where he was committed to stand trial in the Sydney District Court.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CT1qkmm-dZ0 Bosnia

http://www.frontpagemag.com/2014/dgreenfield/caliph-of-islamic-state-orders-genital-mutilation-of-4-million-women-and-girls/ OME ABOUT CONTACT US BOOKSTORE DONATE COLUMNISTS SUBSCRIBE PAMPHLETS HOROWITZ ARCHIVES FPM ARCHIVES Caliph of Islamic State Orders Genital Mutilation of 4 Million Women and Girls July 24, 2014 by Daniel Greenfield 25 Comments Daniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century. 25 Print This Post Islamic apologists have repeatedly claimed that FGM has nothing to do with Islam. The Caliph of the Islamic State disagrees. This is what Islamic law looks like. This is why it has to be resisted and kept out of every country. This is why there can be no compromise with Sharia.Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, Caliph of the Islamic State, has ordered all families around Iraq’s northern city of Mosul to circumcise their daughters or face severe punishment. The female genital mutilation, which would potentially affect four million women and girls, is to “distance them from debauchery and immorality”. A spokesman for Mosul police, Ahmed Obaydi, said: “Baghdadi’s decision to have all women circumcised is, as he claims, to prevent immorality and promote Islamic attitudes among Muslims. The decision was made by Baghdadi as a ‘gift’ for people in Mosul.” UN official Jacqueline Badcock said the fatwa, or religious edict, applied to females between the ages of 11 and 46. Zanun Majid, a citizen in Mosul, told BasNews: “Due to this decision, many girls fear for their lives, not knowing where to flee, otherwise risking severe punishment by staying.” This is what Islamic law looks like. This is why it has to be resisted and kept out of every country. This is why there can be no compromise with Sharia. Filed Under: The Point Tagged With: FGM, ISIS 25 Print This Post About Daniel GreenfieldDaniel Greenfield, a Shillman Journalism Fellow at the Freedom Center, is a New York writer focusing on radical Islam. He is completing a book on the international challenges America faces in the 21st century.

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/07/islamic-state-no-longer-a-terrorist-organization-it-is-a-full-blown-army Islamic State “no longer a terrorist organization. It is a full-blown army.” Robert Spencer Jul 23, 2014 at 10:39pm Islamic State of Iraq and Syria 47 Comments And it will take a full-blown army to dislodge their new caliphate. But there doesn’t appear at this moment to be a full-blown army that it situated well enough and up to the task. “ISIS now ‘full-blown army,’ officials warn,” by Kristina Wong,The Hill, July 23, 2014 (thanks to Pamela Geller): Top U.S. officials warned Wednesday that a Sunni extremist group controlling parts of Syria and Iraq had grown into a threat that is “worse than al Qaeda.” “It is al Qaeda in its doctrine, ambition and, increasingly, in its threat to U.S. interests,” Brett McGurk, a deputy assistant secretary of State, told lawmakers at a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing. “In fact, it is worse than al Qaeda.” McGurk said the group had strengthened its capabilities and is “no longer a terrorist organization. It is a full-blown army.” Elissa Slotkin, acting principal deputy undersecretary of Defense for policy, added that the group has threatened: “We’re coming for you, Barack Obama.” The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria, abbreviated as ISIS or ISIL, has captured major towns in both countries and threatened to move on Baghdad, leading President Obama to deploy nearly 750 troops to Iraq. The testimony from senior officials sparked alarm and frustration on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers said more should have been done to counter ISIS sooner. Over the weekend, Attorney General Eric Holder said the threat of ISIS fighters infiltrating the U.S. was “more frightening than anything I think I’ve seen as attorney general.” Former Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge told The Hill on Wednesday that the threat from ISIS had been “blinking red a long time.” “Now it’s flashing more frequently and is a lot brighter,” he said. “They’ve got a lot of fighters who are from European countries that are visa waiver countries, which means all they have to do is shave their beards and look like normal, responsible civilians and walk into the United States of America without a visa. “It’s a real challenge for our intelligence community to identify them and get their names on a watch list.” During Wednesday’s hearing, officials laid out steps for countering ISIS, including pressuring countries in the region to close their borders to stop the spread of fighters and offering U.S. training for local Iraqi security forces and centrist Syrian groups. But it is still unclear whether the administration is planning any military response. U.S. advisers on the ground in Iraq have yet to begin helping local units as the Pentagon reviews an initial intelligence assessment that found embedded American forces would be easy targets for extremists. Lawmakers expressed concerns over the delays but also remained deeply divided about what military steps the U.S. should take. House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce (R-Calif.) said the administration had ignored the threat for too long and had rejected Iraqi requests for drone strikes as early as August 2013. “What it seems like is the administration is just paralyzed. They just don’t know what to do,” added Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.), an Iraq War veteran. “I’m renewing the call to the administration for massive manned military air strikes to push back this very, very bad cancer that’s encroaching on the Middle East,” he said. Other lawmakers though expressed caution and said any solution must include political reforms in Baghdad. “I supported the president’s decision to send assessment teams to Iraq, but I’m cautious of our future action. We cannot end up in another sectarian quagmire in Iraq,” said Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), the committee’s ranking member. Lawmakers cautioned against providing Iraq with more military help until a stable government was in place. Critics of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki say his Shiite-majority government has alienated Sunni and Kurdish minorities and emboldened ISIS. Several lawmakers called for him to step down. “Maliki is not a good guy just because we installed him. Now we need a new prime minister,” Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) said. McGurk said the administration had not ignored the threat and had already offered military assistance to Iraq. “We set up intelligence fusion sharing centers, we helped them with the Hellfire missiles precision strikes, we helped them in terms of training forces on the ground of special operations,” he said. But he cautioned that the focus should be on supporting an Iraqi unity government, requiring political reforms initiated by Baghdad. “This is a uniquely Iraqi process, with Iraqi political dynamics. And the outcome will reflect that process,” McGurk said. “There will not be an exclusively military solution to the threat posed by ISIL,” Slotkin added. Iraqis must do the heavy lifting.” Good luck with that.

http://www.news.va/en/news/christians-invited-to-pray-for-end-to-gaza-conflic 2014-07-22 Vatican Radio (Vatican Radio) Christians around the world are invited this Sunday to join in prayers for peace in the Holy Land where an Israeli ground offensive is underway in Gaza to root out Hamas militants responsible for rocket fire into Israel. The conflict, which has entered its 13th day, has claimed hundreds of Palestinian lives and those of several Israelis. Not long into the conflict, leaders of the Catholic Church in the Holy Land, the Catholic Ordinaries, issued a strong statement condemning the hostilities, the Israeli occupation of Palestinian territory and the series of injustices they say lay at the root of the unrest. The Director of Caritas Jerusalem, Fr. Raed Abusahliah asks Christians everywhere to join him Sunday to pray for an end to the conflict and explains that in their statement, the Catholic Ordinaries offer a Christian perspective… Listen to the report by Tracey McClure... (From archive of Vatican Radio)

LGD, agreed, yet we must speak out, resist and hold the line of civility.Siilence breeds acceptance

Please watch and learn: Informative FB sites to keep watch on Islam and its creep into civilized society: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Islam-Exposed-The-truth-about-radical-Islam/458698164152194?fref=nf https://www.facebook.com/pages/CAIR-Exposed/537626426348261 https://www.facebook.com/ClarionProject https://www.facebook.com/pages/Infidel-Task-Force/191884884172028 https://www.facebook.com/tarekfatah?fref=ts Keep watch on this guy: https://www.facebook.com/pages/Official-Anjem-Choudary/746252008759459 https://www.facebook.com/pages/Anjem-Choudary-MEDIA-PUBLICITY-NO-MORE/641973822516147 And "The Little Green Book" http://islammonitor.org/uploads/docs/greenbook.pdf

Prayers lifted Candy ~

http://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2014/07/20/video-queen-of-holland-attends-a-concert-conductor-gives-lecture-on-islam-orchestra-stage-a-walkout/

As was done to the Armenians... history repeating before our eyes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6EF3IDlZ_Ms

In 2011 Kurdistan banned FGM., pray they hold the line. Much information can be read here: http://www.jihadwatch.org/2011/06/iraqi-kurdistan-passes-ban-on-female-genital-mutilation# http://www.jihadwatch.org/category/female-genital-mutilation/page/2 An extremely, repeat, extremely graphic video is by Ann Barnhardt and her pictorial of FGM.

WT*!!! Not in MY Country you don't! Get back to your M.E. playland in the sand if you want to live by your own rules. Read more: http://dinarvets.com/forums/index.php?/topic/182628-isis-threatens-iraqi-christians-in-mosul-convert-pay-taxes-or-die/page-2#ixzz37wTOnvta Exactly RVWITHME.... the process begins very slowly., that is why we must stay alert and keep up with the sites that shed light on Sharia Law in the USA.... http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/29/sharia-law-usa-states-ban_n_3660813.html Sharia Law In The USA 101: A Guide To What It Is And Why States Want To Ban ItReligion News Service | By Omar SacirbeyPosted: 07/29/2013 7:10 am EDT 270 50 84 1995 GET RELIGION NEWSLETTERS:SUBSCRIBE FOLLOW: Islam, Islam, Islam, Islamic Law, Faith Based Laws, North Carolina Bans Sharia Law,Separation Of Church And State, Sharia Definition, Sharia Law Usa, Shariah Definition, Shariah Law Usa,State Bans Sharia, What Is Sharia, What Is Sharia Law, What Is Shariah, What Is Shariah Law, Religion News (RNS) North Carolina lawmakers on Wednesday (July 24) approved a bill to prohibit judges from considering “foreign laws” in their decisions, but nearly everyone agrees that “foreign laws” really means Shariah, or Islamic law. North Carolina now joins six other states — Oklahoma, Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, South Dakota, and Tennessee — to pass a “foreign laws” bill. A similar bill passed in Missouri, but Gov. Jay Nixon vetoed it, citing threats to international adoptions. The bills all cite “foreign laws” because two federal courts have ruled that singling out Shariah — as Oklahoma voters originally did in 2010 — is unconstitutional. So what’s the big deal with Shariah? Many Americans think of Shariah as an Islamic legal system characterized by misogyny, intolerance, and harsh punishments. Some anti-Islamic activists warn that Muslims are trying to sneak Shariah into the American legal system in ways that do not reflect U.S. legal principles or beliefs. Many Muslim Americans counter that Shariah is essential to belief, and that any harsh punishments or unconstitutional aspects associated with Islamic law have either been exaggerated, abrogated or are superseded by American law. Muslims around the world have varying views about what Shariah entails, and its role in personal and public life. So what exactly is Shariah? Here are five facts that might help make sense of this complex and often misunderstood term. 1. What is Shariah? Shariah is an Arabic word that literally means a path to be followed, and also commonly refers to a path to water. The term is broad, encompassing both a personal moral code and religious law. There are two sources of Shariah: The Quran, which many Muslims consider to be the literal word of God; and the “Sunnah,” the divinely guided tradition of Islam’s Prophet Muhammad. The interpretation of Shariah is called “fiqh,” or Islamic jurisprudence. Because fiqh is man-made, it can be changed; Shariah, for many Muslims, is divine and cannot be changed. Some Muslims use the term Shariah to apply to both the injunctions in the Quran and Sunnah, and the interpretation of the Quran and Sunnah. Islamic law consists of Shariah and fiqh. 2. What does Shariah cover? While often thought of as a legal system, Shariah covers personal and collective spheres of daily life, and has three components – belief, character, and actions. Only a small portion of the “action” component relates to law. In fact, only about 80 of the Quran’s 6,236 verses are about specific legal injunctions. The “belief” component of Shariah commands Muslims to believe in God, the angels, prophets, revelation, and other metaphysical and physical aspects of the faith. In terms of “character,” Shariah commands Muslims to strive for traits like humility and kindness, and to avoid traits such as lying and pride. “Actions” include those relating to God, such as prayer, fasting, and pilgrimage, as well as actions relating to other humans, such as marriage, crime, and business. Some actions relating to other humans can be regulated by the state, while actions relating to God (as well as belief and character) are between an individual and God. Nevertheless, some Muslim-majority countries have criminalized violations of the belief, character, and action components of Shariah. 3. Who is qualified to issue rulings on Shariah? Shariah was systematized between the eighth and 10th centuries, some 200 to 300 years after Muhammad received his first revelation. Many people believe that, by the end of the 10th century, the core components of Shariah had been exhaustively debated. That said, changes in Islamic society force scholars to look at Shariah anew, with new interpretations expressed in fatwas (religious edicts) and legal opinions. Interpreting Shariah is done by jurists known as “fuqahaa” who look at the practicality of both time and place regarding how a ruling can be applied. In places where Shariah has official status, it is interpreted by judges known as “qadis.” Fiqh interpretations divide human behavior into five categories: obligatory, recommended, neutral, discouraged, and forbidden. Over the centuries, Islamic legal analyses and opinions were compiled in books that judges used in deciding cases. Secular courts and Shariah courts coexisted in Islamic lands, with the Shariah courts often taking responsibility for family law matters. With the arrival of European colonization, many of these legal opinions were codified into civil law. 4. Where is Shariah the law of the land? Professor Jan Michiel Otto of the Leiden University Law School in the Netherlands divides legal systems of Muslim countries into three categories: classical Shariah systems, secular systems, and mixed systems. In countries with classical Shariah systems, Shariah has official status or a high degree of influence on the legal system, and covers family law, criminal law, and in some places, personal beliefs, including penalties for apostasy, blasphemy, and not praying. These countries include Egypt, Mauritania, Sudan, Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, the Maldives, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and certain regions in Indonesia, Malaysia, Nigeria, and the United Arab Emirates. Mixed systems are the most common in Muslim-majority countries. Generally speaking, Shariah covers family law, while secular courts will cover everything else. Countries include: Algeria, Comoros, Djibouti, Gambia, Libya, Morocco, Somalia, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brunei, Gaza Strip, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Malaysia, Oman, and Syria. In several Muslim-majority countries, Shariah plays no role: Burkina Faso, Chad, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, Niger, Senegal, Tunisia, Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Albania, Kosovo, and Turkey. Some countries have Islamic family law courts available for their Muslim minorities: Eritrea, Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, India, Israel, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Thailand, and the United Kingdom. In the United States, there are no Islamic courts, but judges sometimes have to consider Islamic law in their decisions. For example, a judge may have to recognize the validity of an Islamic marriage contract from a Muslim country in order to grant a divorce in America. Some Islamic scholars argue that true Islamic belief cannot be coerced by the state, and therefore belief in Shariah should only come from the individual and not be codified by the state. 5. Does Shariah really prescribe harsh punishments like stoning adulterers? Yes, but many of these punishments have been taken out of context, abrogated, or require a near-impossible level of evidence to be carried out. For someone to be convicted of adultery, for example, there must be four witnesses to the act, which is rare. The Quran also prescribes amputating the hands of thieves, but (and this is often forgotten or unmentioned) not if the thief has repented. Other Shariah scholars say such a punishment system can only be instituted in a society of high moral standards and where everyone’s needs are met (thereby obviating the urge to steal or commit other crimes). In such a society, the thinking goes, corporal punishments would be rarely needed. That said, corporal punishments have been used by Islamic militant groups in places like Afghanistan, Somalia, and Syria, and governments in Iran, Saudi Arabia, the Aceh state in Indonesia and elsewhere. and: http://www.loonwatch.com/2014/03/new-anti-sharia-legislation-introduced-in-several-states/ and: http://www.loonwatch.com/2014/03/new-anti-sharia-legislation-introduced-in-several-states/ New Anti-Sharia Legislation Introduced in Several States by Emperor on March 1, 2014 in Loon Politics, Loon-at-large Sen. Lee “not so” Bright. New Anti-Sharia Legislation Introduced in Several States (Imagine2050) The 2014 legislative year has already seen legislation proposed that would ban the application of Sharia law in state courts. There are currently nine states that have introduced some variation of a bill aiming to block Islamic law. Most of the bills have carried over from 2013 with the exception of Vermont, which has introduced its first bill of this stature. The bills are intended to combat the perceived threat that Muslims are undermining the United States Constitution and imposing Sharia law. Although almost none of the bills mention Sharia or other religious law specifically, instead opting for more neutral language, such as “foreign” and “international” law, their intent to vilify Muslims remains very much the same. The bills are modeled after legislation entitled American Laws for American Courts (ALAC), which was authored by anti-Muslim lawyer and activist David Yerushalmi. The decision to explicitly leave out words like Sharia and Islam reflects a recent court case in Oklahoma where a federal judge ruled that legislation directly targeting Sharia law was in violation of Muslims’ Constitutional rights. However, the bill was amended and secured Oklahoma as the sixth state to enact such a law. Now even more states are looking to pass their own versions. South Carolina State Senator Lee Bright ® is one of the lawmakers trying to pass this type of legislation in his state. Bright is a prime example of the paranoia and anti-Muslim demagoguery behind these bills. Over the summer, Bright, who is primarying Lindsey Graham (R-SC) for a 2014 Senate seat, accused the senator of being a “community organizer for the Muslim Brotherhood.” This was after Graham took a diplomatic trip to Egypt with Senator John McCain (R-AZ). In a recent speech, Bright also went on a diatribe about Muslim immigration, asserting that the country might be admitting terrorists. “We got to be careful about who we let into this country,” he told the crowd. “A lot of these folks from terrorist nations are coming in on student visas, and we shouldn’t allow it.” Later in the speech, Bright referred to immigrants crossing the Southern border unlawfully as “an invasion” and claimed some of them might have connections to the Muslim Brotherhood. Bright is not the only state representative looking to have a bill of this category passed, however. Listed below are all of the proposed 2014 anti-Sharia bills: Florida has introduced Senate Bill 386. The bill’s sponsor is Sen. Alan Hays ®, who last year proposed SB 58, which died on the Senate floor. Hays has previously compared Sharia law to a “dreadful disease,” and its only vaccination is anti-Sharia legislation. Georgia has introduced HB 895 and SR 808 prohibiting courts from recognizing foreign and international law. Iowa’s House Bill 76 was carried over from 2013 and has been referred to a Judiciary House Committee. Kentucky has introduced HB 43, which has been referred to a House Judiciary Committee. Missouri has re-introduced SB 619. The bill’s sponsor is Republican State Senator Brian Knieves, an anti-immigrant legislator and member of the State Legislators for Legal Immigration. SB 619 was vetoed last summer by Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon. South Carolina has introduced three bills: HB 4494, which specifically bans Sharia, and SB 60 and 81, both of which were carried over from 2013. Sen. Bright is responsible for SB 81. Mississippi has introduced HB 44, which has been referred to a House Judiciary Committee. Vermont has introduced SB 265 and is the state’s first anti-Sharia bill. West Virginia has introduced SB 2116, which is currently in a Judiciary House Committee. Washington has introduced SB 6118 and HB 1392, which carried over from 2013. Legislation outlawing Sharia law in state courts remains unnecessary and a distraction from more pressing matters. The background of the laws and its fringe sponsors show their true intent and has no place in our legislative process. For more on Senator Lee Bright and his controversial views, visit The National Memo here. “Lee Bright Warns of Immigrant ‘Invasion’ From ‘Terrorist Nations’” (via Right Wing Watch)

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/07/islamic-state-marks-christian-homes-in-mosul Islamic State marks Christian homes in Mosul Robert Spencer Jul 18, 2014 at 9:08pm dhimmitude, Islamic State of Iraq and Syria 21 Comments They are marking the Christians’ homes with a ن, a nūn forNasara, which is the Qur’an’s word for Christians: Nazarenes. Probably they are doing this so that they can know from which houses to demand the jizya, the tax that the Qur’an demands that the subjugated People of the Book pay in the Islamic state: “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued” (Qur’an 9:29).

It starts much too early in these young lives.... for both sides., the children being taught to kill., and the children being killed.... http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/05/06/Hamas-TV-Tells-Young-Children-To-Shoot-all-the-Jews

I think., no., I'm certain., the hate has always been there... we need to educate ourselves more on the teachings of radical Islam and how early it starts. I am absorbing all I can and will become active and speak out on any push of Islamization in my area. I should hope all do the same. Sites to learn from: https://www.facebook.com/ClarionProject https://www.facebook.com/tarekfatah?fref=ts https://www.facebook.com/pages/Islam-Exposed-The-truth-about-radical-Islam/458698164152194 I am speaking here of radical Islam, as many families are of decent, moral and loving nature., that is why I like Tarek Fatah., he sees the ugliness speaks out against it. Also a very compelling talk by this brave young woman can be found on TED talks: "Your FATWA does not apply here"

http://www.catholicculture.org/news/headlines/index.cfm?storyid=22016 Report: ISIL orders no food aid for Christians in Mosul 7 11 0 Google +1 Delicious0 Catholic World News - July 16, 2014 The Sunni jihadist group that controls much of Iraq and Syria has ordered that no food aid be distributed to Christians in Mosul, according to a Fides news agency report. The ban also extends to Shiite Muslims. The Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), which took over Iraq’s 2nd-largest city in June, has threatened to punish those who violate the order, according to the report.

In Jesus name, Amen.

https://www.facebook.com/126718510717993/photos/a.218220834901093.54556.126718510717993/743197615736743/?type=1&theater

http://www.actforamerica.org/ http://www.clarionproject.org/interviews?page=1

They will creep into villages and towns., isolate themselves., accost the good citizens of that town with bullying and 'demonstrations'... see UK for example: Know the enemy and how they work and why. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=psZBaJU_Cvo http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/?s=creeping+sharia

ISIS next target: http://www.clarionproject.org/analysis/isis-next-targets-jordan-and-saudi-arabia

This is the grooming of non-tolerance in action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uzjWaiOQfQw and in Michigan: