BETTYBOOP

Yes it is but not all off them are in poverty. There are advantages to keeping their rate low

Been to Iraq recently have you...? No didn't think so. All you are able to say is but the the rate is only 1310?? Dry your eyes and learn something. We all want a rate change but we don't constantly harp on about it. All u do is laugh at posts regardless of whether it furthers our knowledge or not.

Have you ever thought that it could do if they implement the agreement?! Just because a currency is not valued where ours is does not mean the people of that country are not prosperous!

Home(current) All news politics Security Economy Local Sport International More Language US: Al-Sudani visit is important to strengthen mutual relations politics +A -A INA - WASHINGTON US Secretary of State Antony Blinken asserted on Monday, that the visit of Prime Minister Muhammed S. Al-Sudani is an important step to strengthen and develop relations between the two countries. "We are happy to receive the Prime Minister and the Iraqi delegation in Washington,” said Blinken during a joint press conference with Planning Minister Muhammed Ali Tamim, followed by the Iraqi News Agency - INA. He added, "The US private sector is highly interested in the investment in Iraq," explaining, "We are pleased to see Iraq succeed in the economic, investment, and energy matters Today, 17:42

Breaking News Two Iraqi ministries approve a plan to eradicate landmines in the country by 2028 Iraqi parliament to amend election law ahead of potential early polls: lawmaker KurdistanIraqiElection 2024-04-15 14:20 Font Shafaq News/ The Iraqi parliament will soon revise the election law in a bid to lay groundwork for potential early elections, Lawmaker Yasser al-Husseini, leader of al-Amal parliamentary bloc, revealed on Monday. Al-Yassiri hinted at what he called "a movement" within the parliament to collect signatures from lawmakers who approve amending the election law and holding a early elections in the country. "Many blocs have demanded amending the election law," he said. "However, each bloc seeks the amendments that suits its political preferences. Some advocate for reinstating multi-districts, while others call for abolishing the Sainte-Laguë system." "Some lawmakers demand that public officials should resign from their jobs six months prior to the election if they seek to take part," he continued ."The amendments had been submitted to the parliament's presidency, yet there has been no response, and it remains undiscussed in the Council." The legislative elections held in Iraq in 2021 were conducted earlier than scheduled, following extensive protests in October 2019, subsequent to the ousting of the previous government led by Adel Abdul Mahdi. The outcomes of the recent elections resulted in the Coordination Framework assuming governance, following Muqtada al-Sadr's withdrawal. Subsequently, a second round of early elections was anticipated, yet the incumbent government has persisted since. With approximately a year remaining in its fifth term, many politicians, notably those aligned with the Coordination Framework, have called for preparations for early parliamentary elections, citing "al-Sadr's inclination towards them." Earlier this month, Shiite Cleric Muqtada al-Sadr rebranded his party as the "Shiite National Movement," a development corroborated by a senior figure within the movement. This move, the source confirmed, reflects al-Sadr's endeavors towards "popular bases and the guidance of former Sadrist lawmaker

Breaking News Two Iraqi ministries approve a plan to eradicate landmines in the country by 2028 CBI auctions $270 million in forex on Monday Biden hosts Iraqi Prime Minister for talks on security and economy IraqBiden 2024-04-15 10:34 Font Shafaq News/ The US President Joe Biden is set to host Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani on Monday evening for discussions as Mideast tensions rise after Iran's recent attack on Israel. The Washington Post (WP) highlighted the importance of the meeting, noting that it will cover a range of topics, including regional stability, economic cooperation, and the potential deployment of American forces. While US forces will be part of the agenda, the primary focus remains on broader issues affecting Iraq and the Middle East, such as energy and trade, which are now priorities for the Iraqi government. Senior US officials, including President Biden and Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, are expected to engage in separate discussions with PM Al-Sudani. According to WP, Iran's recent attacks targeting Israel via Iraqi airspace have raised alarm bells in Washington. Despite Al-Sudani's efforts to navigate a delicate balance between Iran and the United States since assuming office in late 2022, his government was facing many challenges in rapprochement between the two sides. On Sunday, the Committee of Security and Defense in the Iraqi Parliament refuted claims regarding Iraq's advanced knowledge of Iran's drone and missile attack on Israel. Committee rapporteur Ali Nehmeh clarified to Shafaq News that "Iraq was taken by surprise by the timing of Iran's response and had no agreement with Tehran to allow Iranian drones or missiles through its airspace. The decision to halt air traffic came as a precautionary measure after the attack, with Iraq playing no role in Iran's actions." A government source familiar with the situation suggested that Tehran may have refrained from informing Baghdad of the attack's timing to prevent leaks, noting that Iran had notified several regional countries three days prior, as Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian stated. Amir-Abdollahian had earlier informed Washington that the attacks on Israel would be "limited" and in self-defense, with neighboring countries, including Iraq, reportedly notified 72 hours in advance. The recent strike by Iran against Israel in response to the targeting of its annex in Damascus has sent ripples of caution throughout the Middle East. This event has heightened apprehensions about the potential fallout on Iraq as the region braces for a possible escalation into a regional war, with the involvement of various factions, including the Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI), Tehran's military allies in Iraq, including powerful groups such as Kataeb Hezbollah and Harakat Al-Nujabaa. In this regard, Dr. Azhar Al-Gharbawi, an expert in international relations, warned of war expansion to involve Iraq, acknowledging the likelihood of Israel targeting Iranian-affiliated institutions in Iraq. She stated, "The interplay of regional dynamics, particularly Iran's influence within Iraqi security sectors, underscores the strategic calculations behind these responses amidst escalating tensions." Dr. Al-Gharbawi stressed Iraq's pivotal role in managing the tensions by advocating for an independent position through official statements that condemn violence and extremism. "This stance aligns with Iraq's historical position against normalization with Israel, highlighting a commitment to peaceful resolutions and adherence to international norms." According to Dr. Firas Elias, a professor of strategy and national security, "The ongoing escalation between Iran and Israel stands out as a significant security challenge in the Middle East, with potential ramifications across various fronts indirectly involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran and their regional proxies," Elias added, "Iraq is among the forefront nations facing the dangers and complexities of this escalation, given its history of enduring various attacks, whether from the United States or in response to Iran's actions, such as its involvement in Syria or support for Hamas during the Gaza conflict..there's substantial concern that Iraq may become a focal point for further escalation in the near future." Elias pointed out, "This tension arises as Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani visits Washington, seeking to realign Iraq within the context of US policy in the region, encompassing military, economic, and political support. As a result, there are notable risks associated with Iraq's standing in international and regional politics should Iran opt to utilize Iraq as a theater for retaliating against Israel." Based on this, Elias emphasized that "Iraq is required to neutralize the Iraqi arena from this escalation within the framework that preserves Iraqi national interests. Iran is also required to neutralize the Iraqi arena from such escalation because it is also in Iran's interest for the Iraqi arena to be secure. Links Report Iraq Kurdistan Economy World All News Useful Links عربي English کوردی Contact Us RSS Service Developed By Arcella Telecom. Copyright @ 2024 Shafaq News. All rights reserved. Terms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy

2024-04-15 15:14 Font Shafaq News/ On Monday, the Iraqi Parliament recommended that Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani, who is visiting Washington, complete the implementation of the Strategic Framework Agreement in energy and investments. The Strategic Framework Agreement is a 2008 pact between Baghdad and Washington; it serves as a vital blueprint for their bilateral relationship by establishing a foundation for cooperation across political, economic, security, and cultural spheres. The agreement aims to support Iraq's economic growth and integration into the global marketplace, facilitate joint efforts on defense and security matters, and promote regional stability. Additionally, the agreement encourages educational exchange programs and initiatives that foster cultural understanding between the United States and Iraq. In a statement, the Council of Representatives expressed "high confidence in the high-level Iraqi delegation currently visiting the United States under the leadership of the Prime Minister." affirming "support for the government's efforts to achieve the people's interests, sovereignty, and prosperity." The Parliament recommended that the Iraqi delegation "prioritize the completion of the implementation of the Strategic Framework Agreement,, which includes focusing on development, scientific exchange, investments, and energy." The statement concluded with a hopeful note: "We all hope that the Iraqi people will witness positive results that will increase the pace of security and prosperity

Breaking News Two Iraqi ministries approve a plan to eradicate landmines in the country by 2028 Tehran reverses course on Amir-Abdollahian's statements, confirms Shafaq News reports ReportBreakingAbdollahian'sReports 2024-04-15 13:23 Font Shafaq News/ Iran's Foreign Ministry denied claims of any pre-arranged agreement with neighboring countries before its retaliatory attack on Israel. The attack, which involved explosive drones and missiles launched at Israel late on Saturday, marked Iran's first direct assault on Israel, framed as self-defense following Israel's bombing of its embassy annex in Syria's capital on April 1. Regional officials, including Iran's foreign minister, Hossein Amir-Abdollahian, had previously mentioned notifying neighboring countries, including Iraq, days before the attack. In this regard, the ministry's spokesperson, Nasser Kanaani, clarified that no formal pre-arranged deal existed with any country regarding Iran's military response to Israel, as reported by Reuters. On Sunday, the Committee of Security and Defense in the Iraqi Parliament refuted claims regarding Iraq's advanced knowledge of Iran's drone and missile attack on Israel. Committee rapporteur Ali Nehmeh clarified to Shafaq News that "Iraq was taken by surprise by the timing of Iran's response and had no agreement with Tehran to allow Iranian drones or missiles through its airspace. The decision to halt air traffic came as a precautionary measure after the attack, with Iraq playing no role in Iran's actions." A government source familiar with the situation suggested that Tehran may have refrained from informing Baghdad of the attack's timing to prevent leaks, noting that Iran had notified several regional countries three days prior, as Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian stated.

Iraq is denying it but downed all planes before and during it...

That's a death salute,is it not?

Al-Sudani urges Bin Salman: Preventing regional escalation is vital IraqIsraelBin SalmanMuhammad Shia Al-Sudani 2024-04-14 22:10 Font Shafaq News/ On Sunday, Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani informed Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of the necessity "to do more" to prevent escalation in the Middle East region following the Iranian attack on Israel. According to the official Saudi Press Agency (SPA,) Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman received a phone call from Iraqi Prime Minister Al-Sudani and discussed recent military escalation in the region and the danger of its repercussions on security and stability. Both sides stressed the importance of making necessary efforts to avoid escalation in the region. Marking his first visit to the United States since assuming office in October 2022, the Iraqi PM headed on Saturday a high-level delegation on an official visit to discuss various issues of common interests. A government source unveiled to Shafaq News Agency details of Al-Sudani's visit to Washington, which marks a diplomatic endeavor. According to the source, the 5-day visit encompasses three states, Washington, Michigan, and Houston, "showcasing a comprehensive engagement with various sectors and stakeholders." "Al-Sudani is scheduled to meet with key figures, including US President Joe Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and the Secretary of Defense, Lloyd Austin, at the Pentagon to delve into crucial bilateral matters." The source explained. Additionally, Al-Sudani's itinerary includes sessions with representatives from US energy companies and engagements with the Iraqi community across the visited states "to foster deeper ties and explore avenues for collaboration beyond traditional diplomatic spheres." Al-Sudani is accompanied by a delegation comprising government officials, parliamentarians, and business leaders. Notably, the source pointed out that the absence of a high-ranking Iraqi security official from the delegation highlighted a "strategic shift towards cooperation in other fields including economy and developmental agendas in the Iraq-US partnership." "The visit is strategically aligned with Iraq's vision of expanding cooperation with the United States, particularly in economic domains outlined in the U.S.-Iraq Strategic Framework Agreement. Al-Sudani seeks to activate provisions across seven sectors in the Agreement." The Strategic Framework Agreement guides overall political, economic, cultural, and security ties with Iraq. Initiatives like the Strategic Development Road Project, which has the potential to enhance regional connectivity and foster economic prosperity, will be central to discussions, said the source, "The delegation will also engage in talks regarding strategic gas projects and the ongoing dialogue concerning the Global Coalition's mission in Iraq.

EXCLUSIVE: Iraq denies agreement with Tehran on opening airspace during attack on Israel IraqIsraelTehran 2024-04-14 21:00 Font Shafaq News/ On Sunday, the Committee of Security and Defense in the Iraqi Parliament refuted claims regarding Iraq's advanced knowledge of Iran's drone and missile attack on Israel. Committee rapporteur Ali Nehmeh clarified to Shafaq News that "Iraq was taken by surprise by the timing of Iran's response and had no agreement with Tehran to allow Iranian drones or missiles through its airspace. The decision to halt air traffic came as a precautionary measure after the attack, with Iraq playing no role in Iran's actions." The Iraqi Civil Aviation Authority announced the reopening of Iraqi airspace to all incoming, outgoing, and transit after the Iraqi authorities had closed their airspace with the start of the Iranian attack on Israel. A government source familiar with the situation suggested that Tehran may have refrained from informing Baghdad of the attack's timing to prevent leaks, noting that Iran had notified several regional countries three days prior, as Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian stated. Amir Abdollahian had earlier informed Washington that the attacks on Israel would be "limited" and in self-defense, with neighboring countries, including Iraq, reportedly notified 72 hours in advance. The recent strike by Iran against Israel in response to the targeting of its annex in Damascus has sent ripples of caution throughout the Middle East. This event has heightened apprehensions about the potential fallout on Iraq as the region braces for a possible escalation into a regional war, with the involvement of various factions, including the Islamic Resistance in Iraq (IRI), Tehran's military allies in Iraq, including powerful groups such as Kataeb Hezbollah and Harakat Al-Nujabaa. In this regard, Dr. Azhar Al-Gharbawi, an expert in international relations, warned of war expansion to involve Iraq, acknowledging the likelihood of Israel targeting Iranian-affiliated institutions in Iraq. She stated, "The interplay of regional dynamics, particularly Iran's influence within Iraqi security sectors, underscores the strategic calculations behind these responses amidst escalating tensions." Dr. Al-Gharbawi stressed Iraq's pivotal role in managing the tensions by advocating for an independent position through official statements that condemn violence and extremism. "This stance aligns with Iraq's historical position against normalization with Israel, highlighting a commitment to peaceful resolutions and adherence to international norms." According to Dr. Firas Elias, a professor of strategy and national security, "The ongoing escalation between Iran and Israel stands out as a significant security challenge in the Middle East, with potential ramifications across various fronts indirectly involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran and their regional proxies," Elias added, "Iraq is among the forefront nations facing the dangers and complexities of this escalation, given its history of enduring various attacks, whether from the United States or in response to Iran's actions, such as its involvement in Syria or support for Hamas during the Gaza conflict..there's substantial concern that Iraq may become a focal point for further escalation in the near future." Elias pointed out, "This tension arises as Iraqi Prime Minister Mohammed Shia Al-Sudani visits Washington, seeking to realign Iraq within the context of US policy in the region, encompassing military, economic, and political support. As a result, there are notable risks associated with Iraq's standing in international and regional politics should Iran opt to utilize Iraq as a theater for retaliating against Israel." Based on this, Elias emphasized that "Iraq is required to neutralize the Iraqi arena from this escalation within the framework that preserves Iraqi national interests. Iran is also required to neutralize the Iraqi arena from such escalation because it is also in Iran's interest for the Iraqi arena to secure. World All News Useful Links عربي English کوردی Contact Us RSS Service Developed By Arcella Telecom. Copyright @ 2024 Shafaq News. All rights reserved. Terms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy

Did the USA & NATO not tell Isreal if the retaliate against Iran , instead of stepping back, they were on their own because we do not want all out war with Iran? I am sure I either read that or heard it in a news report today

Will one State be Florida???? Mar-a-Lago??? Al sudani.can go visit joe. Pay lip service and the go see Donald and.get the real instructions

Call me decided, or hopeful but if there are no further arguments with Isreal and Iran ( Iran has apparently said the ball is now in Isreals court) and if Sudano can do well in Washington...... we might be in with a chance

So was it coincidence that neighbouring counties cancelled all flights and thus cleared their airspace? They all declared no fly zones so somebody knew what was coming. They resumed flights after 05:30 hours this morning, once they knew it would be over

Just how powerful is Iran? Yes they can influence Iraq because at the minute they have then over a barrel is that Iraq needs to buy electricity from them but if Iran was militarily powerful they could have done a lot more damage last night if they wanted to. Yeah ok they have funded factions but they could have let them do the damage. I agree it was an agreed attack to save face bitI am not sure they control Al Sudani

If they stick to the original plan, the large notes would only be used within the banks. But if the citizens exchange them for the lower notes they would still need to be given 25000iqd worth of lower notes. They can not just take in the larger notes and swap it out with a 25 iqd. If they plan to use the large notes in banks only then they still need to be worth 25000 iqd If they lop the zeros off the currency then they need to take in the large notes and they would not be able to use them in the banks because they would effectively be worthless. Now to my thinking , if they are going digital why would they need the larger notes for inter banking? Theoretically, they wouldn't because it would all just be numbers on the screen. It is possible they could do a lop in this manner but if they plan to use the larger notes then I can't see how they can lop. But I might be wrong .

" when it is worse than Isis... , then the dinar will revalue".

Oh come on!!! Iraq are professional wingers and will claim innocence and be astonished if their visit doesn't get them what they want. They cleared their air space to let it be safe for the missiles n drones ... but they didn't know that Iran was going to do it Yeah right.

Is that the 1 he posted yesterday that I shared in the rumours section?

JJJJEEEEZZZZ ! How many of his cabinet etc are with him?

We can only hope they continue forward.

When will these slow witted clowns on Mark's site stop asking the same DUMB questions..? Now that is funny! 🤣🤣🤣🤣 :tiphat: Thanks 1 Thanks× Quote Quote

World Live TV World / Middle East Iran’s attack seemed planned to minimize casualties while maximizing spectacle Analysis by Tamara Qiblawi, CNN 5 minute read Updated 10:55 AM EDT, Sun April 14, 2024 Video Ad Feedback Biden tells Netanyahu tonight was a win, nothing of 'value' hit in Israel 02:53 - Source: CNN Beirut, LebanonCNN — A decades-long shadow war burst out into the open overnight as Iranian drones and missiles lit up the night sky in Israel and the occupied West Bank. Tehran’s operation was highly choreographed, apparently designed to minimize casualties while maximizing spectacle. This was a complex mission. Over 300 drones and missiles navigated above Iran’s neighbors, including Jordan and Iraq — both with US military bases — before penetrating the airspace of Iran’s mortal enemy, Israel. Israel’s allies helped shoot down the bulk of these weapons, but couldn’t prevent what was long believed to be the Middle East’s doomsday scenario, the Islamic Republic’s first-ever attack on Israel. Israel’s fabled Iron Dome air defense system did not disappoint Israelis, many of whom took to bunkers. Only a small handful of locations were attacked, including a military base and an area in the Negev desert, injuring a Bedouin child, while the dome fended off one of the largest drone attacks in history Yet it was an operation that seemed designed to fail — when Iran launched its killer drones from its own territory some 1,000 miles away, it was giving Israel hours of advance notice. The symbolism of the attack did the heavy lifting. Rather than fire from one of the neighboring countries where Iran and its non-state allies are present, this was a direct attack from Iranian territory on Israeli territory. This compromised Iran’s ability to damage Israel because it robbed the operation of the element of surprise. Yet for some four hours, the world held its breath as weapons whizzed through the night sky. They were balls of fire hovering overhead as onlookers across three different countries filmed images that seemed to harken the start of a cataclysmic war. An anti-missile system operates after Iran launched drones and missiles towards Israel, as seen from Ashkelon, Israel. Amir Cohen/Reuters The lead time meant that Israel and its regional partners could ready Israel’s defenses, and the operation amounted to little more than a terrifying fireworks display. When Iran’s permanent mission at the United Nations tweeted that the operation had “concluded,” it was easy to come away from it thinking the Islamic Republic was all bark and no bite. The strike served as a retaliation against the Israeli airstrikes on Iran’s consulate in Damascus earlier in April that killed a top commander, and it was in keeping with US intelligence and analysts’ expectations. Iran’s leadership felt compelled to strike Israel in order to reiterate its position as a regional powerhouse and to dispel notions of it as a paper tiger. It doubled down on its show of force by launching the operation from its own territory and not by proxy in Syria, Lebanon, Yemen or Iraq. Yet Iran also needed to try to avoid sparking an all-out war. Its economy has buckled under the weight of Trump-era sanctions, and there is growing discontent on its streets over the government’s repressive policies. On Sunday, Iran appeared not only to have factored in Israel’s robust air defense systems, but to have relied on it. The relatively high degree of US intelligence about the operation also suggests Iran may have engaged in back-channelling with Western leaders. Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir Abdollahian said he gave neighboring countries, including major US allies, 72-hour notice. To contain the fall-out of their own operation, they appeared intent to foil it. The style of attack is reminiscent of Tehran’s response to former President Donald Trump’s targeted killing of Iran’s most storied general, Qassem Soleimani, in January 2020. Tehran gave US troops 10 hours of advance warning before raining down massive ballistic missiles on US military positions in Iraq, including al-Asad airbase. The attack wreaked havoc, leaving gaping craters in the ground, but caused no known US casualties. In the process, Iranian forces accidentally shot down a commercial jet taking off from Tehran airport, killing over 100 passengers and fuelling public anger against a regime increasingly seen as incompetent. At the time, the Iranians were preoccupied with demonstrating what their military could do, rather than what it was willing to do. The US did not retaliate, averting regional war. Four years later, Iran’s playbook may not unfold in the same way. Israel has already vowed to respond. The US has publicly stated it would not participate in an Israeli retaliation, which may reassure Iran. Yet Netanyahu’s Israel has proven increasingly unpredictable. Iran’s threats of more severe action in case of further escalation may fall on deaf ears in Israel, to its own peril. Demonstrators wave Iran's flag as they gather at Palestine Square in Tehran on April 14, 2024, after Iran launched a drone and missile attack on Israel. Atta Kenare/AFP/Getty Images In a future Iran strike, Tehran may not hesitate to use Israel’s northern border as a launching pad. A week before the attack, one Lebanese source familiar with the matter had ruled out that Hezbollah, Iran’s most powerful armed group partner, would be part of Iran’s initial retaliation to the April 1 consulate strike. However, the source warned that Hezbollah and other Iran-backed fighting forces “will be prepared for the stage that comes after the Iranian response.” A forceful Israeli retaliation may push Iran to take on an even more hardline position beyond its Israel policy. Conservatives have consolidated control of Iran’s government in recent years, and there is growing resistance to Western pressure to curb the country’s feared uranium enrichment program. “There must be some satisfaction in certain circles in DC and Israel that Iran’s limited response reflects the imbalance of power in Israel’s favor,” wrote Trita Parsi, DC-based Iran analyst and Executive Vice President of the Quincy Institute, on X. “But think further and you’ll realise how this episode will strengthen those in Tehran who believe Iran must go nuclear.”