Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Washington warns Maliki: Iran plans to a limited invasion of Iraq in support of Assad (17 May 2013 13:31)


ALBUNDY
 Share

Recommended Posts

Washington warns Maliki: Iran plans to a limited invasion of Iraq in support of Assad
 

 

 

 

 

Friday, 17 May 2013 13:31

 

Revealed a senior source in the Iraqi Foreign Ministry said Washington had asked Baghdad to stop any coordination with Iran on the situation in Syria, on the grounds that he had been Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki to make concessions largest to support the regime in Damascus in the next stage, as he is the concept for the management of the U.S. raises concerns of Iraq's accession to the axis of Tehran - Damascus - "Hezbollah" in Lebanon.

The source said the diplomatic Iraq that the visit of the commander of the Central Command of U.S. forces, Gen. Lloyd Austin to Baghdad a few days ago and his talks with al-Maliki has shown that the Americans are deeply concerned by the high level of coordination Iraq - Iran at the present stage, in the light of information indicating that al-Maliki told some quarters nearby that if Syrian situation turned to a sectarian war frank and decisive, he intends to raise the ceiling of coordination with the Iranian and Syrian leaderships.

And sought Gen. Austin, according to the source, to know the position of the Iraqi government in case things go for the worse in Syria and blocked the horizon of a political settlement, because Washington fears could lead such circumstances, to choose Maliki coordination with the Iranian leadership rather than coordination with the U.S. administration, consequent turn Iraq into the depth of the logistical support for the Syrian regime to counter any potential Western military moves against his regime.

The source revealed that Austin asked explicitly Maliki subjecting Iraqi airspace completely to control air U.S. military, if they have already started air strikes against the forces of Assad, because this control will be vital for Washington to prevent any movement of Iranian military support of Damascus across Iraq by land, air, and that this oversight the United States will ensure that pre-emptive move to pre-empt any military intentions are directed against the Iranian Jordan across Iraq on the grounds that the Kingdom of Jordan will be involved in the war and perhaps to enter the American ground troops from its territory to Syria.

In contrast, the U.S. forces that included the owners contribute to an active role in addressing any Salafi groups militant planning to come into Iraq after the fall of Assad, and that Washington has pledged to provide all the capabilities high-tech to ensure that control Iraq's borders - Syria in the future to secure the Iraqi security procedure, But all of that will depend on the extent of Baghdad to coordinate the response with the American side.

The source added that Iraqi relations - the U.S. will enter a crucial stage in the coming period, especially that Washington is seeking to thwart any military intervention Iranian support of the Syrian regime in response to Western intervention, learn to force the Iraqi military is not ready at all to prevent Iran from moving on the ground.

In this context, Austin spoke to al-Maliki for specific scenarios for the supposed Iranian movements, including the opening of a military air corridor between Tehran and Damascus through Iraqi airspace, thus do not have the Iraqi air force equipment to address this corridor and we do not have any air defense system.

He also revealed the American general to Iraqi Prime Minister, based on intelligence reports U.S., that some leaders of the "Revolutionary Guards" Iranian thinking invaded Barre limited Iraqi territory, in the event of forces entered the lion's confrontation with the West, and it will include a line of Diyala province toward the highway from Baghdad to the wetlands on the Syrian border, and the Iranian leadership will use its affiliated militias within the Iraqi security forces and abroad to support the invasion.

Accordingly, the U.S. administration has warned Baghdad of having serious options may not be in the range of accounts, especially that Iran is ready to do anything to defend Assad.

According to the Iraqi source, the National Alliance Shiite who leads the Maliki government is divided between acceptance coordinate military with Washington over Syria, and the accession to the coordination with Iran, amid fears that the developments of the Syrian situation in the coming period repercussions on the level of Shiite provinces nine in Iraq, namely the outbreak of civil war within the Iraqi Shiite community itself in the event of a take-Maliki supportive attitude to Tehran or Washington.
 

 

 

 

THE LINK : http://www.uragency.net/index.php/2012-03-11-16-31-52/2012-03-11-16-33-35/20382-2013-05-17-13-31-13

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would be beneficial if they US would stop using diplomacy with maliki and just go and stop the crap.  Assad hangs on with the help of Iran, and Iraq.  Both achmadinejad and maliki are desperate to keep Assad (shiite) in power.  They have one goal.  Order out of chaos.   Just like the illuminati.    Create a bunch of chaos and the savior will come and restore peace and order.  That savior they are waiting for is anything but a savior.   In the meantime achmadinejad, maliki, and Assad will sacrifice/murder anyone or anything that would create a free country.  

 

They must enslave the people in order to indoctrinate them into their way of thought and make them die for their cause of chaos.  We surely see this, when a child or a woman straps a bomb belt on thinking they are helping a god.  Murder is helping a god?  What god?  If this is a god, why would this god need the help of a mere mortal peon to kill people?  NOT!  If it is a god, then gods have the ability to do anything  at will by just thinking it by it's own own definition.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.