Physicists Discover CO2 Cannot Cause Global Warming

bigwave · October 21, 2019

Physicists Discover CO2 Cannot Cause Global Warming

October 20, 2019 by IWB

Physicists: CO2 Molecules Retain Heat Just 0.0001 Of A Second, Meaning CO2-Driven Warming ‘Not Possible’

Mainstream climate science claims CO2 molecules “slow down the rate of heat-loss from the surface” like a blanket does. And yet the rate at which a CO2 molecule retains or slows down heat loss is, at most, a negligible 0.0001 of a second. A CO2 concentration of 300 ppm versus 400 ppm will

therefore have no detectable impact.

SkepticalScience, a blog spearheaded by climate science “consensus” advocate John Cook, is widely considered the explanatory guidebook for the anthropogenic global warming movement.

The blog claims CO2 molecules, with a representation of 4 parts in 10,000 in the atmosphere (400 parts per million, or ppm), collectively function like a blanket does in slowing down the rate at which the human body cools.

The rate or time lapse involved in this “slowing” of heat loss is problematic to the paradigm that says CO2 drives global warming, however.

Professor Nasif Nahle has mathematically assessed the rate at which heat is retained by CO2 molecules; his work was endorsed by the Faculty of Physics of the University of Nuevo Leon (Mexico).

Nahle found the “mean free path” for a quantum wave to pass through the atmosphere before colliding with a CO2 molecule is about 33 meters (Nahle, 2011a). Such a wide chasm between molecular collisions would appear to undermine a visualization of CO2 functioning like a blanket does.

Even more saliently, Nahle determined that the rate at which CO2 molecules can retain heat at the surface may only last about 0.0001 of a second (Nahle, 2011b).

If heat-loss is slowed down at a rate of 0.0001 of a second by CO2 molecules, the atmospheric CO2 concentration – whether it’s 300 ppm or 400 ppm – effectively doesn’t matter. The time lapse differential would be immaterial for either concentration.

Consequently, Nahle concludes “carbon dioxide has not an effect on climate changes or warming periods on the Earth”.

notrickszone.com/2019/10/17/phys…-possible/

There has never been any evidence that CO2 caused warming on any time period. The Antarctic and Greenland Ice cores show CO2 rise always follows warming and does not cause it:

New research in Antarctica shows CO2 follows temperature “by a few hundred years at most”
Anthony Watts / July 23, 2012

The question of “which comes first, the temperature or the CO2 rise?” has been much like the proverbial “which came first, the chicken or the egg?” question. This seems to settle it – temperature came first, followed by an increase in CO2 outgassing from the ocean surrounding Antarctica.

“Our analyses of ice cores from the ice sheet in Antarctica shows that the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere follows the rise in Antarctic temperatures very closely and is staggered by a few hundred years at most,” –

wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/23/n…s-at-most/

joannenova.com.au/global-warming-…ore-graph/

If CO2 caused warming why are present temperatures so low? 8,000 years ago at the Holocene climate optimum temperatures were at least 3 degrees Celsius warmer, but CO2 was almost half what it is today:

The elite pushing global warming want money, YOUR money, and they want to control energy to enslave the world. Don’t buy it, look into the fraud.

edmhdotme.wordpress.com/2015/06/…warming-2/

For 600 million years CO2 has varied widely from 200 PPM to 20 times what it is today. Here is a chart of temperature and CO2 over that period. As you can see there is no relation between the two. In fact in the last 65 million years CO2 has declined as the Cretaceous warmed. This chart alone shows the lie that is modern climate theory. CO2 has no warming ability AT ALL!

For the rest see: https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/physicists-discover-co2-cannot-cause-global-warming/