MSNBC’S JOE SCARBOROUGH EXPLODES ON AIR

[RSTEFAN]

 

 

MSNBC’S JOE SCARBOROUGH EXPLODES ON AIR “WHY DOES THE DEM PARTY EVEN HAVE VOTING BOOTHS? THIS SYSTEM IS SO RIGGED!”

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/joe-scarborough-explodes-on-air-why-does-the-dem-party-even-have-voting-booths-this-system-is-so-rigged_042016

This really is the year when the American people had it rubbed in their faces that their entire presidential election process is a complete scam. A fraud. A dog and pony show. Pointless to the nth degree.

Now pundits are blatantly pointing out this fact left and right all over the place. It is impossible at this point for them to pretend to ignore it.

The most recent developments include the Colorado GOP canceling their primary and just handing their delegates off to Cruz, while Bernie Sanders actually won in Wyoming, but still left with less delegates than Hillarious Clinton.

This fact caused Joe Scarborough to go off on the Dems on air with:

“Why does the Democratic Party even have voting booths? This system is so RIGGED!”

Yes. It is. As it has been for some time now.

Just makes you wonder…

Exactly how many times and in how many different ways do voters on both sides of the aisle have to be told their votes don’t matter for them to actually realize it?

People are realizing it though. That’s why the media had to blackout a mass protest at the capitol where hundreds of people were arrested for peacefully protesting for fair elections… without a permit.

[RSTEFAN]

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-04-16/its-rotten-system-ron-paul-us-elections-are-rigged-voting-simply-used-pacify-public

"It's A Rotten System" Ron Paul Says: US Elections Are Rigged, Voting Simply Used To Pacify The Public

 

Submitted by Tyler Durden on 04/16/2016 11:06 -0400

 

 

 

 

Submitted by MintPress via TheAntiMedia.org,

Dr. Ron Paul says the American electoral system is rigged to keep “independent thinkers” from succeeding.

“I see elections as so much of a charade,” the former Texas congressman said during an April 11 appearance on RT America’s “The Fishtank.” “So much deceit goes on.”

Paul is no stranger to the twisted rules of the American presidential horse race. He ran for the highest office as a Libertarian in 1988, and in 2008 and 2012 as a Republican.

He arguably came closest to the nomination in 2012, when the GOP amended its party regulations to prevent the former Texas representative from stealing Mitt Romney’s thunder.

 

 

 

 

 

Rule 40( of “The Rules of the Republican Party” was changed so the Republican National Committee could “limit the visibility and power of libertarian-minded Texas Rep. Ron Paul at the convention and thus present a unified front behind Mitt Romney, the presumptive nominee,” according to David Byler, an elections analyst at RealClearPolitics. The rule requires that, in order to win the nomination, a candidate must have the support of a majority of delegates from eight states.

Although recent wins have tipped Sen. Ted Cruz past the cut off, the rule as written came close to helping Trump take the nomination. Paul warned that the GOP’s machinations to block Donald Trump are a sign of a corrupt, undemocratic system.

“I’ve worked on the assumption … for many, many decades, that whether there’s a Republican or a Democrat president, the people who want to keep the status quo seems to have their finger in the pot and can control things,” he said in the interview.

“They just get so nervous, though, if they have an independent thinker out there — whether it’s Sanders, or Trump or Ron Paul, they’re going to be very desperate to try to change things.”

Paul had nothing but scorn for Trump’s policies: “He’s offering us nothing new, and he’s going backward in many ways.”

He suggested that the 2016 election is “a lot more entertainment than anything else” because none of the candidates “have answers” to modern political problems.

Even so, Paul interprets the success of these outsider candidates as a sign that “more people are discovering that the system is all rigged and voting is just pacification for the voters and it really doesn’t count.”

“I don’t think there’s an easy way out for the establishment or the parties,” he noted, explaining that Democrats and Republicans would both rather risk “further alienation of the people” than allow a candidate to succeed who could shake up the system.

Paul recalled his own 2012 encounter with Rule 40( as an important political lesson for both himself and the American people.

“I was upset about it but didn’t want to waste too much energy being angry because this is the way the system works,” he said. “It’s a rotten system.”

Watch the entire interview below:

Average:

4.8

 

 

 

[Whatshername]

Thanks Bob.  Trump had this to say about our rigged system...

Let Me Ask America a Question

How has the ‘system’ been working out for you and your family? No wonder voters demand change.

By

Donald J. Trump

April 14, 2016 7:18 p.m. ET

 

On Saturday, April 9, Colorado had an “election” without voters. Delegates were chosen on behalf of a presidential nominee, yet the people of Colorado were not able to cast their ballots to say which nominee they preferred.

A planned vote had been canceled. And one million Republicans in Colorado were sidelined.

In recent days, something all too predictable has happened: Politicians furiously defended the system. “These are the rules,” we were told over and over again. If the “rules” can be used to block Coloradans from voting on whether they want better trade deals, or stronger borders, or an end to special-interest vote-buying in Congress—well, that’s just the system and we should embrace it.

Let me ask America a question: How has the “system” been working out for you and your family?

I, for one, am not interested in defending a system that for decades has served the interest of political parties at the expense of the people. Members of the club—the consultants, the pollsters, the politicians, the pundits and the special interests—grow rich and powerful while the American people grow poorer and more isolated.

No one forced anyone to cancel the vote in Colorado. Political insiders made a choice to cancel it. And it was the wrong choice.

Responsible leaders should be shocked by the idea that party officials can simply cancel elections in America if they don’t like what the voters may decide.

The only antidote to decades of ruinous rule by a small handful of elites is a bold infusion of popular will. On every major issue affecting this country, the people are right and the governing elite are wrong. The elites are wrong on taxes, on the size of government, on trade, on immigration, on foreign policy.

Why should we trust the people who have made every wrong decision to substitute their will for America’s will in this presidential election?

Here, I part ways with Sen. Ted Cruz.

Mr. Cruz has toured the country bragging about his voterless victory in Colorado. For a man who styles himself as a warrior against the establishment (you wouldn’t know it from his list of donors and endorsers), you’d think he would be demanding a vote for Coloradans. Instead, Mr. Cruz is celebrating their disenfranchisement.

Likewise, Mr. Cruz loudly boasts every time party insiders disenfranchise voters in a congressional district by appointing delegates who will vote the opposite of the expressed will of the people who live in that district.

That’s because Mr. Cruz has no democratic path to the nomination. He has been mathematically eliminated by the voters.

While I am self-funding, Mr. Cruz rakes in millions from special interests. Yet despite his financial advantage, Mr. Cruz has won only three primaries outside his home state and trails me by two million votes—a gap that will soon explode even wider. Mr. Cruz loses when people actually get to cast ballots. Voter disenfranchisement is not merely part of the Cruz strategy—it is the Cruz strategy.

The great irony of this campaign is that the “Washington cartel” that Mr. Cruz rails against is the very group he is relying upon in his voter-nullification scheme.

My campaign strategy is to win with the voters. Ted Cruz’s campaign strategy is to win despite them.

What we are seeing now is not a proper use of the rules, but a flagrant abuse of the rules. Delegates are supposed to reflect the decisions of voters, but the system is being rigged by party operatives with “double-agent” delegates who reject the decision of voters.

The American people can have no faith in such a system. It must be reformed.

Just as I have said that I will reform our unfair trade, immigration and economic policies that have also been rigged against Americans, so too will I work closely with the chairman of the Republican National Committee and top GOP officials to reform our election policies. Together, we will restore the faith—and the franchise—of the American people.

We must leave no doubt that voters, not donors, choose the nominee.

How have we gotten to the point where politicians defend a rigged delegate-selection process with more passion than they have ever defended America’s borders?

Perhaps it is because politicians care more about securing their private club than about securing their country.

My campaign will, of course, battle for every last delegate. We will work within the system that exists now, while fighting to have it reformed in the future. But we will do it the right way. My campaign will seek maximum transparency, maximum representation and maximum voter participation.

We will run a campaign based on empowering voters, not sidelining them.

Let us take inspiration from patriotic Colorado citizens who have banded together in protest. Let us make Colorado a rallying cry on behalf of all the forgotten people whose desperate pleas have for decades fallen on the deaf ears and closed eyes of our rulers in Washington, D.C.

The political insiders have had their way for a long time. Let 2016 be remembered as the year the American people finally got theirs.

 

http://www.wsj.com/articles/let-me-ask-america-a-question-1460675882

[SgtFuryUSCZ]

***///

Well... that rules out ho'bummer breaking our Rule of Law to let in thousands of illegals to pack the

Dems' ballot boxes....  must be some other reason...

like packing the Welfare Rolls to justify more theft from the Taxpayer...

or using them to increase the needy for ho'bummer-lack-o-care...

And if THAT ain't enough, now US Taxpayers have to GIVE ILLEGALS money to start their own businesses

back in their crap countries !

HEY !  We The People don't wanna "BUILD THAT", ho'bummer ! You globalist tool !  

 

.

Edited April 16, 2016 by SgtFuryUSCZ