chocolate1 Posted January 26, 2012 Report Share Posted January 26, 2012 DRUDGER REPORT IS JUST NOW REPORTING THE FOLLOWING: Georgia and National Elections 2012 12:15 p.m. Thursday, January 26, 2012 NO RULING IN 'BIRTHER' CHALLENGE.var addthis_config = {data_track_clickback: true} By Bill Rankin The Atlanta Journal-Constitution After hearing evidence with neither President Barack Obama nor his lawyers in attendance, a state administrative law judge on Thursday did not issue a ruling as to whether Obama can be allowed on the state ballot in November. Bob Andres, bandres@ajc.com Around the Plaintiff's table Kevin Powell (from left), Thomas Hatfield, Carl Swensson, John Sampson, and Mark Hatfield greeted each other before the hearing. The plaintiffs contend President Obama is not a natural-born citizen and not eligible to be on the Georgia ballot. <BR class=clear>Enlarge photo Bob Andres, bandres@ajc.com The defendant's side was empty as the Obama camp decided to boycott the hearing. <BR class=clear> Ross D. Franklin, AP A Georgia judge did not issue a ruling on a 'birther' challenge as to whether President Barack Obama can appear on the Georgia ballot. <BR class=clear> Lawyers for area residents mounting "birther" challenges told Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi that Obama should be found in contempt of court for not appearing when under subpoena to do so. But Malihi did not indicate he would recommend that and cut off one lawyer when he criticized Obama for not attending the hearing."It shows not just a contempt for this court, but contempt for the judicial branch," lawyer Van Irion told Malihi. "I'm not interested in commentary on that, counselor," Malihi quickly replied. Late Wednesday, Obama's lawyer, Michael Jablonski, wrote Secretary of State Brian Kemp, asking him to suspend the hearing. "It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here -- a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country," Jablonski wrote. Jablonski also served notice he would boycott the hearing. In response, Kemp said the hearing to consider the challenges is required by Georgia law. "If you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the [Office of State Administrative Hearings] proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril," Kemp wrote. Thursday's hearing was held before a packed courtroom with almost every seat taken -- except for those at the defendant's table facing the judge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chocolate1 Posted January 26, 2012 Author Report Share Posted January 26, 2012 DRUDGER REPORT IS JUST NOW REPORTING THE FOLLOWING: Georgia and National Elections 2012 12:15 p.m. Thursday, January 26, 2012 NO RULING IN 'BIRTHER' CHALLENGE.var addthis_config = {data_track_clickback: true} By Bill Rankin The Atlanta Journal-Constitution After hearing evidence with neither President Barack Obama nor his lawyers in attendance, a state administrative law judge on Thursday did not issue a ruling as to whether Obama can be allowed on the state ballot in November. Bob Andres, bandres@ajc.com Around the Plaintiff's table Kevin Powell (from left), Thomas Hatfield, Carl Swensson, John Sampson, and Mark Hatfield greeted each other before the hearing. The plaintiffs contend President Obama is not a natural-born citizen and not eligible to be on the Georgia ballot. <BR class=clear>Enlarge photo Bob Andres, bandres@ajc.com The defendant's side was empty as the Obama camp decided to boycott the hearing. <BR class=clear> Ross D. Franklin, AP A Georgia judge did not issue a ruling on a 'birther' challenge as to whether President Barack Obama can appear on the Georgia ballot. <BR class=clear> Lawyers for area residents mounting "birther" challenges told Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi that Obama should be found in contempt of court for not appearing when under subpoena to do so. But Malihi did not indicate he would recommend that and cut off one lawyer when he criticized Obama for not attending the hearing."It shows not just a contempt for this court, but contempt for the judicial branch," lawyer Van Irion told Malihi. "I'm not interested in commentary on that, counselor," Malihi quickly replied. Late Wednesday, Obama's lawyer, Michael Jablonski, wrote Secretary of State Brian Kemp, asking him to suspend the hearing. "It is well established that there is no legitimate issue here -- a conclusion validated time and again by courts around the country," Jablonski wrote. Jablonski also served notice he would boycott the hearing. In response, Kemp said the hearing to consider the challenges is required by Georgia law. "If you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the [Office of State Administrative Hearings] proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril," Kemp wrote. Thursday's hearing was held before a packed courtroom with almost every seat taken -- except for those at the defendant's table facing the judge. The judge is expected to review the evidence and make a recommendation to the state whether there is reason to be concerned about Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot. ...although... Lawyers for area residents mounting "birther" challenges told Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi that Obama should be found in contempt of court for not appearing when under subpoena to do so. But Malihi did not indicate he would recommend that and cut off one lawyer when he criticized Obama for not attending the hearing."It shows not just a contempt for this court, but contempt for the judicial branch," lawyer Van Irion told Malihi. "I'm not interested in commentary on that, counselor," Malihi quickly replied. ...Just smells like a mouse in the house, to me.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gooserider67 Posted January 26, 2012 Report Share Posted January 26, 2012 The birthers finally had their day in court and without a objection from the defense..this should be a slam dunk for them... so if nothing comes of this or the judge does not rule in favor of the birthers then this will be a total collapse in the judicial system and we the individual private citizen are completely SCREWED!!! because someone pulled a string and got to the judge to for go the rule of law.... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brandon2222 Posted January 26, 2012 Report Share Posted January 26, 2012 The birthers finally had their day in court and without a objection from the defense..this should be a slam dunk for them... so if nothing comes of this or the judge does not rule in favor of the birthers then this will be a total collapse in the judicial system and we the individual private citizen are completely SCREWED!!! because someone pulled a string and got to the judge to for go the rule of law.... I'm hoping our judicial system holds up it's oath. I'm not a "Birther" but this IS absolutely an issue. Especially if our President feels above the law! Sickens me, and it should sicken anybody that's ever been judged by our law. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yota691 Posted January 26, 2012 Report Share Posted January 26, 2012 They got some strong evidence an alot folks to go along with that evidence. What so bad and sad about this, we are watching this, and not one word from the Media, Why is that? Its a shame that our Government has all these control on us, an Majority of every sound minded American, that you let the Media have that same privilege. Guess that saying My fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country. John F. Kennedy. Is out the Window!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts