dslayer4j

I have uncirculated dinar from Dinar Trade. I need to get $900 per mil for them. I am in the D/FW area and can meet or we can do a COD like DinarTrade did with me. I will pay for shipping.

In the eyes of some people, Jesus got married this week. Elated liberals and cantankerous conservatives both decided to attend the wedding. Karen L. King of Harvard announced her discovery of a fragmented text at the International Congress of Coptic Studies. The text reportedly conveys the idea that Jesus was married. Since then, the media has been ablaze with commentary about this mysterious woman and the implications to Christianity. As is everyone on this blog. Liberals and conservatives alike have looked like fools in their analysis of the issue. Jesus’ purported wife has been turned into a political football (surprised?) which is being kicked back and forth between the two camps. Some liberals are heralding the text, saying that it destroys the concept of traditional marriage and gender roles. Somehow, they reason, if a fourth century writing says that Jesus had a wife, then we should all be able to shack up with someone of the same gender. On the other half of the field, conservatives are pointing to the text as proof of the liberal’s devious plan to chip away at traditional Christianity one belief at a time. Both sides are showing their ignorance. Huffington Post has blown up with posts about the revolutionary find and its implications. Michael D’Antonio wrote: “The implications of professor King’s discovery are profound.” No, they aren’t. Rebecca Pahle wrote: “this particular discovery is pretty interesting (to me, anyways) in that it challenges the traditional Biblical view of woman’s relationship to man.” No, it doesn’t. Conservatives have attacked King, saying she is just another liberal academic trying to dismantle Christianity. King is probably not your typical Sunday morning country churchgoer; but, in my limited experience, most of the people who work in Ivy League divinity schools aren’t trying to destroy your grandma’s beliefs. The text simply shows what a group in the fourth century believed or what they were trying to convince people of. That’s what writing does. If the world spins for another 2,000 years, people will be able to read FOX News and MSNBC and see what they were trying to push in 2012. There’s nothing revolutionary about this text, there’s plenty of ancient writings in which you could find something that might not line up with a traditionally held belief about the Old or New Testament. This latest text is just the flavor of the week. Why aren’t we talking about the writings that bear the names of Enoch, Baruch, Esdras and the Maccabees? Or how about Gabriel’s Revelation, which supposedly cast doubt on the resurrection story? What about the Testament of Abraham? And where’s Huffington Post’s coverage of the Gospel of Thomas? There’s plenty of good material in there for the Bible basher. If you were to regularly attend conferences like the International Congress of Coptic Studies, you would encounter this sort of thing quite frequently. Yes, this was a revolutionary find in the field of biblical studies, but it’s not worth all the media fuss. It doesn’t make King an enemy of traditional beliefs, it doesn’t redefine sexual roles and it doesn’t even mean that Jesus was married. It’s just something a person wrote in the fourth century. It shows what they believed or wanted others to believe. Just because a person jots something down doesn’t make it authoritative. Imagine if all the blogs today were treated as historically authoritative 1,500 years from now. What a mess! Biblical scholars come across this type of thing on a somewhat regular basis. It helps them understand how the ideas and writings of ancient communities evolved. As they teach you in preaching class, no discussion of a text should conclude without a personal application, so here’s how the text applies to you: If you don’t believe the Bible is the inspired, authoritative word of God, then this ancient text tells you that somebody in the fourth century wrote that Jesus had a wife. If you do believe the Bible is the inspired, authoritative word of God, then this ancient text tells you that somebody in the fourth century wrote that Jesus had a wife.

Ok pm me so we can set something up. I see your in Oklahoma.

It would be the same price.

I am looking to sell a portion of my investment. I am in the D/FW area and can meet you or we can do a C.O.D. like dinartrade when I bought it. I have receipts available if needed. These are uncirculated 25k notes. You can p.m. me and I will respond.

Not trying to bash Islam, but there is only one true and living G_d and thats the G_d of the bible. The god of Islam is a figment of their imagination and therefore can bless nothing. He can't bless because he doesn't exist.

PS. Banks aren't in business to lose money. Neither are the countries and individuals that have invested in Iraq.

Go to LOP Talk forums and do your research. There is alot of info in there about that.

No worky linky

It’s Official – The FCC Will Vote to Take Over the Internet in December. Just this past Friday, we warned you that a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) December Internet power grab was probably coming. Well, we now know that it is – and it may be even worse than we thought. Details have been sketchy, and successive reports often contradictory, but what follows is what seems to be looming over us in December. (We will know for sure on Wednesday, November 24 – if the FCC maintains its current December 15 meeting date.) FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski appears to be preparing to dramatically increase the FCC’s regulatory role over the Internet (in TWO ways; more on that later). He is doing so without the necessary Congressional authority – which he himself acknowledges he doesn’t have. And he is doing so by torturing and twisting the regulatory language he is drafting – so as to keep this extraordinary dictatorial seizure within the current Title I confines. The latter is for The Chairman merely an optical effort. If he can feign the appearance of remaining within Title I, he avoids Reclassification to Title II – against which many of us have long been rightly fighting. He will then portray his fealty to Title I as testament to the alleged “moderation” of his (un)modest proposal. This will be a totally bogus assertion, but he will make it – and the media will inparrot-esque fashion repeat it. The Chairman should bring crackers to the press conference. Free Press and the Media Marxists – who have long cried for Title II Reclassification – will on cue rail against The Chairman’s “sell-out.” This will further “bolster” his claim that he has found the magical, mystical Third Way – winding a path between the leftist Open Internet absolutists and the evil telecom companies. The Chairman should also bring nuts to the press conference – in case Free Press & Co. show up. (An aside: How are the telecom companies “evil” – when they have invested hundreds of dollars in building the Internet infrastructure? Which has resulted in the free speech, free market Web Xanadu we consumers all currently enjoy. Free Press and the Media Marxists haven’t invested a dime – yet they somehow successfully lay claim to the mantle of “consumer advocates.”) Of course, this attempted sleight of regulatory hand does not get The Chairman past one glaring problem – the D.C. Circuit Court has already unanimously ruled that the FCC doesn’t have the authority to regulate the Internet under Title I – at least as far as enforcing Network Neutrality is concerned. (Which is why Free Press & Co. have been clamoring for Title II Reclassification.) And Net Neutrality is why The Chairman has engaged in – and forced us all to endure- this one year-plus kabuki dance. Testimonium – The Chairman now looks poised to have the FCC again attempt to enforce Net Neutrality – under his now stretched-beyond-all-recognition Title I. What a short, selective memory he has. And most economically destructive of all – it appears The Chairman will try to impose Net Neutrality not just on wired broadband Internet service – but on wireless “smart phones” as well. This would be a titanic overreach by The Chairman – and an immense blow to the economy. The uncertainty caused just by The Chairman’s prolonged flirtation with the Media Marxists and their ridiculous Internet notions has already cost us billions of dollars in private sector Web investment. The cost in investment dollars and jobs lost when Net Neutrality is actually imposed will be cataclysmic. These aren’t the fake “saved or created” jobs of the alleged “stimulus” – these are very real jobs denied or destroyed by the ridiculous and ridiculously damaging Net Neutrality. Imposed by an FCC and its Chairman who know in advance that they do not have the authority to do so. What will follow will be years of litigation forced upon us by The Chairman – to undo what he knew beforehand he didn’t have the authority to do. What will follow will be years of diminished and diminishing Web capacity, caused by an absurd policy wrongfully jammed down our throats by a dictatorial, rogue Executive Branch Commission. What will follow will be years of stagnant or declining job growth, as investment capital rightly flees a regulation-constricted Internet which is no longer amenable to free market success. What will follow this essay may very well determine the free market, free speech future of the Internet – are you ready to place some calls and send some emails and faxes to protest this preposterous policy proposal and demand that it never be enacted? Stay tuned – we will soon tell you how you can be a part of the preventative solution. My linkDecember

I'll give you $700 U.S. per $1mil dinar if you interested.

Try this. My link Now it works.

Try copy and paste it into address bar.

Next time you hear a politician talk about our debt and throw around that word "trillion" like he know what he is talking about and it's nothing. Kick him out of office he doesn't understand the severity of the situation. When you look at the picture of a trillion just know I think right now we are 14 or 15 of those in the hole. My link

My thoughts exactly and also every country and smaller investors in that country who have dinars and cash in within that country, those dinar will go back to CBI as petro dollars for payment on future oil and gas.

What I'm doing is cashing some in here this year and figuring out what I have tax due and give 90% away to charities that I like and the other 10% will go to big brother (irs). I just don't want to give more than I have to to irs and it end up in some bankers off shore account. Because thats where it is going to end up. I promise. They havn't done away with charitible deductions (yet) there trying though. Get a good tax attorney and cpa that will be the best thing to do for your own situation.

Me too!!! I had the same thing happen and downloaded malware bytes and cleaned everything up. I'm running a scan every night for bugs.

I heard Ali at dinartrade is not going to offer our info but will if he's asked to cough it up by you know who. To cover his you know what.

We all know that this is the Executive Order that allowed us to be able to invest in the Irag dinar, but there are many Executive Orders that lay dormant in the halls of congress that have been given and can be enacted at any time. Lets look at some of them, Executive Order 10995: Seizure of all communications media--radio, television, newspaper, CB and Ham radio, telephones and the internet( in effect, suspension of the first amendment) We can thank Kennedy for this one. Executive Order 10997: Seizure of all electrical power and fossil fuels. (Kennedy) Executive Order 10998: Seizure of all food sources, farms and farm equipment. Food will be rationed. Today some states have anti-hoarding laws on the books, stating that anything over a one weeks supply of food is against the law. (Kennedy) Executive Order 10999: Seizure of all transportation and control of all highways, interstates and seaports. Any vehicle, public or private, can be taken (Kennedy) Executive Order 11000: Seizure of all civilian for work under Federal supervision. (Kennedy) Executive Order 11001: Federal takeover of all health, education, and welfare. (Kennedy) Executive Order 11002: Authorizes the Postmaster General to register every man, woman and child in the US. (Kennedy) Executive Order 11003: Seizure of all airport and aircraft, public or private. (Kennedy) Executive Order 11004: Housing and Finance giver authority for population relocation. (Kennedy) Executive Order 11049: Assigns emergency preparedness functions to federal agencies. Consolidates 21 different executive orders issued over a 15yr period. (Kennedy) Executive Order 11490: Establishes presidential control over all United States citizens, businesses, and churches in times of "emergency"> (Nixon) Executive Order 11921: Allows the Federal Emergency Preparedness Agency to develop plans to establish control over all production and distribution, energy sources, wages, credit and the flow of money in United States financial institutions in any "national emergency". It also states that when a state of emergency is declared by the President, Congress cannot review the action for six months. (Ford) Executive Order 12407: Sets up ten Federal Regional Councils to govern ten Federal Regions made up of the fifty states and U.S. protectorates. Each of the states is to be divided into sub-regions so that Federal Executive control is provided over every community.(Reagan) Executive Order 12656: assigns emergency preparedness responsibilities. " A national emergency is any occurrence, including national disasters, military attack, technological emergency, or other emergency that seriously degrades or seriously threatens the national security of the United States. Policy for national security emergency preparedness shall be established by the President." This order includes the federal takeover of all local law enforcement agencies, wage and price controls, prohibits citizens from moving assets in or out of the United States, creates a draft, controls all means of travel, and much more. (Reagan) Executive Order 12919: Directs various Cabinet officials to be ready to take over virtually all aspects of the United States economy during a "state of national emergency" at the direction of the President. (Clinton) Executive Order 13010: Directs FEMA to take control over all government agencies in times of emergency. FEMA is under direct control of the executive (presidential) branch of government. (Clinton) Executive Order 11051: The Director of the Office of Emergency Planning is authorized to put Executive Orders in effect in "times of increased international tension or financial crisis." it is also to perform additional function as the President may direct. (Kennedy) This means when government declares an emergency, there is no Constitution. The reason? In 1937, the courts, in U.S. vs. Belmont, declared that executive agreements do not require the consensus of either branch of government in order to be enacted. Edmund Burke once said, “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” Now, I don’t know about you, but there’s no way I’m going to sit back and let the liberals take over my country. I’m not going to fiddle while Rome burns, and I hope you won’t either.

Breakout the champagne !!!

How about a group hug????

One dreadful scenario: Say our gov'nt has made a special deal with Iraq. I think I read somewhere that the gov'nt's that have taken dinar for debt forgiveness can't use any for 6 months after whatever they chose to do, RV or lop . So lets say that 6 month period is given to us as a cash in time. If you don't cash in your dinar, it then become toilet paper. Well lets say one of these less profitable scenarios or loss takes place. We have to cash out within that time frame or lose everything. So the gov'nt knows this and we can't do nothing about it but cash in. After the 6 months nobody would be speculating on the dinar, then they RV and all the gov'nt's are filthy rich. I wouldn't put it past our gov for sure. All they want is more money and more control. They take almost 40% of what you have and are going for the rest. I'll bet there is back room deals and I promise you these deals don't benefit us. They just want to keep us under their thumbs.

This will do fine: Immediate Transfer of Ownership I, __________________________, being of sound mind and body, on the ___ day of _________ 20__, do hereby freely make an immediate gift of ________________________ (number of Iraqi Dinar, valued as a collectors item only) to the (legal corporation or new owner) named ______________________________. Signed by former owner ______________ Corporation Name(optional)or New owner ______________________ signed by President & Secretary or director (optional) _______________________ Witness (Notary) below. Subscribed and sworn to before me on this ___ day of _____, 20__. ______________________________ Notary Public My commission expires __________.

Actually these are the brackets:Tax Rate 10% Not over $8,025 Not over $16,050 15% $8,025 – $32,550 $16,050 – $65,100 25% $32,550 – $78,850 $65,100 – $131,450 28% $78,850 – $164,550 $131,450 – $200,300 33% $164,550 – $357,700 $200,300 – $357,700 35% Over $357,700 Over $357,700 I would imagine that 90% of people w/dinar will be in the 35%. Tax Rate Single Married Filing Jointly 10% Not over $8,025 Not over $16,050 15% $8,025 – $32,550 $16,050 – $65,100 25% $32,550 – $78,850 $65,100 – $131,450 28% $78,850 – $164,550 $131,450 – $200,300 33% $164,550 – $357,700 $200,300 – $357,700 35% Over $357,700 Over $357,700 I'm sorry this is it with single or married filing jointly.

I finally went to the top, talked with Ali and cleared it all up. I guess if you have a problem you have to go to him because some of his management just are not able to deal with problems. I checked his BBB report as well today to see if he had any complaints and he is clear with them. Maybe this is an isolated case and something for them to learn by. No worries, all is well !!!