rtrusty

Busted: The White House Claims They Ordered Obama's Short-Form Birth Certificate From Hawaii Department Of Health In 2008, Yet, Obama's Short-Form Birth Certificate Is Date Stamped 2007 --- COMPLETE DETAILS HERE http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/04/busted-white-house-now-claims-they.html

Dream on "Researcher Ron Polland [PhD], known for his forensic investigation of Barack Obama's short-form birth certificate, now has constructed from scratch a duplicate of the document released by the White House in April, seeking to validate his contention that it was created by a forger." -WorldNetDaily. Add one more log to the fire. Polland, who claims that he also "created" the short form birth certificate that Team Obama eventually published on the Internet back in 2008, is not alone. Since Barack Obama released what he claims is his long form birth certificate back in April, more than 20 computer and imaging experts have gone on record and demonstrated anomalies in that document; and to date, NOT ONE forensic expert has stepped forward to vouch for the document's validity. But here's the ultimate irony: as Rome burns and our nation spirals ever closer to bankruptcy, a man who may not even be eligible to serve as President of the United States has essentially hit the campaign trail, spreading his re-election venom of class envy as he tries to extort Congress into passing a job destruction scam that could cripple our fragile nation beyond the point of repair. And his allies and minions are spending untold amounts of money, staging phony "occupy protests" in cities across the nation. The pundits and talking-heads may be too scared to admit it... but it's no coincidence. And the political elites are cowering in fear... they desperately want what may turn out to be the greatest fraud ever perpetuated on the American people to go away. We can't let that happen. Once and for all our elected officials must be made to understand that the means to stop the radical Obama agenda is staring them in the face. The American people need to know, once and for all, if the man who is destroying this great nation brick by brick is a FRAUD and a USURPER. We need a Congressional investigation... and we need it today.

Not One Graphics Expert Has Come Forward And Vouched For The Authenticity Of The So-Called Birth Certificate That Obama Released On The Internet. That's right. With each passing day, increasing numbers of computer and graphics experts come forward and state that the document Obama released on the Internet is highly irregular and yet, Obama can't find one expert who will come forward to vouch for the document. As far as we're concerned, Obama pulled out the computerized equivalent of a crayon scribble. In effect, he's telling you, with an arrogant smirk on his face: 'Here's my birth certificate you ignorant cretins...now be good little comrades, sit down, shut up and don’t question me... EVER AGAIN.' Fat chance, Mr. Obama. You WILL be held to account. We are not going away and this issue is not going away. The American people demand answers! How can we as patriotic Americans sit idly by when so much that we are told is either untrue or simply fails to pass the sniff test. The media refuses to ask the tough questions, so it is left to us, the people, to ask them. We still don't know why Barack Obama spent as much as 2 million dollars to HIDE his long form birth certificate before releasing what more than 20 experts are calling a DIGITALLY ALTERED image on the Internet. That question will not go away. It must not go away. The American People deserve ABSOLUTE transparency. The American people deserve to know whether the man sitting in the Oval Office is indeed eligible, or if he is a FRAUD and a USURPER, and with your help we will get the answers that the American People deserve.

Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 11:29 AM Subject: Re: The Federal Income Tax Officially DIED today (3/27/2007) at 13:53:58 PDT > I truly hate to bother you, but wanting to know if this was correct. > If so what it means for the people of the USA. You're not bothering us, Linda. Yours are very good questions. Yes, this is correct. It is "official" because I am authorized by the Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court legally to represent the "United States" (federal government) in cases in which it was proper and timely for the United States to intervene. I will try to be brief when explaining what this means for the People of the USA, and I will also provide you with links to further explanatory details: (1) even if the IRS were a de jure service, bureau, office or other subdivision of the U.S. Department of the Treasury -- which they decidedly are NOT -- the IRS would STILL have no authority to create a tax liability solely by means of Regulations published in the Federal Register: Commissioner v. Acker: http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.htm ; <--- excellent abstract http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/2amjur2d.gif http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=361&invol=87 ... [T]therefore, to uphold this addition to the tax would be to hold that it may be imposed by regulation, which, of course, the law does not permit. United States v. Calamaro, 354 U.S. 351, 359 ; Koshland v. Helvering, 298 U.S. 441, 446 -447; Manhattan Co. v. Commissioner, 297 U.S. 129, 134 . (2) the issue of whether or not there ever was a bona fide liability STATUTE for taxes imposed by subtitle A of the Internal Revenue Code, was first approached with several FOIA Requests, then with a proper SUBPOENA served upon former Secretary of the Treasury Paul H. O'Neill: he fell silent and his Department's silence activated legal estoppel: http://www.supremelaw.org/press/rels/subpoena.htm http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/eddings/subpoena.liability.htm (3) the meaning and implications of "estoppel" or legal prohibition were explained in much more detail here: http://www.supremelaw.org/letters/irs.estopped.htm (4) later, an even more serious DECLARATION OF INSOLVENCY was duly filed in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Washington State; in that DECLARATION, not only was the missing liability STATUTE documented and verified; the invocation of U.S. bankruptcy laws had the result of activating the AUTOMATIC STAY authorized expressly by 11 U.S.C. 362: http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/fox2/insolvency.htm http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/fox2/insolvency.explained.htm http://www.supremelaw.org/cc/fox2/interpleader.htm Therefore, there are now two (2) very important legal and factual reasons why the IRS is technically barred from enforcing collection of any more Federal income taxes: (1) there is no Statute at Large creating any specific liability(s) for those taxes; (2) the AUTOMATIC STAY now in effect prohibits such collections, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. 362. The following "31 Questions and Answers about the Internal Revenue Service" have been filed in several State and Federal Courts without any rebuttal(s) by any opposing party(s): http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31answers.htm ; <--- numerous hyperlinks to supporting evidence! http://www.supremelaw.org/sls/31Q&A.in.evidence.htm Certified and embossed copies of same can be obtained from my office for a nominal service and handling charge. The rest of the story is documented in voluminous detail in "The Federal Zone" also available here in the Supreme Law Library: http://www.supremelaw.org/fedzone11/ Thank you for contacting the Supreme Law Firm. -- Sincerely yours, /s/ Paul Andrew Mitchell, B.A., M.S. Private Attorney General, 18 U.S.C. 1964 http://www.supremelaw.org/decs/agency/private.attorney.general.htm http://www.supremelaw.org/reading.list.htm http://www.supremelaw.org/index.htm (Home Page) http://www.supremelaw.org/support.policy.htm (Support Policy) http://www.supremelaw.org/guidelines.htm (Client Guidelines) http://www.supremelaw.org/support.guidelines.htm (Policy + Guidelines) All Rights Reserved without Prejudice ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Linda Watson Date: Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:54 AM Subject: The Federal Income Tax Officially DIED today (3/27/2007) at 13:53:58 PDT Mr. Mitchell, I truly hate to bother you, but wanting to know if this was correct. If so what it means for the people of the USA. I have never asked anything like this before, so pardon if I’m not politically correct. Thanks, Linda Watson

Well Robots are told what to do what to say what to wear and when to go to sleep when to talk and that is also a obot who works for the man himself.

I"m glad that I can always depend on some of Obama's Obots to keep this going.LOL

Arizona's maverick Sheriff Joe Arpaio promised surprises in his jurisdiction's investigation of Barack Obama's eligibility for the presidential ballot and his Cold Case Posse is delivering – raising questions that touch on the authenticity of the long-form birth certificate issued last April and the possibility Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security Number. Sources close to the investigation say the posse has decided it needs to see original birth records before it can conclude whether Obama should be eligible for the presidential ballot in 2012, not an electronic file or scanned copies. The sources say the panel needs to examine the microfilm documenting Obama's birth, as well as the ink-and-paper original 1961 birth records the Hawaii Department of Health is holding in its vault. The PDF file and various scanned copies of the birth certificate that the White House released April 27 are simply not good enough, the posse has determined. Autographed copies of Jerome Corsi's best-seller "Where's the Birth Certificate?" are available only from the WND Superstore Earlier this month, WND senior staff reporter Jerome R. Corsi spent 18 hours over a two-day period in Arizona briefing the Cold Case Posse on a wide range of evidence regarding Obama's eligibility. "The posse wants to see the entire microfilm roll containing Obama's birth certificate, not just a microfilm copy of Obama's long-form birth certificate in isolation," Corsi explained. "An individual microfilm copy could be forged, but forging the entire microfilm reel on which Obama's birth certificate is in sequence would be almost impossible." Also, Corsi said, the posse wants the ink-and-paper original 1961 Obama birth records still held in vault by the Hawaii Department of Health to be released publicly and subjected to independent court-authorized forensic examination. Corsi affirmed that the posse's conclusion it needs to see the Obama birth certificate microfilm is part of the "shock" that Arpaio warned would be forthcoming, when he spoke last week to the Surprise Tea Party group meeting in Surprise, Ariz. The focus on the microfilm records of Obama's birth arose after Arpaio's investigators realized the birth certificates of twins born the day after Obama, the Nordykes, had been released as white-on-black copies of microfilm to the family by the Hawaii Department of Health in 1966. MORE HERE: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=362625 Video: Sheriff Joe Arpaio's Cold Case Posse Discovered Shocking New Evidence About Obama - DETAILS HERE http://obamareleaseyourrecords.blogspot.com/2011/10/sheriff-joes-cold-case-posse-wants.html

By Drew Zahn © 2011 A board of county commissioners in North Carolina is asking the Supreme Court for help: Its members don't believe they should have to forbid volunteers from mentioning the name of Jesus in prayers offered before their meetings. But the American Civil Liberties Union and Americans United for Separation of Church and State are standing by their victory in a U.S. circuit court decision that states even "a solitary reference to Jesus Christ" in invocations before the Forsyth County Board of Commissioners' meetings could do "violence to the pluralistic and inclusive values that are a defining feature of American public life." Furthermore, wrote Judge James Harvie Wilkinson III in the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals majority opinion, legislative invocations offered in Jesus' name are inherently "sectarian" and thus should be censored lest they make some attendees feel "uncomfortable, unwelcome and unwilling to participate in … public affairs." What is Christianity's role in the nation? Find out in "Christianity and the American Commonwealth" But the board disagrees, and with the help of the Alliance Defense Fund is asking the Supreme Court to trump Wilkinson's ruling. "America's founders opened public meetings with prayer; this county simply wants to allow its citizens to do the same," said ADF Senior Counsel David Cortman in a statement. "We trust the U.S. Supreme Court will want to review this case because of the long history in America of offering prayers before public meetings. Public officials shouldn't be coerced into censoring the prayers of those invited to offer them just because secularist groups don't like people praying according to their own conscience." For years, the board has extended an open invitation to religious leaders from the community to volunteer a prayer before its twice-monthly meetings, asking only that the invocations "not be exploited as an effort to convert others … nor to disparage any faith or belief." But a pair of local citizens, Janet Joyner and Constance Lynn Blackmon, attended the meetings regularly and were bothered by the frequent mentions of Jesus in the prayers. After the pair sat through yet another Christian prayer, this one including references to "the Cross of Calvary" and the "Virgin Birth," they sued the board of commissioners with help from the ACLU and Americans United lawyers. After a pair of appeals, Judge Wilkinson handed down a majority opinion Americans United called "a major win for church-state separation." "While legislative prayer has the capacity to solemnize the weighty task of governance … it also has the potential to generate sectarian strife," Wilkinson reasoned. "Such conflict rends communities and does violence to the pluralistic and inclusive values that are a defining feature of American public life." "It is not enough to contend, as the dissent does, that the policy was 'neutral and proactively inclusive,'" the ruling continues. "Take-all-comers policies that do not discourage sectarian prayer will inevitably favor the majoritarian faith in the community at the expense of religious minorities living therein. This effect creates real burdens on citizens – particularly those who attend meetings only sporadically – for they will have to listen to someone professing religious beliefs that they do not themselves hold." The Forsyth Board's invocations, the court determined, "made at least two citizens feel uncomfortable, unwelcome and unwilling to participate in the public affairs of Forsyth County. To be sure, citizens in a robust democracy should expect to hear all manner of things that they do not like. But the First Amendment teaches that religious faith stands on a different footing from other forms of speech and observance." Judge Wilkinson concluded, "In order to survive constitutional scrutiny, invocations must consist of the type of nonsectarian prayers that solemnize the legislative task and seek to unite rather than divide." But does a volunteer's prayer that merely mentions Jesus necessarily "divide"? The court referenced one of its prior decisions in which it ruled a town council's prayers "clearly 'advance[d]' one faith, Christianity, in preference to others … because they ended with a solitary reference to Jesus Christ." The ruling further projected, "As our nation becomes more diverse, so also will our faiths. To plant sectarian prayers at the heart of local government is a prescription for religious discord. … In their public pursuits, Americans respect the manifold beliefs of fellow citizens by abjuring sectarianism and embracing more inclusive themes." Judge Paul Niemeyer, however, dissented from the two majority judges in the three-judge panel that heard the case, arguing that the court is, in application, "regulating" public prayer. "When offering legislative prayers in which the Divine Being is publicly asked for guidance and a blessing of the legislators, religious leaders will hereafter have to refrain from referencing the Divine Being with the inspired or revealed name," Niemeyer wrote. "The majority has dared to step in and regulate the language of prayer – the sacred dialogue between humankind and God. Such a decision treats prayer agnostically; reduces it to civil nicety. "Most frightfully," he continued, "it will require secular legislative and judicial bodies to evaluate and parse particular religious prayers." Alliance Defense Fund Senior Counsel Brett Harvey agrees. "The decision is troubling on many fronts," Harvey wrote in a blog post. "It is out of step with many other federal courts that have considered the validity of public invocations, including the United States Supreme Court. It ignores the religious heritage and history of our nation. But more troubling is the impact of the court's decision on prayer itself. ... It requires the government to censor private prayers and engage in comparative theology." He concludes, "The Constitution prohibits the government from deciding which religious words are acceptable and which are not, even if the goal is to make people feel more comfortable." Read more: Jesus' name ruled 'unconstitutional' http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=361461#ixzz1cHGPOGL6

Every obstacle presents an opportunity to improve our life or someone else s life. 1 - First Important Lesson - Cleaning Lady. During my second month of college, our professor Gave us a pop quiz. I was a conscientious student And had breezed through the questions until I read The last one: "What is the first name of the woman who cleans the school?" Surely this was some kind of joke. I had seen the Cleaning woman several times. She was tall, Dark-haired and in her 50's, but how would I know her name? I handed in my paper, leaving the last question Blank. Just before class ended, one student asked if The last question would count toward our quiz grade. "Absolutely, " said the professor.. "In your careers, You will meet many people. All are significant.. They Deserve your attention and care, even if all you do Is smile and say "hello.." I've never forgotten that lesson.. I also learned her Name was Dorothy. 2. - Second Important Lesson - Pickup in the Rain One night, at 11:30 p.m., an older African American Woman was standing on the side of an Alabama highway Trying to endure a lashing rain storm. Her car had Broken down and she desperately needed a ride. Soaking wet, she decided to flag down the next car. A young white man stopped to help her, generally Unheard of in those conflict-filled 1960's. The man Took her to safety, helped her get assistance and Put her into a taxicab. She seemed to be in a big hurry, but wrote down his Address and thanked him. Seven days went by and a Knock came on the man's door. To his surprise, a Giant console color TV was delivered to his home. A Special note was attached. It read: "Thank you so much for assisting me on the highway The other night. The rain drenched not only my Clothes, but also my spirits. Then you came along. Because of you, I was able to make it to my dying Husband's bedside just before he passed away... God Bless you for helping me and unselfishly serving Others." Sincerely, Mrs. Nat King Cole. 3 - Third Important Lesson - Always remember those Who serve. In the days when an ice cream sundae cost much less, A 10-year-old boy entered a hotel coffee shop and Sat at a table. A waitress put a glass of water in Front of him. "How much is an ice cream sundae?" he asked. "Fifty cents," replied the waitress. The little boy pulled his hand out of his pocket and Studied the coins in it. "Well, how much is a plain dish of ice cream?" he inquired. By now more people were waiting for a table and the Waitress was growing impatient.. "Thirty-five cents," she brusquely replied. The little boy again counted his coins. "I'll have the plain ice cream," he said. The waitress brought the ice cream, put the bill on The table and walked away The boy finished the ice Cream, paid the cashier and left.. When the waitress Came back, she began to cry as she wiped down the Table. There, placed neatly beside the empty dish, Were two nickels and five pennies.. You see, he couldn't have the sundae, because he had To have enough left to leave her a tip. 4 - Fourth Important Lesson.. - The obstacle in Our Path. In ancient times, a King had a boulder placed on a Roadway. Then he hid himself and watched to see if Anyone would remove the huge rock. Some of the King's wealthiest merchants and courtiers came by And simply walked around it.. Many loudly blamed the King for not keeping the roads clear, but none did Anything about getting the stone out of the way. Then a peasant came along carrying a load of Vegetables. Upon approaching the boulder, the peasant laid down his burden and tried to move the stone to the side of the road. After much pushing and straining, he finally succeeded. After the peasant picked up his load of vegetables, he noticed a purse lying in the road where the boulder had been. The purse contained many gold coins and a note from the King indicating that the gold was for the person who removed the boulder from the roadway. The peasant learned what many of us never understand! Every obstacle presents an opportunity to improve our condition. 5 - Fifth Important Lesson - Giving When it Counts... Many years ago, when I worked as a volunteer at a hospital, I got to know a little girl named Liz who was suffering from a rare & serious disease. Her only chance of recovery appeared to be a blood transfusion from her 5-year old brother, who had miraculously survived the same disease and had developed the antibodies needed to combat the illness. The doctor explained the situation to her little brother, and asked the little boy if he would be willing to give his blood to his sister. I saw him hesitate for only a moment before taking a deep breath and saying, "Yes I'll do it if it will save her." As the transfusion progressed, he lay in bed next to his sister and smiled, as we all did, seeing the color returning to her cheek. Then his face grew pale and his smile faded. He looked up at the doctor and asked with a trembling voice, "Will I start to die right away". Being young, the little boy had misunderstood the doctor; he thought he was going to have to give his sister all of his blood in order to save her. Now you have choices. 1 Delete this email, or 2. Forward it other people. I hope that you will choose No. 2 and remember. Most importantly.... Live with no regrets, Treat people the way you want to be treated, Work like you don't need the money, Love like you've never been hurt, and Dance like you do when nobody's watching.

WOW talk about being blind. And yes you've that right.

I agreed Moto and it is clear TP didn't take the time to read this but he is fast to put me down and all I can say is I didn't make all this up as it there for all to see.

These are all the programs that the new Republican House has proposed cutting. Read to the end. Corporation for Public Broadcasting Subsidy. $445 million annual savings. Save America 's Treasures Program. $25 million annual savings. International Fund for Ireland . $17 million annual savings. Legal Services Corporation. $420 million annual savings. National Endowment for the Arts. $167.5 million annual savings. National Endowment for the Humanities. $167.5 million annual savings. Hope VI Program. $250 million annual savings. Amtrak Subsidies. $1.565 billion annual savings. Eliminate duplicative education programs. H.R. 2274 (in last Congress), authored by Rep. McKeon, eliminates 68 at a savings of $1.3 billion annually. U.S. Trade Development Agency. $55 million annual savings. Woodrow Wilson Center Subsidy. $20 million annual savings. Cut in half funding for congressional printing and binding. $47 million annual savings. John C. Stennis Center Subsidy. $430,000 annual savings. Community Development Fund. $4.5 billion annual savings. Heritage Area Grants and Statutory Aid. $24 million annual savings. Cut Federal Travel Budget in Half. $7.5 billion annual savings Trim Federal Vehicle Budget by 20%. $600 million annual savings. Essential Air Service. $150 million annual savings. Technology Innovation Program. $70 million annual savings. Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) Program. $125 million annual savings. Department of Energy Grants to States for Weatherization. $530 million annual savings. Beach Replenishment. $95 million annual savings. New Starts Transit. $2 billion annual savings. Exchange Programs for Alaska , Natives Native Hawaiians, and Their Historical Trading Partners in Massachusetts . $9 million annual savings Intercity and High Speed Rail Grants. $2.5 billion annual savings. Title X Family Planning. $318 million annual savings. Appalachian Regional Commission. $76 million annual savings. Economic Development Administration. $293 million annual savings Programs under the National and Community Services Act. $1.15 billion annual savings. Applied Research at Department of Energy. $1.27 billion annual savings. FreedomCAR and Fuel Partnership. $200 million annual savings. Energy Star Program. $52 million annual savings. Economic Assistance to Egypt ... $250 million annually. U.S. Agency for International Development. $1.39 billion annual savings. General Assistance to District of Columbia . $210 million annual savings. Subsidy for Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. $150 million annual savings. Presidential Campaign Fund. $775 million savings over ten years. No funding for federal office space acquisition. $864 million annual savings. End prohibitions on competitive sourcing of government services. Repeal the Davis-Bacon Act. More than $1 billion annually. IRS Direct Deposit: Require the IRS to deposit fees for some services it offers (such as processing payment plans for taxpayers) to the Treasury, instead of allowing it to remain as part of its budget. $1.8 billion savings over ten years. Require collection of unpaid taxes by federal employees. $1 billion total savings.WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Prohibit taxpayer funded union activities by federal employees. $1.2 billion savings over ten years. Sell excess federal properties the government does not make use of. $15 billion total savings. Eliminate death gratuity for Members of Congress. Eliminate Mohair Subsidies. $1 million annual savings. Eliminate taxpayer subsidies to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. $12.5 million annual savings Eliminate Market Access Program. $200 million annual savings. USDA Sugar Program. $14 million annual savings. Subsidy to Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). $93 million annual savings. Eliminate the National Organic Certification Cost-Share Program. $56.2 million annual savings. Eliminate fund for ObamaCare administrative costs. $900 million savings. Ready to Learn TV Program. $27 million savings.. HUD Ph.D. Program. Deficit Reduction Check-Off Act. TOTAL SAVINGS: $2.5 Trillion over Ten Years And it's still only a drop in the bucket............. My question is, what is all this doing in the budget in the first place? Send to everyone you know.

I hope most of you read this to the very end before you make your comment. Look Who Cited To Justia For Supreme Court Holding Attorney Leo Donofrio There’s a bogus astroturfing mantra going ’round the blogosphere which sounds something like this, “No real lawyer would ever use an online web site like Justia.“ The talking point is thoroughly debunked by a very powerful legal source. Ever heard of Perkins Coie? They are the law firm which defended Obama in eligibility suits before he was elected. Ever heard of Bob Bauer? He is a partner in Perkins Coie and was General Counsel of Obama For America 2008, then White House Counsel, and is now back in private practice as Obama’s personal attorney to lead the charge in the 2012 election. Perkins Coie is as powerful and shrewd a law firm as has ever existed and hey, what do you know kids, their mega influential legal blog cited to Justia in an article published there on June 28, 2010, “Business Methods Patents Survive, But Not Bilski’s Patent“: “The next key decision was Parker v. Flook, 437 U.S. 584 (1978)[3]. The process claims there involved a practical application (updating the value of an alarm limit for ending a chemical reaction), but the only novel feature of the process was the specific manner in which the alarm limit was calculated… [3] http://supreme.justia.com/us/437/584/case.html“ So much for the “real lawyers don’t use online web sites like Justia” try. Perkins Coie certainly did. Now, post JustiaGate… not so much. Lawyers, when going before a judge must Shepardize their cases. This is done via two paid online services, Lexis and Westlaw. If you cite a case without “Shepping” it, you risk not knowing whether the case has been questioned, followed or overruled. But many lawyers are also bloggers and commentators. They appreciate the easy access of Justia for such tasks as well as initial research for a client, superior or associate. Justia was absolutely trusted by the legal community to return accurate judicial opinions. The entire legal research aspect of the site was created for that very purpose. Justia isn’t some fly by night operation. Tim Stanley was the big man on campus championing free online research. And Justia has been universally praised by attorneys and law schools for its free publication of Supreme Court cases and other federal legal documents. Robert Ambrogi’s “LawSites” blog post, “Justia Does FindLaw One Better“, reported that Justia had, right out of the box, taken the place of Findlaw on the web as a predominant online legal resource in Feb. 2007: “Look at Justia’s front page today and one is reminded of the FindLaw of old. More to the point, Justia today is becoming every bit as valuable as a legal portal as FindLaw once was.” A Lewis and Clark Law School blog elaborated on Ambrogi’s praise as follows: “Add in the very-Web 2.0 addition of search links to related dockets, news, blogs, and websites, and you find a fantastic one-stop source of information given very many thumbs up by the very many editors of BoleyBlogs!” The University of Wisconsin Law School stated the following adoration of Justia in Oct. 2007: “Justia, a relatively new legal portal, is quickly becoming an indispensable research tool.” The Mass Law Blog, written by Lee Gesmer of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, hyped Justia for its ability to follow federal cases via RSS feeds back in Oct. 2008: “Assume you’re interested in Jones Day v. Blockshopper, pending in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois: Go to Justia.com and click on the link US District Courts’ civil case filings. You can search for the docket of any federal district court case to find the case in Justia.” AUDIO INTERVIEW CONCERNING THE TECH DESIGN OF JUSTIA FROM JAN. 2007 Justia CEO Tim Stanley gave a 21 minute podcast interview to Ken Chan of “Law And Legal Research” in Jan. ’07 after Tim was awarded the Google Enterprise Search Superstar award. In that interview, Stanley was asked who Justia was created to benefit. Here is Stanley’s candid reply: Stanley: The primary users of it tend to be lawyers or attorneys looking for legal information or looking for case-law, or looking for information from some of the legal blogs that are online. And the other sort of major group of users tends to be law students or other students in the college environment or high schools that are looking for information on the US Government and sort of how the court system works. Chan: The homepage, if you will, mentions the indexing of all of the Supreme Court cases… What would you say is the primary piece of information that somebody is coming to your web site to find, or is there one? Is it a wide basis of information or is there a particular type of information that somebody is coming to find? Stanley: In most cases they’re looking for a variety of types of legal information. There is a large percentage though that are looking for Supreme Court information, and looking at particular Supreme Court cases. And one of the nice things we’ve done using the Google Mini is we’ve indexed all the Supreme Court cases, and we have a nice sort of inter-linking among the cases, so you can go from one case, you know, quickly link over to a previous case. And the Google algorithm when it’s indexing the cases does a very good job in terms of prioritizing the cases based on those that sort of have more value to the legal community. Stanley tells us that the primary users are lawyers, not lay people. Also, keep in mind that when he gave this interview in ’07, none of the cases had been sabotaged yet. The cases were in the database with full case names, citations, and no text had been removed. Now examine what Google says about their Google Mini plug and play search engine device: “Unlike high-maintenance systems that require frequent tweaking and recalibrating and that overwhelm systems administrators with constant demands for attention, the Google Mini doesn’t need a tech support baby-sitter. You simply plug it in, configure it, and let it run. The Google Mini does the rest, freeing tech support personnel to fulfill their primary task – supporting their users… No manual document tagging or search customization required. Google believes the technology itself should do the heavy lifting – not you, the administrator. To that end, Google’s search relevance technology automatically considers over 100 different factors when determining search results, eliminating the need for costly and confusing manual search customization. Sounds marvelous, easy and totally bitchin’, and that’s what Stanley thinks too: Chan: When you initially made the decision to install a search engine on the site, did you have another technology that you were using, or was the Google your first choice? Where did you come from? Stanley: … The key for us was really the simplicity of getting it up and going. So it was extremely easy for us just to plug and play it, plug and play the Google Mini, point it to our database and immediately index it, as well as the quality of the search results. So, the algorithm in terms of producing relevant results based on the user’s query is much higher than most of the other search engine technology we’ve used. And if you combine that with the ease of use, or ease of set up, it was a simple decision for us… Chan: What problems were you solving when you had to make the simple decision? Stanley: We needed to get about, over, I’d say somewhere around 75,000 documents indexed relatively quickly, like within a couple of weeks and make sure we had the full interface for it and sort of everything else ready to go. And what was sort of driving that was we wanted to have a release of the Supreme Court Center by the time that the court opened last October. And for us, when we looked at some different alternatives, like doing some of our own programming, or using some of the other search technologies out there, the Google Mini, you know, from our standpoint was just a very simple to use easy solution. We could just install it, index all the data, pull back the data, change the style sheets a little bit, and it just worked. And so that was really one of the driving forces for us. Just as important though to us was the quality of the search results, being able to pull back the relevant documents when people did searches. Chan: You mentioned the crawling algorithms a couple of times. Did you have to configure those or did you use the ones out of the box? How did you do that? Stanley: We pretty much used the ones out of the box. We did a little bit of, sort of additional programming, in terms of getting some searches across the party names of the cases. So there was some additional work that we did there. And a little bit of work on the citations searches, most of which were relatively straight forward, very quick text searches. But as far as the full text goes, the full text searching goes, that was all done with the Google Mini. And then we pulled that result back up, pulled that back to our servers, and we repackaged it with some style sheets that combine in the citation and party name searches into one overall search result. (Emphasis added.) Let me break in to point out that this candid statement back in Jan. ’07 appears to disprove Stanley’s recent claim that a “Regex” error was responsible for all of the alleged sabotage. The only tweaking of the Justia search engine undertaken by Stanley’s team concerned very “straight forward” programming pertaining to the party names and citations, but Google Mini was solely responsible – according to Stanley – for full text searching. Therefore, Stanley’s recent comments given to CNET are further called to question, since, in some of the cases, entire sentences of the Court’s opinion were removed. If Justia programmers didn’t mess with the full text searches, why were specific portions of the text removed? “The ease of just getting it done and not having to worry about it was huge.” Stanley: The main key I think for us is, how can we optimize our engineering resources. Because we have quite a few programmers, it’s very much a, sort of a computer programming-centric organization. And we really want to focus on things that are unique, and that we need to program. And to the extent that we can get plug and play elements like the Google Mini in place that will save some of our programming time, that allows us to do many more projects and go much quicker. Chan: That is the answer I was looking for. If you look at any of the implementations that we’ve talked about with the Google Mini, we’ve found that it really gets down to, I need a quality competent search engine, and I don’t have a lot of time, and I don’t have a lot of resources to spend on that project because I’ve got a lot of other things that I want to work on. And it sounds to me like that solved that problem for you. Stanley: Yeah, I mean absolutely. I mean, basically, and I can’t really sort of understate this, since we’ve spent lots of time building you know, or I’ve spent lots of time with other search engines and building different search products, the ease of use of just getting it done and not having to worry about it is huge. And then again, the other item I always come back to is that the quality of the search results is very very high. The JFK Magic Bullet Theory Aint Got Nothin’ On Justia’s Rogue Regex Anti-Birther Error Theory. All of the cases were working just fine with no sabotage before, during and after this interview (for at least one full year). Then suddenly, miraculously even for the lucky Obama, Tim Stanley’s wonderful search engine powered by Google Mini went nuts on him. His lame excuse that a mysterious coding error was to blame for the precise sabotage of 25 cases citing Minor v. Happersett, the only US Supreme Court case to have directly construed the natural-born citizen clause in the context of a citizenship precedent (by a unanimous court) suddenly became birtherproof… by accident and with no human intervention whatsoever. You know, I might believe this if Chris Angel worked for Justia. Tim Stanley? Wait for it… noz sew mutch. Tim claims that the alleged innocent mistake is responsible for the surgical removal of the case name, “Minor v. Happersett”, along with the official citation… across all 25 cases. We are also asked to believe that various references to The Slaughter-House Cases, Scott v. Sandford and Osborn v. Bank of United States were also innocently removed by the same error, despite the fact that those cases are all tied to the POTUS eligibility debate. Furthermore, key sentences which discuss points of law relevant to Obama’s eligibility must have also been innocently edited out, even though Stanley stated to Chan in ’07 that Justia didn’t do any programming at all with regard to the full text of the cases. Additionally, we must also accept that at the time of this interview, the miraculously wonderful Google Mini was banging out perfect versions of these cases up until the run up to the election in 2008… when all 25 cases suddenly expunged necessary search terms specifically tied to the POTUS eligibility issue. Timing is everything, right? But there’s more… we must also imagine that Stanley’s crack “programming-centric” team, headquartered in the same town as the mighty Google, somehow never found out about the rogue code from 2008 until three years later when I published my first report on the Pope and Boyd cases in July 2011. Can you believe Tim never even wrote to say thank you? A nice picture of Stanley’s dog was called for at the very least. Oh c’mon. Like I’m going to beat those Silicon Valley freaks to the punch on their own damn code. Get the flock outta here. But there’s still more…much much more you have to swallow to buy Stanley’s rogue error theory. You must also accept that the “Regex” error could defy astronomical odds in that the “.*” mentioned by Stanley could pick and choose erasure of the missing case components while the rest of the text was left just fine. And that’s where Dianna Cotter’s next report will come in very handy tomorrow. She has interviewed a university professor with a Ph.D. in computer programming who has gone on the record to say that Stanley’s theory is nuts. Eventually, the computer programming community is going to take Stanley down for this crap. And the legal research community will follow suit. This story is not going away. Just as the dual nationality issue has now over-taken the BC issue, JustiaGate is here to stay and on this point scientific minds will prevail. The silicon whiz kidz are not going to stand by Justia. The techy punk rockers, hackers, Google nerds… etc. all will know that Stanley’s story is BS. OCCUPY JUSTIA! Folks, you have the evidence you need to protect the Constitution. And the stakes are as high as they come. It’s really up to you out on Main Street. If you are lazy with this, the Constitution may never recover. Mark my words. A full investigation needs to take place. The Congress was complicit in not vetting the candidates. But Justia has given them an out of epic proportions in that Justia’s bogus cases changed the national dialogue. If Congress was fooled by Justia (and perhaps this plays into that CRS memo on eligibility which is being looked into more carefully now), they have another chance to make it right. Protest is in the air. The movement on the streets is supposed to be about ending secrecy and forcing the powers that be to come clean. Tim Stanley made $37 million creating databases from our national body of case law. Then his company took criminal liberties with that body of law, sabotaged the living hell out of it, and probably changed national history in the process too. You want to talk about the 1% vs the 99? Here’s a textbook example, kids. Right on! Power to the people. Occupy Justia. That being said, I can only imagine what kind of pressure Tim Stanley is under right now. He almost certainly did not undertake this sabotage on his own initiation. Tim Stanley is now in the very scary position of holding the evidence capable of putting Obama’s administration in true jeopardy. If Stanley was asked, forced or paid to sabotage the cases and/or to maintain them that way after Obama became President, then high crimes were committed. Therefore, Quo Warranto is not the only possible option on the table any longer. Impeachment is now in play. by Leo Donofrio, Esq. Hat tip to Dianna Cotter for finding the Perkins Coie cite to Justia. See attorney Donofrio's initial reports on JustiaGate here, here, and here. For any updates on this current report go here: http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/2011/10/28/look-who-cited-to-justia-for-supreme-court-holding

Those were just his thoughts and he said it could go all the way up to $3.40.

No Because Obama posted his so called new B.C. at that time and most people thought it would be the real thing.

Normally I would agreed with you lakeliving but these people who so far are getting away with this fraud So anybody with a little credibility can help spread the word as to what this administration is doing is a big help.

you're right on the money AoK

Here is the Fox Video http://tinyurl.com/4xbpz2j

Barack Obama's 32 Month Report Card Copy this article. You will need researched material to mail your liberal friends and/or relatives. Mr. Hope and Change wants to create a nation humbled; humiliated, casting-aside capitalism and individual freedoms for one where “we the people” are government controlled. This would be a system that genuflects mediocrity, steals personal aspiration and opportunity, and punishes those who strive to succeed. A gallon of regular gasoline the day Obama was inaugurated was $1.79 on average in the U.S. Today that price is $3.59, a 100.6% increase. The number of food stamp recipients has risen since Obama took office from 31,983,716 to 43,200,878, a 35.1% jump. Long term unemployment soared 146.2% during the same 32 month period from 2,600,000 to 6,400,000. Staggering “hope and change” isn't it? American citizens living in poverty have risen 9.5% from 39,800,000 to 43,600,000, and the number of unemployed has jumped almost 25% from 11,616,000 to 14,485,000 as of August 31, 2011. The number of unemployed blacks has risen from 12.6% at the end of George Bush's term to 15.8% today, a 25.4% increase, and finally, our national debt is up 34.4% from 10.627 trillion to 14,278 trillion * Keep these figures in mind as we recount the number of “firsts” for this presidency: First President to refuse to show a valid birth certificate. First President to apply for college aid as a foreign student, then deny he was a foreigner. First President to have a social security number from a state he has never lived in. First President to preside over a cut to the credit rating of the United States . First President to violate the War Powers Act. First President to be held in contempt of court for illegally obstructing oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico . First President to defy a Federal Judges court order to cease implementing the Health Care Reform Law. First President to require all Americans to purchase a product from a third party. First President to spend a trillion dollars on shovel-ready jobs and later admit there was no such thing as shovel-ready jobs. First President to abrogate bankruptcy law to turn over control of companies to his union supporters. First President to by-pass Congress and implement the Dream Act through executive fiat. First President to order a secret amnesty program that stopped the deportation of illegal immigrants across the U..S., including those with criminal convictions. First President to demand a company hand-over $20 billion to one of his political appointees. First President to terminate Americas ability to put a man in space. First President to encourage racial discrimination and intimidation at polling places. First President to have a law signed by an auto-pen without being present. First President to arbitrarily declare an existing law unconstitutional and refuse to enforce it. First President to threaten insurance companies if they publicly speak-out on the reasons for their rate increases. First President to tell a major manufacturing company in which state they are allowed to locate a factory. First President to file lawsuits against the states he swore an oath to protect (Az, WI, OH, IN) First President to withdraw an existing coal permit that had been properly issued years ago. First President to fire an inspector general of Ameri-corps for catching one of his friends in a corruption case. First President to appoint 45 Czars to replace elected officials in his office. First President to golf 73 separate times in his first two and a half years in office. First President to hide his medical, educational and travel records. First President to win a Nobel Peace Prize for doing NOTHING to earn it. First President to coddle American enemies while alienating Americas allies. First President to publicly bow to Americas enemies while refusing to salute the U.S. Flag. First President to go on multiple global apology tours. First President to go on 17 lavish vacations, including date nights and Wednesday evening White House parties for his friends, paid for by the taxpayer. First President to refuse to wear the U.S. Flag lapel pin. First President to have 22 personal servants (taxpayer funded) for his wife. First President to keep a dog trainer on retainer for $102,000.00 a year at taxpayer expense. First President to repeat “the Holy Qur'an tells us,” and openly admit “the early morning call of the Azan (Islamic call to worship) is the most beautiful sound on earth.” Remember that 32 months of Obama White House we the people have accumulated national debt at a rate more than 27 times as fast as during the rest of our nation's entire history, as the Obama's plan their next extravagant vacation to the Indonesian Island nation of Bali . And I'm sure he isn't done. Hope and change anyone? * sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration, Wall Street Journal, Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Dept of Labor, Standard & Poors/Case-Shiller, Federal Reserve, US Treasury, Heritage Foundation. Posted by John MacHaffie

Well I might add that they do have Dinars over there and just made need them anyway even if we didn't RV. But hey we can always hope anyway.LOL

I'm from Texas and all Rick does as most of them do is follow the money.

K98 I'm glad that you finally see that light.

Very well said and we always said the truth could hurt.

Most of us always knew that there was always a possibility that this could go bad and knew the chances that we were taking. But seeing how this breakup didn't end very nicely has me concern. Most people have wrote it off as nothing so we'll see over the next few weeks as to where we're.

Did you not see how many people he hire at $170,000 a year once he came into office?