buckwheat Posted November 8, 2010 Report Share Posted November 8, 2010 Med: OK I NEED THE FLOOR IF I DELETE AN ARTICLE DO NOT KEEP REPOSTING IT I AM NOT GOING TO LET THIS SITE BE PART OF THIS INSANITY IN IRAQ IF THERE ARE 20 ARTICLES THAT SAY THERE IS AN AGREEMENT I AM NOT GOING TO LET ONE ON THAT CREATES SUCH A STIR I DON’T BELIEVE THE ARTICLE AND THINK IT IS BS I DON’T CARE THOUGH I DON’T WANT IT ON ON THE SAME PAGE IT SAYS ON THERE THAT THEY HAVE AGREED TO FORM I HAVE TO THINK OF THE MEMBERS AND I AM TIRED OF THESE BS STORIES I HAVE TO WEIGH THE FACTS AND MAKE A DECISION I APPRECIATE THAT EVERYONE SEARCHES BUT THIS CREATED SUCH A PROBLEM AND WE KNOW THAT WE COULD HAVE 100 ARTICLES THAT SAID YES AND ONE THAT SAID NO AND WE WOULD SPEND ALL DAY ON THAT ONE ARTICLE AS WE DID WELL ARE THERE ANY ?’S 402raptor: you cleared it up for me thanks Med Med says to (22:17:18): I AM GLAD I JUST DECIDED NOT TO BE A PART OF THERE CRAZINESS AND IF IT IS NOT FROM ALLAWI OR THE SPEAKER FOR THE LIST THEN IT IS NOT LEGIT AND HE HAS NOT DENIED IT DO YOU KNOW WHY BECAUSE HE IS ON HIS WAY TO ERBIL Mawbell: do the swift screens mean anything? or just a preliminary for things to come? I’m confused Med: OF COURSE THEY DO YOU DONT READ MY CHATS DO YOU HON LOL I WENT OVER ALL THIS IN CHAT BUT WILL EXPLAIN AGAIN): THE SWIFT SCREENS ARE HOW ALL INTERNATIONAL BANKS COMMUNICATE THEY HAVE 3 OF THEM ONE FOR TESTING ONE FOR CURRENCIES THAT ARE IN ONE OF THREE POSITIONS THE ONE WE ARE LOOKING FOR IS “LIVE” THAT MEANS THAT THE CURRENCY FROM IRAQ IS NOW A TRADEABLE ONE NO BANK NEEDS ONE OR CENTRAL BANK NEEDS ONE Med says to (22:22:02): UNLESS THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE ONE SO IT IS HUGE NEWS mawbell: I have read your chats–thought they were supposed to go “live” today Projoe: so what will allawi get if they have power sharing it wont be the pm position malilki has made that clear will he have any power at all? Med: THEY DID UGGHHH OK I WILL GO OVER THAT AGAIN ALLAWI’S LIST GOT THE PRESDENT OF PARLIAMENT AND THAT ALL DECISIONS MUST BE AGREED UPON BY THE LIST ALSO AND IN REALITY THE POP IS THE 2ND MOST POWERFUL POSITION IN THE GOVT THE POR IS NOTHING MORE THAN BEING THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND OR THE VP OF THE U.S. IT IS LIKE THE BACKUP QB ON A FB TEAM CARRY THE CLIP BOARD BUT NEVER PLAY Projoe: well at least he got something then Med: IT IS MORE THAN SOMETHING BEING AN OVERSIGHT AND A ROLE IN THE DECISIONS IS HUGE I AM SURE THERE IS MORE jonmac: reduction of power of the PM, more power-sharing? Med AS IN THE MINISTRIES YES JONMAC MALIKI IS NOT SMART ENOUGH TO RUN A COUNTRY ON HIS OWN antyspot: Hello Med it has been a long time and this is about the best news I have heard in over a year Med IT IS GOOD NEWS THERE THOUGH HAS BEEN ALLOT OF POSITIVES FROM CBI THOUGH AND IT IS FUNNY THAT WE THOUGHT WE WOULD ALWAYS HAVE TO WAIT FOR CBI INSTEAD IT IS CBI THAT IS WAITING): I WANT TO ASK THIS IS IT ANY SECRET TO ANYONE WHAT CBI’S INTENTIONS ARE REALLY A bunch of folks replying No Med: THEY HAVE COME OUTRIGHT AND STATED IT projoe: nope especially since the swift screen news came out Med: EXCELLENT I AM ABOVE CONFIDENT ON THE OUTCOME Med chat 11/6/2010 @ 10:30 pm EST Med: HEY ALL OK I JUST TALKED TO SONNY ON THE PHONE FIRST OFF DID I MISS SOME NEWS BEFORE I RUN OFF SO BEFORE I SAY ANYTHING WHAT IS THE NEWS ON THE GOVT I HAVE SOME BUT WANT TO KNOW IF I EVEN NEED TO DISCUSS IT DON’T ALL JUMP IN AT ONCE butterfly: still not sure lol there was a blog post tho tht said some have defected but no articles to back it up Med: OK SONNY CALLED ME ABOUT THE ARTICLE THAT SAID IT WAS ALL A LIE NOW THIS HAS BEEN ON CNN ABC AND FOX SONNY SAID THEY EVEN DID AN INTERVIEW ON FOX I HEARD IT ON IRNUSA RADIO WAS THERE MORE THAN ONE ARTICLE THAT DENIED IT butterfly: i think let me scan real fast Med: OK HE SAID IT SAID THE BLOC HEADS WERE MEETING TOMORROW IN ERBIL butterfly: i see two justnow Med: TO FINALIZE ONE BAD THING IS TOO MANY OF THESE FOOLS CALL THE MEDIA butterfly: they just are all back and forth in there rightnow, one article say they agree, others say they dont. typical Med: YOU HAVE 325 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT BUT 1000 PEOPLE CALL THE MEDIA YES IT IS THE ONLY ONE WAY TO BE SURE OF ANYTHING IS WAIT TILL THURSDAY IF THEY MEET AND VOTE FINE IF NOT ONE THING THAT MIFFS ME IS THE ZEBARI ARTICLE DISCUSSING REMOVAL FROM CHAPTER VII WHEN OBAMA SAID FORGET IT IF THEY DON’T SETTLE IT NOW THE UNSC MEETS ON IRAQ ON TUESDAY REQUESTED BY THE FRENCH GOVT BUT I THINK THIS HAS TO DO WITH THE THREAT TO CHRISTIANS IN IRAQ THEY WERE UPSET OVER IT HOW DO YOU CONTACT THE INTERNATIONAL MEDIA AND HAVE INTERVIEWS IT IS ON ALL OUR NEWS NETWORKS AND RADIO THEN IT IS SUPPOSE TO BE A LIE SOMETHING LIKE THIS CAN’T BE TOLERATED AND THEY CAN’T BE DRAGGING THE U.S. MEDIA INTO THE HOLD PHONE OK SONNY IS READING ME THE ARTICLE THAT DENIES IT AND ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE PAGE IT SAYS THEY HAVE AN AGREEMENT AND ARE MEETING IN IRBIL TO SETTLE IT AND THIS ARTICLE IS NOT FROM ALLAWI SOME MP WHO I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF OK I HAVE TO GO TO THE FORUM Got-UR-back dino: seems the agreement is conditional and the media reported it being done before conditions were met and Allawi was not happy about it. maybe. Med: OK STOP FIRST OFF THERE IS NO LINK TO THE ARTICLE PLEASE WHOEVER POSTED IT PUT IT ON THERE OR DELETE IT AND THE INFO FROM THE LIST DEFECTING IS A BLOG SO IT MEANS SQUAT THERE ARE WAY TOO MANY ARTICLES THAT IT IS SETTLED AND SONNY JUST READ OFF ALL THE U.S. MEDIA OUTLETS THAT CARRIED THE STORY AND NOT ONE DENIAL CAME FROM ALLAWI DON’T YOU ALL THINK THAT THE LEADER OF THE PARTY WOULD MAKE THE DENIAL AND NOT SOME GUY NOONE HAS EVER HEARD OF I PERSONALLY THINK IT IS DONE AND THERE IS AN AGREEMENT 402raptor: way to go Med “debunked” Med: TY RAPTOR IT JUST TAKES A BIT OF RESEARCH projoe: why do they put out articles that say the oposite what do they get out of it Med: AND A FEW PHONE CALLS IT IS TO DISRUPT butterfly: i kept deleting the blog one is there another? Med: THERE WERE SEVERAL ARTICLES THAT CAME OUT ASKING MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO WERE NOT INVOLVED IN NEGOTIATIONS TO SHUT THE H*LL UP AND THEY HAVEN’T YOU HAVE ALLOT OF HATE IN HERE AND ALLOT OF PREDJUDICE BETWEEN THE SECTS AND SOME WISH TO STIR THE POT SO THAT IS ALL I HAVE TO SAY ON THE MATTER UNLESS ALLAWI COMES OUT AND SAYS IT IS FALSE THEN IT IS A DONE DEAL I HAVE NOT SEEN ONE ARTICLE OR AN ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE OFFICIAL SPEAKER FOR THE LIST I AM SORRY IT TOOK SO LONG FOR ME TO GET THIS STRAIGHTENED OUT Med chat 11/6/2010 @ 7 pm EST B Man: Just read the post Iraq denies consent of pres M. Does that mean the people don’t want it? butterfly: i just saw a post of his sayin that he got a phone call that obama had given the kurds an ultimatum and stuff, i am like…. uh, OLD NEWS pal Med: B MAN WHAT IS THAT YOU SAID AND IF YOU READ IT POST IT SO WE ALL KNOW WHAT IT IS ABOUT YESTERDAY I SPENT 30 MINUTES TRYING TO GET SOMEONE TO SPIT OUT SOMETHING HONESTLY IF I CAN’T SEE THE ENTIRE ARTICLE butterfly: its allawi not agreeing to maliki still Med: OH REALLY SO THEY NOW ARE DENYING AN AGREEMENT THAT WAS ON NATIONAL NEWS HERE IN THE U.S. butterfly: http://www.dinarspeculator.com/showt…t-confirmed-it there you go Med: JUST FXXKLDFJAL;FJGL;JAG;LJAG;AGJING GREAT Med says to (18:02:35): busman: one minute one thing, the next another alphonse43: that would be article # 10, 20, 30? on the same subject Med: OK NO THERE ARE TOO MANY WHO ARE REPORTING IT busman: med, could this be the propaganda, you have always warned us about Med: AND THE ONE IS THE ACTUAL SPEAKER FOR THE LIST NOW WHEN THE ARTICLE CAME OUT EARLIER I CAN’T REMEMBER BUT WAS IT ALLAWI WHO GAVE THE STATEMENT OR WAS IT SOMEONE FROM THE RULE OF LAW NOW I KNOW THAT IT HAS BEEN SPREAD AROUND THE WORLD THAT IT IS SETTLED BUT THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE GIVING THESE REPORTS AS LIES ARE TOP DEPUTIES IN THE LIST ME PERSONALLY KNOWING THE PEOPLE IN THAT ARTICLE SAY THERE IS NO AGREEMENT AND IT WAS BS SORRY GANG BUT butterfly: there is one saying that the nassif is gonna be pres instead of allawi Med: THAT IS MY OPINION YES I DON’T THINK ALLAWI WANTS TO BE POP butterfly: so allawi will just totally be out of it i guess Med: YES butterfly: that sucks for him Med: HE WANTED THE POR butterfly: and the people that wanted him Med: BUT THERE IS NO WAY TO COMPARE THE OR EQUALIZE DAYSTAR: thatsa shame, medic I think he is a good man Med: A SPEAKER IN PARLIAMENT TO THE PM IT IS DS SEE IN THE U.S. WE VOTE OUT PEOPLE WHO STEAL AND ARE INEFFECTIVE THEY REELECT THEM WELL HELLS BELLS I DIDN’T WANT TO FEEL THAT GOOD ALL DAY ANYWAYS alphonse43: take it with a grain of salt Med: I ALWAYS DO 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
whiterose Posted November 8, 2010 Report Share Posted November 8, 2010 Thanks for bringing the chat here, Buckwheat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ds2 Posted November 8, 2010 Report Share Posted November 8, 2010 (edited) ok i am confused medick. wasn't it sonny who posted here on DV about one of the articles, and he said goi fromed by the 8th? if so is medick calling sonny a liar? and if medick doesn't like an article posted on his site that he says is BS he dletes it. well i see nothing has changed on his site. what medick says goes if he disagrees he takes action. and people still follow him and live on his every word. if it rv's and he says it hasn't his followers will believe him and not the news. what a squirrel. Edited November 8, 2010 by ds2 3 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Animeshon Posted November 8, 2010 Report Share Posted November 8, 2010 I know I'm being modded, but I hope this gets posted. I'd like to ask a serious question and I know it's not going to be a popular one, but here goes. I've read time and again that we will have a time limit to turn in the large denominations and that once RVed the rate can only fluctuate by 1% for 90 days. So what is to stop Iraq from lopping the zeros giving 90 days to turn in the large bills, then once ou of the hands of investors like us to raise the rate? I know I've heard "our government wouldn't allow us to invest in this only to get screwed, but the mortgage debacle comes to mind real quick when that's said. Let's face it, if our government could get them at or below what we paid for the dinar and they have agreements in place to hold them for 6 months, they put out a little and make a hell of a lot and Bush's claim of this war paying for itself still holds true. As I said, not going to be a popular question, but I would like to hear theories against this scenario. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ha ha Posted November 8, 2010 Report Share Posted November 8, 2010 Yes, Med directs the waves over there in his forum. He says the rate would be .86, everybody agreed with him. l was there with him until l couldn't take it no more. Med cannibalized Maliki in the internet for no good reasons. Now that the screens are showing up, according to his followers, he is still in denial. Thats who he is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammiePJ Posted November 8, 2010 Report Share Posted November 8, 2010 Nothing personal against Medic.... but i have been around for a long time... and i was a member on his site.. until i got booted for asking too many questions. i beleive everyone has a right to thier own opinion. but honestly... come on... it sounds more like med is more upset because DV posted it first... So ROCK ON sonny.. I BELIEVE YOU.. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dukeest Posted November 8, 2010 Report Share Posted November 8, 2010 Don't we have the Elections from march showing ALLAWI the winner then they Certified the Results . Why cant the UN IMF USA GCC OR THE WTO just help up hold or enforce these RESULTS as Written Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinarDiva007 Posted November 8, 2010 Report Share Posted November 8, 2010 I know I'm being modded, but I hope this gets posted. I'd like to ask a serious question and I know it's not going to be a popular one, but here goes. I've read time and again that we will have a time limit to turn in the large denominations and that once RVed the rate can only fluctuate by 1% for 90 days. So what is to stop Iraq from lopping the zeros giving 90 days to turn in the large bills, then once ou of the hands of investors like us to raise the rate? I know I've heard "our government wouldn't allow us to invest in this only to get screwed, but the mortgage debacle comes to mind real quick when that's said. Let's face it, if our government could get them at or below what we paid for the dinar and they have agreements in place to hold them for 6 months, they put out a little and make a hell of a lot and Bush's claim of this war paying for itself still holds true. As I said, not going to be a popular question, but I would like to hear theories against this scenario. Wrong thread Go to Lop and read up Has been addressed numerous times Study Study Study! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveI Posted November 8, 2010 Report Share Posted November 8, 2010 Noted for the record. God Bless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts