soldier4freedom Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair said it would have been "right to remove" Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein even without evidence that he had weapons of mass destruction. It was the "notion of him as a threat to the region" which had tilted him in favor of the invasion of Iraq in 2003, Blair ...More... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mongo Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair said it would have been "right to remove" Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein even without evidence that he had weapons of mass destruction. It was the "notion of him as a threat to the region" which had tilted him in favor of the invasion of Iraq in 2003, Blair ...More...I think the straw that broke the camels back was Saddam was going to dump the dollar for the euro. The feds couldn't have that, the other oil rich middle east nations might have followed suite to separate the dollar from OIL!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joe Posted December 12, 2009 Report Share Posted December 12, 2009 Sadam was the weapon of mass destruction...look what he did to Iraq! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts