Enorrste

That's an interesting speculation, Dandy, certainly possible. I have another post that I will bring in later that shows that the World Bank is deeply involved in getting the techonlogical aspects of the RV into place. Not surprisingly the post is dated only a couple of days after the fake coup attempt, and the post indicated that their work is now complete (!) In addition, only a day after that, Warka bank announced that the ATMs in over 215 countries in the world would now be able to deal in dinars. What? Dinars? Yes, that is what the article said. Does that indicate that we are close, or what? Steve

Let’s quote one line at a time and rephrase it and this should become more clear. Rainbow: symbolizing a rainbow connecting Iraq to US-the RV is completed. Retranslation: Operation Rainbow is a covert joint operation between the US government and the Iraq, clearly “connecting” them now; it has occurred and the RV is a “done deal”. Now before you say I’m stretching let’s move to the next line, and on from there: Governor of Najaf, confirmed that the bombing of the rainbow of the latest terrorist goal to cause chaos and make media. Retranslation: The Governor of Najaf, (who is in charge of this operation) confirms that “Operation Rainbow” is successful in terms of making it look like a terrorist event, which will allow the appearance of chaos and become a media event. You see the phrase “of the latest terrorist goal” now can be understood that it isn’t the goal of the terrorists themselves but a covert goal to look terrorist! It is THEIR goal, i.e., the goal of the US/Iraq coalition. The governor of Najaf, Adnan al in a statement to the rainbow that the latest terrorist bombing in the city caused by a number of devices manufactured locally and aims to cause confusion and make a media and political. Retranslation: I, Adnan Zurufi, (soldier of the US and Governor of Najaf under your command) send this statement about Operation Rainbow (“to” means “in reference to”) that the latest terrorist bombing in the city was made possible (by us!) through the use of a number of devices which we found manufactured locally (so we remain anonymous). This will cause confusion and increase media and political turmoil. On the other hand he Zurfi to tighten security measures, including a comprehensive review of the work of the security services may include changing the leadership of some regions, as well as to prevent vehicles from entering certain areas and to identify special places for parking. Retranslation: As a result I, Adan Zurufi will tighten security measures, including a comprehensive review of the work of the security services. This may include changing the leadership of some regions in Iraq. In addition we may also prevent vehicles from entering certain areas as well as identify special parking zones (for added security). Hassani assure the rainbow: the decline in the export of Iraqi oil caused by a region. Retranslation: (My agent) Hassani reports that Operation Rainbow is a success. However we do have a concern in that oil exports in one region are less than projected. Between a member of the House of Representatives Hadi al-Hassani of the rainbow, the share of Iraq's oil in the fifties of the last century were narrow with lots of Saudi Arabia and Iran in terms of productivity, but wars that the policy pursued by the dictatorial regime and the policy of regional intervention led to the decline in the share of Iraq's oil should have been to Iraq today to issue a A total of five million barrels a day. Retranslation: (My agent) Hadi al Hassani, member of the House of Representatives, a part of Operation Rainbow, reported to me that the share of Iraq’s oil in the 50s of the last century were lower in comparison to Saudi Arabia and Iran, and that the wars of Saddam Hussein plus his interventionist policies caused Iraq’s oil export share to decline. Had this not happened we should be at 5 million barrels a day. On the political position of the hidden and declared to Saudi Arabia from the overall process of political transition in the country; Hassani, the deputy pointed out that Riyadh is opposed to any project renaissance wakes up from the rubble of dictatorship and the ravages of war brought down the debt evidenced by the lack of Iraq's support for the result of the tyranny of unjust wars, as they look to their interests in the region look purely sectarian. Retranslation: As far as keeping Operation Rainbow hidden except to Saudi Arabia in regard to the process of politically transforming Iraq, (my agent) Hassani says that the deputy from Saudi Arabia told him that Riyadh is opposed to anything that might lead to a new dictatorship in Iraq. He reminds us that Saudi Arabia has already reduced the debt of Iraq to them but also that they are happy that Iraq has shown no support for local insurrections. In summary, Saudi Arabia finds it in their interests to deal with this as a sectarian issue (and not religious). Once we have unraveled this email we now can discuss the implications of it. There are several implications that can be drawn from this. Let me enumerate the most obvious: (1) Operation Rainbow is a real operation that has been identified, finally. (2) It involves covert operations done jointly by the US and Iraq in which acts are committed that “appear” to have been done by terrorists. You have witnessed Operation Rainbow in action this week. And what does it tell us? It tells us that the Obama administration, as I said yesterday, is in concert with Maliki to give the “appearance” that they have nothing to do with this operation. What do they get from this? They get a huge media hype that says that the terrorists are still a serious concern, but also that the wonderful Maliki government efficiently squelched this coup attempt in quick order. Everyone say, “Yeah, Maliki!” But in addition they also get to remove 500 dissidents from the streets (news release) and restricted parking. And, if necessary some of the leaders of other regions may even be removed (prior to the election). Did I leave something out? Think! Rainbow: symbolizing a rainbow connecting Iraq to US-the RV is completed. Now I’m a firm believer in the concept of “plausible deniability” so I will state, for the record, that I do not know the source of this memo. I trust the person who sent it to me and he trusts his source. That is all that can be said at this point. At the same time, folks, you have to admit this: what we just saw from a simple Google search and some logic sure makes sense. The conclusion of the email is stated in the first line: The RV is completed. I can safely tell you that in my opinion this email is not only genuine: it also confirms the following: Obama and Maliki are a team and the passage of the ECC and the 11th hour calls by Obama proved that. Now we can confidently add that the undercover Operation Rainbow is another key element in this process. But more than that: Operation Rainbow is a precursor to the RV. And even more: Its success ensures that “the RV is complete.”

So I was intrigued when I saw the end of The Windchimer Walkers post: So now--one and a half years later--we hear that Adnan Alzurufi, the leader of that Detroit area pro-war demonstration, has been named governor of Najaf, a real hotspot in the war-that-never-ends. Not only that, but this same individual was seen in a photo taken during the war in Iraq, wearing a U.S. military uniform. He's pretty tight with Bush and Rumsfeld, I'd say. Clearly the last statement is a personal one made by the blogger. But that she also indicated that Adnan had served as an American soldier caught my eye. In light of the other data it makes clear sense. At this point I began to wonder just how “connected” this man is and came to the conclusion that if he isn’t CIA he certainly should be! And in any case, it is now obvious that he has been molded to perform very important functions in the war in Iraq. Now you might say that my last statement is a stretch, so I will show you another link in this story from August of 2004: [Fact] http://nucnews.net/nucnews/2004nn/0408nn/040824nn.htm The relevant quote from this news story follows: The governor of Najaf, Adnan Al-Zorfi, said Iraqi forces were ready and could attack at any time. ``We are waiting the decision by the political leadership,'' he said. [Analysis] This statement truly amazed me. This young rebel from Saddam escapes, comes to Chicago and Detroit, marches in favor of the war, somehow joins the American armed forces, and then ends up in mid 2004 as the Governor of the Najaf region by appointment of the Pentagon and, presumably, Bush himself. That’s where we were until this last little tidbit. Then, miraculously, only 4 months later, this man states unequivocally that he has prepared Iraqi forces to attack “at any time”. Now I’ve never been in the military but I can say with some degree of certainty that NOTHING happens this quickly, especially in Iraq! I begin now to put my thinking cap on and I am thinking that this guy is really something. In fact he is more than something. He is important. Can we not agree that it is reasonable to say that this guy is important? It’s time to shift gears and set aside Adnan and his miraculous career until we can determine the meaning of “the rainbow”. Let’s go back to the original email and see if we can glean something on which to “hang our hats”. Rainbow: symbolizing a rainbow connecting Iraq to US-the RV is completed This is probably the most exciting linkage of the term Rainbow I could have imagined because it has Iraq, the US, and the complete RV in the same sentence! But let’s not get too excited until we figure out what this term Rainbow really refers to. I guarantee you that you will all be blown away when this comes together. Why? Because it will confirm some of what I said last night in Chat about Obama’s role in the goings-on in Iraq. Put on your new hats. It’s time to Google. From the email we have these clues to attach to “rainbow”: the bombing of the rainbow, and a statement to the rainbow, and assure the rainbow. Clearly these are strange statements. The first phrase would seem to indicate that the rainbow is a thing, or a place, or an event; but the second seems to indicate that it is a person, as does the third. How in the world can we unravel this? So I started with the first and did a simple Google search of the phrase. Here is what I found: [Fact] http://www.nzgirl.co.nz/articles/3986 Surprisingly this is a blog or some sort of personal website from a girl in New Zealand! But I’m patient so I read awhile and came upon this: On the night of 10th July 1985 the Greenpeace flagship ‘Rainbow Warrior’ (easily recognised from its dark green hull with a rainbow and peace dove painted on the side), had already been in Auckland Harbour for three days preparing for a protest voyage to the French nuclear test site. At 10 minutes to midnight a bomb blast ripped open the ‘Rainbow Warrior’. A crew member, photographer Fernando Pereira, returned to the ship after initially escaping to retrieve his equipment. A second bomb exploded. As the Rainbow Warrior sunk, Pereira drowned. New Zealanders awake the next morning to hear that their country had hosted its first international terrorist act. On the surface we see a terrorist act called “the Rainbow warrior”. But I kept reading and came upon this link: http://www.greenpeace.org/international/about/history/the-bombing-of-the-rainbow-war And, once again, I found the relevant quote: Initially, the French government denied all knowledge but it soon became obvious that they were involved. Soon French Prime Minister Fabius appeared on television to tell a shocked world, "Agents of the DGSE (Secret Service) sank this boat. They acted on orders." The French minister of defense resigned. [Analysis] So, what do we see here? We see the following: the “Rainbow” was a ship that Greenpeace owned to attempt to stop nuclear testing by the French near New Zealand. People protested but eventually the French took out the ship. It was done by the French Secret Service and came to be known as “The Rainbow Warrior”. So the Rainbow is both a thing, namely a ship, and an event. But what is the nature of that event? Was it a terrorist act? No, it was a covert act of a legitimate government made to look like a terrorist act. At this point I knew that I’d come upon something VERY BIG. And at that instant I also knew what “the rainbow” is in Iraq today. I will tell you clearly what “the rainbow” is: the “Rainbow” is a covert act done in concert between the US government and Iraq and made to look like a terrorist event. In other words, “Operation Rainbow” is a code name for a covert operation. If you are with me up to this point you know it is time to go back to the email and see if we can “translate” this document into understandable English.

3. The Next Step to Truth Now since posting this I have been fortunate enough, along with my partners at our forum, to add to this documented information. In fact the additional information is so powerful that each and every step confirms the prior one, and continues to build on the solid foundation of FACT that began this analysis. This section includes the one email in this whole document. As you will see as I proceed it is a powerful email and its content strongly suggests that it is legitimate. What is

Clearly HG and his source have stumbled onto a communication from Zurufi, the governor of Najaf (and probable undercover CIA operative) in which the results of Operation Rainbow are summarized, cryptically, for sure, but not to the extent that we couldn't determine exactly what was being said. And we see that the news reports confirm the content of this email also, to the letter. And further we see that the technique employed in the Iraqi Operation Rainbow mirrors the Israeli Operation Rainbow as well. This is justification for the link that stated that Israel is an "equal partner" in the occupation of Iraq. But with whom is Israel an equal partner? The United States of America! Now I knew that we were making some real progress. But I needed to find more clarification. What does the writer of the email mean when he says "the RV is completed"? Personally I found this little project to be quite fascinating in that it took us into the realms of Robert Ludlum intrigue. We see that the US has had a close alliance with Israel, of all people in the occupation of Iraq. That was certainly a shocker to me, at first. However, when you stand back and think about it we find that it only makes sense for Israel to be willing to support the US in Iraq. After all, only Iraq of all ME countries holds even a remote possibility to eventually have some sort of "normal" relationship with Israel. And as a burgeoning democracy, which Israel is as well, these two countries would be the ONLY democratic states in the ME. Furthermore, it is in the best interest of Israel to have any kind of relationship with Iraq since Israel needs oil. So after consideration it is only plausible that Israel would cooperate with the US in the occupation of Iraq, however secretly. Next, we see that in some "real" sense Operation Rainbow is the child of Israel and not just the US and Iraq alone. This is tacit confirmation of the fact that Israel is cooperating with the US in Iraq. The technique used by the Iraqi government in Operation Rainbow has the "fingerprints" of the Israeli Mosad all over it. Next we have to understand that all three parties deemed it necessary to stage this false coup attempt. The reasons for doing so are few, but two stand out clearly to me: First, the obvious reason is to make the Maliki government look efficient, on top of things, and powerful in the drive to create a democratic state. Second, by the content of the email itself, this event seems to have allowed the "completion" of the RV. It seems clear to me that the primary goal of the fake coup is reason number 2 and that reason number 1 is only an ancillary benefit. So this brings us back to that first question above: What does the writer mean when he says, "the RV is completed"? The answer to this would have been obvious had we awakened to a new exchange rate for the IQD. However that did not happen and has not happened, yet. At the same time I find no other way to understand the phrase "the RV is completed" except that it means the rate is now ready to be changed. In other words, whatever timing or opening the fake coup allowed was used to complete the preparations for the change in exchange rates for the IQD We know from the link I provided that the ISX was closed. In addition the banks were closed temporarily as well. It would appear to me, then, that whatever final preparations they needed to make could possibly have reguired this shutdown so that the "testing" could take place without being revealed. This, incidentally, is entirely consistent with the intent and MO of an "Operation Rainbow" event. So with each passing day we step one step closer to seeing the fulfillment of this clear and simple statement: "the RV is complete". After what has been presented I am confident that the email is genuine. We know that the players are genuine and that their backgrounds are consistent with a secret operation. We also know that Operation Rainbow is real and has a history consistent with what took place early last week in Iraq. And finally the email is written in such a cryptic sense that it would pass over the attention of 95% of the people who might see it, except for someone in the know, and someone expecting it. So we are left with the conclusion that we have fortuitously fallen into the hands of a "real" communiqu

4. Where does Operation Rainbow Come From? I knew at this point that Operation Rainbow seemed to be a very real event. But I wondered what in the world would cause the writer of the email to call it by the name Operation Rainbow. I was surprised to find the answer to this question. The email that Highgrade received appears to have been originally written in Arabic. What intrigued me is the cryptic phrases regarding the term rainbow and the weird terminology that required my having to "retranslate" it for it to make sense even to me. What is even stranger is that the "author" speaks fluent English, as we know from the from his biography which I linked above. [Fact] Here is the first link: http://www.jstor.org/pss/4415643 The title of the page is interesting in itself: Israel: An equal partner in the occupation of Iraq I'd like you to go to the bottom of the first column and read that last paragraph. Here is the first mention of Operation Rainbow. I will explain what it is. The Israeli government had an "Operation Rainbow" as well which happened in 2004. In brief, they entered into the Gaza Strip under the guise that there were tunnels that terrorists were using to potentially get nukes into Gaza. [Analysis] But here is the point: the entire thing was created by the government of Israel as a pretext for another mission. We see that there is an historical context for the term "Operation Rainbow": a covert government event made to appear as a response to terrorist activity. [Fact] Here is another link: http://www.merip.org/mero/mero060404.html [Analysis] You may all read this at your leisure; it will expound on the Israeli action and show clearly that it was questioned as to "veracity" and that it became known as Operation Rainbow. [Fact] Now here is another link: http://www.dawn.com/2004/06/03/op.htm. And the relevant quote: The Israeli spin machine describes the Rafah operation as a move to destroy terrorist hideouts, tunnels and bomb factories. Palestinians present a quite different explanation for Operation Rainbow, one that has little to do with security and terrorist threats, and much to do with revenge and collective punishment. Cynics would argue that, of course, the Palestinians are going to say that. But what about Israeli newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth? Yedioth Ahronoth could not be described as a natural supporter of Palestinian views. Yet in its editorial the paper too said Operation Rainbow had little to do with tunnel-busting. "This is a strong-armed operation intended to dull the impression - in both Israeli and Palestinian consciousness - of the attacks in which 13 Israeli soldiers were killed. In delicate language, this is 'searing the consciousness'. In slightly less polite wording, this is revenge, pure and simple." [Analysis] Now we move from our knowledge of the Israeli Operation Rainbow to the Iraqi Operation Rainbow [Fact] Here is the first link: http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Baghda...p.-a0216385360 This article is about the recent "attempted coup" that occurred last week. Here is the relevant quote: A spokesperson for the Baghdad Operations Command (BOC), Maj. Gen. Qassem Ata, denied the news about a military plot to overthrow the government. [Analysis] So even within the hierarchy of the Iraqi military it was obvious to some that this was a scam and that the Batthists either had nothing to do with it or at least could not have pulled it off so quickly. [Fact] The next link: http://isxwatch.com/?p=634 and the relevant quote: Iraq

I submit that Maliki is following the direction that the US followed to the letter, and that in giving Shabbibi the keys to the RV he was doing exactly what Roosevelt did when he created the Federal Reserve. Of course in the case of Iraq the CBI came first, but without the keys what does it mean? Not much. Now, we have reasoned that Maliki has transferred the keys to Shabbibi in order to add to the “transparency” that will lead to his election. He has created a Code of Conduct law to present himself as above reproach. He has also given the authority to revalue the currency to the head of the CBI. He is clean! But wait, he still needs to get re-elected. And his prospects aren’t great given the current state of the economy and the depressed conditions of the people. He must have a solution. And he does have one. The solution is the RV itself. Based on this logic and reasoning we now can understand why he stated on December 13 of last year that he intended to RV the currency (“bring Iraq into the international financial community”) either late in 2009 or in 2010. We can also now see that it must occur before the election for it to have any affect on his election. So, whether there is a condition in the ECC to prohibit certain financial acts of corruption 30 days before the election or not we need not worry ourselves, yet. The only thing we need to ask ourselves is this: when does he have to do it, and what are the implications if he waits? This brings us to this simple conclusion. The RV is the key to Maliki’s re-election effort. It has always been the key. It was designed to be the key, probably in concert with the Obama administration and possibly with the connivance of the UN and IMF, who see their own goals also being met through the RV. Hillarious Clinton came so close to letting the cat out of the bag this week when she gave a speech to potential investors in Iraq at Washington DC. She said the opportunity was so ripe that it is now “palpable”. That word means “so close you could touch it”. I submit to you all this final statement: “The RV is the key to Maliki’s re-election. It will occur in the immediate future and ensure that election. Obama has played a key role in making this happen as have the IMF and the UN, and because of that we can be assured that it will happen. It will happen before the election in order to make the election of Maliki assured.”

[Fact] The following post helps us to understand what they mean and how they apply: Conscious / MP Sabah al-Saadi: In the Absence of Approving the Budget, the Government Would Resort to Exchange Rate Mechanism in the Next Week Conscious / Baghdad / p. X 5/1/2010 6:50 pm The Attorney-Sabah al-Saadi on the mass of virtue that not approving the budget means to give the opportunity for the Government to find the exchange rate mechanism, especially in the twelfth of this month for the maintenance work of the ministries and government institutions. Saadi said in a telephone conversation with (the Iraqi Media News Agency / conscious) that "the linkage between the law of the Federal budget for 2010 and the Electoral Code of Conduct is not just for the fact that the financial budget Aims to support the wheel of the state of Iraq in building, construction, investment, either the Electoral Code of Conduct which regulates the work of actors in the political, governmental mechanisms for the disbursement of state funds in order not to allow them to exploit the money for their campaigns. " He added that "the Iraqi parliament work of great importance, namely the ratification of the federal budget for the continuity of work in government ministries, as we reflect on the end of the legislative term of life of the parliament completed the budget law and to ratify it." As well as "completion of the electoral code of conduct because this law will determine the exchange rate mechanism, political entities so that there is not financial corruption by the state to finance election campaigns and also to stop Power of some parties at the expense of some of the entities participating in the upcoming parliamentary elections " Adding "in the absence of ratification of the budget during these days Vstljo government to exchange rate mechanism, legal The effect on 12 /1 1-12 With a view to continuing the performance of ministries and government institutions and service productivity. " Clearly the translation of this document is difficult but what is easy to understand is hi-lighted in bold red. [Analysis] We now know what it means. I will explain why I believe I am right. The second piece of he puzzle is now before us. We know that the RV will take place, and soon, from the first two documents. This document adds information that at first appears to muddy the waters but will be shown to actually clarify the issue for us. The statement is simple: passing of the ECC will “determine” the ERM. As I stated in my post this makes no sense whatsoever in English. But if we understand that it is a translation from Arabic to English we can obtain the meaning. The word “determine” has many meanings in English. The most used is to “make happen”. For this reason it doesn’t make sense that the ECC would “make happen” the ERM. They aren’t really related to each other. The first deals with election fraud and the second with currency fluctuations. However if we use a less known meaning of the word “determine” in this document it all becomes more clear. That meaning is to “render” or “allow to occur”. It softens the determinative nature of the word that first comes to mind. This is what occurred to me this evening and when it did it all made sense. The ECC and the ERM are not directly related, obviously. They refer to two different functions completely. But if the creation of one leads to the enactment of the other then we have not only a relationship but we can also say that the first “determined” the second. Or, to soften it, the first “rendered or allowed” the second to occur. Let’s put this into simple English. What the document states is this: “Unless and until the ECC is passed the ERM can’t come into play.” In other words the passage of the ECC is necessary (determines) for the ERM to take affect. Let’s summarize where we are, at ground level. We now know from documentation that the RV will take place, that it will take place soon, and that the passage of the Electoral Code of Conduct is necessary to be in place prior to the Exchange Rate Mechanism becoming affective. The passage of the ECC is a necessary precursor (determines) as to whether the ERM will come into play. While it doesn’t literally give birth to the ERM, the ERM will not be in play without it. Events are enfolding quickly since both the ECC and the ERM are already in place! [Fact] Among the many news links that show the ECC passed is this one: http://www.paltelegraph.com/world/mi...-electoral-law The law was passed on December 7, 2009, less than 35 days ago, and even then only with the concerted 11th hour phone call from President Obama. This is from the news directly. [Analysis] We now move into the realm of logic and reasoning The logic and reasoning will be based upon sound documentation. We have Maliki deeply involved in this, clearly. He has stated his intentions to the UN that he intends to RV the dinar and bring Iraq into the “international financial community” from our second document. He clearly has the backing of the UN from the first document. So what is relevant? Only two things are relevant. They are the ECC and the ERM. Let’s figure out why. We now know that the relationship between the ECC and the ERM is that the first must precede the second. Yet the word “determines” hangs in the balance between them for an additional reason which we now need to explore. The ECC, the Electoral Code of Conduct, is a law that lays out for the Iraqi people what can and cannot occur prior to this important election. It is a standard, if you will, placed right before the election to allow for a clean and fair fight. President Obama would use the word “transparency” to describe the purpose of this law. Wait, President Obama was the arbiter at the 11th hour to ensure that this law was passed. Is the “transparency” president injecting himself into this? No doubt about it, folks. It is logical and reasonable that the Iraqi people would want a transparent election. But the need for a special “transparency” law just prior to the election seems a bit contrived, don’t you think? I mean aren’t there already election laws? Iraq didn’t form out of a bubble. They’ve actually had a couple elections already, and successfully. So what’s the big deal? And why is Obama involved? Yet the law passes and no one is the wiser. We now have “transparency” in Iraq just prior to the election, thanks to President Obama and Mr. Maliki. However, it apparently occurred to Mr. Maliki that this was not enough to ensure his election without question. And at this point we aren’t even sure he has a very good chance to be elected, but he seems to have a plan, and the plan involves the ECC. The plan allows him to have “transparency” through the passage of this law. He’s clean! But it isn’t enough. He needs more protection, even more transparency. He decides that he has to do just one more thing to guarantee this transparency. He passes the authority for revaluing the IQD directly to Shabbibi, the head of the CBI. Now this is interesting. That would be like Obama giving Bernanke the authority to revalue the dollar. Is that logical, or reasonable? I don’t think so. I’m sure Timothy Geitner wouldn’t think so either. When in the history of the world has a government given such great authority to a non-governmental entity? Oops. You got it. We did. Remember? 1933. Creation of the Federal Reserve? Now you will say, “Steve, you are getting into conspiracy theory now!” And I answer this question with a question: What is a conspiracy? A conspiracy is when a group of men (the big boys) get together and make a decision that affects the little guys, good or bad. So yes, I’m into conspiracy theory now.

2. A Fresh Beginning We start with the post I made one day after the “award winning” summary post: Finding Ground Level, once and for all! I have decided to indulge myself to try to present a unified statement the current situation and where the pieces are starting to fit together. [Analysis] It is now evident to me that the RV is part of a large political process for the people in control in Iraq. At the same time it is also a part of a very important process in the goings on within the UN. And, finally, I have come to believe that it is going to turn out to be a seminal portion of the US government strategy, inherited from the Bush administration but delightfully now obtained by the Obama administration. Shall we begin? The RV event, as I will call it, has had a number of pieces to it that have come to light in the recent past. We can easily recall them: Chapter VII, GCC membership, IMF goals, US Govt involvement due to the war, China as a quickly rising world power; the upcoming Iraqi elections; the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM); the new IMF loan. Now all of us are familiar with these concepts and have heard innumerable explanations as to how they fit into the big RV picture. And with the same familiarity we have seen these scenarios fall by the wayside, one by one. The reason is simple in hindsight: most of these scenarios don’t have enough fact in them to support themselves; so they collapse under their own weight. What I want to accomplish for us all in this post is to build the grounded base that we have all chatted about on a very solid footing so that we won’t have to cover the same ground again. But more than that I want us all on the same page so that as new information that is backed by a document becomes available we can place it onto our foundation of truth and be able to be confident in it. This would place us uniquely above the blogs and position us to possibly actually know what is going on, if not what is going to go on. So the goal here is to begin by building blocks of truth, a foundation of knowledge that is irrefutable on which we can add layers as events continue. Of course the problem arises that we are dealing with Arabs and we have all come to learn that their reasoning doesn’t follow our own. So we have to proceed with caution, knowing that no matter how logical WE are, they may have a different logic that could throw us off track. Clearly that is what has happened over the last 2 years as we have expected at every turn that any single item was the last one needed before our coveted prize presented itself. So let’s begin to build our foundation of knowledge. What do we really know? Fortunately we know that the Iraqi government and the UN have stated that there is a clear intention to revalue the dinar in the foreseeable future. We know this from two documents from legitimate sources. This is our starting point. [Fact] The first document comes from the United Nations itself. I intend this to be the “ground level,” so to speak, and a reference document that will be the “source” document for what we know to be the case. Here is the link: http://www.un.org/News/Press/docs/2009/gaab3917.doc.htm This link is the actual UN document that says that the UN intends to increase the value of the dinar. I presented my “brief” on this in the post at this link, which you have all probably read: http://ragtime2bigtime.com/showthread.php?t=1161 I will attach my summary of that so we are all together: [Analysis] What does this mean? Here it is: the UN is trying to more equitably assess dues to its members. It wants to base those dues on the most recent gross national income available and use market exchange rates wherever possible. In the case of Iraq, however, a decision was added to “adjust the market exchange rate for Iraq” in order to get their dues level commensurate with their income. Now this is the significant point: the UN is clearly deciding in this document that the dinar has to be revalued in order for Iraq to pay its fair share of UN dues. I see no other explanation possible for this statement on Iraq. We now can establish that the UN is “on board” with the revaluation of the dinar. Admittedly it is for reasons of its own; yet the fact remains that it has “decided”, in its own words, to do it. This is key, since when this was written last summer the UN was in control of Iraq. What is said then will indeed happen. After all the UN still controls Iraq. [Fact] Fortunately we also have internal Iraqi documentation that backs up this statement from none other than Nuri al Maliki himself, the head of the government of Iraq. The link is as follows: http://www.dinarrumor.com/showthread.php?t=10647 (This is copied from the actual resolution into DinarRumor) The key statement from Maliki is here, dated 13 December 2009, only 30 days ago : During the remainder of 2009 and in 2010, we will take action to recover the international financial standing of Iraq while at the same time managing oil and gas revenues in order to benefit the people of Iraq. [Analysis] Recovering the international financial standing can mean nothing other than revaluing the currency to its former level prior to the Hussein regime. We are now in a position to state without hesitation that the RV will occur and that it is in the interest of the UN and Iraq that it occur. In addition, since the UN document refers to dues coming up in 2010 we know that the RV will occur before the dues are paid. And finally we know from Maliki himself that his intention is for this to happen either at the end of 2009 or in 2010. The fact that Maliki mentioned 2009 or 2010 only 17 days before the end of the year is a clear indication that the RV is imminent. If it were not he would have said “in 2010” instead of what he said. We are firmly planted now on solid ground. From clear documentation from the international organization as well as the in-country head we know that the RV will occur in 2010 and most like early in this year. But more than that, Maliki was prepared to do the RV as early as the end of 2009, so we can say with confidence that the RV is “at the door”. This comes from no rumors or “higher ups” or blogs. It comes from two documents only, both of significant authority. We are on solid ground. Having established, therefore, that it is the intention to RV the dinar and that it is the intention of the head of Iraq to do so in the very near future we need to see how he might accomplish this from documents, to ensure that his statement to the UN comes to pass. We can do this quite simply and without having to resort to loans from the IMF or expiration dates of a programmed rate or even loan payment deadlines. All we have to do is look at the documents and figure out what they mean and how they apply.

Due to the large size of this site I have elected to take the advice of some people from last night to post on the forum the information that I wish to impart. I have written a book on the topic above. I will post the introduction and then post each chapter in succession until I have posted the entire book here. There are 14 chapters to this book. Some posts may be broken into several parts due to length. I hope that my effort will stimulate discussion in chat. If it does I will gladly participate. If, on the other hand, it doesn't then at least you will have the benefit of my research here. The first post will be the Table of Contents and Introduction, which follows just below. Then I will post tonight the part that I dealt with in chat a few days ago. Finally in a third post tonight I will post what I wanted to present last night but was not able to do. Hopefully it will lead to a spirited discussion. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. A Fresh Beginning Finding Ground Level, once and for all! 3. The Next Step to Truth What is