ajskj

The key to interpreting the Revelation is, for the most part, the Old Testament. Period. And you apply these symbols used in Revelation that were taken from the Old Testament to the life of Jesus and the early church. You find the stories of the Old Testament, from which Revelation takes references, actually PARALLEL Jesus and the early church! I guarantee, that if you were to start recognizing this, you would wonder in absolute glory at the wisdom of God in ending the Bible with this book! (And I might add you would chuckle at the literal interpretation). You would! First of all, Revelation begins using TEMPLE SYMBOLS. Candlesticks mentioned as being BEHIND JOHN, who has to TURN and see where the voice comes. When he TURNS, he sees the seven candlesticks (the seven-branched menorah). If he had to TURN, then where in the tabernacle would he have faced if the candlesticks were directly BEHIND HIM? They were SOUTH in the holy place. That means, John faced NORTH. And what was NORTH? THE TABLE OF SHEWBREAD! John was truly FEASTING in the Spirit on the bread and wine! Revelation tells us that the spirit of prophecy is the TESTIMONY OF JESUS. What is the testimony of Jesus? Why, none other than the DEATH, BURIAL AND RESURRECTION, and His ascendant glory! Revelation is speaking about THAT. Its NOT the end of the world that is in mind. Its a REVELATION of Jesus, and HIS COVENANT! http://mikeblume.com/symbrev.htm

You have nothing good or relevant to say to anything and you are a waste. Yeah....siris IS. Thanks for agreeing.

ROFLMAOAY!! Shall I quote the MANY things you have tried to insult me with?? Nah...I'm not that much of a whiner. Carry on.

Already have. Revelations is symbolic...not literal.

Why should I? She has a right to her opinion....just not blatant lies.

Sorry, Siris...but I am not the one throwing insults. And by the way...even RUSTY admitted that I debunked THIS lie.... And every time you talk about fluoride...this plays in the background...

You forgot your tin foil, fluoride boy.....

Revelations is not a literal book.

ROFLMAOAY!!! I googled Bush drunk and came up with 58,200,000 results. Is that true?? And you have yet to debunk anything I have said, fluoride head.....despite your pouting and stomping your foot. Not at all.....it's only one of MANY that I have debunked here.

WHO INSULTED JESUS OF NAZARETH???

You think the birthers are EVERYBODY?? Sorry no, not everybody....just you and the birthers. Look it up, rusty....even WND pulled the story.

He probably put fluoride on your tin foil....ROFLOL....

SNOPES is not the only one to look into this...and NO, they are NOT crooked. If you had DONE your own research, you would know that every fact checking source agrees that this email is a LIE....including the ORIGINAL SOURCE...WND themselves. That would be WHY they PULLED the story and put THIS on their website.... Editor's Note: An earlier version of this story incorrectly described a series of cases for which Elena Kagan represented the government as eligibility cases. Those cases, in fact, were a series of unrelated disputes pending before the Supreme Court and the references have been removed from this report. Read more: Kagan case: 'Real Truth About Obama' http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=187797#ixzz1UZKHlLQy If you DID your own research as you claim....you would KNOW this.