Jump to content


Photo
- - - - -

Obamacare Page 1,004: You Must Have RFID Chip Implanted in Your Body


WARNING: Due to the extreme conflict of opinions inherent in discussions of this nature, you are hereby warned that this is a NO TOLERANCE zone. Personal insults are NOT TOLERATED and your account may be restricted with NO NOTICE. Please review the forum guidelines at this address: http://dinarvets.com/links/rules.

  Basically... keep it classy, no personal attacks, and if you can't take the heat... head on over to another section.

  DinarVets does not endorse, condone, promote, or otherwise associate with any of the contents herein. The text written is the sole responsibility of the person that posted it.

  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
25 replies to this topic

#21 dinar_stud

dinar_stud

    Senior Member

  • Banned
  • 1,147 posts

Posted 17 October 2013 - 11:46 PM

There's a hoax going around that the health care reform act HR3200 (The Affordable Care Act, aka "Obamacare") requires everyone to get a chip implanted in their body.

The bottom line is:

  • The proposed law did not require anyone to get anything implanted
  • It just created a national registry of a huge of range of medical devices from pacemakers to dental implants
  • The intent of the registry was to collect statistics on how safe and effective the devices are
  • HR3200 is not the bill that became law. Nor is HR 3962, which only passed the House. The "Obamacare" law is HR 3590, passed as Public Law 111-148, which does not have the registry.

An implantable RFID chip is just one example of a class II implantable medical device. Others include:
http://emedicine.med...681045-overview
 

  • percutaneous catheters
  • vascular graft prostheses
  • bone-conduction hearing aids
  • tympanostomy tubes
  • gastrointestinal tubes
  • implantable staples
  • long-term intravascular catheters
  • intracranial pressure monitor devices
  • peripheral nerve stimulators for pain relief
  • eye sphere implants
  • intramedullary fixation rods
  • joint prostheses

Here's the original bill (which did not ever become law):

http://www.gpo.gov/f...111hr3200ih.pdf

And here's what it says:
 

SEC. 2521. NATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTRY.
[...]
‘‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national medical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each device that—
‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ​
‘‘(B) is— ​
‘‘(i) a class III device; or ​
‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining​

There's a little more about administrative things, but the above is the entirety of what the conspiracy promoters base their theory on. They get away with it in part because the language of the bill is rather complex and difficult to read, so they can basically make up whatever interpretation they like, and many of their readers will be fooled.

They then build upon this by claiming that a Class II device is a 

"implantable radiofrequency transponder system for patient identification and health information."

When actually the three classes of medical devices have nothing to do with what the devices are, but are to do with how much they are regulated to ensure safety. For example:

http://en.wikipedia....e#United_States

Examples of Class III devices include implantable pacemaker, pulse generators, HIV diagnostic tests, automated external defibrillators, and endosseous implants.

Examples of Class II devices include powered wheelchairs, infusion pumps, and surgical drapes.

Examples of Class I devices include elastic bandages, examination gloves, and hand-held surgical instruments.

So the law simply creates a registry for this HUGE range of different medical devices. 

Implantable RFID chips would be covered under the law, but that's simply because they are one of thousands of devices that are classified as Type III or Type II implantable. 

It's not a law, and even if it was, it no more mandates you get a chip implanted than it mandates you get a hip replacement.


  • 1

#22 Maggie123

Maggie123

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 7,059 posts

Posted 18 October 2013 - 12:21 AM

Thank You Dinar Stud :)

 

I already knew this but...   Thank You for dispelling the "fear" for FAUX NEUZ viewers. :)



Well sweety just throw on some red pumps your best dress hit the clubs and get you some . 

:lmao:  :lmao:  :lmao:  :lmao:

Sorry mag I couldnt help myself. 

 

Dang... And here I was feeling guilty for having my dearly departed dog chipped just because of that reason...

 

SHE was the one who put on her red pumps and hit the clubs. (Or Every Neighbor That Would Give Her A  Snack or a Hug)

 

:D


  • 0

#23 Maggie123

Maggie123

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 7,059 posts

Posted 18 October 2013 - 12:43 AM

BTW... the chip was never necessary... just my phone number on her collar was always the ticket. :)


  • 1

#24 tankdude

tankdude

    part time miracle worker

  • Members
  • 1,556 posts
  • LocationHelena, MT


Posted 18 October 2013 - 11:31 AM

I can't have any chips with the diet I'm on - but I can have pork rinds!.

 

I wonder if they would let me substitute pork rinds as a Class III device. They eventually are internal...even if only for a short time. I consider them life supporting -


  • 1
Have you had your molecules today? I'm making all health break loose!!

#25 Shabibilicious

Shabibilicious

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 7,380 posts


Posted 18 October 2013 - 11:39 AM

3shzw1.jpg

 

GO RV, then BV   :drool: 


  • 1

#26 SnowGlobe7

SnowGlobe7

    Senior Member

  • Members
  • 5,518 posts
  • LocationT-Town


Posted 18 October 2013 - 11:50 AM

LOL dog , I hear ya !

 

I'll work on it !

dodge2.jpg



FOUND YA ONE!!!!


  • 0




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users

  • Privacy Policy