Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content

Whatshername

Members
  • Posts

    3,838
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    25

Posts posted by Whatshername

  1.  

    I might be a feminist if they would stop dying their armpit hair blue long enough to champion one righteous cause.  Third Wave Feminism is nothing but an unfunny joke until it addresses the true oppression of women in Third World Muslim culture.

     

    1+1+1+1+1+1++flight.png

     

    Pakistani Village Orders Rape Of Teen Girl For Brother’s Crime.

     DCVillage elders in Pakistan ordered a 17-year-old girl to be raped as retribution after her brother was accused of raping another 12-year-old girl, media reported Thursday.

     

    The 12-year-old told her mother she was raped while cutting the grass, and her mother then reported the crime to the village elders, reports CNN. The elders determined that a fitting punishment would be to rape the eldest sister of the male perpetrator of the crime.

     

    “Her mothers and sisters all protested this but the elders brought out their guns and threatened to kill them,” the police report said.

     

    It’s not unusual to punish family members with rape in Pakistan. In 2002, a tribal court ordered a woman to be gang raped after her brother was accused of having sex with a woman from another tribe.

     

    more

     

     

    So, Why Don't Feminists Fight For Muslim Women?

     

     

    • Upvote 4
  2. Sessions' recusal was a disappointment to many of us.  It's fair to scrutinize his performance thus far...

     

    Trump’s “Disappointment” – An Example of What AG Jeff Sessions Refuses To Address…

    Posted on July 26, 2017 by sundance
     

    Many opinions are visible on the subject of President Trump questioning the focus and competency of Attorney General Jeff Sessions.  With that in mind perhaps it’s worthwhile pointing out a simple example of internal DOJ corruption that AG Sessions is intentionally avoiding.

    trump-oval-office-4.jpg?w=643&h=361

    In October 2015 the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced it was dropping the investigation into the IRS, Lois Lerner, and the unlawful sharing of taxpayer data in the IRS targeting investigation surrounding True The Vote et al.  The decision was laughable. The DOJ dropped an investigation into illegal activity conducted by the DOJ? Oh, ok..

     

    As a direct consequence of the DOJ decision, congressional inquiry into the IRS/DOJ targeting matter seemingly dropped from the radar and disappeared into the ether of the Swamp without anyone paying much attention.

     

    However, if you review the origin of the entire IRS/DOJ scheme, the post-2010 mid-term “shellacking” and “secret research project“, and carry it forward to the 2016 election result any interested observer would still be left asking:

     

    A: “why did the IRS, through Lois Lerner, deliver 1+ million pages of tax filings, to include the entire donor list of Tea Party and patriot groups including every “schedule B” with the names of every contributor to the organization, through 21 CD-ROMs to the DOJ?  And B: Who did she deliver them to?…

     

    This questions are not some esoteric enterprise or hindsight review unworthy of investigation.  The background to the factual distribution of IRS data to the DOJ was not accidental; nor did the actual material arrive at some disingenuous DOJ office.  These files were illegally distributed from the IRS to the DOJ and ended up in the hands of actual DOJ officials.  Who are they?

     

    These are brutally obvious questions which, despite the numerous congressional hearings on the matter, were never asked – nor answered.

     

    holder and obama

    The entire scheme is riddled with complexity; almost too complex for the average person to understand, and seriously difficult to summarize. However, when you boil it down here’s the essential components that are no longer suspicion or supposition, but factually provable:

     

    As a result of a trillion dollar stimulus filled with scheme and graft; and as a result of Obamacare being similarly schemed in backroom deals and late night votes; President Obama was “shellacked” in the November 2010 election.

     

    The White House didn’t see the 2010 defeat a flawed policy issue; rather as the entrenched ideologues they are, they saw the SCOTUS case “citizens united” as the principle tool used by the White House opponents to organize and fund political movements, ie. the tea party.

     

    The Obama Team response to the 2010 Shellacking was to use the Dept. of Justice (AG Eric Holder) to weaponize the IRS and go after groups -like Tea Party Groups- organized under the financial umbrella of 501(c)(4)(5) donation structuring.

     

    Years later, when the scheme was discovered – the White House denied knowledge (“not even a smidgen of corruption”), the DOJ feigned ignorance (“we don’t know why we got the millions of pages”), and the IRS began working overtime trying to hide the construct of the prior communication, planning and strategy.

     

    • The head of IRS tax exempt division, Louis Lerner, plead the Fifth.
    • Obama’s Chief of Staff Jack Lew was made Treasury Secretary (IRS is sub division of Treasury Dept.) where he was/is able to continue hiding information.
    • And Eric Holder constructed a team of DOJ lawyers to isolate, hide and manipulate the trail of evidence within the DOJ.
    •  

    Just before the IRS targeting scheme was fully discovered/comprehended, and seemingly overlooked by any curious media enterprise, in February 2013 representative Maxine Waters said:

    “The President has put in place an organization with the kind of database that no one has ever seen before in life. That’s going to be very, very powerful. That database will have information about everything on every individual on ways that it’s never been done before and whoever runs for President on the Democratic ticket has to deal with that. They’re going to go down with that database and the concerns of those people because they can’t get around it. And he’s [President Obama] been very smart. It’s very powerful what he’s leaving in place.” (link)

    maxine waters 3 quote

    Against, the backdrop of information which proved the UniParty, both dems and republicans, benefited from the targeting of the Tea Party and oppositional forces; and with the full comprehension that Mitch McConnell and the republican leadership organized a post Citizens United strategy to work around their financial dependency on the electorate via Super-PACs; aren’t you just a little bit curious what the purpose was to assemble a data-base or “Secret Research Project“?

     

    Lois Lerner’s and other IRS officials’ concerns about how to handle these donor lists came on the heels of an advisory from the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) to her and other IRS officials in late March 2012 of “an audit we plan to conductof the IRS’s process for reviewing applications for tax exemption by potential section 501(c)(4), 501(c)(5), and 501(c)(6) organizations.”

     

    March 2012 “audit we plan to conduct” was the IG notification for a pending investigation of IRS. Specifically of their handling of Conservative Groups filing applications and status.

     

    We all know the result of that investigation was a finding the IRS was indeed targeting conservative groups – hence the IRS scandal erupted in the headlines.

     

    However, far more troubling were later discoveries into the internal communications which suggested much more nefarious activity regarding the assembly of secret lists, the “Secret Research Project”.

     

    An undertaking by both the Obama Administration and the DOJ together with the IRS began to surface.

     

    The American Center for Law and Justice put it thusly:

    “We know the IRS unconstitutionally targeted conservative groups. We know they illegally demanded, obtained, and held the donor lists of these conservative organizations. Now we learn that in 2012, the height of the targeting, the IRS was involved in a “secret research project” with this confidential, illegally obtained donor information.”

    That’s more than a big deal. It’s potentially criminal.

    The very fact that the IRS was using the phrase “secret research project” should give every American pause. But the fact that this project was conducted as part of a well-orchestrated effort to target and silence conservative Americans is utterly disturbing.

    Now, again, ask yourself:

    Why would Lois Lerner be delivering 21 CD-ROMs of data, lists of every American who joined arms with the Tea Party, to Eric Holder at the DOJ ?  And who specifically did she give it to?

    WASHINGTON […] “After the Justice Department turned over the database to the Oversight Committee this month in response to a subpoena, the Justice Department says it was informed by IRS officials that it contains legally protected taxpayer information that should not have ever been sent to the FBI and it now plans to return the full database to the IRS,” a statement from the oversight committee said.

     

    According to material obtained by the committee, the IRS sent the FBI “21 disksconstituting a 1.1 million page database of information from 501(c)(4) tax exempt organizations, to the Federal Bureau of Investigation.”

     

    The transaction occurred in October 2010. (link)

     

    The data the IRS sent to the DOJ not only included the tax returns of every organization, it also included the “schedule B’s” of each of those returns.  That means the DOJ received the list of every single person who contributed to one of the organizations.  That’s much more information than just the IRS filings of the organizations themselves.

     

    Are we to believe the DOJ just did nothing with that massive list of U.S. citizens who contributed to any political 501(c) group?  Are we to believe those disks just sat in an office somewhere until the DOJ decided to return them?

     

    Think about this and be intellectually honest.

     

    Who authorized creating those CD-ROM’s?  Who, specifically, received them at the DOJ? What, specifically was done after their arrival?  Who specifically was involved in all of this?  We are talking about multiple layers of people in various levels of authorization.

     

    This is actual evidence the DOJ was weaponized against a large portion of the American electorate.  This reality is not in dispute. This actually happened.  Yet, no-one has ever been held to account.  Why?

    If you wonder why the entire corrupt DC political class is openly in opposition to President Donald J Trump…. And if you wonder why President Donald Trump is expressing public frustrations with his Attorney General…. Well,… Perhaps Attorney General Jeff Sessions could begin by just asking these simple questions of his own organization.

    Too much to ask?

    trump-complicated-business.jpg?w=640&h=3

     

    • Upvote 3
  3. Our military is the LAST place we should tolerate Social Engineering.

    Former Transgender Says Trump Is Right About Disallowing Trans in the Military

    July 26, 2017 BFH

     

    The very term “Former Transgender” will tell you everything you need to know about the left’s “science” of gender.

     

    It’s “fluid,” as in, “subjected to my flights of fancy,” or my mental illness.

     

    Daily Signal-

    On Wednesday, President Donald Trump tweeted that he wouldn’t allow transgender individuals to serve in the military:

    After consultation with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow……

     
     

     

    ….Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military. Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming…..

     

    ….victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail. Thank you

     

    I think he made the right decision—and as someone who lived as trans-female for several years, I should know.

     

    When I discovered Congress voted earlier this month to not block funding for transgender-related hormone therapies and sex change surgeries, I wondered if it considered how devastating this will be to the fitness, readiness, and morale of our combat-ready troops.

     

    In July, the House of Representatives voted down Missouri Republican Rep. Vicky Hartzler’s amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act, which would have banned the military from funding such treatments.

     

    Paying for transition-related surgeries for military service members and their families is beyond comprehensible.

     

    Perhaps they have forgotten that our military was forged to be the world’s strongest fighting force, not a government-funded, politically correct, medical sex change clinic for people with gender dysphoria.

     

    Gender dysphoria, the common diagnosis for one who feels at odds with his or her birth gender, develops from prolonged anxiety and depression. People are not born that way.

     

    The “proof” for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria is having strongly held feelings—but feelings can and often do change over time.

     

    more

    • Upvote 2
  4. And then there's this...

    Study: 8,471 Cases of Double Voting Uncovered in 21 States

    Blurry-Voter-AP-David-Goldman--640x450.j
    AP/David Goldman

    by BREITBART NEWS24 Jul 20175,121

    As the debate over President Donald Trump’s voter fraud commission intensifies, a new study has found 8,471 instances of double voting during the 2016 elections occurring in 21 states.

    The nonpartisan Government Accountability Institute (GAI), which was cofounded by Breitbart News Senior Editor-at-Large Peter Schweizer and former Breitbart Executive Chairman Stephen K. Bannon, analyzed data from 21 U.S. states and found that 7,271 ballots were cast in more than one state by individuals with the identical first and last name, middle initial, birthdate, and partial Social Security number. Another 1,200 double votes meeting the same criteria were detected within the same state. Given the high methodological bar employed, GAI says the statistical “probability of correctly matching two records with the same name, birthdate, and Social Security number is close to 100 percent.”

     

    The 37-page study is unique in that while most past voter fraud analyses have used statistical models to project fraud rates, the GAI report identified actual matches of real votes cast using public voter information rolls. “There are currently no government agencies or private entities that compare all state voter rolls to detect duplicate voting fraud,” states the report.

     

    GAI says the reason it only examined 21 states is because the government watchdog group encountered numerous hurdles in gathering state voter data, including: “exorbitant costs,” woefully disorganized and incomplete data, and “outright rejected requests” from states. Still, “extending GAI’s conservative matching method to include all 50 states would indicate an expected minimum of 45,000 high-confidence duplicate voting matches,” says the report.

     

    The same individual casting more than one ballot represents an aggressive form of voter fraud; other types of voter fraud can include falsifying registration information, destroying ballots, or noncitizen voting. GAI says the 8,471 instances of double voting it uncovered “should be investigated to determine whether two votes were cast by the same person or if identity theft occurred.”

    • Upvote 3
  5.  

    Question For Jerry Brown From Concerned Potential Voter

    July 24, 2017 BFH 

    jerry-brown-moonbeam-.jpg

     

    Many years ago, I married a widow out of love, and she had an 18 year old daughter.

     

    After the wedding, my father, a widower, came to visit a number of times, and he fell in love with my step daughter.  My father eventually married her without my authorization.

     

    As a result my step-daughter became my step mother and my father became my son in law.

     

    My father’s wife (also my step daughter) and my step-mother, gave birth to a son who is my grandchild because I am the husband of my step daughter’s mother.

     

    This boy is also my brother, as the son of my father.

     

    As you can see, my wife became a grandmother, because she is the mother of my father’s wife.

     

    Therefore it appears that I am also my wife’s grandchild.

     

    A short time after these events, my wife gave birth to a son, who became my father’s brother-in-law, the step-son of my father’s wife, and my uncle.

     

    My son is also my step mother’s brother, and through my step-mother, my wife has become a grandmother and I have become my own grandfather.

     

    In light of the above mentioned, I would like to know the following:

     

    Does my son, who is also my uncle, my father’s son-in-law and my step mother’s brother fulfill the requirements for receiving childcare benefits?

     

    Sincerely yours,

    Mohammed

     

    THE ANSWER:

     

    Of course you qualify, Mohammed!  I have arranged to start mailing the checks to all of you just as soon as you arrive here in California.

     

    Your Truly,

     
    Jerry Brown
    • Upvote 4
  6. :facepalm2:

    Vagisil: Yell ‘VAGlNA’ in public and Planned Parenthood gets $25,000

    July 21, 2017 MJA 

     

     

    The V***** Challenge? Women are yelling “V*****” in public places as part of a new crazy feminist campaign to raise money for Planned Parenthood. Feminists are posting video of themselves yelling “V*****” online. No, I’m not kidding.

    • Upvote 2
  7. But wait... it gets better!  

     

    Trump Cuts the Fat and the Fat Complains

    July 22, 2017 BFH 

     

    The Federalist-

    Joel Clement, a top climate policy official at the U.S. Department of Interior, has proclaimed himself a whistleblower. What is the grave injustice or illegal activity has he selflessly revealed to the public? Clement is upset that he was involuntarily reassigned to a job that doesn’t have anything to do with his previous work on climate change (he’s now processing royalty checks from fossil fuel companies). But you wouldn’t know it based on the media coverage.

     

    Clement declared this week in an op-ed for The Washington Post and an appearance on NPR that his reassignment is the Trump administration’s retaliation against him for speaking out about the danger climate change poses to Alaska Native communities.

     

    According to Clement, he raised the issue in multiple forums in the months preceding his reassignment, and “It is clear to me that the administration was so uncomfortable with this work, and my disclosures, that I was reassigned with the intent to coerce me into leaving the federal government.”

     

    He’s probably halfway right about that. No doubt Trump’s Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke wants Clement to resign. But it’s not because of his “disclosures” but rather because the climate change work he was doing was a colossal waste of taxpayer dollars.

     

    more

     

     

    • Upvote 2
  8.  

    34 year-old journalist critical of Obamacare found dead

    July 23, 2017 BFH 

     

    Philly- <= Read more.

     

    Joseph Rago, a Pulitzer Prize-winning editorial writer for the Wall Street Journal, was found dead in his New York City apartment Thursday night.

     

     “The cause and manner of death are pending further studies following today’s examination,” a spokeswoman for the city’s medical examiner’s office said.
     

    Rago won the Pulitzer Prize in 2011 for a series of editorials about the Affordable Care Act, which were praised as being “well crafted, against-the-grain editorials challenging the health care reform advocated by President Obama.”

     

    “No matter where you fall in the debate of health care reform, the arguments advanced by Joseph Rago in his series of editorials in The Wall Street Journal were impossible to ignore,” the judges noted. “Not paying attention to these editorials was not an option for policymakers.”

     

    Rago’s last editorial, a criticism of Republicans’ failure to repeal ‘Obamacare’ and replace it with a better plan, ran Wednesday.

    • Upvote 3
  9. 8 hours ago, Shabibilicious said:

    773 cases, eh...

     

    Consider this, Shabs... 🤔 WHAT IF the situation were reversed?  CANEXIT!  Let's say instead, that it's our northern border being flooded with millions of informed, freedom loving canucks like our good friend BJ, eh?  Same basic deal (hypothetically)... they cross illegally, vote in our elections, take our jobs... except they aren't from the freaking third world so they're not here to roof houses and pick fruit... they'll be after your job.  On the bright side, most already speak English and aren't known for carrying diseases so there would be less disruption for our school children.  Anyway, being a little further down the path of tyranny than we are... hey, they just wanna be free!  Freedom of speech, freedom to bear arms, freedom to make their own decisions about their healthcare... and the weather is milder!  Most of them vote conservative.  Stop me when you think the commies on the left would get nervous... 1?  773?  3.5 million?  5.7 million?  How many are acceptable?

     

     

    8 hours ago, BJinMontreal said:

    It's NOT the cases that matter - it's the number of votes!!!

     

    BJinMontreal :tiphat:You're a true patriot!  😘  Are you this passionate about Canadian politics?

     
    • Upvote 5
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.