ayrnay22

Sounds impressive but I could see it being used improperly if it isn't already but its headed in a direction where u could possibly charge a device mo3 phone etc by touching it or docking it to ur self

Obama must not think much of American sovereignty after signing the "Promoting International Regulatory Cooperation" Executive Order (EO 13563). According to Aaron Klein of WND, this executive order pushes us closer towards a North American Union. I am not sure about that. It does, however, make it easier to impose international regulations on our own domestic industry -- which undermines US sovereignty. Published by Kenneth Schortgen Jr. of the Examiner: President Obama has been actively signing several Executive Orders over the past two months, many of which imply or allow the Federal government to take control over private property, and the lawful use of that property, with little recourse of due process for businesses and land owners. In March, Obama signed an unnumbered Executive Order which provides the Federal government the power to confiscate land, infrastructure, and human resources in both peacetime, and during a declared crisis. One month later, the President issued an additional Executive Order which allows the government to nationalize, and take control of all natural gas resources. Every day, more and more economic sovereignty is being signed away by the Obama Administration, with the intention of facilitating a new global economic system whereby the American people and American businesses no longer have the right of due process in the US legal system, but instead are bound under international law and regulation. This new Executive Order signed by President Obama on May 1st is another move towards global governance, and the loss of economic sovereignty for the citizens of the United States.

Have to disagree with u slightly on logging if done corectly its good for environment just know from my uncle who's family has logged northwest Montana for 80 plus years here is a link if u care to watch http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?desktop_uri=%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DNrPTzw2aME0&v=NrPTzw2aME0&gl=US I also agree with u lord on hemp its very useful but good stuartship of forests help Indians burnt sections of land to thin it and bring in fresh growth which in turn brought in game to hunt sorry if Indians is not pc for anyone here

It's easier than tesla if u have running water along ur home u could be getting paid instead of paying for electricity with a hydroelectric system or u could use solar panels they cost a lot but its worth the investment or depending on were u live geothermal heating is an option

Sorry no computer just phone its hard to even spell correctly or edit posts with big fingers and touch screen Your right pollution is bad for people to breath in it can be an eye sore no ones addressed renewable energy or alternate power sources yet just global warming China is not a good example your right but there large population and poor standards in regard to fossil fuel consumption isn't good for the environment but it doesn't cause global warming imo

That would give reincarnation more validity in a sense but I live my life for the present and hope whatever the afterlife brings ill be in good standing won't know till I get there though

Well I'm more of the survivalist primal instinct type or maybe cause suicide is a sin if ur religious but I couldn't take my own life some say its the cowards way out I disagree but that's also something open to debate here that's the point of the topic so far its been fun but I'd like to see more involvement its early though I will wait and see

I think that life other than ours is probable not sure if we are visited by aliens but some ancient cultures put a lot of effort into making signs u can see from space and if they did have visitors like they show on ancient aliens we won't know for sure

Exactly racism bigotry etc are all because of the environment u are brought up around and u can grow out of it or into it I have to disagree with u on the dog thing it wouldn't be my first choice but I hunt so I don't see a dog as a companion first its to help hunt or like the Indians serve a purpose sled dog pack animal and unfortunately dinner for some cultures so if it was a choice between starvationand staying alive id eat the dog and if it cane down to it I think I would eat another person but I can't see there being a situation where I would have to make that decision

My take on the I understand the carbon taxes and credits and that scaring people about global warming serves an agenda to make money but no one talks about it I've watched bill mahr have a republican say there is no global warming and a democrat say there is and the scientist said it was called a climate watch each one I believe pushes an agenda or is backed by a lobbyist fossil fuels for republicans carbon credits renewable energy for the democrats and environmentalists for the scientist they all get kick backs from there lobbyists

Here's a topic that always bugs me cannibalism socially unexceptable but the donner party were forced to the movie alive involving south American soccer team shows how it possibly happened tribes still today practice it and people condemn them for it yes its perverse but why my thoughts are this in the survival aspect of it donner party soccer team they did what they had to and the guilt and shame most likely took a toll on them but if u look at the tribal aspect the did it ritualisticly or maybe because it was a prominent food source remember they are raised to believe its acceptable and u or I are raised and taught that its morally wrong ask yourself this if you had to do it to survive would you or if u were raised to believe it was ok would u question it

So its seems with the group of members that start topics and post comments lately we could all as lord dinar says awaken so why not discuss it intelligently here where anyone can give there opinion it seems that a majority of posts lead away from the initial topic matter I'm open to any ideas such as global warming renewable energy socially exceptable behavior religion taboos etc so don't be shy give ur thoughts on a subject and let others try and expound on it it may surprise all of us what people think but don't express

Lord I don't believe in global warming in my opinion weather is cyclical and since people don't want to realize that were just a blip in the earths life cycle then they say we cause it but if u look at regional high and low temps over just a hundred years u can see the cycles think of it like math or alchemy earth is always going to balance itself out we burn fuels pollute the air etc yes there will be a warming trend and loss of resources but it will be followed by a cooling trend and resources I believe will replenish not in our lifetime maybe not for tens of thousands of years but coal and oil we use now came from somewhere millions of years ago so who's to say in a million years our fossils won't be used for fuel I care I'd be the first one not to buy fuel for a day or week etc to cripple the economy but its just not possible to get a large enough following to make an impact that's the sad truth I'm hopefully optimistic in everything I read but in my day to day life I guess I'm just cynical yes I'm a walking oxymoron maybe its my dual personality being a gemini Well 2 negs was less than I thought I gave myself a plus don't want my rep goin in the toilet for making observations

Actually the post was from a site skeletons in there closets I'm not brainwashed Hugh and yes everyone has past regrets but lord says he wants to open our minds etc I'm entitled to believe what I want and as far as I'm concerned I'm ready for whatever happens fema camps world realignment etc I read half of the dribble on this site I can use a search engine just like you guys but if all u post is the same stuff u lose peoples interest I will vote for change romney or Paul but romney will get the gop nom so I know its a puppet system but that won't be changing anytime soon call me close minded or that my head is in the sand if u must but that just shows your own self indulgence in something u believe to be true just like religion I chose not to waste the time I have in this world praying to a higher power or believing in conspiracies but that doesn't mean I'm less intelligent or not awakened

There's two sides to every story and I see not many replies when Ron Paul isn't shed in a good light I know some Paul lovers read this thread but no response typical

Well seeing as lately its been a Ron Paul love fest in off topic forum I thought I'd share a little info Ron Paul's Skeleton Closet: Scandals, Quotes, and Character By far the oldest candidate in the race at 75, Ron Paul is suddenly a top contender. He has a lot of younger supporters, mostly because he favors legalizing pot, and adopts the sort of extreme intellectual positions that have also drawn college age kids to "pure" philosophies like Communism and Ayn Rand's Positivism for generations. You know, "clean" uncompromising positions that get rid of all those messy human feelings and complexities. Ron Paul loves to brag about being a straight-talker who doesn't change his positions. He says he would have voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act (on property rights grounds, not to defend racism natch.) He wants to legalize all drugs, including heroin, withdraw all US troops from other countries immediately, end government flood control efforts and return to the gold standard. And speaking as someone who has been researching candidate scandals for many years now, he's pretty darn squeaky clean. Sorry to disappoint you haters, but (like Obama) Ron Paul shows no sign of screwing around on his wife (unlike Newt or Bill Clinton), or doing favors for special interests who then put money in his pocket (unlike Newt or Rick Santorum). That's admirable. He's also one of the few politicians who did not evade the draft (unlike Gingrich and Romney. Santorum and Obama were too young to be drafted, and did not volunteer.) But Congressman Paul does has a paranoid, fringey side that he does NOT like to admit. Paul has written and spoken a lot about hidden conspiracies of bankers, diplomats, the Trilateral Commission, secret plans to merge the US with Mexico and Canada, etc. (He calls it the North American Union.) If that sounds like the kind of stuff that John Birchers and right-wing militia racists say, well, he's very popular in that crowd too. (Read the Stormfront and other neo-Nazi websites if you dare, and you'll see.) Ever since he began running for Congress again in 1996, Ron Paul has tried to downplay or deny responsibility for some incredibly racist newsletters he sold to that conspiracy crowd. But it's hard for him to deny responsibility for a publication called "The Ron Paul Survival Report", edited by Ron Paul, when it says stuff like "When I was in Congress....." He had no problem cashing the checks certainly. And if it wasn't paranoid militia conspiracy, why was it called the Survival Report? The sad truth is that Ron Paul is a consummate politician. He's just better at tailoring his message to his different audiences than, say, Mitt Romney, whose adjustments are painfully obvious. Ron Paul is the cool grandpa pothead to college kids, the prophet of racial fear to neo-Nazis, an opponent of public schools to Christian home-schoolers, and a crusader against the coming One World Government to the anti-flouride conspiracy crowd. And each group thinks he's their own, special warrior. Quotes "I think it's a theory, the theory of evolution and I don't accept it as a theory." - Ron Paul, CBS-TV, 2007 "illegal immigrants enter the country for the express purpose of giving birth. But illegal immigrants also use emergency rooms, public roads, and public schools. In many cases they are able to obtain Medicaid, food stamps, public housing, and even unemployment benefits. ... We must end the perverse incentives that encourage immigrants to come here illegally, including the anchor baby incentive." - Ron Paul, (on his congressional website, not the infamous newsletters) "You know, the greatest hoax I think that has been around in many, many years if not hundreds of years has been this hoax on the environment and global warming. You notice they don't call it global warming anymore. It's weather control." - Ron Paul, on Fox "The public school now is a propaganda machine. They start with our kids even in kindergarten, teaching them about family values, sexual education, gun rights, environmentalism, and they condition them to believe in so much that is totally un-American.” - Ron Paul, to Christian home-schoolers, March 2011 "The ultimate goal is not simply a superhighway, but an integrated North American Union--complete with a currency, a cross-national bureaucracy, and virtually borderless travel within the Union. Like the European Union, a North American Union would represent another step toward the abolition of national sovereignty altogether." - Ron Paul, 2006 (on his congressional website, not the infamous newsletters) "Critics of NAFTA and CAFTA warned at the time that the agreements were actually a move toward ... an eventual merging of North America into a border-free area. Proponents of these agreements dismissed this as preposterous and conspiratorial. Now we see that the criticisms appear to be justified." - Ron Paul, 2006 (on his congressional website, not the infamous newsletters) "This new [uN Peackeeping] commission will create the beginning of a global UN army. It will claim the right to intervene in any conflict anywhere on the globe, bringing the World Bank and the IMF formally into the picture as well. It is a complete new world order..." Ron Paul, 2006 (on his congressional website, not the infamous newsletters) -- Quote Sources Racist Newsletter Starting in 1984, Ron Paul published a series of related newsletters, called the Ron Paul Political Report, Ron Paul Freedom Report, Ron Paul Survival Report, etc. He had over 100,000 subscribers at one point and is said to have made over a million dollars a year. (Subscriptions cost $100 a year for a magazine usually 8 pages long.) Over nearly 20 years, the newsletters published a bunch of hateful and inflammatory racist, anti-*** and conspiratorial columns. You can read 50 of the originals on this website. Warning -- it's pretty raw stuff. One article said Martin Luther King Jr. “seduced underage girls and boys” and “replaced the evil of forced segregation with the evil of forced integration.” Another offers this strategy against "urban youth": "If you have to use a gun on a youth, you should leave the scene immediately, disposing of the wiped off gun as soon as possible. Such a gun cannot, of course, be registered to you, but one bought privately (through the classifieds, for example).” Speaking of AIDS, one article said homosexuals “enjoy the attention and pity that comes with being sick,” and another said “I miss the closet. Homosexuals, not to speak of the rest of society, were far better off when social pressure forced them to hide their activities.” -- A June, 1990 article In 2001, as Paul moved to the mainstream and rejoined the Republican party, he disavowed these comments and blamed them on an unnamed ghostwriter. He said he didn't know about them until ten years later -- a statement easily proved false -- and that he had lied in 1996 when he didn't say he didn't write them. You see, when Paul ran for Congress in 1996, as a Libertarian, his opponent brought these newsletters up to show that Paul had fringe ideas. At that time, they were still being published, and Paul didn't deny writing them. He said that the inflammatory quotes his opponent gave were taken out of context, and that his commentaries about blacks came in the context of "current events and statistical reports of the time." (You can check the context of the inflammatory quotes yourself on the link above, but they look pretty representative to me.) In fact, Dr. Paul defended some of these racist statements in an interview with the Dallas Morning News in 1996. One newsletter said that young Black men are "unbelievably fleet of foot." Dr. Paul confirmed this opinion by telling the newspaper "If you try to catch someone that has stolen a purse from you, there is no chance to catch them." Another article in the newsletter (from 1992, just 4 years before this controversy first erupted) said: "Given the inefficiencies of what DC laughingly calls the criminal justice system, I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of the black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal." When the Dallas reporter asked Ron Paul about that quote, he said "These aren't my figures. That is the assumption you can gather from" the report. Paul and his supporters claim that he moved to Texas, the newsletters stayed in Washington, and he was too busy to even look at the 8 page newsletter that earned him a million dollars a years. (So much for Texas straight talk.) We have direct evidence that he's lying. Renae Hathaway, Paul's former secretary who still supports him, says that Paul was a very hands-on owner of the newsletters: "He always got to see the final product. He would proof it." (Another longtimeemployee, Eric Rittberg, confirms that he saw Ron Paul proofing, editing and signing off on the newsletters.) Hathaway said the newsletter company had an office in Houston and another one in Clute, very near Paul's house, and that he came to Houston -- 50 miles from his home -- at least weekly. Ed Crane, the longtime head of the Cato Institute, recalls meeting Paul in the 1980s and discussing mail solicitation lists for the newsletters. Paul agreed that “people who have extreme views” responded best, and said he got his best response from the mailing list for the conspiratorial, anti-Semitic newspaper "The Spotlight." Rittberg says that Paul put the racist material in the newsletters simply to make money -- "the real big money came from some of that racially tinged stuff -- and it seems to have worked very well. The President manages millions of people. Even if you take Ron Paul at his word, he couldn't manage a staff of 10 without them suddenly printing extreme racist progaganda FOR TEN YEARS. I just don't believe him, but if you do, he's a piss-poor manager. More likely he happily trafficked in the racist material to make money. And it worked. In 1984, Paul reported dept of up to $765,000; by 1995, most of the debt was gone and his net worth was up to $3.3 million. The question remains, does he believe any of this stuff himself? The thing is, Ron Paul has published a lot of similar (but milder) material since then, and much of it is still on his congressional website, under his name. (Read any of his "Texas Straight Talk" columns from 2005 or 2006, and you'll see what I mean.) He rails against "anchor babies," warns of conspiracies to impose a "North American United Nations," complains about secret cartels of international bankers -- all big parts of the racist right-wing's world-view. (See quotes, above.) So far he hasn't claimed that someone else wrote these "Texas Straight Talk" columns, but I haven't seen any reporters ask him about them, either. But there's plenty more. Ron Paul defenders claim Martin Luther King Jr. is a hero of his, but Paul voted against the Martin Luther King Day holiday -- both times - and it fell 5 votes short the first time. (It passed the second time despite his opposition.) He said on MSNBC that the Civil War was not necessary, and gave a rave review to a pro-Confederacy revisionist book called "The Politically Incorrect Guide to American History" by Thomas E. Woods. Ron Paul said Wood's book "heroically rescues real history from the politically correct memory hole.” Woods, who founded the secessionist group "League of the South," and Ron Paul both teach at the Ludwig Van Mises Institute in Alabama, which was founded by Lew Rockwell -- Ron Paul's former chief of staff. In fact, many Paul supporters claim Lew Rockwell wrote the racist newsletter columns under Ron Paul's name, but Rockwell denies that. The fact is, Ron Paul has said a lot of things similar to (but milder than) the shocking newsletter quotes, things he does not dispute. In 2007, Dr. Paul republished his 1987 book "Freedom Under Siege" which has a lot of choice passages, such as calling the AIDS sufferer "a victim of his own lifestyle [who] victimizes innocent citizens by forcing them to pay for his care"; saying sexual harassment victims bear some responsibility because they didn't quit their jobs; and complaining that whites would be called bigots if they formed a white caucus in Congress, but minority caucuses are OK. Ron Paul is firmly enmeshed in the right-wing, conspiracy subculture. He has appeared on the Alex Jones radio show 40 times over 12 years, and given extensive interviews to the John Birch Society newsletter. So whether or not he wrote any one particularly nasty racist sentence of a given issue, he is behind all of it. He has been living in that world for years, building connections with the people in it, spreading its ideas, and making money off of doing so. It's cowardly of him to deny it all now. -- Sources Sources Quote Sources -- Back evolution - Updated:Ron Paul Doesn’t “Accept Evolution as a Theory” by Jon Winsor, Discover Magazine, August 29, 2011 climate change -- Ron Paul Interview`, by David Asman, Fox Business Channel, November 4, 2009 home school - "Trio of presidential contenders woo evangelicals over home schooling," by Shannon Travis, CNN, March 23, 2011 college loans - Ron Paul on MSNBC, Cenk Uygur interview, March 3, 2011 NAFTA superhighway - "The NAFTA Super Highway," by Ron Paul, Texas Straight Talk, October 31, 2006 North American Union conspiracy - "A North American United Nations?" by Ron Paul, Texas Straight Talk, August 28, 2006 Anchor babies - Rethinking Birthright Citizenship, by Ron Paul, Texas Straight Talk, October 2, 2006 UN New World Order - NeoCon Global Government, by Ron Paul, Texas Straight Talk, June 13, 2005 Racist Newsletter Sources -- Back Game Over: Scans of Over than 50 Ron Paul Newsletters, Et Tu Mr. Destructo (blog), December 21, 2011 (this source has actual scans of many of the newsletters.) Ron Paul signed off on racist newsletters in the 1990s, associates say, By Jerry Markon and Alice Crites, Washington Post, January 27 1996 Ron Paul interview - Candidate's comments on blacks questioned, by Catalina Camia, Dallas Morning News, May 22, 1996 Angry White Man: The Bigoted Past of Ron Paul by James Kirchick, The New Republic, January 8, 2008 "A Collection of Ron Paul’s Most Incendiary Newsletters", The New Republic, December 23, 2011 More Selections From Ron Paul’s Newsletters, The New Republic, January 17, 2012 Ron Paul's Texas Straight Talk (archive), on his Congressional Web site. "In Book, Ron Paul Opposed Workplace Harassment Protections," by Pema Levy, Talking Points Memo, December 30, 2011 MLK Day Fact Check, by Ta-Nehisi Coates, The Atlantic, January 8, 2012 "Congress > Roll Call Votes > 98th Congress >House Vote #289 (Aug 2, 1983)" (Martin Luther King Day holiday), GovTrack.US website "Congress > Roll Call Votes > 98th Congress >House Vote #578 (November 13, 1979)" (Martin Luther King Day holiday), GovTrack.US website Ron Paul and the racist newsletters (Fact Checker biography), by Josh Hicks, The Washington Post, 12/27/2011

The name of the film is I like killing flies I enjoyed it here is a clip I really enjoyed from it

Thank you I agree but then again I might be tps posing as a romney supporter playing both sides of the fence Wish tps would post something to clear things up

So the Idaho statesman post of tpsprayduster is a fabrication or the fox cbs and abc news here in blackfoot Idaho are false when they say the Paul campaign doesn't endorse the use of rule 38

Not tryin to but u are and that's just the first Nazi one that came up and I guess if its from the 80's it loses credibility if I Google more I'm sure I'd find more current topics what is credible for u last week six months 2011 or are articles from the 90's ok I want to make sure if u read an article about anything bashing Obama or romney from the 80's u wouldn't post it I also guess all ur sources are first hand ?

Not what I believe just sayin the internet or alternate media lacks credibility so think about that when u post all that crappy stuff about cabal etc

Puppet or not a change in leadership even if its just by name only will in your words make sheeple happy and most likely stimulate economy and in turn create more construction jobs giving me work to support my child that's being born on august 3rd so yes change in the government would be great but its not likely I hope u people are right with ur mass arrests etc but I plan for the worst and hope for the best How's this for stuff about Ron Paul from alternate media from Christmas of last year RonPaul with former American Nazi Party member and current KKK Grand Wizard, Don Black Be sure you understand who Ron Paul is before you decide to vote for him. Some Libertarian platform planks (like ending the war on drugs) are attractive, but putting a racist homophobe who is against women's right to choose is a very bad idea. http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/bastard/2009/12/ron_paul_fanatics_go_ape_over.php http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/angry-white-man? page=0,0&id=e2f15397-a3c7-4720-ac15-4532a7da84ca "But, whoever actually wrote them, the newsletters I saw all had one thing in common: They were published under a banner containing Paul’s name, and the articles (except for one special edition of a newsletter that contained the byline of another writer) seem designed to create the impression that they were written by him--and reflected his views. What they reveal are decades worth of obsession with conspiracies, sympathy for the right-wing militia movement, and deeply held bigotry against blacks, Jews, and gays. In short, they suggest that Ron Paul is not the plain-speaking antiwar activist his supporters believe they are backing--but rather a member in good standing of some of the oldest and ugliest traditions in American politics."

That's on the assumption that romney is a puppet and I know u guys will hit me with theoretical scenarios or alternate media sites that's fine but I will take my chances with romney I'm not ignorant I read media monopoly when I was 14 I know all about corruption but I'm not throwing my vote away so Obama gets reelected

Actually I'm a registered voter for the reform party of America and would have voted for Paul if he got the gop nomination but he didn't and this Idaho statesman article states he isn't in support of what is going on with delegates so I evened myself out for the neg I've never voted democrat so I guess u shouldn't assume things u don't know about me and I'm just pointing out how there isn't many replies from Paul supporters when Paul himself doesn't agree with how there getting delegate votes