Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content

YourIntelSux

Members
  • Posts

    126
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by YourIntelSux

  1. Yup! Different Day / Same Story... My Party Is Better Than Your Party. Hahaha

    Both Parties Are NOT Representing OUR Interest When It Comes Right Down To It.

    But YES!!! Let's Argue The Same Old Rhetoric... So No One Notices What Is Really Going On In Washington DC... Along With The Banksters.

    Divide And Conquer. It's Working Real Well For Them.

    BRILLIANT JUST BRILLIANT

    Sure Would Like To See A Joining Of "We The People For The People". Big Ole Sigh..........

    Spot on Maggie!!

    Yup! Different Day / Same Story... My Party Is Better Than Your Party. Hahaha

    Both Parties Are NOT Representing OUR Interest When It Comes Right Down To It.

    But YES!!! Let's Argue The Same Old Rhetoric... So No One Notices What Is Really Going On In Washington DC... Along With The Banksters.

    Divide And Conquer. It's Working Real Well For Them.

    BRILLIANT JUST BRILLIANT

    Sure Would Like To See A Joining Of "We The People For The People". Big Ole Sigh..........

  2. Just reading along and laughing at the way you think that Taitz has any relevance.

    Still waiting for someone to take my bet.....four years from now....nothing will have come from any of these jokers.

    It's pretty easy for you to take the odds favored bet isn't it? Of course getting him out is gonna be harder than just turning our backs on it. Way to go out on a limb there ocdude! By your posts , you never want to look for the truth. Whatever the media says, you believe. You should be embarrassed.

  3. Why are people called a conspiracy theorist for asking questions? There are some valid questions that should be answered and not just looked over. Yes ocdude, it was a horrible thing no matter who did it or was involved. Is seems pretty easy to put the "conspiracy theorist" in their place by answering the publics questions.

    1. How were there several Internet/Facebook pages before the incident?

    2. What happen to the man the police caught in the woods? Who was he?

    3. Why did the professional medical examiner say it was the assault rifle when it was clearly pulled out of the truck after the fact?

    There are so many more questions that are legitimate and deserve answers. I would want to know if it was my child out of respect for his life. Not one person has answered these questions but some people just want to look past this like it didn't happen. If our govt suspected you of a crime, you bet you ass all this evidence on film and the Internet would be used against you immediately. We know children were murdered. Worst thing I've ever heard. So lets question everything until answers are given. Not just turn our backs. IMO, that's spitting on children's graves as ocdude says we are doing. This has nothing to do with rep/dem. It has to do with the truth.

  4. Would you say the same thing for someone who drinks alcohol occasionally?

    Its no different....cause you can have drunks that show up to work under the influence.....and then you have those that only drink after work or on the weekends....

    So why is someone who smokes weed every now and then a larger liability then someone who drinks every now and then?

    IMO. A person drunk is way more of a liability that someone smoking weed. This society is just brainwashed that weed is horrible and the gateway drug, when in fact, alcohol is. Which kills more people every year, which causes people to be aggressive and fight, drive 100 mph, become depressed and hungover. And alcohol is the legal one? Makes no sense, alcohol is far more dangerous to society than weed based on plain stats. It's all about the money and power though. Good hearing from ya keep!!

  5. No, I miss spoke.

    Drunks are drunks and drug addicts are drug addicts, being a drunk doesn’t make someone a drug addict and being a drug addict doesn’t make some one a drunk.

    Being proud of being either is a liberal concept.

    It's all seems a little judgmental. If you're a drunk on your own time, at home, harming nobody, who are you too judge? Same for a pothead? Which are both no different than a person eating processed and fast food too much or smokes cigarettes. Every instance, were all killing ourselves slowly, so to randomly pick which ways are ok is just being brainwashed by our govt telling your which is ok or isn't. Live by moral or immoral, not legal or illegal just because some random politician says so. That's being a sheep IMO.

  6. That would be two thousand drunken stoners. Send them to the the voting both and they will elect Barrack Obama for president.

    This is something a country shouldn't be so proud of.

    So all drinkers smoke weed and vice versa is what you're saying?

    So all drinkers smoke weed and vice versa is what you're saying?

    And by that logic, all drinkers voted for Obama? I'm not sure what your point is?

  7. This may be one of my favorite quotes. It's a scary thought that Americans citizens are being thrown on the back burner and forced to pay for those who aren't even supposed to be here. On top of us citizens having to pay for their families to be here, these illegals down here in the south take almost every construction job available because they are not even on the same playing field. How can any legal contractor compete with an illegal while bidding on a job when the American has to pay 35% of his income to Uncle Sam and the illegal doesn't? This means the illegal can underbid the legal contractor substantially and still make a good profit. Unless someone understands quality of constriction, they take the best price everytime. Money talks, even though it will probably be a shotty job. Then we have to pay for these people's health care and schooling? What a deal!!!

    Hey Obama, secure the borders! Ya right. I know you need votes. Is a country even a country if it doesn't have borders?

    post-34615-135177757903_thumb.jpg

    • Upvote 2
    • Downvote 1
  8. Wait a minute? Does anyone remember the debate about "lifting" zeros and "raising" zeros? This article implies the two terms are different. The Argument was "raising the zeros means .00086 would be .86 and "lifting" was remove mind "0"'s from the actual currency. Others here said they are the same thing. This could be a good thing! Raise those 0's according to this article!!

    Peace

    • Upvote 2
  9. I see two quotes talking about Iraq paying for their own reconstruction, not paying the US a trillion or two for their liberation.

    When saleh says flat out that in deleting three zeros, 25,000 dinar becomes 25 dinar, what exactly is open to debate or opinion?

    If you take what saleh is saying is gospel and there is no debate here, you should be long gone by now. Unless you really just like to argue. CASH OUT BRO!!!!!! SALEH SAID!!!!

    • Upvote 1
  10. What is funny everything that Ron Paul says is backed up by history. I challenge each and everyone of you that support another candidate to come up with history that supports your candidates beliefs of how the US need to be run. I will take a fair bet that none of the candidates can even come up with one quarter 25% of the proof backing up what they say.

    All non Ron Paul supporters say,"we are sick of seeing all the Ron Paul stuff." Well here is your opportunity to show your candidate off. Stop crying because we can support each and every word that Ron Paul says. He is the only True Candidate. RP 2012.

    He is a bad ass. He seems to be the only one that is preaching the right message IMO. Follow the constitution, plain and simple. Unfortunately, both parties are so overrun with money controlling the outcomes. that's about the only thing that is bipartisan. Ha. My dad has always said he thinks he will see an American revolt before he passes. That may be the only way to clean it up. He may be right. We shall see though.

    • Upvote 2
  11. Haven't researched, but it sounds to me llike they don't have to apply for them. They will just get them. How are they supposed to make the payments on them with such a high unemployment rate? Are these going to be backed by the government? A way to steal more money from Iraq?

    I have come to the conclusion that no one in Iraq knows what the XXX they are doing. So maybe they will RV this thing at $3.00 or more.. they aren't smart enough to know the consequences. If they get greedy (and we already know they are) they may just go for it. We may just profit big time off this because of their power struggles and ignorance! :D

    I'm with ya. I have been saying all along to the lopsters to "never say never" just because of the numbers and things we hear about rd'ing. Corruption is one of the best cards in our hand. I gaurentee many Iraqi officials know the possible return on an RV, and there will be several pushing for it and probably are as we speak.

  12. I would agree that their articles are confusing to us, and possible to the Iraqi people. But if I am trying to teach a mass of people, I am going to use several different approaches and presentations. In this case, the major point is the dinar is not going to loose value but gain value. The 000s are going to be a thing of the pass and a new currency will be issued. The new will be without the 000s and will seem less, but in reality it is the same.

    Now, the average citizen will know that something is happening to the currency. They can say, "We will not be hurt financially by what is happening, but we are not sure just exactly the value of the dinar after it happens." (Which, if they gave that piece of information, they would reveal the rate of the RV and that they do not want to do! The CBI is smart enough to NOT educate the people, and us, in that area.) If they did, every jar in the Iraqi house would be full of "squirreled away" dinar. They want the citizens to make the exchange and not horde the large bills. (JMO)

    [/quot

    I wasn't saying the CBI would educate the public on an RV, but I just don't know about them starting an education campaign before it passed Parliment. What if Parliment denies it? Why waste the time if it doesn't go through?

    I also agree at trying to educate people different ways, but the information should be consistent throughout EVERY technique being used to educate them. There's been many contradicting articles with to much different info, imo

  13. The reason we are hearing the same story over, and over, an over is that they are educating the people of Iraq. These articles are not for us, we are the voyeurs looking in on what Iraq is doing and saying. Every time Saleh says anything it is about what they are going to do with the replacing of the 000s. This "education process" of what will happen to the dinar has been going on since early last year and I hope it is coming to some type of conclusion an the stop educating and start the process. I'm educated!!! RV already!!

    I don't think the "education campaign" would start until it passed Parliment, IMO. They may be preparing people that there is going to be currency change of some sort but the articles are not all the same. Some articles say increase value, some say don't affect value. There's articles speaking of $50k and $100k notes, articles that say "soon" and some say 2 years. It just seems they would create one simple and detailed publication that was consistent if they were educating. I mean look at us here at dv, we have many intelligent experienced people here that scrutinize every article and we still aren't sure what's going to happen. I'm sure the CBI has sense enough to publish a clear and understandable "education campaign" to avoid mass confusion and not increase dollarization.

    • Upvote 3
  14. Even with an RV, Iraq couldn't afford the real estate to build an equivalent embassy in our capital city. :lol:

    I was thinking along the same lines. If you want it Sadr, fork d!ck ! Ha. We paid for ours, you pay for yours.

    I chuckled....... Tee-hee

    Sadr is just a voice, a voice over a group of people. Not all of their citizens may necessarily believe him or not, but he does have quite a following.

    So, the words he spews is likely a difference between gaining additional followers, making the U.S. look like the bad guys, or simply political reasons.

    It could be a tactical technique to get their peopel to rejoice and become more peaceful now that the U.S. presence is gone. (Which is quite sad, as political turmoil was heightened upon our departure)

    So, is it simply a point the finger game? Maybe, whatever takes the blame off you..

    Ha! You have to look at it through his eyes, so to speak.

    He wanted the U.S. gone & assumed peace and prosperity would happen. He was wrong, violence & tremble occurred. So, obviously he would find a way to blame the U.S. to maintain followers

    I think they should build an embassy on U.S. soil.. It would not only be quite fair, but it would help strengthen the relationship with the country. I know that the relationship is likely quite strong already, but, this shows we're in it for the long haul and ready to be BFF's (best friends forever) LOL!!!

    That, and if their economy grows as fast as some predict, this may be a very good idea.

    Does it have to be the same size? No, but do I think it should exist? Yes...

    The U.S. has a big embassy over there simply for protection and other issues. Pretty sure if they had an embassy here, they wouldn't need to fear potential threats.

    Just my 0.02 ..

    I agree with ya. Make them feel as equals. They get a little sensitive and competitive sometimes. But make 'em pay for it!

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.