YourIntelSux

Hopefully we're not gonna ban boobs now. I would really miss those.

Spot on Maggie!!

It's pretty easy for you to take the odds favored bet isn't it? Of course getting him out is gonna be harder than just turning our backs on it. Way to go out on a limb there ocdude! By your posts , you never want to look for the truth. Whatever the media says, you believe. You should be embarrassed.

Why are people called a conspiracy theorist for asking questions? There are some valid questions that should be answered and not just looked over. Yes ocdude, it was a horrible thing no matter who did it or was involved. Is seems pretty easy to put the "conspiracy theorist" in their place by answering the publics questions. 1. How were there several Internet/Facebook pages before the incident? 2. What happen to the man the police caught in the woods? Who was he? 3. Why did the professional medical examiner say it was the assault rifle when it was clearly pulled out of the truck after the fact? There are so many more questions that are legitimate and deserve answers. I would want to know if it was my child out of respect for his life. Not one person has answered these questions but some people just want to look past this like it didn't happen. If our govt suspected you of a crime, you bet you ass all this evidence on film and the Internet would be used against you immediately. We know children were murdered. Worst thing I've ever heard. So lets question everything until answers are given. Not just turn our backs. IMO, that's spitting on children's graves as ocdude says we are doing. This has nothing to do with rep/dem. It has to do with the truth.

Looks like a lot of offense with no defense. If there were a time where that was needed, you would think you'd want some doors on that thing. "What of he shot you in the face Harry?"

I'm with ya on that Mags!!! Bunch of crooks trying to horde all the money by controlling the money supply and enslaving America thru debt. Drives me crazy we let a small group of bankers do this. Peace

Well, I own a white sand beach club in downtown Dallas called The Sandbar. We're having a huge " end of the world party" if anyone wants to go out with a bang!

IMO. A person drunk is way more of a liability that someone smoking weed. This society is just brainwashed that weed is horrible and the gateway drug, when in fact, alcohol is. Which kills more people every year, which causes people to be aggressive and fight, drive 100 mph, become depressed and hungover. And alcohol is the legal one? Makes no sense, alcohol is far more dangerous to society than weed based on plain stats. It's all about the money and power though. Good hearing from ya keep!!

It's all seems a little judgmental. If you're a drunk on your own time, at home, harming nobody, who are you too judge? Same for a pothead? Which are both no different than a person eating processed and fast food too much or smokes cigarettes. Every instance, were all killing ourselves slowly, so to randomly pick which ways are ok is just being brainwashed by our govt telling your which is ok or isn't. Live by moral or immoral, not legal or illegal just because some random politician says so. That's being a sheep IMO.

So all drinkers smoke weed and vice versa is what you're saying? And by that logic, all drinkers voted for Obama? I'm not sure what your point is?

Put 1000 pot smokers together in party And 1000 drinkers at another party.........which party will cause the most trouble ie fighting, reckless driving, hangovers, and anger. Weird ones legal and the other isn't.

This may be one of my favorite quotes. It's a scary thought that Americans citizens are being thrown on the back burner and forced to pay for those who aren't even supposed to be here. On top of us citizens having to pay for their families to be here, these illegals down here in the south take almost every construction job available because they are not even on the same playing field. How can any legal contractor compete with an illegal while bidding on a job when the American has to pay 35% of his income to Uncle Sam and the illegal doesn't? This means the illegal can underbid the legal contractor substantially and still make a good profit. Unless someone understands quality of constriction, they take the best price everytime. Money talks, even though it will probably be a shotty job. Then we have to pay for these people's health care and schooling? What a deal!!! Hey Obama, secure the borders! Ya right. I know you need votes. Is a country even a country if it doesn't have borders?

Wait a minute? Does anyone remember the debate about "lifting" zeros and "raising" zeros? This article implies the two terms are different. The Argument was "raising the zeros means .00086 would be .86 and "lifting" was remove mind "0"'s from the actual currency. Others here said they are the same thing. This could be a good thing! Raise those 0's according to this article!! Peace

If you take what saleh is saying is gospel and there is no debate here, you should be long gone by now. Unless you really just like to argue. CASH OUT BRO!!!!!! SALEH SAID!!!!

Dr Evil must have wrote this article.

He's 60.

He is a bad ass. He seems to be the only one that is preaching the right message IMO. Follow the constitution, plain and simple. Unfortunately, both parties are so overrun with money controlling the outcomes. that's about the only thing that is bipartisan. Ha. My dad has always said he thinks he will see an American revolt before he passes. That may be the only way to clean it up. He may be right. We shall see though.

Smoke and mirrors? Ha. Kind of a scary article. Sounds real familiar

I'm with ya. I have been saying all along to the lopsters to "never say never" just because of the numbers and things we hear about rd'ing. Corruption is one of the best cards in our hand. I gaurentee many Iraqi officials know the possible return on an RV, and there will be several pushing for it and probably are as we speak.

I don't think the "education campaign" would start until it passed Parliment, IMO. They may be preparing people that there is going to be currency change of some sort but the articles are not all the same. Some articles say increase value, some say don't affect value. There's articles speaking of $50k and $100k notes, articles that say "soon" and some say 2 years. It just seems they would create one simple and detailed publication that was consistent if they were educating. I mean look at us here at dv, we have many intelligent experienced people here that scrutinize every article and we still aren't sure what's going to happen. I'm sure the CBI has sense enough to publish a clear and understandable "education campaign" to avoid mass confusion and not increase dollarization.

They call it a " currency attack" because nobody wants their butt wipin' money? That's funny. How bout an RV to help with this attack!? As far as we should be concerned, let the people keep turning in money.

Wasn't stolen money the reason for Kuwaitis RV as well? I thought I read that somewhere but I'm not sure.

I was thinking along the same lines. If you want it Sadr, fork d!ck ! Ha. We paid for ours, you pay for yours. I agree with ya. Make them feel as equals. They get a little sensitive and competitive sometimes. But make 'em pay for it!

Is there a way to figure out how much money there is in circulation by somehow using the 1/4 trillion sold at the auction and how many points the exchange rate changed to "stabilize" as Saleh puts it? I was Just brainstorming if there is maybe a back door way to get the amount in circulation but that's way over my head. any takers on that?