HYPR2001 - Do you know what a circular argument is? In your rebuttal you presented no proof, you simply asserted (repackaged) your original theory in an attempt to settle the matter. Unfortunately, that doesn’t play well with most folks. Did you not state in your first post “neighboring countries”? Did I not in fact, provide you with conclusive evidence of the “neighboring countries” in addition to their currency rates? Did I not disprove your statement “"There is no way that the IQD could come in less than what the neighboring countries are ranking at and still be a world player in the export business?” You then try and salvage your position by including practically every country in the Middle East! And your point was? You then try to make your point by asserting that the answer lies with oil producing countries vs. non-oil producers but to what conclusion? Next you mention the Iraq “trade embargo”. I’m sure you’re referring to the UN’s economic trade sanctions from 1991 until the 2003 U.S. invasion (and yes this was in essence) a trade embargo. But you still fail to make an argument as to how all this adds up to an RV of $1.49 - $3.00+. Simple math tells me even if you were to use Iraq’s entire oil and gold reserves as a basis for an RV today, and then add to that number the potential profit (from oil) over the next 50 years, the RV is non-sustainable. Listen, I’m not bashing you—I as much as anyone else would love to see a high RV in fact I hope I’m 100% wrong. I am simply asking for solid evidence that can stand the test of numbers. BTW, I expect you to kick my butt when presenting your next argument. Will