Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content


Platinum VIP
  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Posts posted by delta22

  1. demandemailheader3.jpg


    Reading the news today was like reliving a nightmare from eleven years ago:

    American civilians have been attacked and killed once again on American soil - on September 11th - by Islamic terrorists.

    Unfortunately, we can't rely on the Obama administration to get these fallen Americans the justice they deserve.

    That’s why, as Chairman of The Conservative Caucus, I'm asking you to go to right now.

    Sign our letter to Islamic leaders demanding they condemn these acts of violence, and apologize directly the families of those Americans who were murdered yesterday.

    Incredibly, when we were first attacked in Cairo yesterday on the anniversary of 9/11 the response from our government was:

    "The Embassy of the United States in Cairo condemns the continuing efforts by misguided individuals to hurt the religious feelings of Muslims . . ."

    That's right. WE APOLOGIZED TO THEM!

    Shortly after we failed to respond forcefully to the Cairo attack, the American embassy in Libya was bombarded by rockets and gunfire – resulting in the deaths of four American citizens including our Ambassador.

    . . . All because a group of religious extremists were offended by a YouTube video.

    How many more American lives must be lost before so-called moderate Muslims will condemn these acts of violence by their brothers?

    Take Action: Demand an apology from Muslim leaders in America.

    Our very way of life is under direct attack by the religious intolerance of a group of people who hate us for our freedom, and we must make a clear and bold statement.

    That's why the Conservative Caucus, which has fought for liberty in America since 1974, is distributing letters demanding a condemnation and an apology from the leaders of every Islamic Mosque in the United States.

    These Mosques enjoy the privilege of non-profit tax status, and the constitutionally protected freedom to spread their views within our communities. The least they can do is speak out and condemn these murders of their fellow Americans.


    • We demand that the leaders of every Mosque condemn the deaths of their fellow Americans at the hands of radical Muslims, and apologize directly to the families of those killed.
    • We demand that these leaders openly reject any and all efforts to spread or enforce extremist Sharia Law within the United States.
    • We demand they reject violent directives within the Quran, including Chapter 8, Verse 39, "Fight them until there is no more Fitnah (worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion will all be for Allah alone."
    • We demand that Islamic leaders around the world pledge to respect our Christian culture, the freedom of speech, and the independence of our nation from Sharia Law and religious violence.

    Radical Muslim forces are rising around the world thanks to financial and military support from the Obama Administration. Americans must respond to these latest attacks by declaring that religious violence and Sharia Law will not take one more step forward within our own borders.

    Join The Conservative Caucus today by adding your signature to our letter to U.S. Muslim leaders, and help us reach millions more Americans with this important message.

    Your individual faith, support and vigilance are greatly valued at a time when our government has failed to protect its own citizens - or even send a strong message to the enemies of freedom.

    With your support, we will prevail.



    Peter Thomas


    The Conservative Caucus

    P.S. Help The Conservative Caucus get justice for the Americans murdered in Libya. Go to and sign the letter demanding that Muslim leaders in America condemn these acts by religious extremists and apologize to the families affected.

    With your support, we will reach millions of Americans to show that religious intolerance and violence have no place in our culture.

    • Upvote 1
  2. Violent protests in Libya that claimed the life of the U.S. ambassador were the result of President Obama’s decision to intervene in the Libyan revolt without a “deep appreciation” for what would follow, former CIA Director Michael Hayden tells Newsmax.

    Hayden, a former four-star Air Force general, was appointed CIA director by President George W. Bush in 2006 and served until 2009.

    In an exclusive interview with Newsmax.TV on Wednesday, Hayden discusses the events in Libya: “I’m reminded of Secretary of State Powell’s comments about Iraq going back almost a decade — the Pottery Barn theory that if you break it you own it.

    “Here’s a case where we went into Libya for reasons that seemed very powerful for some people at the time, almost all of them in Tehran, perhaps without a true or deep appreciation for what the secondary and tertiary effects of overthrowing [Libyan ruler Moammar] Gadhafi would be.

    Watch our exclusive interview. Story continues below.

    <EMBED height=270 name=ooyalaPlayer_3gnqq_h70mnl3z type=application/x-shockwave-flash align=middle pluginspage= width=480 src= flashvars="&embedCode=xhdDV2NTq-rU-1BCkfarrMNJrVq3-7b8&videoPcode=JkcWs6v53lsRdGfwlCSwg_a5CUMv" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" loop="false" play="true" bgcolor="#000000"></EMBED>“This was always the story we saw in those cell phone videos of oppressed and oppressor, but there were other stories going on too, other narratives — East vs. West in Libya, tribal disputes in Libya, eastern Libya being home of the Islamic Libyan fighting group.

    Please Note: You can watch Gen. Hayden's special LIGNET Briefing on the Iran Crisis and the implications of an Israeli Attack — Click Here Now

    link to sign up lignet for iran“All these subplots were always out there and once you shatter the old society, these subplots become far more powerful and now we are seeing the results of that: Loss of control, portable air missiles, weapons from Libya being used to grab the northern half of Mali away from the Malian government, which is a good friend of the U.S."

    “The U.N. Security Council resolution on Libya was bait and switch. It was never just humanitarian assistance, it was to overthrow the regime," added Hayden.

    "As for how that affects the Russians, think about Syria. Now you’ve got a state, a heavily armed state in Libya that is armed at the militia and tribal level. I actually said when we first intervened that we now take on a moral responsibility for the future of the Libyan state and here we are.”

    Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other members of the U.S. diplomatic mission were killed in Benghazi, the cradle of the Libyan revolution, on Wednesday in protest at a movie that depicts the prophet Muhammad.

    In addition to the protests in Libya, demonstrators in Egypt tore down an American flag and burned it. Hayden, a member of the advisory board of, was asked if State Department officials in other countries, particularly the Middle East, are in greater danger.

    “I am sure that the cables have gone out to the appropriate embassies in that region saying be on your guard, increase security, strengthen your liaison with local government in order to get a warning of impending demonstrations or attack,” he responds.

    “You might even see people being told to vary their times en route to work. You might see other people being told to stay at home. You’ve got to take all appropriate precautions, although I must admit that if you were going to predict two countries in which these events were to take place I would’ve predicted Egypt and Libya as being the two that were most volatile and the two where these events would’ve been most likely.”

    Libyan military forces and police were slow to act once the protest in Benghazi developed. Asked if they may have been complicit in the demonstrations, Hayden tells Newsmax: “I really don’t know, and a wise man once told me several decades ago, never blame on malice what can easily be explained by incompetence. So we’re just going to see how the facts take us with regard to what the Libyan government did and didn’t do.”

    The protests were sparked by the YouTube trailer of a movie, “Innocence of Muslims,” which insults the Prophet Muhammad. Florida pastor Terry Jones, who had inflamed anger in the Muslim world in 2010 with plans to burn the Koran, said he had promoted the film, which was produced by an Israeli-American property developer.

    Regarding Jones, Hayden says: “Blood on his hands is a strong statement, but actions have consequences. These are reasonably predictable consequences, so I do think that someone who set this chain of events in motion bears some measure of responsibility.

    “But when you come right down to it, one of our fundamental values is freedom of speech. We have a right to say that. People have a right to say things even if those things are offensive. Frankly, that’s a real test of freedom of speech, isn’t it?”

    Asked why protests turned so violent in Libya but not in Egypt, Hayden says: “On the surface, Libya is a far more fractured society. It is all controlled by a variety of competing armed groups. It could be a case where arms in the hands of violent ill-tempered men are more numerous than they are in Egypt.”

    Please Note: You can watch Gen. Hayden's special LIGNET Briefing on the Iran Crisis and the implications of an Israeli Attack — Click Here Now

    © 2012 Newsmax. All rights reserved.

    • Upvote 5
  3. Take Action: House to Vote to Fund ObamaCare Tomorrow

    Dear Patriots,

    In March 2010, Congress passed the President’s health care law against overwhelming public opinion. This public opinion translated into major election results in November 2010, and has continued to be strongly against the health care law.

    Unfortunately, Congress does not appear to be paying attention. This week the House of Representatives is intending to pass – apparently with bipartisan support – a six-month budget that includes full funding for the Affordable Care Act. Tea Party Patriots stands against this flouting of the public’s will, and asks anyone and everyone who can send an e-mail or make a phone call to their Congressman to do so. The message is simple: in order to represent your constituents, do not vote to fund the President’s health care law. If you do, you are not with the American people, and you are with the bureaucrats and lobbyists in Washington.

    Some people will tell you that Washington will be more conservative after November, and so we should wait until then before aggressively targeting the health care law. Unfortunately, grassroots activists have seen just how much value there is in waiting until next year – remember how spending cuts were supposed to be taking place in 2011 and 2012 if we only gave Republicans one chamber of Congress? Clearly, both parties have failed to hold to principles of balanced budgets and limited government, so it is the job of Tea Party Patriots to hold all Members of Congress accountable.

    Your call, your e-mail, your activism is absolutely critical to our success, but it must happen as soon as possible. The vote takes place tomorrow. Thank you in advance for doing all you can to push for fiscal responsibility within our government.

    Click to Call Your Representative Now

    • Upvote 2
  4. A prominent member of Chicago’s homosexual community claims Barack Obama’s participation in the “***” bar and bathhouse scene was so well known that many who were aware of his lifestyle were shocked when he ran for president and finally won the White House.

    “It was preposterous to the people I knew then to think Obama was going to keep his *** life secret,” said Kevin DuJan, who was a gossip columnist in Chicago for various blogs when Obama was living in the city as a community organizer and later a state senator.

    “Nobody who knew Obama in the *** bar scene thought he could possibly be president,” said DuJan.

    DuJan, founder and editor of the Hillarious Clinton-supporting website, told WND he has first-hand information from two different sources that “Obama was personally involved in the *** bar scene.”

    “If you just hang out at these bars, the older guys who have been frequenting these *** bars for 25 years will tell you these stories,” DuJan said. “Obama used to go to the *** bars during the week, most often on Wednesday, and they said he was very much into older white guys.”

    Obama, DuJan said, is “not heterosexual and he’s not bisexual. He’s homosexual.”

    Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen, who worked with the National Security Agency from 1984 to 1988 as a Navy intelligence analyst, confirmed DuJan’s claims.

    “It is common knowledge in the Chicago *** community that Obama actively visited the *** bars and bathhouses in Chicago while he was an Illinois state senator,” Madsen told WND.

    WND also spoke with a member of the East Bank Club in Chicago, who confirmed Obama was a member there and was known to be a homosexual. The upscale fitness club says it has some 10,000 members, but it’s one of a number of places identified by the Chicago homosexual community as a “*** gym.”

    In April, WND reported a federal judge dismissed a libel case against Larry Sinclair, a homosexual who claimed Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign had paid to rig a polygraph test regarding Sinclair’s sensational charge that he had sex and used cocaine twice with Obama while Obama was an Illinois state senator. Sinclair tells his story in “Barack Obama & Larry Sinclair: Cocaine, Sex, Lies & Murder.”

    WND also reported former radical activist John Drew has said that when he met Obama when Obama was a student at Occidental College, he thought Obama and his then-Pakistani roommate were “***” lovers.

    In addition, rumors have swirled around Obama’s relationship with his personal aide and former “body man,” Reggie Love, who resurfaced on the eve of the Republican National Convention to support his old boss. Love resigned from the White House in November 2011 after compromising photographs of him as a college student received wide circulation.

    WND also has documented in two separate articles, here and here, that Obama wore a gold band on his wedding ring finger from the time he attended Occidental College through his student days at Harvard Law School.

    DuJan said that during Obama’s first presidential campaign, “there was fear in the *** community” about talking openly about Obama being homosexual, particularly after the murder in December 2007 of Donald Young, the openly *** choir director at Jeremiah Wright’s Trinity United Church of Christ, who was known to be a close friend of Obama.

    “People did not want to talk openly about Obama being ***,” he said.

    “Then, when we saw how Larry Sinclair was demonized, anybody who would expose Obama worried they would be silenced if they dared to speak the truth about Obama’s *** life,” DuJan said.

    ‘Obama’s secrets’

    DuJan said he has been told “Obama’s secrets would have to come out just like John Edwards’ secrets came out.”

    He said Obama stopped going to *** bars and bathhouses in Chicago when he began running for the U.S. Senate in 2004.

    “Back then, Obama could walk around Chicago and people generally wouldn’t recognize him, even though he was a state senator in the Illinois assembly at the time,” DuJan said.

    DuJan insisted that while he’s a supporter of Hillarious Clinton, he holds no personal animus toward Obama. He said he campaigned for Clinton in 2008 “because I had waited for years for her to be able to run.”

    “I opposed Obama not because I’m a racist, or that I hate Obama, I just knew the type of person Obama associated with in Chicago,” he said.

    He pointed to Obama’s association with convicted Chicago real estate magnate Tony Rezko, Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan and Rev. Wright.

    “Obama was a dirty politician that the media never wanted to vet – that’s what concerned me about Obama,” Du Jan said.

    DuJan spoke further of his claims about Obama in an interview Monday night on Andrea Shea King’s show on, which included questions from WND during the last half of the show.

    Man’s Country

    Madsen published an article in his Wayne Madsen Report in May 2010 claiming Obama and Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel were members of the same bathhouse in Chicago.

    “President Obama and his chief of staff Rahm Emanuel are lifetime members of the same *** bathhouse in uptown Chicago, according to informed sources in Chicago’s *** community, as well as veteran political sources in the city,” Madsen wrote.

    He said the bathhouse, “Man’s Country,” catered “to older men,” noting “it has been in business for some 30 years and is known as one of uptown Chicago’s ‘grand old bathhouses.’”

    Madsen wrote his 2010 report after traveling to Chicago to interview bartenders and customers at several “***” bars.

    DuJan gave WND a list of “***” bars in Chicago where older customers hang out and tell stories about how Obama, prior to 2004, frequented visited to pick up men for sex, including several on Halstead Street, widely known as an “uber-*** Chicago street.

    Writing in Tuesday, DuJan said rooms at Man’s Country bathhouse are still referred to as the “presidential suite,” or the “Oral Office,” because “the current President used to haunt the place when he was a just another Illinois state senator that no one had ever heard of or cared about.”

    DuJan said he believes that, someday, “all of this is going to be as public knowledge as JFK’s affair with Marilyn Monroe and the other women he cavorted with while married to Jackie.”

    “Someday,” he said, “in the next 10-20 years, everyone will know all about Man’s Country, and the place will no doubt get a plaque of sometime commemorating that place as a *** hangout for the future leader of the free world.”

    • Upvote 2
    • Downvote 1
  5. Ronald Kessler reporting from Washington, D.C. — The government can seize all profits received by former Navy SEAL Matt Bissonnette for his book “No Easy Day,” according to John L. Martin, who headed the Justice Department section that prosecutes spies and leakers of classified information.

    Even if the book, written under the pseudonym Mark Owen, contains no classified information, the author breached his contract with the government by not submitting it for pre-publication review, Martin tells Newsmax.

    See Why Pentagon Is Nervous: Get 'No Easy Day' for ONLY $4.95 With Special OfferGo Here Now

    Martin cites a 1980 Supreme Court decision upholding such a contract that was signed by Frank Snepp, a former CIA officer. In that case, no classified information was disclosed, but the proceeds from Snepp’s book were placed in trust for the government.

    “In the Snepp case, he failed to submit his book for review, and the government seized the profits from the book,” Martin says. “Snepp took the case to the Supreme Court. So there is a Supreme Court decision on this very point that stands for the proposition that notwithstanding the fact that no classified information was published, the contract with the government prevails, and the former employee still has an obligation to put that book through pre-publication review and that the remedy for the government is the seizure of the profits.”

    A lawyer and former FBI agent, Martin headed Justice Department espionage prosecutions for nearly 25 years and supervised the prosecution of 76 spies. They included John A. Walker Jr., a Navy warrant officer; Jonathan J. Pollard, a spy for Israel; Ronald Pelton, a former NSA employee; and Aldrich Ames, a CIA officer.

    As it happens, the Pentagon has said the book does contain classified information. The book itself refers to the entire mission as being top secret. But Martin says, “You do not have to bring criminal charges against anyone, and you can punish him by seizing his profits, and you remove the incentive, which was the big point in the Snepp case — removing the incentive of making profits from breaching your contract with the government.”

    In his book, Bissonnette says he is donating “most of the proceeds from its sale in honor of” the Navy SEALS who have lost their lives since 9/11. However, the Navy SEAL Foundation, one potential recipient, says on its website that it “will not be accepting any donations that are generated from the book or any related activities.” Martin says the proceeds would be seized by the government regardless of how they are spent.

    See Why Pentagon Is Nervous: Get 'No Easy Day' for ONLY $4.95 With Special OfferGo Here Now

    Given the remedy of seizing the profits from the book, Martin sees no need for a prosecution.

    “If you go after this guy with an indictment for allegedly disclosing classified information, you are going to give credibility to the book and increase its sales,” Martin says. “You are also going to make him more of a celebrity because every First Amendment advocate in this country — the American Civil Liberties Union, The New York Times, the faculty at Harvard Law School — will be coming after the government, accusing the government of suppressing the poor guy’s First Amendment rights.”

    Ronald Kessler is chief Washington correspondent of He is the New York Times best-selling author of books on the Secret Service, FBI, and CIA. Read more reports from Ronald Kessler — Click Here Now.

    • Upvote 1
  6. (Editor’s Note: This the first of a series of articles on President Barack Obama’s war on religion)

    The American people have been exceedingly fair in drawing a distinction between the personal religious beliefs and practices of presidential candidates and the public policies they adopt. This does not mean that personal predilections are without policy implications.

    To be sure, there are occasions when key personal anecdotes reveal something important about the mindset of candidates. Take, for example, what Michelle and Barack Obama told People magazine in 2008 about the “Obama House Rules.”

    Of the seven “House Rules” they enumerated, most were conventional, but one stood out: Michelle and Barack do not believe in giving Christmas gifts to their children. Barack explained that he wants “to teach some limits.”

    Special Report: Obama’s Assault on Religion — Click Here Now

    The goal is noble. But of all the other choices available to them — setting spending limits, putting a limit on TV time — for some reason they chose the Christmas holiday as their teaching moment. This is more than unusual: non-Christians, as well as agnostics and atheists, are known to exchange Christmas gifts.

    Against this backdrop, we can make sense of the controversy that erupted during the Obamas’ first Christmas at the White House. At issue was whether they should break tradition and nix the display of a manger scene.

    The flap started when The New York Times reported that the Obamas were planning a “non-religious Christmas.” The leak came from a former White House social secretary who attended a luncheon for the new appointee, Desirée Rogers: allegedly, the Obamas were not going to permit the display of a nativity scene.

    When Times reporter Sheryl *** Stolberg contacted the White House to see if this was true, the story was confirmed. Stolberg was told “there [have] been internal discussions about making Christmas more inclusive and whether to display the crèche.” In the end, the Obamas decided to allow a manger scene.

    However, Christmas did not escape without controversy. For reasons never explained, the White House Christmas tree was adorned with ornaments depicting drag queens and mass murderers (Mao Zedong was featured; he killed 77 million of his own people).

    In 2008, when Obama was a presidential candidate, he made a comment about white working-class Christians that would come back to haunt him. “It’s not surprising,” he said, “[that] they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” What proved to be so revealing about this admission was the venue: in a closed-door session, he addressed a forum of wealthy, left-leaning secularists in San Francisco.

    Given his mindset, it is not surprising that Obama is opposed to the posting of the Ten Commandments on public property. More surprising are his reservations regarding the display of religious symbols on private property. He was only in office a few months when his advance team told officials at Georgetown University that they had better put a drape over any religious symbols that might appear as a backdrop to where the president was going to speak. To drive the point home, they made sure that the IHS symbol, a monogram of the name Jesus Christ, was not in sight.

    On Sept. 15, 2009, Obama addressed the Congressional Hispanic Caucus Institute’s 33rd Annual Awards. It was to be a perfunctory speech, although it didn’t turn out that way. To wit: Obama did not reference God, or the “Creator,” when citing the Declaration of Independence.

    Here is what he said: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, endowed with certain inalienable rights . . .” This is not what Jefferson wrote. He was explicit about the origin of our rights, noting that all men were “endowed by their Creator” with certain unalienable rights.

    What Obama said was no accident; the remarks were prepared. Moreover, even after being roundly criticized for this startling omission, Obama did the exact same thing only a month later at a fundraiser in Rockville, Md.

    The fact is Obama is uncomfortable with America’s Christian heritage. In 2010 he could not bring himself to utter the words “In God We Trust” when speaking in Indonesia about our national motto; instead, he substituted “E Pluribus Unum.” But he is quite comfortable with atheists.

    In 2010, Obama became the first president in U.S. history to welcome a gathering of atheists: administration officials met with activists from the Secular Coalition for America, an umbrella group that includes American atheists and other virulently anti-Christian organizations.

    Obama is not equally jittery about all religions. When it comes to Islam, he can be very accommodating. For example, in 2010 he said he supported the right of Muslims to build a mosque at Ground Zero. The real issue, of course, was not a legal one — it was a moral one. He refused to discuss this matter.

    It is not simply Obama who is uncomfortable with religion; it is true of the most active members of his party. Consider what just happened at the Democratic National Convention. On the first day, there was a panel discussion led by a notorious foe of the religious rights of Catholics, namely, Catholics for Choice (CFC).

    This group, which is nothing more than a well-funded letterhead sponsored by the likes of the Ford Foundation — it has no members — has twice been condemned by the bishops’ conference as a fraud. Perversely, CFC addressed the subject of religious liberty! This would be like having the Klan speak about race relations at the RNC.

    Until 2012, every Democratic Party Platform made some reference to God. But things changed this year, demonstrating once again that the administration has a “God problem.”

    In 2008, the platform mentioned that government “gives everyone willing to work hard the chance to make the most of their God-given potential.” The italics, which I added, were deleted from the 2012 Platform. Worse, when CNN’s Piers Morgan asked DNC chair Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz why someone “deliberately” excised the word “God,” she replied, “I can assure you that no one has deliberately taken God out of the Platform.”

    Special Report: Obama’s Assault on Religion — Click Here Now

    After listening to this remarkable response, Morgan pressed her again, asking, “So it was an accident?” She refused to comment.

    Once the pushback began, the Obama team folded and reinstated God. But even this process turned out to be a disaster. After ignoring the expressed will of the delegates — a voice vote to put God back in the platform was split (it didn’t come close to the two-thirds majority that was needed) — it was ruled, by fiat, to have passed.

    Terri Holland, a New Mexico delegate, made a very revealing remark when she said that the revisions were made to “kow-tow to the religious right.” In other words, thoughtful Democrats would never want to pay homage to God in their Platform.

    (The second article in this series will address Obama’s secular allies.”)

    Dr. William Donohue is the president of and CEO of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, the nation’s largest Catholic civil rights organization. The publisher of the Catholic League journal, Catalyst, Bill is a former Bradley Resident Scholar at the Heritage Foundation and served for two decades on the board of directors of the National Association of Scholars. The author of five books, two on the ACLU, and the winner of several teaching awards and many awards from the Catholic community, Donohue has appeared on thousands of television and radio shows speaking on civil liberties and social issues.

    • Upvote 5
  7. It has been said many times that politics makes strange bedfellows. That was proven once again Monday, when Republican vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan voiced support for Chicago Mayor Rahm Emanuel in his battle against the Chicago Teachers Union.

    Emanuel, of course, was formerly chief of staff for President Barack Obama, and he was slated to begin soliciting funds for super PACs supporting Obama until the teachers strike broke out this week.

    "Rahm and I have not agreed on every issue or on a lot of issues, but Mayor Emanuel is right today in saying that this teachers' union strike is unnecessary and wrong," Ryan said at a campaign fund-raiser in Portland, CNN reports. "We know that Rahm is not going to support our campaign, but on this issue and this day we stand with Mayor Rahm Emanuel."

    Obama is walking a fine line between backing Emanuel, whose stance is shared by education reformers throughout the country, and backing teachers unions that have offered strong political support to the president.

    Not surprisingly, then, White House spokesman Jay Carney said Monday that Obama hadn’t come to a conclusion on the strike yet, but that his chief focus is the students and families affected by the strike.

    Ryan urged Obama to get off the fence. “This does not have to divide the two parties," the Wisconsin congressman said. "And so we're going to ask, where does President Obama stand? Does he stand with his former chief of staff Mayor Rahm Emanuel, with the children and the parents, or does he stand with the union? On issues like this, we need to speak out and be very clear."

  8. Former Vice President **** Cheney has blasted President Barack Obama over a report that the current commander in chief has gone to fewer than half of his security briefings during his time in office.

    The revelation underscores why “people are so offended by Obama’s “efforts to take sole credit for the killing of Osama bin Laden,” Cheney said in an email to the Daily Caller.

    “Those who deserve the credit are the men and women in our military and intelligence communities who worked for many years to track him down. They are the ones who deserve the thanks of a grateful nation,” Cheney said in the note sent on the eve of the 9/11 anniversary.

    The conservative Government Accountability Institute issued the report that said Obama had attended just 43.8 percent of his daily briefings, a figure the White House did not dispute.

    The group said Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush, rarely missed a meeting.

    National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor described Obama’s attendance at the meetings as “not particularly interesting or useful,” as he receives written daily briefings. “The president gets the information he needs from the intelligence community every day,” Vietor said.

    • Upvote 9
  9. The White House has rejected a request by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to meet President Barack Obama in the United States this month, an Israeli official said on Tuesday, after a row erupted between the allies over Iran's nuclear programme. An Israeli official told Reuters on condition of anonymity that Netanyahu's aides had asked for a meeting when he visits the United Nations this month, and "the White House has got back to us and said it appears a meeting is not possible. It said that the president's schedule will not permit that".

    Netanyahu, who has met Obama on all his U.S. trips since 2009, has been pushing him to adopt a tougher line against Iran.

    He argues that setting a clear boundary for Iran's uranium enrichment activities and imposing stronger economic sanctions could deter Tehran from developing nuclear weapons and mitigate the need for military action.

    In comments that appeared to bring the possibility of an Israeli attack on Iran closer, Netanyahu had earlier taken Washington to task for rebuffing his call to set a "red line" for Iran's nuclear programme, which has already prompted four rounds of U.N. sanctions.

    "The world tells Israel 'wait, there's still time'. And I say, 'Wait for what? Wait until when?'" said Netanyahu, speaking in English.

    "Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don't have a moral right to place a red light before Israel," he added, addressing a news conference with Bulgaria's prime minister.


    The website of Israel's daily newspaper Haaretz called his words "an unprecedented verbal attack on the U.S. government".

    Iran makes no secret of its hostility to Israel, widely assumed to be the region's only nuclear-armed power, but says its nuclear programme is purely peaceful.

    Netanyahu's relations with Obama have been strained over Iran and other issues, such as Jewish settlement building in the occupied West Bank.

    But he has never framed his differences with Obama - who has pledged he will "always have Israel's back" and is deep in a re-election campaign - in moral terms.

    Republican challenger Mitt Romney has accused Obama of throwing Israel "under the bus".

    Netanyahu's comments followed U.S. Secretary of State Hillarious Clinton's remarks on Monday that the United States would not set a deadline in further talks with Iran, and that there was still time for diplomacy to work.

    Diplomats have also said six world powers - including the United States - are poised to voice "serious concern" about Iran's uranium enrichment programme and to urge it to open up access to nuclear sites.

    U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said on Tuesday that Washington would have little more than a year to act to stop Iran if it decided to produce a nuclear weapon.

    Iran has threatened to retaliate against Israel and U.S. interests in the Gulf if it is attacked, and any such conflict could throw Obama's re-election bid off course.


    Netanyahu did not mention Clinton by name but pointedly parroted her use of the word "deadline", saying:

    "If Iran knows that there is no 'deadline', what will it do? Exactly what it's doing. It's continuing, without any interference, towards obtaining a nuclear weapons capability and from there, nuclear bombs ...

    "So far we can say with certainty that diplomacy and sanctions haven't worked. The sanctions have hurt the Iranian economy but they haven't stopped the Iranian nuclear programme. That's a fact. And the fact is that every day that passes, Iran gets closer and closer to nuclear bombs."

    Recent tougher Israeli rhetoric has stoked speculation that Israel might attack Iran before the U.S. election in November, believing that Obama would be forced to give it military help to avoid alienating pro-Israeli voters.

    But over the past week, Netanyahu, in calling for a "red line", had appeared to be backing away from military action and preparing the ground for a possible meeting with Obama.

    Opinion polls suggest that a majority of Israelis do not want their military to strike Iran without U.S. support.

    Defence Minister Ehud Barak seemed to criticise Netanyahu's assault on the Jewish state's biggest ally.

    "Despite the differences and importance of maintaining Israel's independence of action, we must remember the importance of partnership with the United States and try as much as possible not to hurt that," a statement from his office said.

    © 2012 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.

    • Upvote 3
  10. > Gun Control in England - READ ALL THE WAY TO THE END! SPINE CHILLING


    > You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door.


    > Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers.


    > At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way.


    > With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up

    > your shotgun.


    > You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open

    > it.


    > In the darkness, you make out two shadows.


    > One holds something that looks like a crowbar.


    > When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the

    > shotgun and fire.


    > The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams,

    > while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside.


    > As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble:


    > In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few

    > that are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them

    > useless.


    > Yours was never registered.


    > Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They

    > arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a

    > Firearm.


    > When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry:

    > authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.


    > "What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask.


    > "Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if that's nothing.


    > "Behave yourself, and you'll be out in seven."


    > The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper.


    > Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante, while the two

    > men you shot are represented as choirboys.


    > Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them.


    > Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both

    > "victims" have been arrested numerous times - but the next day's

    > headline says it all:


    > "Lovable Rogue Son Didn't Deserve to Die."


    > The thieves have been transformed from career criminals into Robin

    > Hood-type pranksters.


    > As the days wear on, the story takes wings.


    > The national media picks it up, then the international media.


    > The surviving burglar has become a folk hero.


    > Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and he'll probably

    > win.


    > The media publishes reports that your home has been burglarized

    > several times in the past, and that you've been critical of local

    > police for their lack of effort in apprehending the suspects. After

    > the last break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared

    > next time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were

    > lying in wait for the burglars.


    > A few months later, you go to trial. The charges haven't been

    > reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently predicted.


    > When you take the stand, your anger at the injustice of it all works

    > against you. Prosecutors paint a picture of you as a mean, vengeful

    > man. It doesn't take long for the jury to convict you of all charges.


    > The judge sentences you to life in prison.


    > This case really happened:


    > On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk , England , killed

    > one burglar and wounded a second.


    > In April, 2000, he was convicted, and is now serving a life term.


    > How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in the once great

    > British Empire ?


    > It started with the Pistols Act of 1903.


    > This seemingly reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or

    > felons and established that handgun sales were to be made only to

    > those who had a license.


    > The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only

    > handguns but all firearms except shotguns.


    > Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any

    > weapon by private citizens, and mandated the registration of all

    > shotguns.


    > Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest after the

    > Hungerford mass shooting in 1987. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed

    > man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting

    > everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.


    > The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years of "gun

    > control", demanded even tougher restrictions. (The seizure of all

    > privately-owned handguns was the objective even though Ryan used a

    > rifle.)


    > Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a

    > semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public

    > school.


    > For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally

    > unstable or, worse, as criminals. Now the press had a real kook with

    > which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after

    > week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a

    > total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later,

    > sealed the fate of the few sidearms still owned by private citizens.


    > During the years in which the British government incrementally took

    > away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to

    > armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities

    > refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming

    > that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun.

    > Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while

    > the real criminals were released.


    > Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as

    > saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands."


    > All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous times, and several

    > elderly people were severely injured in beatings by young thugs who

    > had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of

    > antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by

    > burglars.


    > When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were

    > given three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good

    > British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn't were

    > visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if

    > they didn't comply. Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly

    > 200,000 handguns from private citizens.


    > How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been

    > registered and licensed. Kind of like cars. Sound familiar?WAKE UP

    > AMERICA!





    > "..It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,

    > tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.."

    > --Samuel Adams


    > You had better wake up, because your new president is going to do

    > this very same thing over here, if he can get it done. And there are

    > stupid people in congress and on the street that will go right along

    > with him.

    • Upvote 7
  11. GREAT


    Great going, Florida . You set the stage for the other 49 States to join! Kudos to Republican Governor Rick Scott for having the correctness and guts to move forward on this critical issue !

    Hooray for Florida ! !

    I-95 will be jammed for the next month or so........Druggies and deadbeats heading North out of Florida ..

    Florida is the first state requiring drug testing to receive welfare!

    Hooray for Florida !!!!

    In signing the new law, Republican Gov. Rick Scott said, "If Floridians want welfare, they better make sure they are drug-free.

    Applicants who test positive for illicit substances won't be eligible for the funds for a year, or until they undergo treatment.

    Those who fail a second time would be banned from receiving funds for three years!

    Naturally, a few people are crying this is unconstitutional.

    How is this unconstitutional ?

    It's completely legal that every other working people have to pass drug tests in order to get a J-O-B which supports those on welfare!

    Forward if you agree!!

    Let's get Welfare back to the ones who NEED it, not those who WON'T get a JOB.....

    I AGREE!!!! 100%

    • Upvote 5
  12. This is alarming!

    Beer contains female hormones!

    Yes, that's right, FEMALE hormones!

    Last month, Montreal University and scientists released the results of a recent analysis that revealed the presence of female hormones in beer. Men should take a concerned look at their beer consumption.

    The theory is that beer contains female hormones (hops contain Phytoestrogens) and that by drinking enough beer, men turn into women.

    To test the theory, 100 men each drank 8 schooners

    of beer within a one (1) hour period.

    It was then observed that 100% of the test subjects,

    yes, 100% of all these men:

    1) Argued over nothing.

    2) Refused to apologize when obviously wrong.

    3) Gained weight.

    4) Talked excessively without making sense.

    5) Became overly emotional

    6) Couldn't drive.

    7) Failed to think rationally, and

    8) Had to sit down while urinating.

    No further testing was considered necessary!

    Send this to the men you know

    to warn them about drinking too much beer!


    • Upvote 4
  13. Dear Lord, I thank You for this day, I thank You for my being able to see and to hear this morning.

    I'm blessed because You are a forgiving God and an under-standing God.

    You have done so much for me

    and You keep on blessing me.

    Forgive me this day for everything

    I have done, said or thought

    that was not pleasing to you.

    I ask now for Your forgiveness. Please keep me safe from all danger and harm.

    Help me to start this day with a new attitude and plenty of gratitude.

    Let me make the best of each and every day to clear my mind so that I can hear from You.

    Please broaden my mind that I can accept all things. Let me not whine and whimper over things I have no control over..

    And give me the best response

    when I'm pushed beyond my limits..

    I know that when I can't pray,

    You listen to my heart.

    Continue to use me to do Your will.

    Continue to bless me that I may be a blessing to others.

    Keep me strong that I may help the weak...

    Keep me uplifted that I may

    have words of encouragement for others.

    I pray for those that are lost

    and can't find their way.

    I pray for those that are misjudged

    and misunderstood.

    I pray for those who

    don't know You intimately.

    I pray for those that will delete this without sharing it with others.

    I pray for those that don't believe.

    But I thank You that I believe

    that God changes people

    and people change things.

    I pray for all my sisters and brothers.

    For each and every family member

    in their households.

    I pray for peace, love and joy

    in their homes; that they are out of debt and all their needs are met

    I pray that every eye that reads this knows there is no problem, circumstance, or situation greater than God.

    Every battle is in Your hands for You to fight.

    I pray that these words be received into the hearts of every eye that sees it in Jesus' name. Amen!

    • Upvote 10
  14. A woman stopped by, unannounced, at her son's house. She knocked on the door then immediately walked in. She was shocked to see her daughter-in-law lying on the couch, totally naked. Soft music was playing, and the aroma of perfume filled the room. 'What are you doing?' she asked. 'I'm waiting for Justin to come home from work.' The daughter-in-law answered. ' But you're naked!' the mother-in-law exclaimed. 'This is my love dress,' the daughter-in-law explained. 'Love dress? But you're naked!' 'Justin loves me to wear this dress,' she explained. 'Every time he sees me in this dress, he instantly becomes romantic and ravages me for hours.' The mother-in-law left. When she got home she undressed, showered, put on her best perfume, dimmed the lights, put on a romantic CD, and lay on the couch waiting for her husband to arrive. Finally, her husband came home. He walked in and saw her lying there so provocatively. ' What are you doing?' he asked. 'This is my love dress,' she whispered sensually. 'Needs ironing,' he said, 'What's for dinner?' And Always Remember This: You don't stop laughing because you grow old, You grow old because you stop laughing.

    • Upvote 2
  15. <p style="margin-bottom: 12pt;">


    Cancer Update from Johns Hopkins :

    1. Every person has cancer cells in the body. These cancer cells do not show up in the standard tests until they have multiplied to a few billion. When doctors tell cancer patients that there are no more cancer cells in their bodies after treatment, it just means the tests are unable to detect the cancer cells because they have not reached the detectable size.

    2. Cancer cells occur between 6 to more than 10 times in a person's lifetime.

    3. When the person's immune system is strong the cancer cells will be destroyed and prevented from multiplying and forming tumors.

    4. When a person has cancer it indicates the person has nutritional deficiencies. These could be due to genetic, but also to environmental, food and lifestyle factors.

    5. To overcome the multiple nutritional deficiencies, changing diet to eat more adequately and healthy, 4-5 times/day and by including supplements will strengthen the immune system.

    6. Chemotherapy involves poisoning the rapidly-growing cancer cells and also destroys rapidly-growing healthy cells in the bone marrow, gastrointestinal tract etc, and can cause organ damage, like liver, kidneys, heart, lungs etc.

    7. Radiation while destroying cancer cells also burns, scars and damages healthy cells, tissues and organs.

    8. Initial treatment with chemotherapy and radiation will often reduce tumor size. However prolonged use of chemotherapy and radiation do not result in more tumor destruction.

    9. When the body has too much toxic burden from chemotherapy and radiation the immune system is either compromised or destroyed, hence the person can succumb to various kinds of infections and complications.

    10. Chemotherapy and radiation can cause cancer cells to mutate and become resistant and difficult to destroy. Surgery can also cause cancer cells to spread to other sites.

    11. An effective way to battle cancer is to starve the cancer cells by not feeding it with the foods it needs to multiply.


    a. Sugar substitutes like NutraSweet, Equal, Spoonful, etc are made with Aspartame and it is harmful. A better natural substitute would be Manuka honey or molasses, but only in very small amounts. Table salt has a chemical added to make it white in color Better alternative is Bragg's aminos or sea salt.

    B. Milk causes the body to produce mucus, especially in the gastro-intestinal tract. Cancer feeds on mucus. By cutting off milk and substituting with unsweetened soy milk cancer cells are being starved.

    c. Cancer cells thrive in an acid environment. A meat-based diet is acidic and it is best to eat fish, and a little other meat, like chicken. Meat also contains livestock antibiotics, growth hormones and parasites, which are all harmful, especially to people with cancer.

    d. A diet made of 80% fresh vegetables and juice, whole grains, seeds, nuts and a little fruits help put the body into an alkaline environment. About 20% can be from cooked food including beans. Fresh vegetable juices provide live enzymes that are easily absorbed and reach down to cellular levels within 15 minutes to nourish and enhance growth of healthy cells. To obtain live enzymes for building healthy cells try and drink fresh vegetable juice (most vegetables including bean sprouts) and eat some raw vegetables 2 or 3 times a day. Enzymes are destroyed at temperatures of 104 degrees F (40 degrees C).

    e. Avoid coffee, tea, and chocolate, which have high caffeine Green tea is a better alternative e and has cancer fighting properties. Water-best to drink purified water, or filtered, to avoid known toxins and heavy metals in tap water. Distilled water is acidic, avoid it.

    12. Meat protein is difficult to digest and requires a lot of digestive enzymes. Undigested meat remaining in the intestines becomes putrefied and leads to more toxic buildup.

    13. Cancer cell walls have a tough protein covering. By refraining from or eating less meat it frees more enzymes to attack the protein walls of cancer cells and allows the body's killer cells to destroy the cancer cells.

    14. Some supplements build up the immune system (IP6, Flor-ssence, Essiac, anti-oxidants, vitamins, minerals, EFAs etc.) to enable the bodies own killer cells to destroy cancer cells.. Other supplements like vitamin E are known to cause apoptosis, or programmed cell death, the body's normal method of disposing of damaged, unwanted, or unneeded cells.

    15. Cancer is a disease of the mind, body, and spirit. A proactive and positive spirit will help the cancer warrior be a survivor. Anger, un-forgiveness and bitterness put the body into a stressful and acidic environment. Learn to have a loving and forgiving spirit. Learn to relax and enjoy life.

    16. Cancer cells cannot thrive in an oxygenated environment. Exercising daily, and deep breathing help to get more oxygen down to the cellular level. Oxygen therapy is another means employed to destroy cancer cells.

    1. No plastic containers in micro.

    2. No water bottles in freezer.

    3. No plastic wrap in microwave.

    Johns Hopkins has recently sent this out in its newsletters. This information is being circulated at Walter Reed Army Medical Center as well. Dioxin chemicals cause cancer, especially breast cancer. Dioxins are highly poisonous to the cells of our bodies. Don't freeze your plastic bottles with water in them as this releases dioxins from the plastic. Recently, Dr Edward Fujimoto, Wellness Program Manager at Castle Hospital , was on a TV program to explain this health hazard. He talked about dioxins and how bad they are for us. He said that we should not be heating our food in the microwave using plastic containers. This especially applies to foods that contain fat. He said that the combination of fat, high heat, and plastics releases dioxin into the food and ultimately into the cells of the body. Instead, he recommends using glass, such as Corning Ware, Pyrex or ceramic containers for heating food. You get the same results, only without the dioxin. So such things as TV dinners, instant ramen and soups, etc., should be removed from the container and heated in something else. Paper isn't bad but you don't know what is in the paper. It's just safer to use tempered glass, Corning Ware, etc. He reminded us that a while ago some of the fast food restaurants moved away from the foam containers to paper The dioxin problem is one of the reasons.

    Please share this with your whole email list.........................

    Also, he pointed out that plastic wrap, such as Saran, is just as dangerous when placed over foods to be cooked in the microwave. As the food is nuked, the high heat causes poisonous toxins to actually melt out of the plastic wrap and drip into the food. Cover food with a paper towel instead.

    This is an article that should be sent to anyone important in your life.

    • Upvote 1
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.