Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Dinar News Central [Bank] advisor to Maliki sees the


Enorrste
 Share

Recommended Posts

Am I missing something? A 25k Dinar note on the face is worth 25,000 dinar. A 25 note on the face is worth 25 dinar. It's units. so many dinar per note, it doesn't matter what the Dinar is worth .86 or $6 the note dictates the number of dinar that it is redeemable for. So...how is it possible they can be the same at the same time? Can someone please explain this to me? This is a fundamental premise of banking if the note is issued it HAS to be redeemable unit for unit upon presentment....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ClownSauce: I have already answered this but will do so again just for you. Here it is: a 25,000 dinar note today is worth $25; a 25 dinar note tomorrow is worth $25. The difference is TIME; today and tomorrow will be separated by the RV. The point of the article is not the "number", but the "purchasing power". Today, 25,000 dinars will buy $25 worth of stuff; after the RV, 25 dinars will buy $25 worth of stuff. That is why Saleh can say that the purchasing power will remain the same. Please re-read what this thread started with one more time, OK?

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve, just so I get this. If I have 40 of the 25,000 notes and RV at $1.00 then now I have $1,000,000 usd, right?

Now if 25,000 notes is value the same as $25, then how is that going to be $1,000,000.00. If you take $25.00 X 40, it comes out only $1000.00. Please explain, I'm confuse. Thanks for your help. ~Chang

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second time answering; TIME is the issue; today 25,000 dinars is $25; tomorrow, after the RV, 25 dinars is $25. But that means tomorrow 25,000 dinars is $1,000,000. Get it? So, the local Iraq who today has 25,000 dinars worth $25 will go to the bank tomorrow and deposit his 25,000 dinar note. He will get 25 dinars, worth $25, so no loss in purchasing power, as the article says. But what you are missing is this: he still has 24,975 dinars in the bank!

Remember, both are legal currency. He just won't be able to use the 25,000 dinar note, since it is tomorrow worth $25,000. So he deposits it and has 24,975 dinars in savings. Do you think he might vote for Maliki on the 7th if this happens?

I think you might be getting it now, right?

Steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The intire article is basically saying...If they RV for 1/1...you're getting 25k for 25k (period). What they say about the lower note (new) 25.iqd is that it will be worth 25 dollars and you will be able to buy $25.00 worth of product with a 25iqd instead of a 25,000iqd (period). Not saying you swap a 25k for a 25 note. In turn, people will no longer need to carry the large notes. So, they will bank them or exchange them for lower notes. By doing this, the large notes with 3zeros will be removed from circulation. Furthermore reducing the currency in circulation by trillions. Not reducing the "value" by trillions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for your input! The rv will come soon we cant get anxious cultures are different then our fast passed have to have everything yesterday... The rest of world runs slower they savor god, life, family, money they enjoy the journey. Savor the ride dont be anxious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The intire article is basically saying...If they RV for 1/1...you're getting 25k for 25k (period). What they say about the lower note (new) 25.iqd is that it will be worth 25 dollars and you will be able to buy $25.00 worth of product with a 25iqd instead of a 25,000iqd (period). Not saying you swap a 25k for a 25 note. In turn, people will no longer need to carry the large notes. So, they will bank them or exchange them for lower notes. By doing this, the large notes with 3zeros will be removed from circulation. Furthermore reducing the currency in circulation by trillions. Not reducing the "value" by trillions.

You are right that the currency in circulation would be reduced by this theory (by the way, great post, Steve), but the money supply would remain high. Collecting the notes does not reduce the overall money supply, only the paper in circulation. Central bank reserves, inflation, and other macroeconomic considerations will have to apply to all of the money, not just the paper in circulation. This major speed bump in the RV theory is too often overlooked and brushed aside with this misconception that collecting 25k notes will reduce the money supply by trillions. It is far more complicated than that to constrict the money supply by using higher interest rates (which is economically regressive) and other means.

Steve does make some good points, though, and I think we have reason to be optimistic. (If you know me, you'll not be surprised that I'm not overly

optimistic!)

FP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are right that the currency in circulation would be reduced by this theory (by the way, great post, Steve), but the money supply would remain high. Collecting the notes does not reduce the overall money supply, only the paper in circulation. Central bank reserves, inflation, and other macroeconomic considerations will have to apply to all of the money, not just the paper in circulation. This major speed bump in the RV theory is too often overlooked and brushed aside with this misconception that collecting 25k notes will reduce the money supply by trillions. It is far more complicated than that to constrict the money supply by using higher interest rates (which is economically regressive) and other means.

Steve does make some good points, though, and I think we have reason to be optimistic. (If you know me, you'll not be surprised that I'm not overly

optimistic!)

FP

Sure FP collecting the notes might not seem to reduce the money supply but you are assuming a majority becomes electronic and still counted as such. Or better yet stays in circulation through smaller notes equivalent to the lager notes supply. You have to account for goods and services where the physical cash gets exhausted and recycled. Just a little addition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have my Dinar in a safe. So, am I better off physically holding onto my $25,000 Dinar notes with the thinking that $25,000 Dinar will hopefully equal $25,000 American dollars? Or may I better off having all my Dinar electronic instead of Physically holding them, with the thinking that a $25,000 dinar note will equal $25.00 American dollars? HELP.... I'm so confussed and don't really understand the whole economic thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you Steve... I found the 1st translation confusing (which for me is easy to accomplish), but you shed alot of clarity for me. I am getting more axious for the RV. Is it going to happen this weekend??:rolleyes::rolleyes: Looking forward to your reply Bruce

I have nothing to say about this matter... evidently you believe that Gankans and I are one and the same... I am his earthly father only... Gankans speaks for himself, however I am truly proud of him. Bruce

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure FP collecting the notes might not seem to reduce the money supply but you are assuming a majority becomes electronic and still counted as such. Or better yet stays in circulation through smaller notes equivalent to the lager notes supply. You have to account for goods and services where the physical cash gets exhausted and recycled. Just a little addition.

If it is exchanged for smaller currency, there is no change to the money supply, unless you are receiving 20x 1,000 notes for your 25,000k note. In this case, I want to be your banker.

If the money is spent on goods or services, the merchant who provided those goods or services now has your money. Even though you may exhaust the goods or services, the money is still part of the money supply because the person you paid still has it. Contracting the money supply is more complicated than this.

FP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.