Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

12/9/2011 — FEMA camps on 72 hour notice AND military authorized to arrest = VERIFIED


MAMARABBIT02
 Share

Recommended Posts

12/9/2011 — FEMA camps on 72 hour notice AND military authorized to arrest = VERIFIED

Posted on December 10, 2011

THIS IS OFF A SITE I FOUND.....http://sincedutch.wordpress.com/

For the record, I said months ago that I did NOT believe that there was a REAL plan to round up American/US citizens and put us into “FEMA camps”… being that I am from the “show me state” of missouri.. I felt this claim required more proof that what was offered months/years ago.

Now, the tables have turned, and I surely / sorely stand corrected.

The US congress has approved a bill which AUTHORIZES THE MILITARY to be able to arrest US citizens on US SOIL !!! Not only can they arrest us without cause, they can hold you indefinitely — with no lawyer and no one knowing your location !! ( they can do this now through this “law” that was passed…by labeling you beligerent towards the government thus being a terrorist sympathizer — therefore allowing the military to take you to a secret prison without a trial)

Also this very same short period of days, this week, KBR (security corporation which handles FEMA emergency camps) put out a call to staff these FEMA camps.. and to be ready on a 72 hour notice.

Take these two events together.. same week… FEMA camps being alerted to staff on a short notice, and the US military authorized to arrest people at the drop of a hat.

Who voted yes and who voted no:

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2011-212

Here is the s. 1867 military authorization bill:

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c112:S.1867:

here is the link to KBR security corporation needing to staff FEMA camps with a 72 hour notice:

http://static.infowars.com/2011/12/i/general/kbr-doc.pdf

Here is the general link to Alex Jones / Infowars — who has been staying on top of this issue.. (I know a lot of people thumb their nose at AJ — but this is just one of MANY news outlets covering this issue — just search on google s.1867 or KBR FEMA if you don’t like Alex Jones or agree with his other work) This issue transcends “personalities”… we need to put any differences aside and deal with this together in unison !

http://www.infowars.com

http://www.prisonplanet.com

--

There is no other intimacy in world that can compare to being in the presences of the Lord!!! THANK YOU GOD IN JESUS NAME!!!

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Section 1032 on “Requirement for Military Custody,” for instance, “the requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not apply to citizens of the United States.”

Section 1031, which relates to the use of the armed forces to detain covered people “pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force,” has a very narrow purpose of describing detention “under the law of war” of people who either participated in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, or is a member or “substantial supporter” of al-Qaida, the Taliban, or “associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners.”

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to Section 1032 on “Requirement for Military Custody,” for instance, “the requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not apply to citizens of the United States.”

Section 1031, which relates to the use of the armed forces to detain covered people “pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force,” has a very narrow purpose of describing detention “under the law of war” of people who either participated in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, or is a member or “substantial supporter” of al-Qaida, the Taliban, or “associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners.”

wow, please tell me, when has the government ever held itself to any honorable standard?

With Obamacare?

With enforcing illegal immigration?

Have they ever stood up to resist corruption?

How about refusing to pass laws that favor the big corporations?

So what makes you think they are actually going to check for citizenship during a civilian roundup?

Are you really so trusting?

  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

:rolleyes: VERIFIED??? Yeah because those seem like real trustworthy sites. You peopple are so gullible and paranoid. I hope they do have those camps and round each and every single one of you crazy people up. :lol:

-1000000 !!!! If I could! I am not an American citizen , I have not clicked on any of the links provided BUT, if the above comment was directed at ANY members of this site then as far as I am concerned you do not deserve to be an integral part of this site or any other. How could you possibly wish such a thing on a fellow human being !?!?! That attitude is shameful and you should be ashamed for even expressing it ! :angry: We can not always love , agree or even "get along" with every single person as we walk this path called our life , BUT I would NEVER with some one be sent to prison unjustly or wish anyone dead! Even if I dislike them. How would you feel if we chose to send you to the D. V. Prison? I. E. We all choose to completely ignore your posts and never respond to any of them. Not a pleasant thought is it? I hope you put some thought into any future posts you make. :angry:

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

-1000000 !!!! If I could! I am not an American citizen , I have not clicked on any of the links provided BUT, if the above comment was directed at ANY members of this site then as far as I am concerned you do not deserve to be an integral part of this site or any other. How could you possibly wish such a thing on a fellow human being !?!?! That attitude is shameful and you should be ashamed for even expressing it ! :angry: We can not always love , agree or even "get along" with every single person as we walk this path called our life , BUT I would NEVER with some one be sent to prison unjustly or wish anyone dead! Even if I dislike them. How would you feel if we chose to send you to the D. V. Prison? I. E. We all choose to completely ignore your posts and never respond to any of them. Not a pleasant thought is it? I hope you put some thought into any future posts you make. :angry:

ummm It's called sarcasm :rolleyes: .....because none of this stuff is really going on. There is no proof just crazy websites and crazy people saying things. I do think that maybe some of the things that people say on here can and should get them locked up in some sort of facility though. :P

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

‎"...There is no nation on earth powerful enough to accomplish our overthrow...Our destruction, should it come at all, will be from another quarter. From the inattention of the people to the concerns of their government, from their carelessness and negligence...I fear that they may place too implicit a confidence in their public servants, and fail properly to scrutinize their conduct; that in this way they may be made the dupes of designing men, and become the instruments of their own undoing." -- Daniel Webster, June 1, 1837

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.