rtrusty Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 A hearing, with the apparent support of two state lawmakers, is scheduled before the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission to hear a complaint filed by Orly Taitz that alleges Barack Obama has used fraudulent documents and a fraudulent Social Security number. The hearing is scheduled Friday at 2 p.m. in Room 307 of the New Hampshire Legislative Office Building, and Taitz is encouraging the public to be present. The state holds the first presidential primary Jan. 10, 2012. On her website, Taitz said state Rep. Harry Accornero had said he was joining in her complaint, and she expects Rep. Larry Rappoport also to be in attendance. The lawmakers could not be reached immediately for comment. "Let's hope the elections board of New Hampshire will have the decency to refuse [to allow] Obama to appear on the ballot due to undeniable evidence of him using a stolen [Connecticut Social Security Number] … and due to the fact that he is using a computer generated forgery instead of a valid birth certificate," Taitz wrote. Jerome Corsi's New York Times best-seller, "Where's the Birth Certificate?", which addresses Obama's Social Security Number, is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore She noted that the election code in the state contains a statement that requires a candidate to swear to his qualification to be president pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the United States Constitution, which states, "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president." Taitz has been involved in a long list of high-profile cases over the past few years that have challenged Obama's eligibility under the Constitution's requirement that the president be a natural-born citizen. Some believe that means a birth in the United States, and they doubt the validity of the image of a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth that Obama released in April. Others say natural-born means both parents must be citizens at the time of the birth. Under that standard, Obama could not qualify, because his father was a student in the U.S. but not a citizen. The complaint alleges that Obama is ineligible because "he never provided any documentary evidence of his natural born status." Further, "The most staggering evidence is Mr. Obama's lack of a valid Social Security number and his use of a fraudulently obtained Social Security number from the state of Connecticut, a state where he never resided, which was never assigned to Obama, according to E-Verify," the complaint states. It alleges not only is the Obama birth documentation a modern printout, there are numerous experts who attest it is fraudulent. "Taitz received an affidavit from scanning machines expert Douglas Vogt. … It shows further evidence of forgery, such as different types of ink used. Some of the document shows as gray scale scanning, some as black and white scanning, some color. It shows different types of letters and kerning … numerous other parameters lead to the same conclusion, that the document in question is not a copy of a 1961 type written document, but a computer generated forgery, created by cutting and pasting bits and pieces from different documents and filling in the blanks with computer graphics," the document explains. "Obama does not have an valid identification papers, which are necessary to be a candidate on the ballot, running for the U.S. presidency, based upon New Hampshire elections law 655-17 and on Article 1, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution," Taitz wrote. "This case shows an unprecedented level of corruption and lawlessness in the federal government and in the government of Hawaii, which allowed Obama to get on the ballot in 2008. … Petitioner demands removal of Obama from the ballot in the state of New Hampshire in the Democrat party primary and demands immediate criminal prosecution of Obama and his accomplices for elections fraud, common law fraud and uttering of forged documents." Meanwhile, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County in Arizona has assigned a special cold case team to investigate the possibility that Obama could use fraudulent documents to apply for the Arizona ballot next year. He's said the investigators have accumulated thousands of pages of evidence and his report likely will come early in 2012. Read more: New Hampshire wakes up to Obama's alleged Social Security fraud http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=368645#ixzz1dvpNDVmQ 8 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capn Geech Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 These mens tears are the syrup on my freedom pancakes served with liberty butter. 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPSprayduster Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 I cannot wait to see what is the veredict is. I wonder if it is going to be a repeat of the hawaii caper. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gainsmore Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 ......while you sip your gunpowder tea?........... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TPSprayduster Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 (edited) A hearing, with the apparent support of two state lawmakers, is scheduled before the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission to hear a complaint filed by Orly Taitz that alleges Barack Obama has used fraudulent documents and a fraudulent Social Security number. The hearing is scheduled Friday at 2 p.m. in Room 307 of the New Hampshire Legislative Office Building, and Taitz is encouraging the public to be present. The state holds the first presidential primary Jan. 10, 2012. On her website, Taitz said state Rep. Harry Accornero had said he was joining in her complaint, and she expects Rep. Larry Rappoport also to be in attendance. The lawmakers could not be reached immediately for comment. "Let's hope the elections board of New Hampshire will have the decency to refuse [to allow] Obama to appear on the ballot due to undeniable evidence of him using a stolen [Connecticut Social Security Number] … and due to the fact that he is using a computer generated forgery instead of a valid birth certificate," Taitz wrote. Jerome Corsi's New York Times best-seller, "Where's the Birth Certificate?", which addresses Obama's Social Security Number, is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore She noted that the election code in the state contains a statement that requires a candidate to swear to his qualification to be president pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the United States Constitution, which states, "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president." Taitz has been involved in a long list of high-profile cases over the past few years that have challenged Obama's eligibility under the Constitution's requirement that the president be a natural-born citizen. Some believe that means a birth in the United States, and they doubt the validity of the image of a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth that Obama released in April. Others say natural-born means both parents must be citizens at the time of the birth. Under that standard, Obama could not qualify, because his father was a student in the U.S. but not a citizen. The complaint alleges that Obama is ineligible because "he never provided any documentary evidence of his natural born status." Further, "The most staggering evidence is Mr. Obama's lack of a valid Social Security number and his use of a fraudulently obtained Social Security number from the state of Connecticut, a state where he never resided, which was never assigned to Obama, according to E-Verify," the complaint states. It alleges not only is the Obama birth documentation a modern printout, there are numerous experts who attest it is fraudulent. "Taitz received an affidavit from scanning machines expert Douglas Vogt. … It shows further evidence of forgery, such as different types of ink used. Some of the document shows as gray scale scanning, some as black and white scanning, some color. It shows different types of letters and kerning … numerous other parameters lead to the same conclusion, that the document in question is not a copy of a 1961 type written document, but a computer generated forgery, created by cutting and pasting bits and pieces from different documents and filling in the blanks with computer graphics," the document explains. "Obama does not have an valid identification papers, which are necessary to be a candidate on the ballot, running for the U.S. presidency, based upon New Hampshire elections law 655-17 and on Article 1, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution," Taitz wrote. "This case shows an unprecedented level of corruption and lawlessness in the federal government and in the government of Hawaii, which allowed Obama to get on the ballot in 2008. … Petitioner demands removal of Obama from the ballot in the state of New Hampshire in the Democrat party primary and demands immediate criminal prosecution of Obama and his accomplices for elections fraud, common law fraud and uttering of forged documents." Meanwhile, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County in Arizona has assigned a special cold case team to investigate the possibility that Obama could use fraudulent documents to apply for the Arizona ballot next year Isn't that a misuse of state money? He's said the investigators have accumulated thousands of pages of evidence and his report likely will come early in 2012. Read more: New Hampshire wakes up to Obama's alleged Social Security fraud http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=368645#ixzz1dvpNDVmQ Edited November 17, 2011 by TPSprayduster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Usaok Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 Do let the door hit him in the butt on the way out .?. I hope . No socialism in my USA.. an old marine here..... 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ems Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 Do let the door hit him in the butt on the way out .?. I hope . No socialism in my USA.. an old marine here..... No socialism, no Marxism, no communism, no Obamaism in my USA either. I'm standing with you marine. You may be elderly, but you're not old. Marines will never be old in the USA. Forever young, semper fi. We are free because of marines like you, sir. Thank you for your service to our country, USAok. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tampa1000 Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 Do let the door hit him in the butt on the way out .?. I hope . No socialism in my USA.. an old marine here..... Amen brother, I pray America will wake up!!! Socialism is bringing our country down!!! America is blind to it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliciadogz Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 USAok sorry meant to give you a plus.I hope someone will even you out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DinarMillionaire Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 USAok sorry meant to give you a plus.I hope someone will even you out. Gotcha covered. Even with the socialist, Marxist, propaganda television and screwed up Judiciary branch, Americans have awakened and the next election, as in 2010, will overwhelmingly reject the march towards Socialist, Communism that Obama and the globalist have us on. But we sure better get it right this time or there won't be another chance. We the people need to keep vigilant and educate as many as we can and insist they vote against the Democratic Socialist party, Marxist and Communist. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted November 17, 2011 Report Share Posted November 17, 2011 Trusty, I respect your point of view, as always. If you could lump all of the states, provinces, territories and U.S. Guam into one article.....you could save time and 50 or so of the same articles. Thanks. GO RV, then BV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts