Sara Johnson Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 Vice chest: we will try to pass a law in parliament, is binding on the government to ask the Americans to pay compensation to Iraq 21/10/2011 PM - 10:36 AM | Hits: 28 Deputy Liberal on the mass of the Sadrist movement that "the mass will try to pass a law in the parliament is binding on the government if it failed to obtain reparations for the Iraqi people from the American side." The MP said the Prince Kanani told all of Iraq [where] on Friday that "the Liberal bloc will try to pass a law in the House of Representatives be binding on the government in case of failed past during its negotiations with the U.S. side about the survival of U.S. trainers to pay reparations to the Iraqi people as demanded by the cleric Moqtada al-Sadr ". He added that "the translation of such a decision is through legislation, law in parliament or through a decision of the Council of Ministers." The cleric Moqtada al-Sadr has been linked to in his speech yesterday, the first contract with the U.S. trainers to pay compensation to the Iraqi people and to be following the U.S. withdrawal after the end of the year 2011. It is said that leaders of political blocs agreed at their meeting house of President Jalal Talabani on the fourth of this month to keep the number of trained Americans in Iraq for the purpose of training the Iraqi forces armed with not giving them full immunity, while the insisted that the leaders of the blocks on the withdrawal of U.S. forces in schedule the end of this year. Iraq has signed and the United States during the 2008 Framework Agreement strategy to support the ministries and agencies of the Iraqi transition from a partnership strategy with the Republic of Iraq to the areas of economic, diplomatic, cultural and security as well as providing important sustainable rule of law, including the police development program and the completion of the coordination, supervision and report to Fund Iraq Relief and re- ages. Under the security pact signed between Baghdad and Washington in late November of 2008 that it should withdraw all U.S. forces from all territories and waters and airspace of Iraq not later than 31 December of this year. http://www.burathane...cle_139651.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thegente Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 I have a better idea for these bumbling fools-how's about just saying thank you to the US for removing Saddam's boot-heel from your neck, and actually moving forward with some progress for your fellow countrymen, and stop being greedy, thieving opportunists??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawaiianGal Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 So they are saying now that they won't grant immunity to any US troops who remain in Iraq after December 31, 2011. Doesn't that mean that there IS immunity before then? I guess that is on each individual soldier rather than the US Government. Don't we already have millions of dollars in our budget (if not billions) for the rebuilding of that country? My understanding is that you want to be the losing side of an American war because we ALWAYS rebuild. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
uncirculd Posted October 21, 2011 Report Share Posted October 21, 2011 (edited) Moqtada al-Sadr is nothing more than a terrorist. He has claimed there would be more violence if the troops stay beyond dec 2011. He is T-R-O-U-B-L-E. Has been part of the problem from the beginning. He needs to go away and quit bringing the country down with his radical views. Edited October 21, 2011 by uncirculd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts