Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

National deficit to be cut to around $3.3 trillion over next 10 years


Recommended Posts

Take another look at it. They are talking about reducing the "budget deficit" over the next ten years, not the National Debt. :o

yes you are correct .. i dont think 99% of our countrys citizens know what the deficit is .. you can look right at them and explain it and their out there the next day with the same claims

THE DEFICIT IS HOW MUCH MONEY THEY SPEND EACH YEAR OVER AND ABOVE THE BUDGET "OR THE AMOUNT OF TAXES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT COLLECTS EACH YEAR .. AND THAT IS ADDED TO OUR NATIONAL DEBT .....

RIGHT NOW OUR GOVT IS SPENDING 1.5 TRILLION DOLLARS OVER THE AMOUNT THEY COLLECT EACH YEAR .. IN OTHER WORDS OBAMA WILL HAVE A 1.5 TRILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT THIS YEAR .. .. SO OVER TEN YEARS THAT MEANS THEY WILL BE SPENDING 15 TRILLION MORE DOLLARS THAN THEY WILL BE TAKING IN ...AND WHAT THAT ARTICLE SAYS IS THEY WILL ONLY BE SPENDING 11,7 TRILLION MORE DOLLARS THAN THEY COLLECT IN TAXES OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS .. THEREFORE ADDING 11.7 TRILLION TO OUR NATIONAL DEBT OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS INSTEAD OF ADDING 15 TRILLION DOLLARS TO OUR DEBT .. SO WE WILL THEN HAVE AROUND 25 TRILLION IN DEBT IN 10 YEARS .. / RIGHT NOW WE HAVE AROUND 14.5 TRILLION DOLLARS NATIONAL DEBT

THE ANSWER IS CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING OR GO INTO DEBT TILL YOUR BANKRUPT..

VOTE OUT ALL DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS AND SOCIALISTS AND INDEPENDENTS THAT VOTE AGAINST CUTTING GOVERNMENT SPENDING .. OR YOU AND YOUR COUNTRYS FUTURE ARE DOOMED!!!

IF YOU STILL DONT KNOW THE DIFFERANCE BETWEEN DEBT AND DEFICIT .. LOOK IT UP .. OR READ THIS >>> http://www.afn.org/~concord/coalition/debtdef.htm

THEY SPELL THE 2 WORDS DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT WORDS WITH 2 DIFFERENT MEANINGS

DEBT ...>>>> DEFICIT<<<<< SEE

SORRY IF I SOUND RUDE .. ITS JUST THAT IT SEEMS I EXPLAINED THAT 5 TIMES A WEEK FOR THE LAST 20 YEARS TO PEOPLE .. AND IT SEEMS LIKE ILL GO TO MY GRAVE EXPLAINING THAT THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS (WORDS)

IF THERE IS NO DEFICIT THAT MEANS YOU HAVE A BALANCED BUDGET .. THATS ALL IT MEANS .. I THINK WE ONLY HAD 2 OR 3 BALANCED BUDGETS IN MY LIFE TIME ,, NEWT GINGRICH AND THE REPUBLICANS BALANCED THE BUDGET WHILE CLINTON WAS PRESIDENT ... JUST LOOK UP .... CONTRACT WITH AMERICA ... THEY HAD TO FIGHT WITH CLINTON .. ACTUALLY SHUTTING DOWN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO GET IT DONE

AFTER THEY SHUT DOWN THE GOVT CLINTON FINALLY AGREED TO A BALANCED BUDGET .. THEN CLINTON CAME OUT AND SAID ,,,LOOK WHAT I DID ,, I BALANCED THE BUDGET .. AND THEY SHOWED NO DEFICIT AND ACTUALLY HAD A BUDGET SURPLUS ... AND THEN ALL THE DUMMYS CAME OUT AND SAID .. CLINTON PAID OFF THE DEBT AND BIUSH CAUSED 10 TRILLION IN DEBT .. .. BUT THE TRUTH IS CLINTON LEFT BUSH WITH 5.7 TRILLION DEBT BUT NO DEFICIT .. THEN CAME 911 AND THAT IS WHAT SCREWED UP OUR SURPLUS .. AND WHEN GAS PRICES WENT UP OTHAT SCREWED UP OUR ECONOMY .. AND IS STILL WHY OUR ECONOMY IS SCREWED UP .. WE NEED TO DRILL HERE .. WE SEND 600 BILLION A YEAR OVER SEAS FOR FORIEGN OIL RIGHT NOW .. ITS NOT NECESSARY ,, BUT THE ENVIRONMENTALISTS AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE WORKING HAND IN HAND PREVENTING US FROM DRILLING ...WITH REGULATIONS .. WHICH MANY THINK OPEC IS SPONCERING THESE ENVIROMENTALIST WHACKOS

Edited by ashtray
  • Upvote 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

SEE OPEC SPONCERS THE ENVIROMENTALIST WHACKOS SO THEY CAN GET LAWS PASSED SO WE CANT DRILL HERE .. THAT WAY WE HAVE TO CONTINUE BUYING THEIR OIL ,, SINCE WE CANT DRILL OUR OWN .. AND GUESS WHAT ,,, THE DEMOCRATS HELP THOSE WHACKOS .. IN RETURN THEY GET VOTES TO BE RE ELECTED.. ISNT THAT NICE .. EVER NOTICE HOW THE DEMOCRATS ARE ALL AGAINST BIG OIL ...

THEY CLAIM THEY MAKE TO MUCH MONEY.. YA DONT SEE THEM AGAINST APPLE COMPUTER DO YA ... ITS SICKINING ... THE CONSTANT LIES .. AND TEACHERS UNION EDUCATINMG OUR NATIONS YOUTH INCORECTLY .. AND TURNING THEM AGAINST THE REPUBLICANS

  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Also... keep in mind. The CBO gets the numbers From the Obama admin. They could give them anything and say crunch these numbers. For me. Like Obama Care. Everyone knows its going to be more costly than Obama said. And the CBO themselves said that the numbers come from the administration and not them. Just saying :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

SEE OPEC SPONCERS THE ENVIROMENTALIST WHACKOS SO THEY CAN GET LAWS PASSED SO WE CANT DRILL HERE .. THAT WAY WE HAVE TO CONTINUE BUYING THEIR OIL ,, SINCE WE CANT DRILL OUR OWN .. AND GUESS WHAT ,,, THE DEMOCRATS HELP THOSE WHACKOS .. IN RETURN THEY GET VOTES TO BE RE ELECTED.. ISNT THAT NICE .. EVER NOTICE HOW THE DEMOCRATS ARE ALL AGAINST BIG OIL ...

THEY CLAIM THEY MAKE TO MUCH MONEY.. YA DONT SEE THEM AGAINST APPLE COMPUTER DO YA ... ITS SICKINING ... THE CONSTANT LIES .. AND TEACHERS UNION EDUCATINMG OUR NATIONS YOUTH INCORECTLY .. AND TURNING THEM AGAINST THE REPUBLICANS

seriously? are you really serious about these comments that the teachers are turning students against the republicans?? man, you need a break. i've heard all manner of conspiracy theories but this one takes the cake. this is the most ridiculous statement a member can make. what don't you go stand on a stump and preach your partisan politics to people that care. last time i checked this was a dinar site comprised of every party and realistically beyond all parties. man, take some time away, some time off... really...

Edited by aaanth
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we are missing the big picture. The simple question is why was the dollar sought after. Back when, the US economy was very strong and we the consumer were the biggest market to sell to. The dollar was very strong and therefore sought after and all nations were happy to accept it. But ultimately the US leaders wanted to insure that it remained the benchmark. They made a deal with OPEC that if they would accept only the US dollar for payment for oil, the US would buy most of their oil from OPEC. This would guarentee that the dollar would be strong. Why else would we buy foreign oil. We have enough oil in Alaska, Montana, etc. to supply the needs of this country for more than 100 yrs. The US should have been a major exporter of oil, not just the Middle East. This allowed the dollar to remain dominant until recently. But our government has lost its way and still think we are in the mid 20th century and will be able to print fiat money to get us out of trouble, or until they are voted out of office

Link to post
Share on other sites

seriously? are you really serious about these comments that the teachers are turning students against the republicans?? man, you need a break. i've heard all manner of conspiracy theories but this one takes the cake. this is the most ridiculous statement a member can make. what don't you go stand on a stump and preach your partisan politics to people that care. last time i checked this was a dinar site comprised of every party and realistically beyond all parties. man, take some time away, some time off... really...

you cant talk about me like that , unless you talk about someone else too ... or you are a partisian .. .. im not a republican .. im independent .. i work in a union .. i know where my dues are going .. if someone cannot say something about the democrat party without being called a partisian we miight as well have free speech taken away .. kinda like free enterprise is taken away .. and replaced with controled enterprise .. thanks to all the restrictions and regulations in place by ...you know who.... a little girl getting fined for selling lemon aid .. come on .. whos side are you on .. the gustapo ?.. forcing people to buy something from corporations . . isnt that facist .. health care ? ring a bell .. sorry if i touched a nerve ..

  • Upvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

yes you are correct .. i dont think 99% of our countrys citizens know what the deficit is .. you can look right at them and explain it and their out there the next day with the same claims

"THE DEFICIT IS HOW MUCH MONEY THEY SPEND EACH YEAR OVER AND ABOVE THE BUDGET "OR THE AMOUNT OF TAXES THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT COLLECTS EACH YEAR .. AND THAT IS ADDED TO OUR NATIONAL DEBT .....

RIGHT NOW OUR GOVT IS SPENDING 1.5 TRILLION DOLLARS OVER THE AMOUNT THEY COLLECT EACH YEAR .. IN OTHER WORDS OBAMA WILL HAVE A 1.5 TRILLION DOLLAR DEFICIT THIS YEAR .. .. SO OVER TEN YEARS THAT MEANS THEY WILL BE SPENDING 15 TRILLION MORE DOLLARS THAN THEY WILL BE TAKING IN ...AND WHAT THAT ARTICLE SAYS IS THEY WILL ONLY BE SPENDING 11,7 TRILLION MORE DOLLARS THAN THEY COLLECT IN TAXES OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS .. THEREFORE ADDING 11.7 TRILLION TO OUR NATIONAL DEBT OVER THE NEXT 10 YEARS INSTEAD OF ADDING 15 TRILLION DOLLARS TO OUR DEBT .. SO WE WILL THEN HAVE AROUND 25 TRILLION IN DEBT IN 10 YEARS .. / RIGHT NOW WE HAVE AROUND 14.5 TRILLION DOLLARS NATIONAL DEBT"

THE ANSWER IS CUT GOVERNMENT SPENDING OR GO INTO DEBT TILL YOUR (should be you're, a contraction meaning "you are")

BANKRUPT..

I say the way to resolve the problem is to get rid of the Fed and IRS. That's exactly the course that RON PAUL has been advocating for years. That way the congress prints money and we don't rent Federal reserve notes from a privately owned banking corporation consisting of a bunch of corrupt bankers. They will be US dollars, and we won't be paying the Fed interest every time the treasury needs money and the Fed creates it out of thin air and charges interest on that amount of US$ just created from thin air with absolutely nothing, except the faith we have in our great country, to back it.

So it stands to reason to elect Ron Paul in 2012. It doesn't take a rocket scientist, or whatever almighty throne you seem to place yourself upon to be above the intelligence of everyone else here. We're a pretty smart group and sometimes take offense to remarks by KNOW-IT-ALLS such as yourself.

"VOTE OUT ALL DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS AND SOCIALISTS AND INDEPENDENTS THAT VOTE AGAINST CUTTING GOVERNMENT SPENDING .. OR YOU AND YOUR COUNTRYS FUTURE ARE DOOMED!!!

IF YOU STILL DONT KNOW THE DIFFERANCE BETWEEN DEBT AND DEFICIT .. LOOK IT UP .. OR READ THIS >>> http://www.afn.org/~...ion/debtdef.htm

THEY SPELL THE 2 WORDS DIFFERENTLY BECAUSE THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT WORDS WITH 2 DIFFERENT MEANINGS

DEBT ...>>>> DEFICIT<<<<< SEE

SORRY IF I SOUND RUDE .. ITS JUST THAT IT SEEMS I EXPLAINED THAT 5 TIMES A WEEK FOR THE LAST 20 YEARS TO PEOPLE .. AND IT SEEMS LIKE ILL GO TO MY GRAVE EXPLAINING THAT THEY ARE 2 DIFFERENT THINGS (WORDS)

IF THERE IS NO DEFICIT THAT MEANS YOU HAVE A BALANCED BUDGET .. THATS ALL IT MEANS .. I THINK WE ONLY HAD 2 OR 3 BALANCED BUDGETS IN MY LIFE TIME ,, NEWT GINGRICH AND THE REPUBLICANS BALANCED THE BUDGET WHILE CLINTON WAS PRESIDENT ... JUST LOOK UP .... CONTRACT WITH AMERICA ... THEY HAD TO FIGHT WITH CLINTON .. ACTUALLY SHUTTING DOWN THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TO GET IT DONE

AFTER THEY SHUT DOWN THE GOVT CLINTON FINALLY AGREED TO A BALANCED BUDGET .. THEN CLINTON CAME OUT AND SAID ,,,LOOK WHAT I DID ,, I BALANCED THE BUDGET .. AND THEY SHOWED NO DEFICIT AND ACTUALLY HAD A BUDGET SURPLUS ... AND THEN ALL THE DUMMYS CAME OUT AND SAID .. CLINTON PAID OFF THE DEBT AND BIUSH CAUSED 10 TRILLION IN DEBT .. .. BUT THE TRUTH IS CLINTON LEFT BUSH WITH 5.7 TRILLION DEBT BUT NO DEFICIT .. THEN CAME 911 AND THAT IS WHAT SCREWED UP OUR SURPLUS .. AND WHEN GAS PRICES WENT UP OTHAT SCREWED UP OUR ECONOMY .. AND IS STILL WHY OUR ECONOMY IS SCREWED UP .. WE NEED TO DRILL HERE .. WE SEND 600 BILLION A YEAR OVER SEAS FOR FORIEGN OIL RIGHT NOW .. ITS NOT NECESSARY ,, BUT THE ENVIRONMENTALISTS AND THE DEMOCRATS ARE WORKING HAND IN HAND PREVENTING US FROM DRILLING ...WITH REGULATIONS .. WHICH MANY THINK OPEC IS SPONCERING THESE ENVIROMENTALIST WHACKOS"

[/quote/

I believe most here know the difference between debt and deficit. It, however is not sufficient to just complain that people may be unsure of the difference, Mr. Einstein, but to suggest a way to resolve a poor situation and my resolution, stated many times, Is that RON PAUL may be our ONLY salvation. Take that to the bank along with your RV'd Iraqi dinar.

Edited by tommyboy
  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

im voting for romney .. hopfully cain and romney are running mates.. we need someone in the white house thats buisness savy... and will surround them selves with business minded people .. when was the last time we had a buisness man in the white house ....and i dont mean one who was a failure at business... mitt romney is one of the wordls top busness minds... we could stand to put business on the front burner for a few years

  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.