Parliamentary hints to amend the security agreement to extend the staying of the US forces

[k98nights]

Parliamentary hints to amend the security agreement to extend the staying of the US forces

On Monday, 28-02-2011 01: 08 PM

Baghdad (news)/Report/, al-rabeiy/. Hints started flying, on the meetings between the American Embassy and the Iraqi government and a number of House of Representatives to amend the convention on security matters between the two countries for the purpose of the extension of troops, amid unrest in the provinces because of a lack of services.

He said a member of the Security and Defense Committee, Badr Organization of the Shahid al-mihrab Qasim al aargi in a statement (the news News, on Monday: "That the United States of America is to find a kind of security disorder in Iraq to confirm that Iraq needs to its forces," he said. He added that " Iraq does not need US forces to stay after the end of the agreed upon in the security agreement between the United States of America and the Iraqi government will work strongly to anyone who tries to extend the stay of U.S. troops. "

He pointed out that " there are meetings between the Iraqi government and the US forces in the Green Zone to reach final form للانتفاقية security, pointing out that the Iraqi parliament will reject any extension of the US forces to stay, even if the government had requested the extension of the troops. "

On the other hand, said the leader of a coalition of الكردستانيه, just البرواري " the need for reviewing the security of the convention, U.S. troops would remain. "

البرواري Said in a statement (the news News, on Monday: " That the Iraqi security forces are not qualified to take over the security file in a comprehensive way, the US forces, especially the type is not ready to protect Iraq's airspace, in addition to the fact that the internal security situation is not stable and requires a review of the security agreement, U.S. troops would remain until Iraqi forces processing this extension in the interest of general public. "

And that America has interests in Iraq, but Iraq interests more troops to stay for the enemies of foreign interventions take the opportunity of the withdrawal of the US forces to the entire political process and any security lapses would threaten the political process.

He pointed out that the issue of the review of the security agreement need to be put to the House of Representatives, because the prime minister and commander-in-chief of the armed forces and security are in charge of this convention.

On his part, said the vice-chairman of the Committee for Security and Defence, for the Iraqi List " wattout the formation of a joint committee of security and defense committee and the US forces for the implementation of a US-Iraq security agreement the withdrawal of U.S. troops.

Wattout said in a statement (the news News, on Monday: " That the Iraqi security forces to provide air cover so that they can حمايه the borders of Iraq, and by sophisticated heavy weapons, indicating that in the case of failure to provide air cover and Iraq, Iraq needs to U.S. troops would remain until the full preparations for the army troops in Iraq.

He added that " this issue if it is put to parliament most of the political blocs will refuse US forces Existence "

On the other hand, denied the deputy of the rule of law to شلاه that there will be meetings between the Iraqi government and the US forces to extend the presence of U.S. troops.

شلاه Said in a statement (the news News, on Monday: "There is no meeting between the Iraqi government and the US forces to extend the security agreement, if there are moves by the U.S. Embassy or the virtual is not realistic",

He added that " the Iraqi security forces capable of protecting its land and that recent experience that took place in the demonstrations proved that the Iraqi forces capable of maintaining security, even as the movement addressed to young people in the street. "

And that this " place that need to be presented to parliament in the first place because the government will not agree to the extension of the US forces. "

Us ambassador, James jeffrey said that "US Vice-President John Biden discussed during his visit in a number of issues including the application of the agreements between Iraq and the United States and Iraq to get him out of the seventh article," he said, in a press conference attended by the agency (the news) that: "Biden said earlier that" the United States is looking forward بتطبق the national strategy with Iraq in all political, security and economic issues and we are responsible for the formation of الحكومة.وفي in response to a question of the (The News) the position of the United States as happened in Iraq what happened to Tunisia, he said, "We regret the loss of life in Tunisia, and that Iraq is different from Tunisia, because it is a democratic country to work within the rule of law in spite of the problems, he added:" The people of Iraq as a country proud himself despite the violence and assassinations that have." /End/(2.. M).

http://ikhnews.com/news_view_9214.html

[Circlewood]

Hmmm, I'm thinking they're getting a little nervous about being left to themselves. I say to bad.

[goldman]

i think this is one of the important issue to effect the RV,

finally....... Go RVVV

[AdaB]

We just had a tenant move out this weekend because she is being deployed to Iraq for the next 18 mo.