World Bank calls for Iraq to speed up the formation of his government

[carlablum]

Now that's a post .Funny how the date seems to be getting translatesd correctly today ! you musta got that fixed from yesterday.It seems to be getting the date right today. Wow so maybe the one marked 19/1/2010 was translated corecctly frojm yesterday's post as well?

You are kidding aren't you? What are you trying to say? If you are not happy with the translated version someone provides for you then please use your own. I do not fix anything and yesterdays post was current. I was just trying to help you understand the date so please give it a rest! I am not sure what I have done to make you post stuff like this.

Well?

[xxxgator]

it wasn't translated wrong it said 19/1/2010 not 19/12/2010 on that article according to google witch is my point !It was an article from january not dec.You missed it ! re read the content and ask your self whather it makes sense now or in january.They may have re- hashed the article for the site but the date is clearly on it.In all debates their is an antogonist and a protagonist.If you don't want something questioned, then don't post it.You have taken challenging the time frame ,as a personal assault on your character.This is absolutely not the intent.But i don't know why you would wan't to leave mis-information up.I guarrantee if you wish to search you will find that very same article in the archive being discussed earlier this year.I did use my own transolator the article was released 19/1/2010 just like your version said.What you did to make me post stuff [like this ] is to take sarcastic humor out of context and intent.I often forget sarcasim dosen't translate on the computer well for some.i have had a smile face posted on all my reply's.So don't take any thing written here or any where else so personaly.It's just a blog .

[carlablum]

it wasn't translated wrong it said 19/1/2010 not 19/12/2010 on that article according to google witch is my point !It was an article from january not dec.You missed it ! re read the content and ask your self whather it makes sense now or in january.They may have re- hashed the article for the site but the date is clearly on it.In all debates their is an antogonist and a protagonist.If you don't want something questioned, then don't post it.You have taken challenging the time frame ,as a personal assault on your character.This is absolutely not the intent.But i don't know why you would wan't to leave mis-information up.I guarrantee if you wish to search you will find that very same article in the archive being discussed earlier this year.I did use my own transolator the article was released 19/1/2010 just like your version said.What you did to make me post stuff [like this ] is to take sarcastic humor out of context and intent.I often forget sarcasim dosen't translate on the computer well for some.i have had a smile face posted on all my reply's.So don't take any thing written here or any where else so personaly.It's just a blog .

OK.. I give!!

But could you please take a look at the alsumaria news site that I have gotten information from an explain to me what this date is

Tuesday, 21 k 1 2010 07:00 GMT It is like this on all of todays articles as well as the one that you had questioned. Are they all from January becouse if they are then I will not use that site as a resource. If they are reposting all of Januarys news then it is a worthless site. It is in my opinion that the dates are current and just not translated or written clear enough for some, but I may be wrong. If it's your opinion that the news site is posting everyday Januarys news then I would'nt read it but I believe you are incorrect so I will keep providing info from the site. Sorry if I am taking your sarcasm humor out of context but I have not been sarcastic to you. I'm just helping you to understand how the news site displays there date. Articles have been known to be brought up at later dates in the news but I just post what news is current from there site. Yes the article that you were refering to from yesterday seems to be a rehash but that is not what I care about, I care about current news.

Sorry if you are taking me wrong,

Carla

http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&sl=ar&tl=en&u=http://www.alsumarianews.com/ar/3/14981/news-details-.html&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com

[Moe485]

nice post

[RVDinar4MyFamily]

I guarrantee if you wish to search you will find that very same article in the archive being discussed earlier this year

I'm confused, are you saying the article in this thread is from January of this year? And, if I were to search the archives (which I did) I will find this very same article was discussed earlier this year? I saw the same article on the same website with the date of 20/12/2010

Please help clarify what you are saying, If this is an old article and it has been circulated before, then please show where, as I have not been able to find it.

the closest I could find that were even close were

Emir of Qatar calls to speed up Iraq Govt. formation

Read more:

and

GCC calls to speed up the formation of the Iraqi government

Read more: