Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Med chat (3): Dinar Speculator 11/7/10


buckwheat
 Share

Recommended Posts

Med:

OK I NEED THE FLOOR

IF I DELETE AN ARTICLE

DO NOT KEEP REPOSTING IT

I AM NOT GOING TO LET THIS SITE BE PART OF THIS INSANITY IN IRAQ

IF THERE ARE 20 ARTICLES THAT SAY THERE IS AN AGREEMENT

I AM NOT GOING TO LET ONE ON THAT CREATES SUCH A STIR

I DON’T BELIEVE THE ARTICLE

AND THINK IT IS BS

I DON’T CARE THOUGH

I DON’T WANT IT ON

ON THE SAME PAGE

IT SAYS ON THERE THAT THEY HAVE AGREED TO FORM

I HAVE TO THINK OF THE MEMBERS

AND I AM TIRED OF THESE BS STORIES

I HAVE TO WEIGH THE FACTS

AND MAKE A DECISION

I APPRECIATE THAT EVERYONE SEARCHES

BUT THIS CREATED SUCH A PROBLEM

AND WE KNOW

THAT WE COULD HAVE 100 ARTICLES

THAT SAID YES

AND ONE THAT SAID NO

AND WE WOULD SPEND ALL DAY ON THAT ONE ARTICLE

AS WE DID

WELL ARE THERE ANY ?’S

402raptor:

you cleared it up for me thanks Med

Med says to (22:17:18):

I AM GLAD

I JUST DECIDED

NOT TO BE A PART OF THERE CRAZINESS

AND IF IT IS NOT FROM ALLAWI

OR THE SPEAKER FOR THE LIST

THEN IT IS NOT LEGIT

AND HE HAS NOT DENIED IT

DO YOU KNOW WHY

BECAUSE HE IS ON HIS WAY TO ERBIL

Mawbell:

do the swift screens mean anything? or just a preliminary for things to come? I’m confused

Med:

OF COURSE THEY DO

YOU DONT READ MY CHATS DO YOU HON

LOL

I WENT OVER ALL THIS IN CHAT

BUT WILL EXPLAIN AGAIN):

THE SWIFT SCREENS ARE HOW ALL INTERNATIONAL BANKS COMMUNICATE

THEY HAVE 3 OF THEM

ONE FOR TESTING

ONE FOR CURRENCIES THAT ARE IN ONE OF THREE POSITIONS

THE ONE WE ARE LOOKING FOR IS “LIVE”

THAT MEANS THAT THE CURRENCY FROM IRAQ IS NOW A TRADEABLE ONE

NO BANK NEEDS ONE

OR CENTRAL BANK NEEDS ONE

Med says to (22:22:02):

UNLESS THEY ARE GOING TO HAVE ONE

SO IT IS HUGE NEWS

mawbell:

I have read your chats–thought they were supposed to go “live” today

Projoe:

so what will allawi get if they have power sharing it wont be the pm position malilki has made that clear will he have any power at all?

Med:

THEY DID

UGGHHH

OK I WILL GO OVER THAT AGAIN

ALLAWI’S LIST GOT THE PRESDENT OF PARLIAMENT

AND THAT ALL DECISIONS

MUST BE AGREED UPON BY THE LIST ALSO

AND IN REALITY

THE POP IS THE 2ND MOST POWERFUL POSITION IN THE GOVT

THE POR IS NOTHING MORE THAN BEING THE QUEEN OF ENGLAND

OR THE VP OF THE U.S.

IT IS LIKE THE BACKUP QB ON A FB TEAM

CARRY THE CLIP BOARD

BUT NEVER PLAY

Projoe:

well at least he got something then

Med:

IT IS MORE THAN SOMETHING

BEING AN OVERSIGHT AND A ROLE IN THE DECISIONS

IS HUGE

I AM SURE THERE IS MORE

jonmac:

reduction of power of the PM, more power-sharing?

Med

AS IN THE MINISTRIES

YES JONMAC

MALIKI IS NOT SMART ENOUGH

TO RUN A COUNTRY ON HIS OWN

antyspot:

Hello Med it has been a long time and this is about the best news I have heard in over a year

Med

IT IS GOOD NEWS

THERE THOUGH HAS BEEN ALLOT OF POSITIVES FROM CBI THOUGH

AND IT IS FUNNY

THAT WE THOUGHT WE WOULD ALWAYS HAVE TO WAIT FOR CBI

INSTEAD IT IS CBI THAT IS WAITING):

I WANT TO ASK THIS

IS IT ANY SECRET TO ANYONE

WHAT CBI’S INTENTIONS ARE

REALLY

A bunch of folks replying No

Med: THEY HAVE COME OUTRIGHT AND STATED IT

projoe: nope especially since the swift screen news came out

Med:

EXCELLENT

I AM ABOVE CONFIDENT

ON THE OUTCOME

Med chat 11/6/2010 @ 10:30 pm EST

Med:

HEY ALL

OK I JUST TALKED TO SONNY

ON THE PHONE

FIRST OFF

DID I MISS SOME NEWS

BEFORE I RUN OFF

SO BEFORE I SAY ANYTHING

WHAT IS THE NEWS

ON THE GOVT

I HAVE SOME

BUT WANT TO KNOW IF I EVEN NEED TO DISCUSS IT

DON’T ALL JUMP IN

AT ONCE

butterfly:

still not sure lol

there was a blog post tho tht said some have defected

but no articles to back it up

Med:

OK SONNY CALLED ME ABOUT THE ARTICLE

THAT SAID IT WAS ALL A LIE

NOW THIS HAS BEEN ON CNN ABC AND FOX

SONNY SAID THEY EVEN DID AN INTERVIEW ON FOX

I HEARD IT ON IRNUSA RADIO

WAS THERE MORE THAN ONE ARTICLE THAT DENIED IT

butterfly:

i think

let me scan real fast

Med:

OK

HE SAID IT SAID THE BLOC HEADS WERE MEETING TOMORROW IN ERBIL

butterfly:

i see two justnow

Med:

TO FINALIZE

ONE BAD THING IS TOO MANY OF THESE FOOLS CALL THE MEDIA

butterfly:

they just are all back and forth in there rightnow, one article say they agree, others say they dont. typical

Med:

YOU HAVE 325 MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT BUT 1000 PEOPLE CALL THE MEDIA

YES IT IS

THE ONLY ONE WAY TO BE SURE OF ANYTHING

IS WAIT TILL THURSDAY

IF THEY MEET AND VOTE

FINE

IF NOT

ONE THING THAT MIFFS ME

IS THE ZEBARI ARTICLE

DISCUSSING REMOVAL FROM CHAPTER VII

WHEN OBAMA SAID FORGET IT IF THEY DON’T SETTLE IT

NOW THE UNSC MEETS ON IRAQ ON TUESDAY

REQUESTED BY THE FRENCH GOVT

BUT I THINK THIS HAS TO DO WITH THE THREAT TO CHRISTIANS IN IRAQ

THEY WERE UPSET OVER IT

HOW DO YOU CONTACT THE INTERNATIONAL MEDIA

AND HAVE INTERVIEWS

IT IS ON ALL OUR NEWS NETWORKS AND RADIO

THEN IT IS SUPPOSE TO BE A LIE

SOMETHING LIKE THIS CAN’T BE TOLERATED

AND THEY CAN’T BE DRAGGING THE U.S. MEDIA INTO THE

HOLD PHONE

OK SONNY IS READING ME THE ARTICLE

THAT DENIES IT

AND ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE PAGE

IT SAYS THEY HAVE AN AGREEMENT

AND ARE MEETING IN IRBIL TO SETTLE IT

AND THIS ARTICLE IS NOT FROM ALLAWI

SOME MP WHO I HAVE NEVER HEARD OF

OK I HAVE TO GO TO THE FORUM

Got-UR-back dino:

seems the agreement is conditional and the media reported it being done before conditions were met and Allawi was not happy about it. maybe.

Med:

OK STOP

FIRST OFF THERE IS NO LINK TO THE ARTICLE

PLEASE WHOEVER POSTED IT

PUT IT ON THERE

OR DELETE IT

AND THE INFO FROM THE LIST DEFECTING

IS A BLOG

SO IT MEANS SQUAT

THERE ARE WAY TOO MANY ARTICLES THAT IT IS SETTLED

AND SONNY JUST READ OFF ALL THE U.S. MEDIA OUTLETS THAT CARRIED THE STORY

AND NOT ONE DENIAL CAME FROM ALLAWI

DON’T YOU ALL THINK THAT THE LEADER OF THE PARTY

WOULD MAKE THE DENIAL AND NOT SOME GUY NOONE HAS EVER HEARD OF

I PERSONALLY THINK IT IS DONE

AND THERE IS AN AGREEMENT

402raptor:

way to go Med “debunked”

Med:

TY RAPTOR

IT JUST TAKES A BIT OF RESEARCH

projoe:

why do they put out articles that say the oposite what do they get out of it

Med:

AND A FEW PHONE CALLS

IT IS TO DISRUPT

butterfly:

i kept deleting the blog one

is there another?

Med:

THERE WERE SEVERAL ARTICLES

THAT CAME OUT

ASKING MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT WHO WERE NOT INVOLVED IN NEGOTIATIONS

TO SHUT THE H*LL UP

AND THEY HAVEN’T

YOU HAVE ALLOT OF HATE IN HERE

AND ALLOT OF PREDJUDICE BETWEEN THE SECTS

AND SOME WISH TO STIR THE POT

SO THAT IS ALL I HAVE TO SAY ON THE MATTER

UNLESS ALLAWI COMES OUT AND SAYS IT IS FALSE

THEN IT IS A DONE DEAL

I HAVE NOT SEEN ONE ARTICLE OR AN ANNOUNCEMENT FROM THE OFFICIAL SPEAKER FOR THE LIST

I AM SORRY IT TOOK SO LONG FOR ME TO GET THIS STRAIGHTENED OUT

Med chat 11/6/2010 @ 7 pm EST

B Man:

Just read the post Iraq denies consent of pres M. Does that mean the people don’t want it?

butterfly:

i just saw a post of his sayin that he got a phone call that obama had given the kurds an ultimatum and stuff, i am like…. uh, OLD NEWS pal

Med:

B MAN

WHAT IS THAT YOU SAID

AND IF YOU READ IT

POST IT

SO WE ALL KNOW WHAT IT IS ABOUT

YESTERDAY I SPENT 30 MINUTES

TRYING TO GET SOMEONE TO SPIT OUT SOMETHING

HONESTLY IF I CAN’T SEE THE ENTIRE ARTICLE

butterfly:

its allawi not agreeing to maliki still

Med:

OH REALLY

SO THEY NOW ARE DENYING

AN AGREEMENT

THAT WAS ON NATIONAL NEWS

HERE IN THE U.S.

butterfly:

http://www.dinarspeculator.com/showt…t-confirmed-it

there you go

Med:

JUST FXXKLDFJAL;FJGL;JAG;LJAG;AGJING GREAT

Med says to (18:02:35):

busman:

one minute one thing, the next another

alphonse43:

that would be article # 10, 20, 30? on the same subject

Med:

OK

NO THERE ARE TOO MANY WHO ARE REPORTING IT

busman:

med, could this be the propaganda, you have always warned us about

Med:

AND THE ONE IS THE ACTUAL SPEAKER FOR THE LIST

NOW WHEN THE ARTICLE CAME OUT EARLIER

I CAN’T REMEMBER

BUT WAS IT ALLAWI WHO GAVE THE STATEMENT

OR WAS IT SOMEONE FROM THE RULE OF LAW

NOW I KNOW THAT IT HAS BEEN SPREAD AROUND THE WORLD

THAT IT IS SETTLED

BUT THESE PEOPLE WHO ARE GIVING THESE REPORTS AS LIES

ARE TOP DEPUTIES

IN THE LIST

ME PERSONALLY KNOWING THE PEOPLE IN THAT ARTICLE

SAY THERE IS NO AGREEMENT

AND IT WAS BS

SORRY GANG

BUT

butterfly:

there is one saying that the nassif is gonna be pres instead of allawi

Med:

THAT IS MY OPINION

YES

I DON’T THINK ALLAWI WANTS TO BE POP

butterfly:

so allawi will just totally be out of it

i guess

Med:

YES

butterfly:

that sucks for him

Med:

HE WANTED THE POR

butterfly:

and the people that wanted him

Med:

BUT THERE IS NO WAY TO COMPARE THE OR EQUALIZE

DAYSTAR:

thatsa shame, medic I think he is a good man

Med:

A SPEAKER IN PARLIAMENT

TO THE PM

IT IS DS

SEE IN THE U.S.

WE VOTE OUT PEOPLE WHO STEAL AND ARE INEFFECTIVE

THEY REELECT THEM

WELL HELLS BELLS

I DIDN’T WANT TO FEEL THAT GOOD ALL DAY ANYWAYS

alphonse43:

take it with a grain of salt

Med:

I ALWAYS DO

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ok i am confused medick. wasn't it sonny who posted here on DV about one of the articles, and he said goi fromed by the 8th? if so is medick calling sonny a liar? and if medick doesn't like an article posted on his site that he says is BS he dletes it. well i see nothing has changed on his site. what medick says goes if he disagrees he takes action. and people still follow him and live on his every word. if it rv's and he says it hasn't his followers will believe him and not the news. what a squirrel.

Edited by ds2
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I'm being modded, but I hope this gets posted. I'd like to ask a serious question and I know it's not going to be a popular one, but here goes. I've read time and again that we will have a time limit to turn in the large denominations and that once RVed the rate can only fluctuate by 1% for 90 days. So what is to stop Iraq from lopping the zeros giving 90 days to turn in the large bills, then once ou of the hands of investors like us to raise the rate? I know I've heard "our government wouldn't allow us to invest in this only to get screwed, but the mortgage debacle comes to mind real quick when that's said. Let's face it, if our government could get them at or below what we paid for the dinar and they have agreements in place to hold them for 6 months, they put out a little and make a hell of a lot and Bush's claim of this war paying for itself still holds true.

As I said, not going to be a popular question, but I would like to hear theories against this scenario.

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, Med directs the waves over there in his forum. He says the rate would be .86, everybody agreed with him. l was there with him until l couldn't take it no more. Med cannibalized Maliki in the internet for no good reasons. Now that the screens are showing up, according to his followers, he is still in denial. Thats who he is.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing personal against Medic.... but i have been around for a long time... and i was a member on his site.. until i got booted for asking too many questions. i beleive everyone has a right to thier own opinion. but honestly... come on... it sounds more like med is more upset because DV posted it first... So ROCK ON sonny.. I BELIEVE YOU..

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know I'm being modded, but I hope this gets posted. I'd like to ask a serious question and I know it's not going to be a popular one, but here goes. I've read time and again that we will have a time limit to turn in the large denominations and that once RVed the rate can only fluctuate by 1% for 90 days. So what is to stop Iraq from lopping the zeros giving 90 days to turn in the large bills, then once ou of the hands of investors like us to raise the rate? I know I've heard "our government wouldn't allow us to invest in this only to get screwed, but the mortgage debacle comes to mind real quick when that's said. Let's face it, if our government could get them at or below what we paid for the dinar and they have agreements in place to hold them for 6 months, they put out a little and make a hell of a lot and Bush's claim of this war paying for itself still holds true.

As I said, not going to be a popular question, but I would like to hear theories against this scenario.

Wrong thread Go to Lop and read up Has been addressed numerous times Study Study Study!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.