Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Supreme Court Case #22-380 Brunson VS. Adams Defendants Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris & 94 Senators


Recommended Posts

Supreme Court Case #22-380 Brunson VS. Adams Defendants Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris & 94 Senators

 

The Entire Brief is Read by: WE ARE THE NEWS (WATN): Clear voice and a National Security Issue and is seen on Rumble at:

 

 

 

 

 

 

image.png.788896d7229853a25646e18632deb925.png

November 23, 2022
The Solicitor General of the United States Department of Justice replaces the U.S. Attorneys
(Good news! Elizabeth B. Prelogar, the Solicitor General of United States, the official attorney on record for the defendants, and in behalf of the 388 defendants, waived their right to respond to this lawsuit, thus allowing the SCOTUS to move forward!)

 

November 30, 2022
The SCOTUS set the conference date
(The 9 Justices will meet to discuss the case and decide (by vote) if they want to move it to a hearing, where they will officially judge the case and decide (by vote) if defendants should be removed from office)

Date is set for 01/23/2023

http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html

 

This is a reading of Supreme court case 22-380 Brunson VS. Adams. It alleges that the 2020 election was rigged and it lists the defendants, 94 U.S. State Senators and 129 members of the House of representatives, Joesph R. Biden and Kamala Harris as well as former Vice President Mike Pence, in a conspiracy to defraud the United States and Mr. Brunson, by rigging or allowing to be rigged the 2020 election process. It calls for amongst other things the removal of 94 Senators, President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris as well as over 100 members of the House of Representatives for being part of the conspiracy to rig the 2020 elections and overthrow the duly elected leader of the United States.

 

Questions presented in the brief are:

A serious conflict exists between decisions rendered from this Court and lower appeal courts, along with constitutional provisions and statutes, in deciding whether or not the trial court has jurisdiction to try the merits of this case. This case uncovers a serious national security breach that is unique and is of first impression, and due to the serious nature of this case it involves the possible removal of a sitting President and Vice President of the United States along with members of the United States Congress, while deeming them unfit from ever holding office under Federal, State, County or local Governments found within the United States of America, and at the same time the trial court also has the authority, to be validated by this Court, to authorize the swearing in of the legal and rightful heirs for President and Vice President of the United States. In addition there are two doctrines that conflict with each other found in this case affecting every court in this country. These doctrines are known as the doctrine of equitable maxim and the doctrine of the object principle of justice. Equitable maxim created by this court, which the lower court used to dismiss this case, sets in direct violation of the object principle of justice also partially created by this Court and supported by other appeal courts and constitutional provisions. These conflicts call for the supervisory power of this Court to resolve these conflicts, which has not, but should be, settled by this Court without delay.

 

*This document is public use, there is no copyright. Feel free to share.

Links:

(Supreme Court Case Number 22-380)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/DocketFiles/html/Public/22-380.html

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/writ_of_certiorari

https://casetext.com/case/brunson-v-adams

(Brunson VS. Adams On Petition for Writ of Certiorari To the United States Court of Appeals For The Tenth Circuit)
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf

Appendix:
https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221024152923186_20221024-152524-95757879-00000747.pdf

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fortieth Congress of the United States of America;

At the third Session, Begun and held at the city of Washington, on Monday, the seventh day of December, one thousand eight hundred and sixty-eight.

A Resolution Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, (two-thirds of both Houses concurring) that the following article be proposed to the legislature of the several States as an amendment to the Constitution of the United States which, when ratified by three-fourths of said legislatures shall be valid as part of the Constitution, namely:

Article XV.

Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude—

Section 2. The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

 

https://www.archives.gov/milestone-documents/15th-amendment

 

Well, here we all have it.

 

Why is this amendment not mentioned as a Constitutional provision for addressing the corruption in the elections?

 

There is a significant background to the explanation for the 15th Amendment.

 

However, the language specific to the 15th Amendment cannot be ignored.

 

Regardless of the reason(s) for the 15th Amendment, the 15th Amendment must be applied in all aspects in entirety as stated.

 

No exceptions.

 

Section 2 above demonstrates the dereliction of duty for upholding and applying the 15th Amendment.

 

The will of The Citizens Of The United States Of America has been circumvented by the corruption associated with the elections.

 

Stew Peters should have noted the 1960 elections were one of the most corrupt elections installing JFK.

 

Joseph Kennedy is a nemesis of The United States Of America making his fortune from bootlegging and buying political influence. Influence including redirecting the 1960 election outcome.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.