He mocked Biden's wife.. Expelling a general in the US army and interrogating him

[yota691]

He mocked Biden's wife.. Expelling a general in the US army and interrogating him

2022.07.10 - 12:39

 

Baghdad - people   

The US military suspended the contract of a military general and placed him under investigation, after he posted a tweet on social media, which was considered to be "mock" of First Lady Jill Biden, wife of President Joe Biden.  

 

  

And US media reported on Saturday, that “retired General Gary Volsky, the former army spokesperson, who has military contracts with the US Army, was responding to a tweet published by President Joe Biden’s wife, in which she said that women’s rights were stolen after the Supreme Court’s decision to abolish the constitutional right to abortion for women.” .  

  

“Nearly 50 years ago, women had the right to make their own decisions about our own bodies,” Jill Biden added. “And today, that right has been stolen from us.”  

  

According to the website "Exios" and the newspaper "US Today", Volsky responded to the first lady, with a tweet on Twitter, in which he said: "I am pleased to see you finally know what a woman is."  

  

US Army spokeswoman Cynthia Smith was quoted by USA Today as saying that the commander of the Combined Arms Center, General Theodore Martin, had suspended Volsky's contract and referred him for investigation.  

  

Smith noted that Volsky, who was in charge of the Army's 101st Airborne Division, signed a contract after he retired to advise serving officers.  

  

And the newspaper considered that “Volsky’s response to the first lady in America was a violation of the literature of a retired military officer,” noting that what he wrote was “an unusual step in partisan politics by an official paid by the Pentagon, especially since the ministry usually avoids such matters.”  

  

According to the American newspaper "Washington Post", Volsk, 60, received many honors during his long military career, and before retiring from the army he was appointed as a mentor.  

  

Volsky took command of the 1st Corps, a large military formation. From 2014 until 2017, he commanded the 101st Airborne Division.  

  

He then led the joint base "Lewis McCord" from 2017 to 2020. He also served in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.  

  

Volsky was awarded the Silver Star, the third highest US combat military honor, for his participation in the military efforts northeast of the Iraqi capital, Baghdad.  

[md11fr8dawg]

Awwww, he hurt "DOCTOR" Jill's feelings. And yet what the General said was spot on!!

[cranman]

2 minutes ago, md11fr8dawg said:

Awwww, he hurt "DOCTOR" Jill's feelings. And yet what the General said was spot on!!

Retired General at that.  He's allowed to have an opinion and enjoy free speech.  

 

Unless the contract, he agreed to and signed, stated otherwise.  

[Smokey Mtn. Dinar]

"Freedom of speech"  is one of our basic rights in the constitution.  Why bother serving to "preserve, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States Of America"  if they are not defended by the same constitution?   Maybe this is yet another way the "Demon Craps" are trying to destroy the very same constitution that they take an oath to protect.  

 

[cranman]

1 hour ago, Smokey Mtn. Dinar said:

"Freedom of speech"  is one of our basic rights in the constitution.  Why bother serving to "preserve, protect, and defend the constitution of the United States Of America"  if they are not defended by the same constitution?   Maybe this is yet another way the "Demon Craps" are trying to destroy the very same constitution that they take an oath to protect.  

 

When you enlist in the military you agree to become part of an organization that has rules, standards and espirit de corps.  

You don't go to public forums and state disparaging remarks about the POTOUS, FLOTUS  and government officials.  You don't  get to choose which war to fight, which deployment you embark on or what your physical state of readiness is.

Freedom in all forms is wonderful thing and needs to be protected at all cost.  But freedom is also the main reason we have so much divisiveness, violence and states moving in different directions in regards to judicial issues. 

 

The military is an organization, that you volunteer for, that tries to remove all  that as much as possible as its goal is to train, fight wars and protect our freedom. Hard to do to if everyone is allowed to do what they  want, when they want and only when it fits thier religious beliefs, political views or physical abilities.  

 

You give up certain parts of your freedoms in order to protect Freedom for others.  

 

If the retired generals contract with the military required him to abide the same rules, regulations  and standards as an enlisted personnel then he needs to be very careful what he says and where he says.   Or he shouldn't sign.  He was supposed to be acting as a mentor for other officers I believe.

 

Just my opinion as someone who served for many years. Others who have served may not agree. But I'm old fashion that way. Lol

 

 

 

[Synopsis]

2 hours ago, cranman said:

Freedom in all forms is wonderful thing and needs to be protected at all cost. 

 

FLOTUS is NOT an elected or Constitutionally appointed official.

 

FLOTUS does not address the fact that an unborn fetus is a living human being. There is no such thing as abortion rights. The unborn fetus and living human being is just as much a human being as the mother.

 

Freedom in all forms is a wonderful thing and needs to be protected at all costs for the unborn living human being fetus.

 

As such, retired General Gary Volsky can say and post what he wants about whoever he wants without having his 1st Amendment right "disabled". There is nothing morally, legally, or Constitutionally wrong with what retired General Gary Volsky posted.

 

What is a crime is what was done to retired General Gary Volsky and THAT must be brought before a Military Tribunal and prosecuted since FLOTUS was and is advocating a Crime Against Humanity.

[cranman]

1 hour ago, Synopsis said:

 

FLOTUS is NOT an elected or Constitutionally appointed official.

 

FLOTUS does not address the fact that an unborn fetus is a living human being. There is no such thing as abortion rights. The unborn fetus and living human being is just as much a human being as the mother.

 

Freedom in all forms is a wonderful thing and needs to be protected at all costs for the unborn living human being fetus.

 

As such, retired General Gary Volsky can say and post what he wants about whoever he wants without having his 1st Amendment right "disabled". There is nothing morally, legally, or Constitutionally wrong with what retired General Gary Volsky posted.

 

What is a crime is what was done to retired General Gary Volsky and THAT must be brought before a Military Tribunal and prosecuted since FLOTUS was and is advocating a Crime Against Humanity.

That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. 

 

I was simply stating if he signed a contract with the military that required him to abide my the military's standards and conduct, then he absolutely has to consider what he says,  and on what forum he says it on. 

 

He was working under contract for the military as a mentor for officers.  There is a certain conduct that officers in all branches need to adhere too.  I'm sure stating anything about the FLOTUS, the presidents wife, is something that is highly discouraged and not something they want a mentor teaching new officers.

 

I'll say it again,  when you voluntarily join the military, you give up some freedoms. It's the military way.  You dont have to like it. But then again you dont have to enlist either. 

 

 

[cranman]

10 hours ago, yota691 said:

 

 

10 hours ago, yota691 said:

 

And the newspaper considered that “Volsky’s response to the first lady in America was a violation of the literature of a retired military officer,” noting that what he wrote was “an unusual step in partisan politics by an official paid by the Pentagon, especially since the ministry usually avoids such matters.”  

This explains the military's view. 

Not a civilians view which is irrelevant in this case. 

 

 

[bigwave]

12 hours ago, yota691 said:

the ministry usually avoids such matters.”

I'm glade they put the word "usually"  as if were Melania it probably would have be cool. 

[md11fr8dawg]

9 hours ago, bigwave said:

I'm glade they put the word "usually"  as if were Melania it probably would have be cool. 

Yep, if that same General would have said anything like that about Trump or his wife or family, it would have been Partay Time!! One must remember the military is a benevolent dictatorship and if the benevolience ever ceases, you have onlt 2 choices. Shut up or get out!!

[Synopsis]

12 hours ago, cranman said:

That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. 

 

I was simply stating if he signed a contract with the military that required him to abide my the military's standards and conduct, then he absolutely has to consider what he says,  and on what forum he says it on. 

 

He was working under contract for the military as a mentor for officers.  There is a certain conduct that officers in all branches need to adhere too.  I'm sure stating anything about the FLOTUS, the presidents wife, is something that is highly discouraged and not something they want a mentor teaching new officers.

 

I'll say it again,  when you voluntarily join the military, you give up some freedoms. It's the military way.  You dont have to like it. But then again you dont have to enlist either. 

 

 

 

In this case, is it appropriate to prosecute FLOTUS via a Military Tribunal for Crimes Against Humanity?

 

FLOTUS is not an elected or appointed official. FLOTUS is a civilian so may be a stretch for FLOTUS to be prosecuted via a Military Tribunal for Crimes Against Humanity. If FLOTUS is a civilian, then service personnel can speak freely on matters pertaining to FLOTUS without repercussions.

[cranman]

1 hour ago, Synopsis said:

 

In this case, is it appropriate to prosecute FLOTUS via a Military Tribunal for Crimes Against Humanity?

 

FLOTUS is not an elected or appointed official. FLOTUS is a civilian so may be a stretch for FLOTUS to be prosecuted via a Military Tribunal for Crimes Against Humanity. If FLOTUS is a civilian, then service personnel can speak freely on matters pertaining to FLOTUS without repercussions.

Again, that's a civilians opinion. The military expects the officers and enlisted personnel to act and speak in a certain manner. It's not really about your opinion. It's what you agree to when you voluntarily enlist. Ecepecially as an officer.

 

Kind of like calling your commanders wife an stupid, babbling  idiot.  The wife is not a military member but you don't bad mouth or mock your commanders wife. You just don't do it. Conduct unbecoming of an officer and enlisted personnel. 

 

[Synopsis]

9 hours ago, cranman said:

Again, that's a civilians opinion. The military expects the officers and enlisted personnel to act and speak in a certain manner. It's not really about your opinion. It's what you agree to when you voluntarily enlist. Ecepecially as an officer.

 

Kind of like calling your commanders wife an stupid, babbling  idiot.  The wife is not a military member but you don't bad mouth or mock your commanders wife. You just don't do it. Conduct unbecoming of an officer and enlisted personnel. 

 

So, OK, WHAT, pray tell, is FLOTUS doing commenting publically on SCOTUS???!!!

 

FLOTUS MUST understand the division of powers noted in The Constitution Of The United States Of America.

 

Whereas, FLOTUS cares NOTHING for The Constitution Of The United States Of America.

 

I believe retired General Gary Volsky can say what he wants even more so than FLOTUS can comment on a superior rendering of SCOTUS on ANY matter.

[cranman]

8 minutes ago, Synopsis said:

So, OK, WHAT, pray tell, is FLOTUS doing commenting publically on SCOTUS???!!!

 

FLOTUS MUST understand the division of powers noted in The Constitution Of The United States Of America.

 

Whereas, FLOTUS cares NOTHING for The Constitution Of The United States Of America.

 

I believe retired General Gary Volsky can say what he wants even more so than FLOTUS can comment on a superior rendering of SCOTUS on ANY matter.

Not sure why you care what FLOTUS says in regards to this issue.  She is not in military.  This was about the Generals statements who was working / contracted by the military.  

 

I can't make it any clearer than that.  What FLOTUS said is irrelevant.  Your opinion is irrelevant  as it does not coincide with the conduct expected from an officer. 

 

It's not a " she said something  so I can say something " situation. But that's what appears to be your stance.

 

 

 

[FlyHi]

Ok let's pose a hypothetical. 

Let's suppose Brandon is no the legitimate president then his partner would not be technically the Flotus so then the ex- military retired General would be allowed to have an opinion on her methinks 

[Synopsis]

23 hours ago, cranman said:

Not sure why you care what FLOTUS says in regards to this issue.  She is not in military.  This was about the Generals statements who was working / contracted by the military.  

 

I can't make it any clearer than that.  What FLOTUS said is irrelevant.  Your opinion is irrelevant  as it does not coincide with the conduct expected from an officer. 

 

It's not a " she said something  so I can say something " situation. But that's what appears to be your stance.

 

 

 

 

All to illustrate a couple points.

 

One, FLOTUS should NOT be commenting about SCOTUS EVER.

 

Two, to uphold and defend the Constitution Of The United States Of America does NOT prohibit the use and benefits thereof to INCLUDE RETIRED General Gary Volsky.

 

FLOTUS is "engaged" in a diversion HERE:

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jill-biden-apologizes-for-comparing-latinos-to-tacos/vi-AAZvbmn

[cranman]

2 hours ago, Synopsis said:

 

All to illustrate a couple points.

 

One, FLOTUS should NOT be commenting about SCOTUS EVER.

 

Two, to uphold and defend the Constitution Of The United States Of America does NOT prohibit the use and benefits thereof to INCLUDE RETIRED General Gary Volsky.

 

FLOTUS is "engaged" in a diversion HERE:

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jill-biden-apologizes-for-comparing-latinos-to-tacos/vi-AAZvbmn

Ok. Believe what you want. I'm not going to try to convince you to think otherwise. I won't lose any sleep over it.

 

Obviously you don't understand the military culture.  99% ( give or take) of the population don't either.  Some people in the military struggle to understand  it. Especially the younger generation.

 

But none the less, the culture, expectations, standards  and code of conduct exist and are expected to be accepted and followed in all branches of the military. It's just the way it is

 

 

 

 

 

 

[cranman]

Also, that news clip about FLOTUS comparing Latinos to tacos  is just more divisive BS. 

 

That was not her intent. But hey, let's not waste an opportunity to be offended.  I mean the more the country can be divided and weakened the better right? 

 

Were you really so bothered by that you felt a need to copy a link? 

 

It's getting to the point where you won't able to say "Good Morning " with out offending some sensitive sally.

[Synopsis]

20 hours ago, cranman said:

Also, that news clip about FLOTUS comparing Latinos to tacos  is just more divisive BS. 

 

That was not her intent. But hey, let's not waste an opportunity to be offended.  I mean the more the country can be divided and weakened the better right? 

 

Were you really so bothered by that you felt a need to copy a link? 

 

It's getting to the point where you won't able to say "Good Morning " with out offending some sensitive sally.

 

Well, OK, Good Morning, cranman!

 

Top Of The Morning To YOU!!!

 

Enjoy Your Day or Your Evening now for that matter!!!

 

So, now to the business at hand.

 

WHO, pray tell, cares about the ILLEGITIMATE FLOTUS???!!!

 

IF FLOTUS is NOT legitimate, THEN FLOTUS should be investigated AND prosecuted for violations of The Rule Of Law AND sedition undermining the The Constitution Of The United States Of America JUST LIKE POTUS!!!

 

Military Tribunals AND ALL!!!

 

REMEMBER, RETIRED General Gary Volsky can speak HIS mind as afforded him in the 1st Amendment to The United States Of America Constitution TO INCLUDE the Ratified Bill Of Rights.

 

RETIRED General Gary Volsky can say what he wants, too, on the Military Tribunal PROSECUTING POTUS AND FLOTUS!!!

 

Well, OK, Hunter Biden, TOO!!!

[bigwave]

3 minutes ago, Synopsis said:

OK, Hunter Biden, TOO!!!

Speaking of Hunter:

 

NAKED AND AFRAID: Buck Naked and Cracked Out Hunter Biden Rides the Water Slide to His Prostitute’s Delight (VIDEO)

See it here:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/07/naked-afraid-buck-naked-cracked-hunter-biden-rides-water-slide-prostitutes-amusement-video/

[cranman]

2 hours ago, Synopsis said:

 

Well, OK, Good Morning, cranman!

 

Top Of The Morning To YOU!!!

 

Enjoy Your Day or Your Evening now for that matter!!!

 

So, now to the business at hand.

 

WHO, pray tell, cares about the ILLEGITIMATE FLOTUS???!!!

 

IF FLOTUS is NOT legitimate, THEN FLOTUS should be investigated AND prosecuted for violations of The Rule Of Law AND sedition undermining the The Constitution Of The United States Of America JUST LIKE POTUS!!!

 

Military Tribunals AND ALL!!!

 

REMEMBER, RETIRED General Gary Volsky can speak HIS mind as afforded him in the 1st Amendment to The United States Of America Constitution TO INCLUDE the Ratified Bill Of Rights.

 

RETIRED General Gary Volsky can say what he wants, too, on the Military Tribunal PROSECUTING POTUS AND FLOTUS!!!

 

Well, OK, Hunter Biden, TOO!!!

Well we will just have to disagree on the main issue. 

 

No harm in that.