In the document..The Federal Court issues a new circular regarding the 2021 Budget

[Fitxvz]

maybe postpone because kazemi go to united states end of july.. 

 

return from united states.. we hope we can hear a good news.. caiyok2

[Longtimelurker]

12 minutes ago, chris2028 said:

In this particular instance does "Next" actually mean "Next" and not "This" as in the 24th of this month? Normally when they have an article that says the "GOI will meet next Thursday" or what not, it really means they are meeting the Thursday of that current week. 

You're correct and the article reads both ways so that doesnt help any either.. lets watch both dates and see... things are happening and I'm excited about it!

[rvmydinar]

9 hours ago, Longtimelurker said:

lets watch both dates and see... things are happening and I'm excited about it!

Let's hope so.

[yota691]

Parliamentary Finance reveals government violations in terms of the budget: We will hold the Ministry of Finance accountable

 

795 Policy 2021/07/15 16:42 Today ,

Thursday, the Finance Committee in the House of Representatives monitored violations in some provisions of the budget law, explaining the impact of the Federal Court’s decision to postpone the date for deciding on the appeals submitted by the government to the implementation of those items. Committee member Faisal Jabbar said, in a statement singled out to him, (Baghdad Today), that "the Ministry of Finance has suspended some items in the budget, which is an illegal procedure, as the ministry will be held accountable for this disruption." Jabbar added, "The postponement of the Federal Court to decide on the appeals case submitted by the government will not affect the implementation of the budget items." The committee member pointed out that "the Ministry of Finance is continuing to implement the items in general, but there is a disruption of some paragraphs." The Federal Supreme Court decided the date of the challenge to the Federal Budget Law for the fiscal year 2021, to the twenty-fourth of next month.

[horsesoldier]

What an EPICALLY SUPREME TRAGIC JOKE these fools are.....18 years of round & round, riding the wooden ponies up & down on the Carnival Carousel  to nowhere 

 
Question: How many empty lamp posts are there in Bagdad ???

Answer: As many as are needed if only there were the military will and intestinal fortitude to see the job through to the end.

[yota691]

The Federal Court in Iraq clarifies the fact that Al-Halbousi was fined

The Federal Supreme Court of Iraq

 July 17, 2021 3:15 PM15

Mubasher: The Federal Supreme Court of Iraq denied, today, Saturday, issuing any decision regarding fining Parliament Speaker Muhammad al-Halbousi.

 

The Federal Court said, that the media and communication sites circulated a news entitled “The Federal Court fined the Speaker of the House of Representatives 100,000 dinars for appointing 38 ministers and agents in an unconstitutional manner,” noting that “the Federal Supreme Court did not issue such a decision,” according to the Iraq News Agency “conscious.” .

The court called on the media to be careful when publishing news and to obtain information from its official sources.

[yota691]

Federal Court: There is no constitutionality for the association of the Human Rights Commission with the House of Representatives

political| 11:08 - 10/08/2021

 

 

 

 

 

Baghdad - Mawazine News

The Federal Supreme Court confirmed, on Tuesday, that it is unconstitutional for the Commission on Human Rights to be linked to the House of Representatives.
And one of the court’s judges stated, in a statement received by Mawazine News, a copy of it, that “the Federal Supreme Court issued several decisions during its sessions held last July, including its decisive decision in the case numbered (43/Federal \ 2019) and the ruling that Articles 2 are unconstitutional. / First) and Article (12 / Fifth) and (16 / Fourth) of the Law of the High Commission for Human Rights No. (53) of 2008, the plaintiff's lawsuit was received regarding Articles (2/Second), (6), (7) and (8) And (8/second/f), (12/fourth and seventh), (13/first/second and third), (14/third), (15/first/9), (15/second and third) and (16/first/second and third) of Law of the High Commission for Human Rights No. (53) of 2008", referring to "the unconstitutionality of the association of the Commission for Human Rights with the House of Representatives."
The judge added, "The Federal Supreme Court rejected the case numbered (18/Federal/ 2021) submitted by the head of the Tishreen National Assembly, which included a request for ruling the unconstitutionality of the first and second paragraphs of Article (15) of Chapter Five, the Iraqi Parliament Elections Law No. (9) of 2020 Its text is (First: Multiple electoral districts are divided in the same governorate. Second: Candidacy shall be individual within the electoral district) on the grounds that this creates unequal opportunities among citizens and inequality among them.
The canceled decision according to the article under appeal is (790) of 2017, not 2018, which included confirmation of Cabinet Resolution No. (272 of 2015) which includes obligating ministries and agencies not affiliated with a ministry to print and implement their publications in government and private presses, provided that no sub-contracting with Press outside Iraq. Second: The contested text was unfair and infringed on the rights of a large sector of the Iraqi Federation of Industries and caused harm to this sector. Third: The text under appeal was not part of the government project, and the government’s opinion was not taken in it, and the court issued its decision dismissing the case, and the judgment decision was publicly understood.
He stated that "the court also rejected the lawsuit numbered (30 / federal / 2021), which included the appeal to the text of paragraph (2-d) of Article (2) of Law No. (23) of 2021, the Federal General Budget Law of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2021 published in the facts newspaper. Al-Iraqiya on 12/4/2021 and includes the text of the contested article (2 - I / D - the governors and the head of the Reconstruction Fund for Liberated Cities Affected by Terrorist Operations authorize direct contracting up to (5) billion dinars for one project as an exception from the contracting methods stipulated in the instructions Execution of Government Contracts No. (2) of 2014).
And he stated, "The court united the two cases numbered (31 and its unit 32 / Federal / 2021), which included a request for a ruling obligating the defendants to include the text of Article (16) of the General Ministry of Construction, Housing and Municipalities Law No. (33) of 2012 in the Federal Budget Law for the year 2021 as an exception. From Paragraph (1) Section (4) of the Financial Management Law No. (95) of 2004 or any other law that replaces it, on the grounds that the budget law has neglected to include it, especially since the previous budget laws from 2012 to 2019 have taken into account that and included them And that this deprivation violates Article (27) of the constitution and will lead to damage to public funds and the National Center for Engineering Consultation, as it will be unable to provide consultancy services properly.
The judge concluded, "The court issues its final and binding decisions to all authorities based on Articles (93/94) of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2005 and Article (5) of the Federal Supreme Court Law No. (30) for the year 2005 amended by Law No. (25) for the year 2005. 2021.” Ended 29/A 43

[yota691]

Iraq

FEDERAL COURT: THERE IS NO CONSTITUTIONALITY FOR THE ASSOCIATION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION WITH THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

 

Tue, Aug 10 2021 11:10 AM

Baghdad / National News Center

Today, Tuesday, the Federal Supreme Court confirmed that it is unconstitutional for the Human Rights Commission to be linked to the House of Representatives.

And one of the court judges stated, in a statement received by the “National News Center”, that “the Federal Supreme Court issued several decisions during its sessions held last July, including its decisive decision in the case numbered (43/Federal/2019) and the ruling that articles (2/) are unconstitutional. First) and Article (12/fifth) and (16/fourth) of the High Commission for Human Rights Law No. (53) of 2008, the plaintiff’s lawsuit was received regarding Articles (2/Second), (6), (7), (8) and (8/second/f), (12/fourth and seventh), (13/first/second and third), (14/third), (15/first/9), (15/second and third), (16/first, second and third) of the law High Commission for Human Rights No. (53) of 2008,” referring to “the unconstitutionality of the association of the Human Rights Commission with the House of Representatives.”

The judge added, “The Federal Supreme Court rejected the case numbered (18/Federal/ 2021) submitted by the head of the Tishreen National Assembly, which included the request for ruling the unconstitutionality of the first and second paragraphs of Article (15) of Chapter Five, the Iraqi Parliament Elections Law No. (9) of 2020 Its text is (First: Multiple electoral districts are divided in the same governorate. Second: Candidacy shall be individual within the electoral district) on the grounds that this creates unequal opportunities for citizens and inequality between them.

Second: The contested text was unfair and infringed on the rights of a large sector of the Iraqi Federation of Industries and caused harm to this sector. Third: The text under appeal was not part of the government project, and the government’s opinion was not taken on it, and the court issued its decision dismissing the case, and the ruling was publicly understood.”

He stated that "the court also rejected the case numbered (30 / federal / 2021), which included the appeal to the text of paragraph (2-d) of Article (2) of Law No. (23) of 2021, the Federal General Budget Law of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2021 published in the facts newspaper Al-Iraqiya on 12/4/2021 and includes the text of the contested article (2-I/D) authorizing the governors and the head of the Reconstruction Fund for Liberated Cities Affected by Terrorist Operations, the power of direct contracting up to (5) billion dinars for one project, as an exception to the contracting methods stipulated in the instructions Execution of Government Contracts No. (2) of 2014).

And he indicated, "The court united the two cases numbered (31 and its unit 32 / Federal / 2021), which included a request for a ruling obligating the defendants to include the text of Article (16) of the Ministry of Construction, Housing and Public Municipalities Law No. (33) of 2012 in the Federal Budget Law for 2021 as an exception. From Paragraph (1) Section (4) of the Financial Management Law No. (95) of 2004 or any other law that replaces it, on the grounds that the budget law has neglected to include it, especially since the previous budget laws from 2012 to 2019 have taken into account that and included them In it, this deprivation violates Article (27) of the Constitution and will lead to damage to public funds and to the National Center for Engineering Consultations, as it will be unable to provide consultancy services in the correct manner.

The judge concluded, “The court issues its final and binding decisions to all authorities based on Articles (93/94) of the Constitution of the Republic of Iraq for the year 2005 and Article (5) of the Federal Supreme Court Law No. (30) for the year 2005 amended by Law No. (25) for the year 2005. 2021".

[yota691]

The government did not fulfill its promise to address the problems of the poor after raising the price of the dollar

 

 MAHMOOD NABEEL

 IRAQI AFFAIRS

 AUGUST 10, 2021

 

 19 VIEWS

 

She called on her to withdraw her appeals against the budget for causing economic damage.. Parliamentary Finance:

Special - The New Morning:
Yesterday, Monday, the Finance Committee in the House of Representatives called on the government to withdraw its appeals against some paragraphs of the budget law, pointing out that the delay in resolving them caused damage to a number of poor and medium segments.
Member of the committee, Representative Jamal Kougar, said in a statement to “Al-Sabah Al-Jadeed” that “the delay in appeals to the budget law would cause harm to a number of segments covered by the objected paragraphs.”
Cougar added, "The Iraqi society is going through an economic crisis as a result of government decisions related to setting the price of the dollar, which should be addressed."
He pointed out, "The government had retracted the appeal that was placed on a paragraph related to the addition of 50 thousand dinars for each ton of wheat purchased of its own volition."
Cougar said, "This decline indicates that the government can withdraw all appeals, and we hope that it will, because current indications indicate that its resolution will be delayed."
He stressed, "Iraq had failed to enact last year's budget, and delaying some items of the current year's budget that pertain to societal segments by challenging them means putting sticks in the wheel of economic development, which we call for avoiding."
Cougar continues, "The delay in resolving these appeals has its reasons, but attention should be paid to the public interest, especially since there were many meetings that were held with the government before the law was passed that witnessed coordination in positions."
He explained, "The situation in the current year has greatly affected the purchasing power of the Iraqi citizen. The government did not put the remedies it promised when it changed the exchange rate."
Cougar went on to say that "the preoccupation with electoral propaganda and disputes, in addition to the Parliament's failure to hold its sessions, also affected the process of focusing on the budget, especially from the media aspect, by the government and parliament alike."
For his part, a member of the committee, Representative Mahmoud Al-Shabki, said, in an interview with Al-Sabah Al-Jadeed, that “the issue of delaying the settlement of the budget has caused severe damage to the segments, especially the middle and poor.”
Al-Shabki added, "All the paragraphs were drawn up by the House of Representatives and approved in coordination with the government, and we did not bypass the constitutional mechanisms in this aspect."
He is surprised by the government’s “insistence to proceed with the appeals,” and hopes that it will “initiate to withdraw it because there is not much left in the fiscal year, in addition to the approaching date of the country’s general elections.”

[yota691]

The Federal Court postpones the decision on the budget appeals to the first of next September

•  Time: 08/24/2021 12:14:55
•  
•  Reading: 585 times

  

{Local: Al Furat News} The Federal Supreme Court has postponed the decision on the appeals submitted by the government in the fiscal budget law for the year 2021.

The court postponed its decision to the first of next September.

[yota691]

The Federal Court postpones the decision on challenges to the budget for the year 2021

 

PM:03:47:24/08/2021

400 views

 

The Federal Supreme Court decided, on Tuesday, to postpone the decision on the appeals of the general budget for the year 2021 until the beginning of next September.

A judicial source told NRTArabiya, today (August 24, 2021), that "the Federal Court decided to postpone the decision on the appeals of the current year's budget to the first of next September."

He added, "The postponement of the decision on appeals to the federal budget is a natural matter and is related to legal procedures and has nothing to do with political issues."

On April 20, the Council of Ministers, during its weekly session, authorized Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi to submit an appeal to the Federal Court in some items of the financial budget for the current year..

The government spokesman, Minister of Culture Hassan Nazim, said in a joint press conference with the Ministers of Finance Ali Allawi and Planning Khaled Negm, that "the cabinet discussed the changes that occurred in the draft budget law in Parliament before its approval.".

He added, "The Council of Ministers authorized Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi to file an appeal with the Federal Court in some articles of the budget law."

Al-Kazemi had said, that his government intends to challenge some provisions of the budget because the amendments made to them by Parliament affect the health, electricity and other sectors.

 

[yota691]

The Federal Court postpones the decision on the budget appeals to the beginning of next September

 political

 

 Today, 12:14

Baghdad - conscious - Sajjad Al-Mousawi

Today, Tuesday, the Federal Supreme Court decided to postpone the decision on the appeals of the general budget for the year 2021 until the beginning of next September.

A reporter for the Iraqi News Agency (INA) stated that "the Federal Court decided to postpone the decision on the appeals of the current year's budget to the first of next September."

The Council of Ministers had earlier authorized Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi to file an appeal with the Federal Court on some items of the federal budget for the 2021 fiscal year.

 

•  

[ronscarpa]

4 hours ago, yota691 said:

The Federal Court postpones the decision on the budget appeals to the beginning of next September

 

Delay, Delay ... it's the name of the game..! 

[yota691]

Federal Court postpones decision on budget appeals

Wednesday 25 August 2021 126

 

 Baghdad: Shaima Rashid

 

Yesterday, Tuesday, the Federal Supreme Court decided to postpone the decision on the appeals of the general budget for the year 2021 until the beginning of next September.

The Council of Ministers had earlier authorized Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi to file an appeal with the Federal Court on some provisions of the federal budget for the 2021 fiscal year. Meanwhile, the economic advisor to the Prime Minister, Mazhar Muhammad Salih, explained that "setting a specific ceiling for spending in the budgets works to reduce or reduce the public debt."

Saleh said, in an interview with "Al-Sabah": "The budget law is annual, which is known to everyone, and there can be strategic plans for finance, such as what do we expect for taxes during the next five years? Or what do we expect for this sector during the coming period? Which is a matter Good because it is part of strategic planning."

 

 

[yota691]

A new statement on the contested budget articles

political| 01:13 - 02/09/2021

 

 

 

 

Baghdad - Mawazine News
The Finance Committee of the House of Representatives clarified, on Thursday, the details of the appeal with three articles in the budget, including the petrodollar, while noting that the contested articles are valid and enforceable.
Committee member Muhammad Al-Shabki said, according to the official news, that “the Cabinet submitted an appeal to the article related to the Federal Service Council issue, but later inquired and found that the subject and the article did not contain financial consequences, but rather were a reconnection of departments similar to the work of the Federal Service Council and linking them to the Council to be There is a fluidity in the issues of appointment and avoidance of interventions, and there will be development of the job sector and other conditions that enable the job sector to advance,” noting that “the Council of Ministers returned to the recognition and approval of the Federal Service Council law, although it initially challenged it.”
Al-Shabki added that "the article related to the petrodollar issue, there was a misunderstanding between the ministries of finance and oil, and the issue also had financial consequences related to an accounting entry to control and monitor non-oil revenues that are received by the governorates, and the Council of Ministers objected to this issue," noting that "the Ministry of Finance She later wanted to withdraw the appeal."
He continued, "The third other issue that the Council of Ministers challenged is the support of farmers and peasants by increasing the prices of crops by fifty thousand, as it was a vision to support the agricultural sector," noting that "all of the articles challenged are valid and enforceable."
And a member of the Finance Committee in the House of Representatives concluded his speech by saying: “We followed up with the Ministry of Finance and other ministries that challenged some of the articles related to it, and we demanded that the Ministry consider the budget law as a governing law and all the articles in which it contained governing articles,” explaining, that “there are articles that burdened the budget.” There is no need for it, and it has been set up to be considered as governing articles that are binding on application.” Ended 29 / A 43

[yota691]

Parliamentary Finance clarifies the details of the contested budget articles

02 September 2021

 

 

 

Doable (Facebook)

Ultra Iraq - Editorial Team

The Finance Committee of the House of Representatives confirmed that the articles contested in the budget are valid and enforceable. 

Committee member Muhammad Al-Shabki said in a statement to the official agency, and “Ultra Iraq” followed him, that “the Council of Ministers submitted an appeal to the article related to the Federal Service Council case, but later inquired and found that the subject and article do not have financial consequences, but rather are a reconnection of similar departments.” For the work of the Federal Service Council and linking them to the Council, so that there is a flow of appointment issues and avoidance of interference, and there is a development of the job sector and other conditions that enable the job sector to advance,” noting that “the Council of Ministers returned to recognizing and approving the Federal Service Council law, although it challenged it at the beginning. matter."

Al-Shabki added that “the article related to the petrodollar issue, there was a misunderstanding between the ministries of finance and oil, and the issue also has financial consequences related to an accounting entry to control and monitor non-oil revenues that are received by the governorates, and the Council of Ministers objected to this issue,” noting that “the Ministry of Finance She later wanted to withdraw the appeal."

He continued, "The third other issue that the Council of Ministers challenged is to support farmers and peasants by increasing the prices of crops by fifty thousand, as it was a vision to support the agricultural sector," noting that "all of the articles he challenged are valid and enforceable."

A member of the Finance Committee in the House of Representatives concluded his speech by saying: “We followed up with the Ministry of Finance and other ministries that challenged some of the articles related to it, and we demanded that the Ministry consider the budget law as a governing law, and all the articles in which it contained ruling articles,” explaining that “there are articles that burdened the budget.” They are not needed, and they were designed to be considered as governing articles that are binding on application.

[screwball]

Well sept26-27 and oct 30-31 is the window in MHO

[yota691]

Parliamentary Finance: The decision on budget appeals was delayed for several reasons, including the approaching elections #dream
172 views Sep 8, 2021

[yota691]

The Federal Court sets the 19th of this month as a new date for considering budget appeals

•  Time: 09/14/2021 12:50:54
•  
•  Reading: 533 times

  

 

The Federal Court sets the 19th of this month as a new date to consider the appeals submitted in some provisions of the 2021 budget

 

 

[yota691]

The Federal Court sets a new date for hearing budget appeals

 2021/09/14

 

 29

Follow-up - Al-Mawrid News

The Federal Court announced today, Tuesday, a new date for the consideration of budget appeals.
An informed source said, "The Federal Court decided to set the 19th of this month, as a new date to consider the appeals submitted regarding the budget."
The Federal Supreme Court had decided (last August 24) to postpone the decision on the appeals of the general budget for the year 2021 to this September.

[yota691]

The Federal Court sets a new date for hearing budget appeals

 

 Today, 12:46

Baghdad - I know

Today, Tuesday, the Federal Court set a new date to consider budget appeals.

A reporter for the Iraqi News Agency (INA) said, "The Federal Court decided to set the 19th of this month as a new date to consider the appeals submitted regarding the budget."

On August 24, the Federal Supreme Court decided to postpone the decision on appeals to the general budget for the year 2021 until this September.

It is noteworthy that the Council of Ministers had earlier authorized Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi to file an appeal with the Federal Court on some items of the federal budget for the fiscal year 2021.

 

[yota691]

The Federal Court sets the date for the decision to appeal the budget

•  Time: 09/19/2021 11:30:35
•  
•  Reading: 858 times

  

{Local: Al Furat News} The Federal Court set, on Sunday, the date for the issuance of the decision to appeal the budget.

The President of the Federal Court, Jassim Muhammad, said in a press statement that "the 23rd of this month has been set as the date for the issuance of the decision to challenge the budget."

And the Federal Supreme Court decided, on September 14, to postpone the decision on the appeals of the general budget for the year 2021 to the 19th of this month.

[yota691]

The Federal Court sets the date for the decision to appeal the budget

 

Iraqi Parliament. "Internet"

money and business Economy News - Baghdad The Federal Court set, on Sunday, the date for the issuance of the decision to appeal the budget. The President of the Federal Court, Jassim Muhammad, said in a statement that was reported by the official channel and followed by "Al-Iqtisad News", that "the 23rd of this month has been set as the date for the issuance of the decision to challenge the budget." The court had set September 19 as the date for hearing the budget appeals. The Federal Supreme Court postponed, earlier, the date of the challenge to the Federal Budget Law for the fiscal year 2021. A judicial source stated, to the official news agency "conscious", that "the Federal Supreme Court postponed the date for appealing the Federal Budget Law for the fiscal year 2021, to the twenty-fourth of next month." The Council of Ministers had earlier authorized Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi to file an appeal with the Federal Court on some items of the federal budget for the 2021 fiscal year. The government appealed 10 paragraphs of the budget, which the Parliamentary Finance Committee changed or amended, as follows: Article 2, Paragraph 4g, which says, “The Ministry of Finance must abide by the ceiling of the allocations in Schedule B as amended, and redistribute those allocations, both operational and capital, and classify them on the basis of the level of departments, chapters, materials and types. This article relates to the expenditures of the ministries that Parliament reduced from 164 trillion to 128 trillion dinars, including the reduction of social welfare allocations. Article 2, Paragraph 4h, which relates to the allocations of revenues obtained from collection and fees to municipal and health departments in the governorates, and which is found in their balances for the years 2019, 2020 and 2021, and authorizes the governor to ratify the spending plan. And Article 2, paragraph 8, which relates to the establishment of funds in all governorates producing crude or refined oil or gas under the name of the Petrodollar Fund, which is managed by the governor and financed monthly. The objection relates to Article 12 Second B, which says, “The Council of Ministers must disengage and restructure departments and departments in ministries and entities not affiliated with a ministry that exercise, under its laws, tasks corresponding to or similar to the tasks stipulated in Federal Public Service Council Law No. 4 of 2009 amended to activate the role of the Council in public service. The government also submitted an objection to Article 18 III B related to the imposition of a 15% tax on imported fuel that is sold directly through car filling stations. Article 50 A, which says, “The Minister of Finance may add financial allocations to fill the shortfall in employee compensation from salaries, contractors’ wages and daily wages, if any, provided that the total amount does not exceed 500 billion dinars, provided that it is audited by the Federal Financial Supervision Bureau later. Article 50 c, which talks about “the Council of Ministers shall increase the current prices for the purchase of wheat, barley and rye crops from farmers by 50 thousand dinars per ton for each of the mentioned crops.” Article 56 Third, which says, “The extractive oil companies are obligated not to include the expenses for the license tour contracts in the lists of calculating the cost of the current activity, with the exception of the salaries of employees seconded to work with contracting companies within the license tours, taking into account what was stated in the Council of Ministers decision numbered “S.L. 212” in 29/6/2013. Article 58, which obligates the Council of Ministers to assign the names of those entrusted with the positions of heads of independent bodies, special grades, deputy ministers and advisors to the House of Representatives no later than 30/6/2021, and the House of Representatives is obligated to take its decision by voting within 30 days from the date of sending the names. Wasit government submitted an objection to the Federal Court against Schedule C in the 2021 budget

Views 57   Date Added 09/19/2021

[yota691]

The Federal Court issues its ruling on the budget appeals

•  Time: 09/29/2021 11:14:24
•  
•  Reading: 2,184 times

  

{Local: Al Furat News} The Federal Supreme Court issued a ruling on the appeals submitted by the government in the financial budget for the year 2021.

The court decided to approve 6 contested paragraphs of the budget in favor of the government, and the appeal was received on 4 articles.

And it agreed to challenge the government by adding allocations to compensate employees' salaries, contracts and wages.

The court also agreed to appeal the refusal to impose 15 percent taxes on fuel and agreed to the government's appeal over the costs of oil licensing rounds.

The Federal Court approved the government's appeal by refusing to establish petrodollar funds

[DWS112]

9 minutes ago, yota691 said:

The Federal Court approved the government's appeal by refusing to establish petrodollar funds

DE-Peg ?

Edited September 29, 2021 by DWS112