Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Three congressional bills call for Biden's impeachment


Recommended Posts

 
 Washington: agencies
 
Republican Representative of the US Congress, Marjorie Taylor-Green, submitted to Congress three draft resolutions on the impeachment of US President Joe Biden.
The republic, a supporter of former US President Donald Trump, wrote on her account on Twitter: "On behalf of the Americans, I submitted projects to impeach Joe Biden for not fulfilling his duties in office, regarding the situation in Afghanistan."
And she believed it was necessary to impeach Biden also because of the ongoing immigration crisis on the southern US border and what she described as a "constitutional imbalance" that led to his "ignoring the rules of the Supreme Court."
It is impossible for the US Congress to support the initiatives of the Republican representative, as the Democratic Party is the one who controls the Congress, according to the results of the recent elections. For its part, Forbes noted that most Republicans have repeatedly rejected Greene's proposals.
Green, 47, became a deputy in the US Congress, according to the results of the general elections that took place in the United States on November 3, 2020. Trump previously described her as the "rising star" of the Republican Party. Politico wrote that the former president's supporter has various "theories" conspiracy."
  • Like 2
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Smokey Mtn. Dinar said:

 

Save our time and money, just drop a bomb on them. 💣 💣 💣 

 
 
It's all insane and blame goes many different directions..we should never have gone in.

Afghanistan: Former advisor to Mike Pence warned in 2020 that Trump was setting up another 'Benghazi'

19 hours 
  • James Golby served as a special advisor in the office of Vice President Mike Pence.
  • He spent 20 years in the US Army and deployed twice in Iraq.
  • Last fall, he said Donald Trump was leaving behind "an unsustainable presence in Afghanistan."
 
 

A Trump administration advisor warned late last year that President Donald Trump's decision to leave just 2,500 troops in Afghanistan — and his telegraphed desire to get out whether or not the Taliban chose to abide by its agreement with the US — would leave American forces vulnerable to an attack.

"Perhaps by design, perhaps by incompetence, perhaps out of sheer spite or arrogance, Trump has created the circumstances for another Bay of Pigs, Black Hawk Down, or Benghazi," James Golby, who served as a special advisor to Vice President Mike Pence, wrote in a November article for The Atlantic. Those were all situations, he wrote, "where the United States inserted itself into overseas conflicts enough to draw lethal opposition but without sufficient strength to protect its people."

On Thursday, more than 160 Afghans were killed in suicide attacks outside Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, per reports, along with at least 13 US troops. The extremist group ISIS-K has claimed responsibility.

Golby, a US Army veteran who is a senior fellow at the Clements Center for National Security at the University of Texas at Austin, took issue with Trump's mid-November decision because, he wrote, he would be "leaving behind an unsustainable presence in Afghanistan, a crisis for the Afghan people, and a mess for the Biden-Harris administration."

More than 5,000 Afghan civilians were killed or injured in the first half of 2021 — the most since records started being kept in 2009, according to the United Nations, with anti-government forces accounting for 64% of the bloodshed. In May, a terrorist attack in Kabul outside a secondary killed more than 50 people, mostly young girls, the BBC reported.

President Joe Biden campaigned on ending the 20-year American presence in Afghanistan, a decision that enjoys broad public support in the US. Any decision to stay, Golby noted last year, even for a more limited counterterrorism mission, would have required deploying more US troops and could have triggered a new round of clashes between those forces and the Taliban.

Though Biden does not bear responsibility for the large backlog of Special Immigrant Visa applicants created by his predecessor, refugee advocates had pleaded in April — four months before the fall of Kabul — and again in May for the administration to begin mass airlifts of vulnerable Afghans, using his power to grant humanitarian "parole" to bypass the State Department bureaucracy.

Biden elected not to do that until after Kabul fell, though he did authorize a modest surge of US forces just before the collapse, approving the deployment of 5,000 troops. In part, The New York Times recently suggested, those calls were rejected because the government of Afghan President Ashraf Ghani requested that he hold off so as to not harm morale and to avoid deploying more troops ahead of the complete withdrawal — but also, per two US officials who spoke with Reuters, because he was wary of the "political impact" posed by a "large number of Afghan refugees flowing into the United States."

 
 
 
  • Downvote 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CSM (R) Thack said:

Got nothing…Blaming Trump…is lame as sh-t!! 
 

pOTUS owns this Colossal Failure!!! 

Not blaming..but he has contributed with a lame deal last May that released 500 Taliban and one is now part of the current leadership..no president is blameless that has been part of this entire lame conflict. POTUS owns the current failure yes, but none are blameless.

  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, miraj said:
 
 
It's all insane and blame goes many different directions..we should never have gone in.

Afghanistan: Former advisor to Mike Pence warned in 2020 that Trump was setting up another 'Benghazi'

19 hours 
  • James Golby served as a special advisor in the office of Vice President Mike Pence.
  • He spent 20 years in the US Army and deployed twice in Iraq.
  • Last fall, he said Donald Trump was leaving behind "an unsustainable presence in Afghanistan."
 
 

A Trump administration advisor warned late last year that President Donald Trump's decision to leave just 2,500 troops in Afghanistan — and his telegraphed desire to get out whether or not the Taliban chose to abide by its agreement with the US — would leave American forces vulnerable to an attack.

"Perhaps by design, perhaps by incompetence, perhaps out of sheer spite or arrogance, Trump has created the circumstances for another Bay of Pigs, Black Hawk Down, or Benghazi," James Golby, who served as a special advisor to Vice President Mike Pence, wrote in a November article for The Atlantic. Those were all situations, he wrote, "where the United States inserted itself into overseas conflicts enough to draw lethal opposition but without sufficient strength to protect its people."

On Thursday, more than 160 Afghans were killed in suicide attacks outside Hamid Karzai International Airport in Kabul, Afghanistan, per reports, along with at least 13 US troops. The extremist group ISIS-K has claimed responsibility.

Golby, a US Army veteran who is a senior fellow at the Clements Center for National Security at the University of Texas at Austin, took issue with Trump's mid-November decision because, he wrote, he would be "leaving behind an unsustainable presence in Afghanistan, a crisis for the Afghan people, and a mess for the Biden-Harris administration."

More than 5,000 Afghan civilians were killed or injured in the first half of 2021 — the most since records started being kept in 2009, according to the United Nations, with anti-government forces accounting for 64% of the bloodshed. In May, a terrorist attack in Kabul outside a secondary killed more than 50 people, mostly young girls, the BBC reported.

President Joe Biden campaigned on ending the 20-year American presence in Afghanistan, a decision that enjoys broad public support system" rel="">support in the US. Any decision to stay, Golby noted last year, even for a more limited counterterrorism mission, would have required deploying more US troops and could have triggered a new round of clashes between those forces and the Taliban.

Though Biden does not bear responsibility for the large backlog of Special Immigrant Visa applicants created by his predecessor, refugee advocates had pleaded in April — four months before the fall of Kabul — and again in May for the administration to begin mass airlifts of vulnerable Afghans, using his power to grant humanitarian "parole" to bypass the State Department bureaucracy.

Biden elected not to do that until after Kabul fell, though he did authorize a modest surge of US forces just before the collapse, approving the deployment of 5,000 troops. In part, The New York Times recently suggested, those calls were rejected because the government of Afghan President Ashraf Ghani requested that he hold off so as to not harm morale and to avoid deploying more troops ahead of the complete withdrawal — but also, per two US officials who spoke with Reuters, because he was wary of the "political impact" posed by a "large number of Afghan refugees flowing into the United States."

 
 
 

 

I disagree.....we should have gone in..... we did, and we completed the task...and we should have pulled out years ago.....

 

Fast forward......under Bidens watch....the departure has been an unmitigated disaster. 

   

The abandonment of Bagram AFB might be one of the stupidest moves ever....$8 Billion to build it....200+ Black Hawks left behind.....4-5 thousand ISIS criminals released from Bagran......

So those who want to kill US Citzens.... are free....with $80 billion  I weapons.... brilliant.. CL

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 5
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, miraj said:

Not blaming..but he has contributed with a lame deal last May that released 500 Taliban and one is now part of the current leadership..no president is blameless that has been part of this entire lame conflict. POTUS owns the current failure yes, but none are blameless.

There is a difference though, between the art of the DEAL and colossal failure.  I hope you can figure out the difference.

  • Upvote 5
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, miraj said:

Not blaming..but he has contributed with a lame deal last May that released 500 Taliban and one is now part of the current leadership..no president is blameless that has been part of this entire lame conflict. POTUS owns the current failure yes, but none are blameless.

Not blaming…Sorry…but you posted the article that blames Trump!! Where’s your article blaming pOTUS??? Even your last line  “but none are blameless”…still not laying those iron sights solely on Biden!! 


Orange man bad…y’alls immediate go to line!! The lack of an EXFIL plan lays squarely on Biden’s narrow shoulders!!! It was “his” decision to leave thousands of Americans in harms way…it’s a disgrace, and F’ing UNSAT!! 

 

Had this been Trump…impeachment hearings would be underway!! MSM and the left would be going bat sh-t versus praising his weak azz EVAC, while hand picked puppets blame the very Americans pOTUS left behind!! 
 

The BLUF here…I’m EXTREMELY pissed off…dead Marines…completely unnecessary! Damn straight…Biden owns this sh-t!!!

  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 11
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Miraj, I believe you are ex military, am I correct? If so and you were POTUS, what would have been the first thing you would have done to withdraw our forces from Afghanistan? The very first thing? Would you,have closed Bagram AF? Would you have added more troops to protect the civilain withdrawal? What? Help us out Mr. Prez!!

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/28/2021 at 6:34 AM, md11fr8dawg said:

Miraj, I believe you are ex military, am I correct? If so and you were POTUS, what would have been the first thing you would have done to withdraw our forces from Afghanistan? The very first thing? Would you,have closed Bagram AF? Would you have added more troops to protect the civilain withdrawal? What? Help us out Mr. Prez!!

Go home after the proposed mission was complete....simple

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, md11fr8dawg said:

18 years too late mirij. So I'll ask again in case you did not understand my question. It is today, here and now, not what should have been done. What would Prez miraj do with the situation in Afghanstan NOW. Come on CIC lead us!!

I would have put you in charge.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.