Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Arizonians File In State Supreme Court To Remove State Officials From Office


Recommended Posts

REPORT: Arizonians File In State Supreme Court To Remove State Officials From Office

by CD Media Staff214034
VIDEO: Democrats Cave In Maricopa County Court, Election Audit Will Go On

Please Follow us on Gab, Minds, Telegram, Rumble, Gab TV

 

This story is developing…

 

We Are Reporting on A Petition for Review Special Action in Writ of Quo Warranto that was delivered to the Arizona Supreme Court on Friday, reported Arizona Red Roots Telegram Channel.

 

Their post is below…

 

For a short definition, Quo Warranto is a special form of legal action used to resolve a dispute over whether a specific person has the legal right to hold an office.

 

The PETITIONERS (ones who filed it) are not all public.

 

The Named RESPONDENTS are as follows:

 

Governor Doug Ducey
Secretary of State Katie Hobbs
State Treasurer Kimberly Yee
Maricopa Sheriff Paul Penzone
Pima Sheriff Chris Nanos
Phoenix Mayor Kate Gallego
Tucson Mayor Regina Romero
Maricopa Recorder Stephen Richer
Superintendent of Public Instruction Kathy Hoffman
Corporations Commissioner Ana Tovar
Corporations Commissioner Lea Marquez Peterson
Corporations Commissioner Sandra D. Kennedy
Corporations Commissioner Justin Olson
District 9 Senator Victoria Steele
District 10 Senator Kirsten Engle
District 25 Representative Russell Bowers
District 9 Representative Randall Friese
District 10 Representative Domingo DeGarzia
District 12 Representative Travis Grantham

 

The Petitioners challenge the Respondents’ right to office based on actions by others that were in direct violation of Help America Vote Act of 2002 (HAVA) Federal Law and State Statute.

 

“Conditions for receiving votes for office were not met as to law and statute. Therefore Respondents are inadvertent usurpers.”

 

“Our rights have been grossly violated and injury occurred and is occurring. The facts show clearly egregious illegality. Results of these failures render null the leadership in place.”

 

The Relief Requested:


Petitioner respectfully requests that the Court enter Judgement against the Respondents as follows:

 
  1. Order that each Respondent be removed from the trusted office that is now held unlawfully.
  2. Order a pro-tempore only seat to the challengers until such time as free, fair and secure elections can be held.
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Walls of the Liberal Empire are Beginning to Crumble and Fall and They know There is Not a Damn thing they can do to stop it......They tried and their feeble Attempts to stop this or cover it up have turned against them. The American People, "We The People" have had enough.

 

Soon Michigan, then Georgia and in time PA....Even the US Census can't see it happening.

 

 Trump-Obama-Biden.jpg

 

Karsten

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.