Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

WATCH LIVE: Arizona Elections Audit


Recommended Posts

Thanks jg1, Here's that article. Nothing to hide I'm guessing because it's been illegally Deleted. 
 
 
BREAKING: Maricopa County ElectionsOfficials DELETED ENTIRE DATABASE from Voting Machines – Including “All Election Information” from Main Database — With Copy of Senate Letter
By Patty McMurray
Published May 12, 2021 at 10:27pm
6253 Comments

Last week, the Gateway Pundit reported about the emergency meeting that was called by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, after the County was reportedly unable to provide passwords to the auditors performing an audit of the county’s 2020 Election results.  They also did not provide access to the routers which were requested in the audit as well.

audit-740x416.jpeg

This afternoon, it was discovered that “the entire database” for the 2020 General election, showing the “Results Tally and Reporting,” has been deleted!

 

100 Percent Fed Up reports– President of the Arizona Senate Karen Fann has written a letter to Chairman Sellers, demanding answers.

karen-fann-740x416.jpeg

Arizona Senate President Karen Fann

TRENDING: BREAKING: Maricopa County Elections Officials DELETED ENTIRE DATABASE from Voting Machines - Including "All Election Information" from Main Database -- With Copy of Senate Letter

Here is the letter to Maricopa County Supervisor Chairman Jack Sellers from Arizona Senate President Karen Fann:

Dear Chairman Sellers:

I am writing to seek your assistance and cooperation in the resolution of three (3) serious issues that have arisen in the course of the Senate’s ongoing audit of the returns of the November 3, 2020, general election in Maricopa County.

I. Ongoing Non-Compliance with the Legislative Subpoenas

The first issue concerns Maricopa County’s apparent intent to renege on its previous commitment to comply fully with the legislative subpoenas issued on January 13, 2021, which, as you know, Judge Thomason found were valid and enforceable.

To date, attorneys for Maricopa County have refused to produce virtual images of routers used in connection with the general election, relying on a conclusory and unsupported assertion that providing the routers would somehow “endanger the lives of law enforcement officers, their operations, or the protected health information and personal data of Maricopa County’s citizens.”If true, the fact that Maricopa County stores on its routers substantial quantities of citizens’ and employees’ highly sensitive personal information is an alarming indictment of the County’s lax data security practices, rather than of the legislative subpoenas.

Similarly, the County’s assertion that producing the internet routers for inspection would cost up to $6,000,000 seems at odds with Deputy County Attorney Joseph La Rue’s prior representation to Audit Liaison Ken Bennett that the routers already had been disconnected from the County’s network and were prepared for imminent delivery to the Senate.

 

Nevertheless, in an effort to resolve the dispute regarding production of the routers, we propose that agents of CyFIR, an experienced digital forensics firm and subcontractor of Cyber Ninjas, review virtual images of the relevant routers in Maricopa County facilities and in the presence of representatives of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. Such an arrangement would permit Maricopa County to retain custody and monitor the review of router data while ensuring that the Senate may access the information it requires—and to which it is constitutionally entitled—to successfully complete its audit. The Senate has no interest in viewing or taking possession of any information that is unrelated to the administration of the 2020 general election.

Separately, Maricopa County has refused to provide the passwords necessary to access vote tabulation devices. Its attorneys’ insistence that the County does not have custody or control of this information is belied by the County’s conduct of its own audits, which, if they were as comprehensive as they purported to be, almost certainly would have entailed use of the passwords to examine the tabulation devices, and it strains credulity to posit that the County has no contractual right to obtain (i.e., control of) password information from Dominion.

II. Chain of Custody and Ballot Organization Anomalies

As the audit has progressed, the Senate’s contractors have become aware of apparent omissions, inconsistencies, and anomalies relating to Maricopa County’s handling, organization, and storage of ballots.We hope you can assist us in understanding these issues, including specifically the following.

    1. The bags in which the ballots were stored are not sealed, although the audit team has found at the bottom of many boxes cut seals of the type that would have sealed a ballot bag. Why were these seals placed at the bottom of the boxes?
    2. Batches within a box are frequently separated by only a divider without any indication of the corresponding batch numbers.In some cases, the batch dividers are missing altogether.This lack of organization has significantly complicated and delayed the audit team’s ballot processing efforts.What are the County’s procedures for sorting, organizing, and packaging ballot batches?
    3. Most of the ballot boxes were sealed merely with regular tape and not secured by any kind of tamper-evident seal.Is that the County’s customary practice for storing ballots?
    4. The audit team has encountered a significant number of instances in which there is a disparity between the actual number of ballots contained in a batch and the total denoted on the pink report slip accompanying the batch.In most of these instances, the total on the pink report slip is greater than the number of ballots in the batch, although there are a few instances in which the total is lower.What are the reasons for these discrepancies?For your reference, please see several illustrative (i.e., not comprehensive) examples in the table below:

AZ1-740x231.jpg

For your convenience, images of the corresponding pink report slips are attached in Exhibit A.

III. Deleted Databases

Advertisement - story continues below

 

We have recently discovered that the entire “Database” directory from the D drive of the machine “EMSPrimary” has been deleted. This removes election related details that appear to have been covered by the subpoena. In addition, the main database for the Election Management System (EMS) Software, “Results Tally and Reporting,” is not located anywhere on the EMSPrimary machine, even though all of the EMS Clients reference that machine as the location of the database. This suggests that the main database for all election-related data for the November 2020 General Election has been removed. Can you please advise as to why these folders were deleted, and whether there are any backups that may contain the deleted folders?

The image below shows the location of the files known to be deleted. In addition, the main database for “Results Tally and Reporting” is not present.

rstudio-740x429.jpeg

* * *

Advertisement - story continues below

 

I am hopeful that we can constructively resolve these issues and questions without recourse to additional subpoenas or other compulsory processes.To that end, I invite you and any other officers or employees of Maricopa County (to include officials in the Elections Department) who possess knowledge or information concerning the matters set forth above to a meeting at the Arizona State Capitol on Tuesday, May 18, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. in Hearing Room 109. Chairman Petersen, former Secretary Bennett, and I will attend the meeting, which will be live-streamed to the public.

Please let me know at your earliest convenience whether you accept my invitation and, if so, which Maricopa County personnel will attend.

Thank you for your cooperation on these important issues of public concern.

Respectfully,

Advertisement - story continues below

 

image.png.510b5d61741a6c27a65fe1146eac263c.png

Karen Fann, President

Arizona State Senate

When inspectors received the boxes of ballots where the audit was being performed, the tamper-proof tape was cut on the boxes and the number of ballots inside the boxes was not the same as what was reported by the County reporter, and what was turned over to the Senate don’t line up.

Advertisement - story continues below

 

A week before the machines were turned over, records were deleted by an administrator—this has to be treated as an act of intentional cover-up!

The Maricopa Arizona Audit team has also tweeted about the breaking bombshell:

Breaking Update: Maricopa County deleted a directory full of election databases from the 2020 election cycle days before the election equipment was delivered to the audit. This is spoliation of evidence!

 

Advertisement - story continues below

 

Why would the database be deleted unless there was something massive they were trying to hide? This article is for everyone who’s been trying to convince Americans that no voter fraud took place in the November election and that it was the safest and most secure election in modern history.

Nothing to see here!

UPDATE — Here is the letter from the Arizona Senate to the Maricopa County Supervisors

Advertisement - story continues below

 

Exclusive Letter to Maricop… by Jim Hoft

 

 
 
patty-150x150.jpg
 
Summary
 
 More Info Recent Posts Contact
100 Percent Fed Up Publisher.
  • Thanks 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, 64jaguar said:
Thanks jg1, Here's that article. Nothing to hide I'm guessing because it's been illegally Deleted. 
 
 
BREAKING: Maricopa County ElectionsOfficials DELETED ENTIRE DATABASE from Voting Machines – Including “All Election Information” from Main Database — With Copy of Senate Letter
By Patty McMurray
Published May 12, 2021 at 10:27pm
6253 Comments

Last week, the Gateway Pundit reported about the emergency meeting that was called by the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, after the County was reportedly unable to provide passwords to the auditors performing an audit of the county’s 2020 Election results.  They also did not provide access to the routers which were requested in the audit as well.

audit-740x416.jpeg

This afternoon, it was discovered that “the entire database” for the 2020 General election, showing the “Results Tally and Reporting,” has been deleted!

 

100 Percent Fed Up reports– President of the Arizona Senate Karen Fann has written a letter to Chairman Sellers, demanding answers.

karen-fann-740x416.jpeg

Arizona Senate President Karen Fann

TRENDING: BREAKING: Maricopa County Elections Officials DELETED ENTIRE DATABASE from Voting Machines - Including "All Election Information" from Main Database -- With Copy of Senate Letter

Here is the letter to Maricopa County Supervisor Chairman Jack Sellers from Arizona Senate President Karen Fann:

Dear Chairman Sellers:

I am writing to seek your assistance and cooperation in the resolution of three (3) serious issues that have arisen in the course of the Senate’s ongoing audit of the returns of the November 3, 2020, general election in Maricopa County.

I. Ongoing Non-Compliance with the Legislative Subpoenas

The first issue concerns Maricopa County’s apparent intent to renege on its previous commitment to comply fully with the legislative subpoenas issued on January 13, 2021, which, as you know, Judge Thomason found were valid and enforceable.

To date, attorneys for Maricopa County have refused to produce virtual images of routers used in connection with the general election, relying on a conclusory and unsupported assertion that providing the routers would somehow “endanger the lives of law enforcement officers, their operations, or the protected health information and personal data of Maricopa County’s citizens.”If true, the fact that Maricopa County stores on its routers substantial quantities of citizens’ and employees’ highly sensitive personal information is an alarming indictment of the County’s lax data security practices, rather than of the legislative subpoenas.

Similarly, the County’s assertion that producing the internet routers for inspection would cost up to $6,000,000 seems at odds with Deputy County Attorney Joseph La Rue’s prior representation to Audit Liaison Ken Bennett that the routers already had been disconnected from the County’s network and were prepared for imminent delivery to the Senate.

 

Nevertheless, in an effort to resolve the dispute regarding production of the routers, we propose that agents of CyFIR, an experienced digital forensics firm and subcontractor of Cyber Ninjas, review virtual images of the relevant routers in Maricopa County facilities and in the presence of representatives of the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office. Such an arrangement would permit Maricopa County to retain custody and monitor the review of router data while ensuring that the Senate may access the information it requires—and to which it is constitutionally entitled—to successfully complete its audit. The Senate has no interest in viewing or taking possession of any information that is unrelated to the administration of the 2020 general election.

Separately, Maricopa County has refused to provide the passwords necessary to access vote tabulation devices. Its attorneys’ insistence that the County does not have custody or control of this information is belied by the County’s conduct of its own audits, which, if they were as comprehensive as they purported to be, almost certainly would have entailed use of the passwords to examine the tabulation devices, and it strains credulity to posit that the County has no contractual right to obtain (i.e., control of) password information from Dominion.

II. Chain of Custody and Ballot Organization Anomalies

As the audit has progressed, the Senate’s contractors have become aware of apparent omissions, inconsistencies, and anomalies relating to Maricopa County’s handling, organization, and storage of ballots.We hope you can assist us in understanding these issues, including specifically the following.

    1. The bags in which the ballots were stored are not sealed, although the audit team has found at the bottom of many boxes cut seals of the type that would have sealed a ballot bag. Why were these seals placed at the bottom of the boxes?
    2. Batches within a box are frequently separated by only a divider without any indication of the corresponding batch numbers.In some cases, the batch dividers are missing altogether.This lack of organization has significantly complicated and delayed the audit team’s ballot processing efforts.What are the County’s procedures for sorting, organizing, and packaging ballot batches?
    3. Most of the ballot boxes were sealed merely with regular tape and not secured by any kind of tamper-evident seal.Is that the County’s customary practice for storing ballots?
    4. The audit team has encountered a significant number of instances in which there is a disparity between the actual number of ballots contained in a batch and the total denoted on the pink report slip accompanying the batch.In most of these instances, the total on the pink report slip is greater than the number of ballots in the batch, although there are a few instances in which the total is lower.What are the reasons for these discrepancies?For your reference, please see several illustrative (i.e., not comprehensive) examples in the table below:

AZ1-740x231.jpg

For your convenience, images of the corresponding pink report slips are attached in Exhibit A.

III. Deleted Databases

Advertisement - story continues below

 

We have recently discovered that the entire “Database” directory from the D drive of the machine “EMSPrimary” has been deleted. This removes election related details that appear to have been covered by the subpoena. In addition, the main database for the Election Management System (EMS) Software, “Results Tally and Reporting,” is not located anywhere on the EMSPrimary machine, even though all of the EMS Clients reference that machine as the location of the database. This suggests that the main database for all election-related data for the November 2020 General Election has been removed. Can you please advise as to why these folders were deleted, and whether there are any backups that may contain the deleted folders?

The image below shows the location of the files known to be deleted. In addition, the main database for “Results Tally and Reporting” is not present.

rstudio-740x429.jpeg

* * *

Advertisement - story continues below

 

I am hopeful that we can constructively resolve these issues and questions without recourse to additional subpoenas or other compulsory processes.To that end, I invite you and any other officers or employees of Maricopa County (to include officials in the Elections Department) who possess knowledge or information concerning the matters set forth above to a meeting at the Arizona State Capitol on Tuesday, May 18, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. in Hearing Room 109. Chairman Petersen, former Secretary Bennett, and I will attend the meeting, which will be live-streamed to the public.

Please let me know at your earliest convenience whether you accept my invitation and, if so, which Maricopa County personnel will attend.

Thank you for your cooperation on these important issues of public concern.

Respectfully,

Advertisement - story continues below

 

image.png.510b5d61741a6c27a65fe1146eac263c.png

Karen Fann, President

Arizona State Senate

When inspectors received the boxes of ballots where the audit was being performed, the tamper-proof tape was cut on the boxes and the number of ballots inside the boxes was not the same as what was reported by the County reporter, and what was turned over to the Senate don’t line up.

Advertisement - story continues below

 

A week before the machines were turned over, records were deleted by an administrator—this has to be treated as an act of intentional cover-up!

The Maricopa Arizona Audit team has also tweeted about the breaking bombshell:

Breaking Update: Maricopa County deleted a directory full of election databases from the 2020 election cycle days before the election equipment was delivered to the audit. This is spoliation of evidence!

 

Advertisement - story continues below

 

Why would the database be deleted unless there was something massive they were trying to hide? This article is for everyone who’s been trying to convince Americans that no voter fraud took place in the November election and that it was the safest and most secure election in modern history.

Nothing to see here!

UPDATE — Here is the letter from the Arizona Senate to the Maricopa County Supervisors

Advertisement - story continues below

 

Exclusive Letter to Maricop… by Jim Hoft

 

 
 
patty-150x150.jpg
 
Summary
 
 More Info Recent Posts Contact
100 Percent Fed Up Publisher.

Stopped reading at The gateway pundit! You should too! 😉

  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Um.... caddieman......the Gateway Pundit did write the letter to the court....

It came from:

 

Karen Fann, President

Arizona State Senate

 

WHY would election information be deleted?????  This is HUGE news that cannot be ignored!!!!!!!!!

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, fancy said:

Um.... caddieman......the Gateway Pundit did write the letter to the court....

It came from:

 

Karen Fann, President

Arizona State Senate

 

WHY would election information be deleted?????  This is HUGE news that cannot be ignored!!!!!!!!!

Um.........fancy..........it’s right off the gateway pundit web sight! Twisted to a-line with the radical right agenda to get clicks from people. The gateway pundit is proven to be very very low in factual reporting, if you can even call it that. Gateway pundit is an absolute joke as a NEWS source 

Edited by caddieman
  • Confused 2
  • Downvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, caddieman said:

Um.........fancy..........it’s right off the gateway pundit web sight! Twisted to a-line with the radical right agenda to get clicks from people. The gateway pundit is proven to be very very low in factual reporting, if you can even call it that. Gateway pundit is an absolute joke as a NEWS source 

The Gateway Pundit DIDN'T Write the letter....Karen Fann, President of the AZ State Senate Did.

 

Gateway Pundit only Reported on it.

 

Much the same as one of your Cohorts be\rings everything over from Yahoo News who are well Left Leaning and report on everything even before it is Verified.

 

Karsten

 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, caddieman said:

Um.........fancy..........it’s right off the gateway pundit web sight! Twisted to a-line with the radical right agenda to get clicks from people. The gateway pundit is proven to be very very low in factual reporting, if you can even call it that. Gateway pundit is an absolute joke as a NEWS source 

Isn't it interesting how deceitful and evil people love to twist and distort facts to promote their agendas?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, caddieman said:

Um.........fancy..........it’s right off the gateway pundit web sight! Twisted to a-line with the radical right agenda to get clicks from people. The gateway pundit is proven to be very very low in factual reporting, if you can even call it that. Gateway pundit is an absolute joke as a NEWS source 

No that's not right, look at the letter again it was written by Karen Fann, President of the AZ State Senate.

And it's been written in more than this one news source.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

‘SPOLIATION OF EVIDENCE’: Maricopa County Deleted Election Databases Before Equipment Was Delivered To Arizona Auditors

Maricopa County, Arizona officials deleted a directory of 2020 election databases only days before turning election equipment over to the auditors.

Tom Pappert by TOM PAPPERT
 
 
Arizona-Audit-Spoliation-of-Evidence-102
 
 

New information has surfaced suggesting that Maricopa County election officials deleted voter databases from the 2020 election, despite being under a subpoena, before they were delivered to the auditors conducting the full forensic audit of votes in the county. According to the official Maricopa Arizona Audit, this constitutes “spoliation of evidence.”

According to an update from the official Maricopa Arizona Audit Twitter account, controlled by Former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett, a directory full of election databases from the 2020 election cycle was deleted by Maricopa County officials only “days before the election equipment was delivered to the audit,” despite being under a subpoena at the time. According to Bennett, this constitutes “spoliation of evidence.”

 

According to the American Bar Association, “spoliation of electronically stored information (ESI) ranks at the top of the list” of pitfalls lawyers and their clients should avoid, as it “subjects the non-compliant party to a substantial likelihood of sanctions.” In one prominent court case, the court sanctioned the defendant by allowing evidence and discussion that would otherwise have been prohibited during the trial. The American Bar Association continues, parties are “under an obligation by court rules and case law to preserve relevant documents, including ESI, once litigation is reasonably contemplated.”

 

This came just before the revelation that the total number of ballots in pallets delivered to the Arizona auditors have wide discrepancies between the number that Maricopa County officials claimed were in the pallets and the actual numbers, with the number differing by 17.5% in one instance. According to political strategist Boris Ephsteyn, “anything above a tiny fraction of a percentage is unacceptable, by the way, unacceptable according to the Federal Elections Commission.” This led Ephsteyn to declare that Democrats are hiding the fact that it is likely “Joe Biden did not win in Arizona.”

 

Earlier this month, Maricopa County also refused to turn over electronic devices – in this case routers – that were used in the 2020 election, despite a Senate subpoena ordering them to do so. National File reported, “A letter signed by the Maricopa County Attorney’s Office and addressed to former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett vigorously defended officials’ decision to not turn over internet routers, but did not elaborate on the purported risk that complying with the subpoena would cause.”

 

 

 
  • Upvote 3
  • Pow! 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BREAKING: ‘Significant Discrepancies’ Discovered In Arizona Audit, Ballots Off Up to 17.5%, ‘Likely Joe Biden Did Not Win’

"They're hiding the disaster in which they handled this election, and likely, the fact that Joe Biden did not win in Arizona."

Tom Pappert by TOM PAPPERT
 
 
Ballot-Discrepancy-Biden-Likely-Did-Not-
 

The ongoing audit of ballots cast in Maricopa County, Arizona has uncovered “significant discrepancies” in the number of ballots versus the supposed number of ballots that were supposed to exist. Political strategist Boris Epshteyn adds that the discrepancies may be as high as 17.5%, and it is “likely Joe Biden did not win Arizona”.

Arizona Senate President recently sent a letter to the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, outlining the major issues discovered already in the audit, and offering to settle them without additional subpoenas or compulsory action. In the letter, says Epshteyn on Steve Bannon’s podcast, it reveals, “Pallet five, batch 2976, 200 pink slip total, actual total 165. They are missing 35 ballots out of that batch.” He added, “35 out of 100 is 17.5%. 10 out of 200 is 5%.”

 

“Do you know how shocking that is? 17.5% discrepancy in a batch is beyond belief.” He added, “In one they’ve got 18 more than there’s supposed to be, which is a 9% discrepancy. Again, if we are to have any confidence in elections in this country, how can we possibly be okay with discrepancies of double digit percentages? It’s absolutely mind boggling, anything above a tiny fraction of a percentage is unacceptable, by the way, unacceptable according to the Federal Elections Commission.”

 

 

Ephsteyn explained that several databases subpoenaed for the purpose of the audit have been removed, including files that contain the election results and how they were tallied. “There’s evidence these databases were removed as recently as March, right before handed over, and while being subject to a subpoena. That’s criminal activity.”

 

“We now know why the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors have been fighting this subpoena so hard, why Perkins Coie has come in, why the Democrats are pushing back, why you’ve got mainstream media melting down,” he explained, “Because they’re hiding this. They’re hiding the disaster in which they handled this election, and likely, the fact that Joe Biden did not win in Arizona.” (READ MORE: Mark Kelly Hires Perkins Coie To Sue National File, Here’s How You Can Help)

 

The official Maricopa Arizona Audit Twitter account, controlled by Arizona Former Secretary of State Ken Bennett, confirmed the discrepancy and its significance. “Breaking Update: As we open boxes of ballots delivered by Maricopa County, we are discovering significant discrepancies between the number of ballots therein and the batch reports included in the boxes.”

 

Democrats have repeatedly attempted to interfere with the audit process using the media, the courts, and public statements from Arizona Secretary of State Katie Hobbes, a Democrat. As National File reported, “Secretary of State Katie Hobbs, whose team is now monitoring the audit, has shown blatant bias, tweeting out the hashtag #fraudit. The Maricopa Arizona Audit official Twitter account told Hobbs to stop ‘attempting to disrupt the audit process.’”

 

 

 

 

 
  • Thanks 1
  • Pow! 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Markinsa said:

According to an update from the official Maricopa Arizona Audit Twitter account, controlled by Former Arizona Secretary of State Ken Bennett, a directory full of election databases from the 2020 election cycle was deleted by Maricopa County officials only “days before the election equipment was delivered to the audit,” despite being under a subpoena at the time. According to Bennett, this constitutes “spoliation of evidence.”

 

Hmmm... I wonder why they would delete the databases?  Could there be evidence of voter fraud?  Say it isn't so Toto!  Of course the Useful Idiots will deflect and defend this action as being patriotic in some form or fashion. :lol: :facepalm:

 

.

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evidence Deleted In The Arizona Audit
45,311 views•May 13, 2021

 


Behizy
 

Evidence Deleted In The Arizona Audit

Maricopa County actually deleted important system files they should be going to jail over, Federal code prohibits the deletion of any election files within 22 months after a Nov election.

 

 

 

 

Alabama Mothman
9 hours ago
To me it's just proof that Boden is an illegitimate president.

 



Sandra King
9 hours ago
I'm from Arizona and I can't stand all this! The local news is so corrupt! You're the only reliable news!

 



SCHOOLTHEWORLD
9 hours ago
We need to start up CLASS ACTION LAWSUITS FOR ALL AMERICANS ... as soon as there is more info !!

 



K M
9 hours ago
We all knew the longer time they had, the more they would destroy or try to destroy. The fact that we can see what they “deleted” is hilarious.

 



Clyde Harris
8 hours ago
FBI raids innocent people in the middle of the night on no concrete evidence and ignores the real  proven criminals with real evidence of a crime. We are living in an upside down world of  the twilight zone.

 



Eric Barnes
9 hours ago
The only reason for the Senate not to enforce the subpoenas is they are complicit.

 



Nikki Wagner
8 hours ago
Deleted files is the same as hiding evidence, tampering with evidence.. Who is going to jail here?? I've been waiting like many of us.. And I'm becoming impatient..JAIL THEM ALL!! Let's finish draining this swamp!!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Fmr. President Trump Releases New Statement on ‘Missing Databases’ and Other Irregularities Uncovered in Arizona Election Audit

By
 T. Grant Benson
 -
0
1199
 
 
 
 
 
211f698b-d87e-4330-ba6a-6b8dd41c647b-lar
President Trump (Credit: Gage Skidmore/ CC BY-SA 2.0 vig MGN.).

President Trump on Thursday released the following statement after allegations surfaced in the audit being conducted in Arizona:

A devastating letter written by Arizona Senate President Karen Fann on voting irregularities, and probably fraud, in Maricopa County during the 2020 Presidential Election. Even the database was illegally deleted after the subpoena to produce the information. Senate President Fann has invited Maricopa County officials to a public hearing on May 18 to allow them the opportunity to try to explain what happened to the missing databases, ballots, and other significant issues.

The Fake News and Lamestream Media is doing everything they can not to cover this major story. They just refuse to talk or report about it. They don’t want the United States or World to see what is going on with our corrupt, third world election.

 

 

 

 

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Breaking Auditors Find Omissions, Inconsistencies And Anomalies With Maricopa County Ballots Number
56,227 views•May 13, 2021

 


NewsNet

#Arizona #Maricopa #MaricopaCounty
The Maricopa County forensic audit of the 2020 election is once again in the spotlight this time with auditors claiming to have found major issues with the way election officials have handled ballots. 

This according to a letter written by the Arizona State Senate President to the board of supervisors. 

The letter states that the audit team has discovered numerous omissions, inconsistencies and anomalies relating to the county's handling, organization and storage of ballots. 

II. Chain of Custody and Ballot Organization Anomalies

As the audit has progressed, the Senate’s contractors have become aware of apparent omissions, inconsistencies, and anomalies relating to Maricopa County’s handling, organization, and storage of ballots. We hope you can assist us in understanding these issues, including specifically the following:

*The County has not provided any chain-of-custody documentation for the ballots. Does such documentation exist, and if so, will it be produced?

*The bags in which the ballots were stored are not sealed, although the audit team has found at the bottom of many boxes cut seals of the type that would have sealed a ballot bag. Why were these seals placed at the bottom of the boxes?

* Batches within a box are frequently separated by only a divider without any indication of the corresponding batch numbers. In some cases, the batch dividers are missing altogether. This lack of organization has significantly complicated and delayed the audit team’s ballot processing efforts. What are the County’s procedures for sorting, organizing, and packaging ballot batches?

*Most of the ballot boxes were sealed merely with regular tape and not secured by any kind of tamper-evident seal. Is that the County’s customary practice for storing ballots?

*The audit team has encountered a significant number of instances in which there is a disparity between the actual number of ballots contained in a batch and the total denoted on the pink report slip accompanying the batch. In most of these instances, the total on the pink report slip is greater than the number of ballots in the batch, although there are a few instances in which the total is lower. What are the reasons for these discrepancies? For your reference, please see several illustrative (in other words When auditors received the boxes of ballots, the tamper-proof tape was cut and the number of ballots inside the boxes was not the number reported by the County reporter)

 am hopeful that we can constructively resolve these issues and questions without recourse to additional subpoenas or other compulsory processes. To that end, I invite you and any other officers or employees of Maricopa County (to include officials in the Elections Department) who possess knowledge or information concerning the matters set forth above to a meeting at the Arizona State Capitol on Tuesday, May 18, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. in Hearing Room 109. Chairman Petersen, former Secretary Bennett, and I will attend the meeting, which will be live-streamed to the public.

Please let me know at your earliest convenience whether you accept my invitation and, if so, which Maricopa County personnel will attend.

Thank you for your cooperation on these important issues of public concern.

Respectfully,
Karen Fann, President

Arizona State Senate

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, fancy said:

No that's not right, look at the letter again it was written by Karen Fann, President of the AZ State Senate.

And it's been written in more than this one news source.

You totally missed my point. My point has nothing to do with the letter. Did she write it yes. The Gateway pundit then takes the letter and wraps it around a bunch of false statements. It’s what that website does. That’s my point. The gateway pundit is a radical right news source. And has very very low credibility. So I will say again. I stopped reading at gateway pundit you should too! 

  • Downvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, md11fr8dawg said:

You mean like ALL your news sources caddieman, PMSNBC, CNN, CNN, ABC, NBC and SeeBS!!!

 

Truth, not narratives, fr8dawg.  Anybody can search out news sources that make them feel all warm and fuzzy....having the courage to look outside that safe space box is the secret.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 2
  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.