Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

WATCH LIVE: Arizona Elections Audit


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

Not a hoax.

 

 

GO RV, then BV

Yes.....it is pathetic when the FBI and CIA alter, or prevent evidence to be made available to the general public, for the purpose of altering a US election.....

 

So if the US agencies are corrupt...(think FISA warrants).....and you were on the receiving end of getting screwed by your own country......would you just bend over and take it?......or would you look for the facts elsewhere.....

 

Again, what would you do?

CL

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

.

 

12 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

Doug Logan's history of "Stop the Steal" Qwackery.

 

GO RV, then BV

 

 

20 hours ago, Markinsa said:

The audit will validate every area of the voting process to ensure the integrity of the vote. The scope of work will include, but is not limited to, scanning all ballots, a full manual recount, auditing the registration and votes cast, the vote counts, and the electronic voting system… Because it is an independent audit, leadership will not be directly involved, and members do not expect to comment on any of the processes of the audit until the report is issued in about 60 days,” stated a press release from the Arizona State Senate Republican Caucus.

 

.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Markinsa said:

 

Where does it say that?

 

.

 

11 minutes ago, Markinsa said:

The audit will validate every area of the voting process to ensure the integrity of the vote. The scope of work will include, but is not limited to, scanning all ballots, a full manual recount, auditing the registration and votes cast, the vote counts, and the electronic voting system… Because it is an independent audit, leadership will not be directly involved, and members do not expect to comment on any of the processes of the audit until the report is issued in about 60 days,” stated a press release from the Arizona State Senate Republican Caucus.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

Selective reading comprehension.....much the same as selective hearing.  As always, just my opinion.  B)

 

GO RV, then BV

 

14 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

Because it is an independent audit, leadership will not be directly involved,

 

So, which Leadership is not going to be involved in the Arizona Audit?  If you mean the AZ Senate, they're not the Auditors so saying they are not going to be involved in the Audit doesn't make sense because of course not, they hired others to do that otherwise it wouldn't be an independent audit.

 

 

  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Markinsa said:

 

 

So, which Leadership is not going to be involved in the Arizona Audit?  If you mean the AZ Senate, they're not the Auditors so saying they are not going to be involved in the Audit doesn't make sense because of course not, they hired others to do that otherwise it wouldn't be an independent audit.

 

 

 

:shakehead: :facepalm:

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Markinsa said:

 

I'm reading that as the leadership of the companies performing the Audit weren't going to be involved?  Who do you think that statement addresses?

 

.

 

You're assuming the employees of the audit companies hired are independent, committed to finding the truth, no matter where it leads, even though the CEO who pays their salaries is not....The article is clearly stating the Arizona politicians who hired the companies will stay out of the process....not the CEO of Cyber Ninjas.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

You're assuming the employees of the audit companies hired are independent, committed to finding the truth, no matter where it leads, even though the CEO who pays their salaries is not....The article is clearly stating the Arizona politicians who hired the companies will stay out of the process....not the CEO of Cyber Ninjas.

 

GO RV, then BV

 

Those people you see in the AZAudit.org videos in different colored shirts are all volunteers, not employees.

 

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/04/doug-tennapel-explains-t-shirt-color-coding-system-used-maricopa-county-forensic-audit-video/

 

And I'll have to disagree with you on what the article is stating in regards who the Leadership is.  

 

.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HuffPost

Judge Slaps Down Election Recount Firm Hired By Arizona GOP Senate

 
 
Mary Papenfuss
·Trends Reporter, HuffPost
Fri, April 30, 2021, 8:53 AM
 
 

A private company hired by Arizona’s Republican Senate to do another presidential recount has been smacked down by a judge for battling to keep the process secret.

The Cyber Ninjas company — headed by a conspiracy theorist and disciple of the “Stop the Steal” lie that the presidential election was rigged — has no election or balloting experience. Its lawyer argued in court this week that it could not reveal its “trade secrets” on how it would conduct the recount, and wanted to bar oversight of its audit process.

But Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Daniel Martin said he was concerned “that the rights of the voters in Maricopa County” be protected and ordered Cyber Ninjas to turn over documents explaining the methods being used to review the 2.1 million 2020 ballots cast in the county, which includes Phoenix. The recount began last week.

The recount result appears headed for a foregone conclusion. Months before the process started, Cyber Ninjas owner Doug Logan retweeted messages claiming that an audit would find hundreds of thousands of new votes for Donald Trump.

The Washington Post reported Thursday that Trump asks “multiple times a day” about Cyber Ninjas recount updates. He’s reportedly transfixed by the operation’s examination of the ballots with ultraviolet light, which some experts believe could damage them, according to the Post.

In documents Cyber Ninjas turned over in response to the court order, there’s nothing explaining the point of examining ballots by UV light, according to the Arizona Republic.

Voter and civil rights groups, including the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, sent a letter to the Department of Justice on Thursday asking for federal monitors, saying the ballots are in danger of theft, defacement or damage.

Company workers have been spotted examining ballots with blue pens in their hands. Recounters are only allowed red pens. Arizona’s Elections Procedural Manual states that anyone involved in a ballot recount cannot use pens with blue or black ink, which can be read by ballot tabulator machines and could be used to change ballots or render them unreadable.

Arizona Republic reporter Jen Fifield, who was watching the recount, pointed out the pen violation last week to Logan, who was on the scene. He argued with her, then discovered she was correct and promised to “work on” the issue, she said.

The company’s findings will have no effect on President Joe Biden’s victory in the state by a 0.3-point margin, which has long been officially certified.

But if auditors claim to find new votes for Trump, it will throw further doubt on a legitimate election — the kind of falsehood that fueled the pro-Trump Capitol riot on Jan. 6.

“I’m very concerned this has ramifications for every state in the country,” Kim Wyman, the Republican secretary of state in Washington state, told the Post. “This is politicizing an administrative process with no real structure, or laws or rules in place to guide how it goes.”

It threatens to create a future in which a controlling party can always challenge results, and “people will no longer have confidence that we have fair elections,” Wyman added.

 
 
For some reason the tweets included in the article won't copy and paste.
 
GO RV, then BV

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shabibilicious said:

Company workers have been spotted examining ballots with blue pens in their hands. Recounters are only allowed red pens. Arizona’s Elections Procedural Manual states that anyone involved in a ballot recount cannot use pens with blue or black ink, which can be read by ballot tabulator machines and could be used to change ballots or render them unreadable.

 

They keep pushing that blue pen issue which was corrected BEFORE the audit officially began.  :facepalm:

 

.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

HuffPost

Former GOP State Lawmaker At Capitol On Jan. 6 Is Photographed Auditing Arizona Votes

 
 
Mary Papenfuss
·Trends Reporter, HuffPost
Sat, May 1, 2021, 10:08 AM
 
 

An Arizona Republic reporter was ejected Friday during an audit of the state’s presidential ballots after he snapped a photo of U.S. Capitol rally agitator and former Arizona Rep. Anthony Kern (R) reviewing ballots.

 

Kern’s own name is also on the ballots he was auditing. He ran for reelection last year and placed last in the three-way race, losing his seat. He was also listed as a presidential elector for Donald Trump, according to the Republic.

The review of 2.1 million votes cast in Maricopa County is only auditing the tally for the presidency and the U.S. Senate, the races won by Democrats.

Kern has insisted that Trump’s defeat was fraudulent. While he was still a representative, he signed a “joint resolution” with fellow Republican lawmakers in a bid to invalidate the state’s election results.

Kern was photographed in the crowd during the Jan. 6 siege in Washington, the Arizona Republic reported.

 
 

More than 40 Democrats in the Arizona state Legislature called on the Justice Department to investigate Kern after the Capitol siege. His “own social media posts strongly suggest” that Kern was “present at the riot in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 6, and actively encouraged the mob, both before and during the attack on the Capitol,” the letter said.

He later “blamed antifa,” the letter noted.

Kern refused to turn over his cellphone so investigators could examine his emails and text messages related to his travel to the Capitol that day, Newsweek reported.

Kern has denied any wrongdoing.

The CEO of Cyber Ninjas, the Florida-based firm that Arizona’s Republican Senate has hired to manage the audit process, told reporters last week that workers were screened to ensure “there was nothing on their social media or other details that showed strong opinions one way or another.”

But Cyber Ninjas itself is headed by founder Doug Logan, a promoter of the “Big Lie” conspiracy theory that the presidential election was stolen. Months before the process started, Logan retweeted messages claiming that an audit would find hundreds of thousands of new votes for Trump.

Voter and civil rights organizations are so alarmed that they’ve written to the Justice Department for federal monitors out of fear that ballots will be damaged, stolen, altered or lost.

Ejected reporter Ryan Randazzo tweeted that he was initially allowed at the recount location at the Veterans Memorial Coliseum an hour late. He witnessed a confusing shuffling of boxes stuffed with ballots that were examined with no obvious organization.

 
 
 

But then Randazzo tweeted that he was kicked out after posting the photo of Kern.

 

A spokesman for the recount operation said Randazzo was ejected because he took a photo of a ballot.

“He tweeted out a tweet that included a picture of a ballot. We are being extremely cautious based on the judge’s decision. He doesn’t want ballot images made public,” Ken Bennett, a former GOP secretary of state who has been serving as the Republican state Senate’s liaison for the controversial process, told the Arizona Republic.

But political reporter Jermey Duda tweeted that journalists agreed not to photograph ballots with discernible markings. He said there was no agreement not to photograph faces.

 

The audit findings will have no effect on President Joe Biden’s victory in the state by a 0.3-point margin, which has long been officially certified. But claims of new votes for Trump could undermine faith in a legitimate election and lead to further unrest.

 

https://www.yahoo.com/huffpost/anthony-kern-arizona-maricopa-county-capitol-riot-140857881.html

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the Biden crowd is so confident the election was without flaw.....why are they fighting so hard to suppress and discredit the efforts labeling them as "conspiracy".....   CL

 

 

May 2, 2021

Media hysteria means Arizona election audit may be on to something

 

While an uncertain public awaits  results from the Arizona election audit, the immediate major media outcry, prematurely denouncing it, should be viewed as the audit's hitting a major media nerve.  The media's reaction vividly demonstrates their fear of a searching re-examination of the election purity they have so arrogantly and unwaveringly proclaimed.

 

After all, if this election were as well run as touted (with the customary admission to the mere occasional and inevitable, but insignificant, error), then the Biden-centric media should be cheerleading the effort.  Shouldn't the audit, to use a favored media word, be anticipated to "debunk" the claims of widespread irregularities?

 

The media have drawn great succor from numerous court cases turning down challenges to the 2020 election results.  However, these claims raised issues not properly cognizable by our judicial system.  Ordering a recount is one thing; relitigating a multimillion-vote election is quite another.  It looks tremendously suspicious that, after Republican poll-watchers were banished, massive blocs of Detroit votes were introduced in the early morning, with 95% Biden selection.  But what exactly is a smart person in black robes supposed to do with this tableau?  Overturn the election without taking evidence?  Convene a three-month trial with numerous witnesses and experts, while Biden and Trump cool their heels?  A wise court should toss the case, as each reviewing jurist did.  But this rejection should not be seen as validating the election process, as the major media did.

 

The election process itself, not the judicial system, is supposed to be administered so as to provide the public with confidence in the announced tallies.  For this reason, the only widely recognized judicial remedy, as in Bush v. Gore, is an order to recount, which brings the process back to its proper venue: the election centers.  So the unsuccessful Republican and Trump lawsuits to invalidate the various election results do not validate the propriety of election procedures; they merely demarcate the limited jurisdictional boundaries of our judicial system.

 

click the link for the rest of the article:

 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/05/media_hysteria_means_arizona_election_audit_may_be_on_to_something.html

 

 



Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/05/media_hysteria_means_arizona_election_audit_may_be_on_to_something.html#ixzz6to1JIDXT
 

  • Thanks 1
  • Pow! 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.