Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Al-Kazemi congratulates the President and members of the Federal Court on their assumption of their posts


DWS112
 Share

Recommended Posts

  •  Time: 04/10/2021 16:21:45
  •  
  •  Reading: 0 times
    With documents, Saleh endorses the appointment of the president, deputy and members of the Federal Court
      
    {Baghdad: Al Furat News} The President of the Republic approved the appointment of the President, Deputy and members of the Federal Court.

     

     

  
 

3bca96ba3b13ba86d650abe2a99f13a7.jpg

c84f1f1c3914a66236542d1166b01780.jpg

 
  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

by Editor Iraq news 4 Hours ago

%D9%83%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%
The President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Judge Dr. Faik Zaidan, received Mr. Nervan Barzani, President of the Kurdistan Region and his accompanying delegation, and discussed with him the role of the Supreme Judicial Council in developing the work of the courts in the region and the joint effort in tracking down the violators of the law.
The meeting was attended by the judges, the head of the Judicial Oversight Authority, Jasim Muhammad Abboud, the President of the Baghdad Court of Appeal, Rusafa, Imad al-Jabri, and the head of the Baghdad Appeals Court, al-Karkh, Khaled Taha.

2.jpeg1.jpeg

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yota,

8 hours ago, yota691 said:
by Editor Iraq news 4 Hours ago

%D9%83%D8%B1%D8%AF%D8%B3%D8%AA%D8%A7%D9%
The President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Judge Dr. Faik Zaidan, received Mr. Nervan Barzani, President of the Kurdistan Region and his accompanying delegation, and discussed with him the role of the Supreme Judicial Council in developing the work of the courts in the region and the joint effort in tracking down the violators of the law.
The meeting was attended by the judges, the head of the Judicial Oversight Authority, Jasim Muhammad Abboud, the President of the Baghdad Court of Appeal, Rusafa, Imad al-Jabri, and the head of the Baghdad Appeals Court, al-Karkh, Khaled Taha.

2.jpeg1.jpeg

Congratulations on 200K

 

We’re fixing to have a rate. 

  • Like 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
  •  
 2021-04-11 09:03
 

Shafaq News / On Sunday, the President and members of the Federal Court took the constitutional oath before the President of the Republic, Barham Salih.

The President of the Republic, Barham Salih, said during the swearing-in: That "Iraq has taken an important step towards completing the requirements of one of its most important constitutional institutions."

On Saturday (April 10), the President of the Republic, Barham Salih, issued a republican decree appointing the president and members of the Federal Supreme Court.

According to a two-page document received by Shafaq News: That the President of the Republic signed a decree that includes the names of 12 judges to assume their duties in the Federal Supreme Court.

According to the decree; Judge Jassim Al-Amiri will assume the presidency of the court, as well as eight judges who are original members of the court, while the decree also includes 3 reserve members.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

2021-04-11_20-28-33_630235.jpg

 

 

 

Federal Supreme Court ... A difficult birth - Faeq Zaidan

 

Ordinance No. (30) of 2005 is considered the temporary law of the Federal Supreme Court until the original law stipulated in Article (92 second) of the constitution was enacted, whose legislation has stalled since the constitution came into force until now due to a difference of views on two basic points, the first related to the formation of the court and the second with a quorum Issuance of its decisions.

With reference to Article (92second), we find that it states (that the Federal Supreme Court shall consist of a number of judges, experts in Islamic jurisprudence, and legal scholars, their number shall be determined, the method of their selection and the work of the court shall be regulated by a law enacted by a two-thirds majority of the members of the House of Representatives). Two trends regarding the formation of the court. The first sees that the court consists of three categories: judges, experts of Islamic jurisprudence, and legal scholars, and all of these are original members of the court who treat the same treatment. The second trend believes that the formation of the court consists of judges only. As for Islamic jurisprudence experts and legal scholars, their role is advisory only. They provide expertise in their field of competence upon the court's request to do so, as is the case in civil courts that seek the assistance of experts in various disciplines.

As for the second point of contention, it is related to the quorum for the issuance of decisions by the court, as some have argued that the court is like any court consisting of a commission or a number of judges on which decisions are issued, either by agreement or by simple majority (more than half of the number of its members). Whereas the second opinion went that the court issues decisions that have some privacy, so they must be according to a certain majority, such as being two-thirds, as is the case in the text of Article (5 / First) of Ordinance No. (30) of 2005 regarding disputes between the federal government And regional and governorate governments, municipalities, and local administrations. A third opinion is that some members of the court (the right of veto), and without their consent, the court's decision is not issued in certain matters.

These differences in viewpoints, regardless of their owners' justifications and our agreement or disagreement with them, thwarted all attempts to legislate the original Federal Supreme Court’s law, and we believe that this failure to legislate this law will continue, especially with the requirement (presence and approval) of a two-thirds majority of the members of the House of Representatives on this law, meaning that Merely achieving a quorum with the presence of a two-thirds majority of the members of the House is not sufficient to legislate the law, but this attendance must be accompanied by the approval of a two-thirds majority of the members of the House of Representatives.

Because of these problems, order No. (30) of 2005 continued to be enforced despite it being a temporary law that is supposed to end with the implementation of the constitution and the formation of an alternative court in accordance with the provisions of Article 92) .The matter became more complicated by the issuance of Federal Court Decision No. (38/2019) on 5/2019. / 21 by which the authority of the Supreme Judicial Council to nominate the president and members of the court was abolished and thus the constitutional judiciary entered the stage of (the constitutional vacuum) which it had previously warned us about on more than one occasion, but unfortunately some interpreted this position incorrectly until what happened to which we were warned about by referring someone Members of the court to retire upon his request compelled to poor health and then his death and his right to the death of another member, so the quorum of the court’s session became insufficient, as Article (5 / First) of Ordinance No. 30 of 2005 stipulates for the court to convene in order for all its members to attend, and they are according to the law (9 ).

Then the judiciary entered another crisis by trying to avoid the error resulting from the issuance of the decision (38/2019) when the President of the Federal Court appointed a retired judge as a primary member of the court without a constitutional or legal basis and after a legal argument and a lawsuit resolved by the civil judiciary that this appointment was not legal. Therefore, I decided to withdraw the Republican decree in which this member was appointed, and the court remained the same in terms of unjustified disruption, and the matter became more dangerous with the approaching date of early elections, which were to be held on the tenth of October 2021, as Article (93 Seventh) of the constitution provides for ratification. The Federal Court on the election results, so the House of Representatives found itself in front of a de facto situation in the necessity to address the constitutional vacuum according to two options that have no third, either to legislate the original law stipulated in Article (92) of the constitution or to issue a law amending Order No. (30) of 2005 and finding an alternative text For the text canceled by the Federal Court and to determine what authority is in chargeThe task of nominating the president and members of the Federal Court, especially since the two draft laws (original and amendment) have been read first and second and ready for the final vote.

And there was almost unanimity among the political forces that made up the House of Representatives on the legislation of the original law according to the provisions of Article (92second) of the Constitution, and the vote was approved by a majority of two-thirds of the members of the House of Representatives on eighteen articles out of twenty-four articles until the matter reached the points of contention presented above. He mentioned it, so the Supreme Judicial Council presented a proposal to the House of Representatives as a compromise solution that might be taken as a way out of the bottleneck. The proposal included that experts of Islamic jurisprudence and legal scholars be considered members of the origin alongside the judges in two cases that fall within their jurisdiction according to the text of Article (2) of the first constitution in the event that The court considered a lawsuit related to a law that contradicts the principles of the provisions of Islam and the second in the event of a lawsuit that contradicts the principles of democracy or fundamental rights and freedoms. Other than that, the court is made up of judges only, despite the complexities and details of the proposal, and the House of Representatives approved it, and the first problem has been overcome, but the problem has largely emerged. The second where some stipulatedIf the court considers a case related to Article (2) of the constitution, the opinion of the experts of Islamic jurisprudence is reliable and the decision is issued according to it, and if it differs from the opinion of the judges in the sense that if the experts of Islamic jurisprudence object to the decision of the majority of the members of the court from the judges, then the decision is issued according to the opinion Experts of Islamic jurisprudence is a matter that prompted one of the political parties to set another condition in exchange for this condition, which is that court decisions related to hearing a case with specific privacy, a small number of the court’s judges have the right to object (by veto), and the decision is only issued with the approval of these minority judges in the court’s membership.

Here, the judiciary felt a threat to the reputation of the Iraqi judiciary at the local, regional and international levels, as there is no court in the world that follows this approach in making decisions, and this method of decision-making could disrupt the work of the court, so the judiciary made an exceptional effort in cooperation with those who realized the seriousness of something. It could happen if these ideas that are alien to the judicial tradition were implemented and the judiciary succeeded in persuading the House of Representatives to go to the second option and legislate the Order Amendment Law (30) for the year 2005, especially since all the articles of the said amendment law are among the eighteen articles in the original law that are The approval of a two-thirds majority of the members of the House of Representatives obtained its legislation after voting on it with approval in addition to that the procedures for enacting the aforementioned amendment law were contingent on voting for the general approval of this law after all its articles were approved by voting unilaterally, and indeed the vote was approved for the enactment of the Law Amending Order 30) ) For the year 2005By the simple majority, which we think is constitutional and sufficient to legislate the law, that is because the two-thirds majority that some invoke is directed to the origin of the Federal Supreme Court law stipulated in Article 92 of the Constitution and not to Order No. 30 of 2005 issued by the Prime Minister at the time by virtue of a certain ruling. It possesses legislative power as well as executive power before the constitution comes into effect.

With the legislation of the Law Amending Order No. 30 of 2005, many problems have been addressed, the most important of which is the creation of a body competent to nominate a president, deputy head, and members of the court. This body, according to Article 3 / Second of the Amendment Law, is the heads of the components of the judicial authority stipulated in Article (89). Of the constitution and according to the constitutional hierarchy in that article (the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, the President of the Federal Supreme Court, the head of the Public Prosecution Authority, and the head of the Judicial Supervision Authority). The aforementioned gentlemen met immediately after the implementation of the amendment law on the date of its approval in the House of Representatives according to the text of Article 😎 of the aforementioned law and it was by agreement Choosing a new formation of the court in a judicial atmosphere dominated by the logic of scientific debate and objective evaluation of the candidates.

Under the amendment law, the problem that was raised by some regarding the former Federal Court’s handling of issues related to the interpretation of the constitution was also addressed under the amendment law, given that Order No. 30 of 2005 was devoid of the court’s jurisdiction in this, in addition to other specializations that some had denied to the previous court, so the text was stipulated in Article 4)) From the Amendment Law to all the constitutional competencies stipulated in Article 93 () of the Constitution and other articles to fall within the jurisdiction of the court.

In addition, the case of incomplete quorum of the court that may occur in the future for any reason whatsoever was also addressed, as the position of reserve judges was created for the court in accordance with Article (3 / b) of the amendment law.

We did not agree with the House of Representatives on one point only, which in all cases is not hindering the functioning of the court related to the retirement age, as Article (6 / third) of the amendment law specified the retirement age at the completion of (72) years, while we thought that the retirement age should be in accordance with The provisions of the Judicial Organization Law No. 160 of 1979, as amended, and the Law Defining Judges' Service No. 39 of 2021, that the completion of 68 years be similar to that of the judges of the Court of Cassation.

After the difficult birth of the Federal Supreme Court was achieved in complex circumstances that accompanied the legislation of the amendment law, we noticed, unfortunately, that some applauded at the beginning of the legislation of this law welcoming it and considered it (a victory) for the judiciary and the civil state (according to his description) and his preference over the original legislation of the law that includes in the composition of the court experts of jurisprudence However, as soon as some of them became acquainted with the conditions of appointment in this court, which seems to have dispelled his wish to work in it, he turned on himself and promoted a warning against the upcoming performance of this new court and it did not start its work yet, but even before the names of the judges in it were known.

Therefore, we call on researchers and specialists to review the texts of the law and carefully investigate the facts, processes, and circumstances of its legislation from reliable sources, leading to the exercise of the right to criticism and accurate and constructive scientific analysis with our respect for the legitimate ambition to work in this court or other for everyone who believes himself to be qualified for that, but this must be Ambition is far from distorted and falsified facts.

((It is reported that one of the people known to be (bad) liked a girl who refused to marry him and married another who suffers from problems in the ability to conceive, and he tried (the bad) to exploit this in the hope of separating the wife from her husband, hoping that he would be able to bond with her, but he did not succeed and After long years of treatment, the wife conceived from her husband and while waiting for the birth, while everyone was waiting for the joy of the newborn after a long wait (bad) rumor that the pregnancy is illegal with the intention of spoiling the joy of the spouses and their families, but his endeavor failed to know everyone about his bad intentions)) ..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Federal Supreme" in Iraq begins its work

After its members took the constitutional oath before the President of the Republic
Monday - 1 Ramadan 1442 AH - 12 April 2021 AD Issue No. [15476]
 
 
 

The Federal Supreme Court in Iraq began its work yesterday, Sunday, after its president, Judge Jassem Al-Amiri and its members, took the constitutional oath before the President of the Republic, Barham Salih, in the presence of the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Judge Faiq Zaidan.
In a speech after taking the oath, Saleh said that "the Federal Court is the faithful guardian of the democratic system, protecting public rights and freedoms, ensuring law enforcement, safeguarding the constitution, and overseeing the constitutionality of laws and regulations." According to a presidential statement, Saleh added, “Completing the formation of the Federal Court represents an important and fundamental step towards completing the legal and constitutional requirements for holding early elections, which represent a national and popular entitlement that the Iraqis look to to express their will away from all influences; To embark on a new stage on the road to building a political process that raises a parliament that expresses the will of the electorate.
The Iraqi Parliament had voted on March 18-2021 to amend the Federal Court Law by a majority of its members after failing to mobilize the necessary support to pass the Federal Court Law, which has been postponed since 2005. The vote was held to amend Article Three and a new article of the First Amendment Law (Order No. 30 For the year 2005 AD) of the Federal Supreme Court Law. The political blocs had failed to agree on the new Federal Court bill; Legislation requires the attendance of two thirds of the members of Parliament. The differences centered on granting some seats to scholars from the Shiite and Sunni sects in the Federal Court, and giving them the power to vote on decisions. For his part, Judge Faeq Zaidan, Chairman of the Supreme Judicial Council, described the birth of the amendment to the Federal Court Law as a difficult birth.
Zaidan called on “researchers and specialists to review the texts of the law, and carefully investigate the facts, processes and circumstances of its legislation from reliable sources, leading to the exercise of the right to criticism and accurate and constructive scientific analysis with our respect for the legitimate ambition to work in this court or other for everyone who believes that he is qualified for that.” This ambition must be far from distorting and falsifying the facts.

 
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Saleh considers it the honest guardian of democracy

Iraq: Members of the Federal Supreme Court take an oath

12:07 AM, Mon, 12 April, 2021%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%AD%D9%83%D9%85%D8%

Baghdad - dpa:

Members of the Federal Supreme Court in Iraq yesterday took the constitutional oath before the Iraqi President Barham Salih, in the presence of the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Judge Faiq Zaidan. "Iraq has taken an important step towards completing the requirements of one of its most important constitutional institutions, and that the Federal Court is the faithful guardian of the democratic system, protecting public rights and freedoms, ensuring law enforcement, safeguarding the constitution, and overseeing the constitutionality of laws and regulations," the Iraqi president said after the swearing-in ceremony. He added: Completing the formation of the Federal Court represents an important and fundamental step towards completing the legal and constitutional requirements for holding early elections, which represent a national and popular entitlement that the Iraqis aspire to, to express their will, far from all influences, to embark on a new stage on the way to building a political process that promotes a parliament that expresses the will Electors. The Iraqi Council of Ministers decided in January to set the tenth of October next, as the date for holding early elections, based on the proposal of the Independent High Electoral Commission in Iraq. In addition, a statement by the Security Media Cell in the Iraqi Joint Operations Command said yesterday that Iraqi forces, of various types, supported by air forces, began a military operation to search and clear the mountain range surrounding Hamrin Lake and the adjacent areas in Diyala Governorate, 57 km northeast of Baghdad. A statement by the Security Media Cell stated that the Joint Operations Command began in the morning “carrying out inspection and clearance of the mountain range surrounding Lake Hamrin and the areas adjacent to it north of Saadia in the Diyala Operations Sector.” In addition, a statement by the Security Media Cell in the Iraqi Joint Operations Command said yesterday that Iraqi forces, of various types, supported by air forces, began a military operation to search and clear the mountain range surrounding Hamrin Lake and the adjacent areas in Diyala Governorate, 57 km northeast of Baghdad. A statement by the Security Media Cell stated that the Joint Operations Command began in the morning “carrying out inspection and clearance of the mountain range surrounding Lake Hamrin and the areas adjacent to it north of Saadia in the Diyala Operations Sector.” In addition, a statement by the Security Media Cell in the Iraqi Joint Operations Command said yesterday that Iraqi forces, of various types, supported by air forces, began a military operation to search and clear the mountain range surrounding Hamrin Lake and the adjacent areas in Diyala Governorate, 57 km northeast of Baghdad. A statement by the Security Media Cell stated that the Joint Operations Command began in the morning “carrying out inspection and clearance of the mountain range surrounding Lake Hamrin and the areas adjacent to it north of Saadia in the Diyala Operations Sector.”».

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Federal Court is preparing to hold its first session .. The provincial councils and budget appeals await them

Political06:01 - 11/04/2021

 
image
 
 

 

Baghdad - Mawazine News
The Federal Supreme Court is preparing to hold its first session in its new formation tomorrow, after its members took the constitutional oath in front of the President of the Republic, Barham Salih.
According to sources who spoke to Mawazine News, "There are several files awaiting the Federal Court, including the appeal submitted by members of the dissolved provincial councils of the parliament's decision to dissolve it, as well as appeals in several paragraphs of the current year budget law."
She added, "The work of the court has been suspended for nearly a year, and therefore there are many cases awaiting the new formation for consideration."
Regarding the work of the court, the legal expert Tariq Harb said, "It remains that the work of the court is governed by the constitution and not by the law, that is, that which is against the constitution, and what is against the law falls within its jurisdiction according to Article 93 of the constitution. For example, there is nothing contrary to the constitution in the parliament’s decision to dismiss members of councils. The governorates, the parliament has not abolished the constitution’s ruling on provincial councils, has not amended the constitution, and has not issued anything contrary to the constitution, which did not specify a period for the work of members of the provincial councils. Rather, it decided to demobilize these councilors until new elections are held, after two years have passed since they completed their four-year term of office and the members of the provincial councils remain for a period of six For years despite the completion of the period, it violates the principle stated in Article (5) of the Constitution, which requires transfer of power.
He added, "Parliament's decision is constitutional, even if it deviates from the governorate election law, which decided to continue them because this is a legal issue. It does not fall within the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court because the jurisdiction of this court is in decisions that violate the constitution and the parliament's decision is in line with the constitution, and what contradicts the constitution does not enter into its jurisdiction." Ended 29 / h

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Source:
 
204 Views
 
 

Today, Sunday, Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi congratulated the President and members of the Federal Court on the occasion of their assumption of their posts.

The Supreme Judicial Council said in a statement received by Alsumaria News, "On today 4/18/2021, the President of the Federal Supreme Court, Jasim Muhammad Abboud, received Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi."

He added, "Al-Kazemi congratulated the president, vice-president and members of the court on the occasion of their assumption of their posts."
 
 
 
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
  •  
 2021-04-18 08:07
 

Shafaq News / A government source stated that the meeting of Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi with the President and members of the Federal Supreme Court today, Sunday, did not include a government appeal for some paragraphs of the 2021 Budget Law.

The source told Shafaq News Agency, that "the competent government agencies are still working on preparing the appeal, and it will be submitted to the Federal Supreme Court within the next few days."

On Thursday (April 15, 2021), the Iraqi Prime Minister, Mustafa Al-Kazemi, announced his government's intention to challenge "some" paragraphs of the budget law before the Federal Court, and said that there are paragraphs that will affect the electricity sector, the health sector, and others.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The President of the Federal Supreme Court receives the Prime Minister

The President of the Federal Supreme Court receives the Prime Minister

 

 

2021-04-18 14:04:00

 

Baghdad / Judicial Notification
On 4/18/2021, the President of the Federal Supreme Court, Judge Jasim Muhammad Abboud, received Mr. Mustafa Al-Kazemi, Prime Minister, and the Prime Minister extended his congratulations to the President, Vice President and members of the Court on the occasion of their assumption of their positions.

401394044.jpg

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In two separate meetings .. Al-Kazemi meets with the President and members of the Federal Court and the President of the Supreme Judicial Council

 

 

308 Policy 2021/04/18 14:15 am Baghdad today -

Baghdad The Prime Minister, Mustafa Al-Kazemi, met today, Sunday (April 18, 2021), the President of the Federal Supreme Court, Judge Jassem Muhammad Abboud, members of the court, and the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Faiq Zaidan, in two separate meetings. In a statement received by the Supreme Judicial Council (Baghdad Today), the President of the Federal Supreme Court, Judge Jassem Muhammad Abboud, received Mustafa Al-Kazemi, Prime Minister, indicating that Al-Kazemi “extended my congratulations to the president, deputy head and members of the court on the occasion of their assumption of their positions.” The statement pointed out that "the head of the Supreme Judicial Council, Judge Faik Zeidan, received the Prime Minister, Mustafa Al-Kazemi, and discussed joint efforts in the field of combating corruption and organized crime," indicating that "the meeting was attended by the deputies of the President of the Court of Cassation, the Head of the Public Prosecution, and the Head of Judicial Supervision." .

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He revealed the truth about Al-Kazemi's appeal against the budget during his meeting with the President and members of the Federal Court

 

 

298 Policy 2021/04/18 15:15 Baghdad today -

Baghdad A government source confirmed, today, Sunday (April 18, 2021) that the government will not yet submit an appeal regarding certain paragraphs in the 2021 budget to the Federal Court. The source told (Baghdad Today), "The meeting of the Prime Minister, Mustafa Al-Kazemi, with the President and members of the Federal Supreme Court, which took place today, during which the government appeal for some paragraphs of the 2021 Budget Law was not submitted." And that "the competent government agencies are still working on preparing the appeal, and it will be submitted to the Federal Supreme Court within the next few days." Earlier in the day, the Prime Minister, Mustafa Al-Kazemi, met the President of the Federal Supreme Court, Judge Jassem Muhammad Abboud, members of the court, and the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Faiq Zaidan, in two separate meetings. In a statement received by the Supreme Judicial Council (Baghdad Today), the President of the Federal Supreme Court, Judge Jassim Muhammad Abboud, received Mustafa Al-Kazemi, Prime Minister, indicating that Al-Kazemi “extended my congratulations to the President, Vice President and members of the Court on the occasion of their assumption of their positions.” The statement pointed out that "the head of the Supreme Judicial Council, Judge Faik Zeidan, received the Prime Minister, Mustafa Al-Kazemi, and discussed joint efforts in the field of combating corruption and organized crime," indicating that "the meeting was attended by the deputies of the President of the Court of Cassation, the Head of the Public Prosecution, and the Head of Judicial Supervision." .

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Al-Kazemi congratulates the President and members of the Federal Supreme Court

 
 Baghdad: Morning
 
On Sunday, Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kazemi congratulated the President and members of the Federal Supreme Court, on the occasion of their assumption of their posts.
A statement by the Supreme Judicial Council stated, "The President of the Federal Supreme Court, Jasim Muhammad Abboud, received the Prime Minister, and during the meeting Al-Kazemi congratulated the President, Vice President and members of the Court on the occasion of their assumption of their posts."
The statement indicated, "The President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Faik Zaidan, also received Al-Kazemi, and during the meeting they discussed joint efforts in the field of combating corruption and crime
the organization". 
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
  •  
 2021-04-19 08:19
 

 

Shafaq News / A source in the Federal Supreme Court stated, on Monday, that the consideration of appeals against the decision to dissolve the provincial councils has been postponed.

 

The source said to Shafaq News Agency, the Federal Court has postponed the consideration of appeals against the decision of the House of Representatives in which the provincial councils were dissolved throughout Iraq, to the fourth of next May, after the appeals were scheduled to be considered today.

 

It is noteworthy that a number of parliamentary blocs and deputies called for the reinstatement of the provincial councils and described the House of Representatives’s decision to dissolve it as not successful.

 

Yesterday, Saturday, the representative of the National Approach bloc, Mazen Abdel Moneim Al-Faily told Shafaq News, “The cancellation or freezing of the provincial councils is a wrong political decision that we did not vote on and it came under pressure from popular demonstrations at the time,” indicating that “canceling them caused chaos and waste of public money In the governorates due to the absence of oversight over the governors and their deputies and the disruption of the supervisory role in the provinces.

 

On the impact of the popular demonstrations that Iraq witnessed in October of 2019, the Iraqi Council of Representatives voted in favor of a legal amendment ending the work of the governorate councils that are not organized in a region and the district councils and their current sub-districts, and assigned members of Parliament the task of monitoring the work of the governor and his deputies in each governorate. Sharpness.

 

The provincial, district and district councils have submitted appeals to the Federal Court, and the decision on them has been postponed for several times due to multiple legal reasons, the most prominent of which is the failure to complete the quorum of the Federal Court.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  •  Time: 04/26/2021 11:23:10
  •  
  •  Read: 2,392 times
The head of Anbar Appeals Court takes the legal oath
  
{Locality: Al Furat News} The President of the Anbar Federal Appeals Court took the oath, today, Monday, after his appointment to the position.

A statement of the Supreme Judicial Council, of which Al-Furat News Agency received a copy, stated that "Judge Hamid Nuri Bedaiwi took the legal oath before the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Judge Faik Zaidan, in the presence of the President of the Federal Supreme Court, the Head of the Public Prosecution Service, and the Head of the Judicial Supervision Authority." Noting that all of the attendees congratulated the head of Anbar's appeal for his appointment to this position.

Hazem 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The President of the Anbar Appeals Court takes the legal oath before the President of the Supreme Judicial Council

The President of the Anbar Appeals Court takes the legal oath before the President of the Supreme Judicial Council

 

 

2021-04-26 11:11:00

 

 

Baghdad / Judicial Flags
On 4/26/2021, the President of the Federal Court of Appeal of Anbar, Judge Hamid Nuri Bediwi, took the oath before the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Judge Dr. Faiq Zaidan, in the presence of the President of the Federal Supreme Court, the Head of the Public Prosecution Authority and the President of the Judicial Supervision Authority, and the attendees blessed the President Al-Anbar appoints him to this position.

 

1629050969.jpg

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
 
 Baghdad: Morning
On Sunday, the First Deputy Speaker of Parliament, Hassan Al-Kaabi, called for the need to strengthen cooperation between the legislative authority and the Federal Court with regard to the legislation of laws and to draw attention to its legal opinions to ensure the enactment of laws that are more reasonable and more beneficial to the citizen and the country as a whole.
During his meeting with the President of the Federal Supreme Court, Jassim Al-Amiri, Al-Kaabi stressed, in a field visit he conducted to the headquarters of the court, accompanied by Representatives Alaa Al-Rubaie and Muhammad Al-Ghazi, and the legal advisor to the House of Representatives Muhammad Yusef, that "the legislative authority is keen for the judicial authority to exercise its natural role under a democratic system No matter how developed countries that do not pursue a democratic system, they are unable to achieve an independent judicial system without interference by the authority in its affairs. ”He added,“ Our need now for a judicial institution with its various specializations stems from our need for the stability of the democratic system, and the Federal Court is one of the most important. Judicial institutions guaranteeing the creation of stability, impartiality and justice, and decisions are made between opponents, whether at the level of institutions or even between the individual and the institution. Good governance is achieved by the rule of law and faith in the justice of the law and not vice versa.He pointed out that {everyone agrees on one goal that strengthens the exercise of the Federal Court's great role in the unity of Iraq}.
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.