FBI Believed Hillarious Clinton – Not Donald Trump – Was Receiving Help From Foreign Influences In 2016, Memos Reveal

[Markinsa]

FBI Believed Hillarious Clinton – Not Donald Trump – Was Receiving Help From Foreign Influences In 2016, Memos Reveal

Comey slow-walked a FISA warrant that most likely would have found the Clinton campaign accepted foreign donations against FEC regulations

 

Field agents with the FBI had an open investigation in 2014 focused of foreign finances flowing into Hillarious Clinton’s fledgling presidential campaign. But instead of receiving the FISA warrant they requested, FBI executive leadership briefed the candidate on the issue.

Declassified memos revel that FBI field agents became frustrated with being stonewalled from securing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to the point they escalated their request outside the chain of command to then-FBI Director James Comey.

 

“The FISA application has remained in limbo for the last four months, even though subsequent investigative activity by [redacted] provided additional probable cause for the FISA application,” one FBI operative wrote to Comey in April of 2015.

 

That communication stated the FBI field office leading the probe and requesting the FISA warrant was “still uncertain as to why the application has not been sent to DOJ for final approval although several reasons have been put forth by CD [Criminal Division], most recently that the decision to put the application on hold originated ‘on the seventh floor.’”

The seventh floor of the FBI headquarters in Washington, DC, is where the FBI director and his staff have their offices.

 

 

Comey’s response to the communication was a non-committal, “Don’t know anything about this but will get smarter.”

 

Instead of examining the FISA request or the reasons the FBI field agents requested the warrant, FBI leadership decided to provide Clinton’s team with a “defensive briefing” in October of 2015, just as her presidential campaign was gearing up.

According to the declassified memos, the briefing was delivered to Clinton’s legal team led by David Kendall and Katherine Turner.

 

“Kendall and Turner were advised the FBI was providing them with this briefing for awareness and so Ms. Clinton could take appropriate action to protect herself,” a summary memo stated. “They were also told the FBI was seeking their assistance to identify other appropriate recipients of the brief, if any.”

Clinton’s lawyers were told, “the campaign should increase its vigilance of contributions related to any of the matters discussed above.”

 

 

The now declassified memos redact the name of the foreign country in question as well as the FBI field office that requested the FISA warrant. But they do make clear the plot involved “foreign aid money that might be contributed to her campaign should/when she announce(s) her run for POTUS.”

 

The memos offer no evidence Clinton herself was aware of the plot.

 

It is unclear whether the FIA warrant application was ever truly entertained by FBI leadership, or ever advanced to the FISA court for consideration.

 

The memos were declassified in an 11th-hour order by outgoing-President Trump. They serve to illustrate the inequitable contrast in the way the FBI treated Clinton and Trump, respectively.

 

 

 

 

[brokerkeith]

 

Just Another Pile of "Fact Based FBI Documents" that will never see the Light of Day on any Mainstream Media Channels, let's see how the Haters try spinning this one....oh, that's right, you'll never even hear about this.  

[nstoolman1]

To our leftist (Hate everything Trump, Orange Man Bad) members, if the evidence has not been seen in a court of law and approved or judged by a jury it is not fact. 

[cranman]

2 hours ago, nstoolman1 said:

To our leftist (Hate everything Trump, Orange Man Bad) members, if the evidence has not been seen in a court of law and approved or judged by a jury it is not fact. 

Well I'm a Trump supporter and I believe that.  The election may ( or may not have) have been stolen. But due to lack of evidence citing that it was Biden is now the president. I like to think that the State Courts and Supreme Courts act impartially and do there jobs correctly.  At least a good majority do I hope. It is what it is and there is not much anyone can do, legally ,about it.

 

Providing proof of someone's guilt is on the accuser. But let's face it, in the world we live in today even proof of guilt will not place those with power, money and connections in a place they should. Money talks and proof of guilt is just a formality Political party doesn't matter. 

 

 

A little off subject but I suspect there will be more articles flinging mud around from both sides proclaiming wrong doings but no evidence to back them up. 

 

Just super secret insider information. 

[Markinsa]

1 hour ago, cranman said:

But due to lack of evidence citing that it was Biden is now the president. I like to think that the State Courts and Supreme Courts act impartially and do there jobs correctly. 

 

Try not to be gaslighted by the left.  There is evidence, it has not been allowed into the courts.  The courts are dismissing the cases before the evidence is presented.  There are still several cases that are still ongoing that should bring that to light, hopefully.  If you had watched any of the State Hearings that Giuliani presented the evidence you would know that.

 

.

[nstoolman1]

Speaking of courts acting impartial:

It was a Constitutional duty for the SC to listen to two states who had a case against one another.