Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Full text of Michigan Lawsuit (linked)


Recommended Posts

The Sidney Powell Michigan lawsuit was filed on Wednesday.  Full text of Michigan lawsuit has 75 pages so I am not going to copy and paste the PDF. There is plenty of eyewitness testimony (evidence) in the form of affidavits attesting to the complaint  (Due to the nature of time, I am presuming, this complaint is not the best in terms of grammar, syntax and word processing software usage.)

 

Some key aspects:

 

Dominion Voting Systems Fraud and Manipulation

 

The multifaceted schemes and artifices implemented by Defendants and their collaborators to defraud resulted in the unlawful counting, or manufacturing, of hundreds of thousands of illegal, ineligible, duplicate or purely fictitious ballots in the State of Michigan, that constitute a multiple of Biden’s purported lead in the State. While this Complaint, and the eyewitness and expert testimony incorporated herein, identify with specificity sufficient ballots required to overturn and reverse the election results, the entire process is so riddled with fraud, illegality, and statistical impossibility that this Court, and Michigan’s voters, courts, and legislators, cannot rely on, or certify, any numbers resulting from this election.

 

Smartmatic and Dominion were founded by foreign oligarchs and dictators to ensure computerized ballot-stuffing and vote manipulation to whatever level was needed to make certain Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez never lost another election.See Exh. 1, Redacted Declaration of Dominion Venezuela Whistleblower (“Dominion Whistleblower Report”). Notably, Chavez “won” every election thereafter

 

The design and features of the Dominion software do not permit a simple audit to reveal its misallocation, redistribution, or deletion of votes. First, the system's central accumulator does not include a protected real-time audit log that maintains the date and time stamps of all significant election events. Key components of the system utilize unprotected logs. Essentially this allows an unauthorized user the opportunity to arbitrarily add, modify, or remove log entries, causing the machine to log election events that do not reflect actual voting tabulations—or more specifically, do not reflect the actual votes of or the will of the people. See Exh. 107, August 24, 2020 Declaration of HarriHursti, ¶¶45-48).

 

In deciding to award Dominion a$25 million, ten-year contract (to a Dominion project team led by Kelly Garrett, former Deputy Director of the Michigan Democratic Party), and then certifying Dominion software, Michigan officials disregarded all the concerns that caused Dominion software to be rejected by the Texas Board of elections in 2018 because it was deemed vulnerable to undetected and non-auditable manipulation. An industry expert, Dr. Andrew Appel, Princeton Professor of Computer Science and Election Security Expert has recently observed, with reference to Dominion Voting machines: "I figured out how to make a slightly different computer program that just before the polls were closed, it switches some votes around from one candidate to another. I wrote that computer program into a memory chip and now to hack a voting machine you just need 7 minutes alone with it and a screwdriver."3

 

Plaintiff’s expert witness, Russell James Ramsland, Jr. (Exh. 101, “Ramsland Affidavit”), has concluded that Dominion alone is responsible for the injection, or fabrication, of 289,866 illegal votes in Michigan, that must be disregarded. This is almost twice the number of Mr. Biden’s purported lead in the Michigan vote (without consideration of the additional illegal, ineligible, duplicate or fictitious votes due to the unlawful conduct outlined below)

 

Fact Witness Testimony of Voting Fraud & Other Illegal Conduct 

 

There were three broad categories of illegal conduct by election workers in collaboration with other employee state, county and/or city employees and Democratic poll watchers and activists. 

 

First, to facilitate and cover-up the voting fraud and counting of fraudulent, illegal or ineligible voters, election workers:

A. Denied Republican election challengers access to the TCF Center, where all Wayne County, Michigan ballots were processed and counted;

B. Denied Republic poll watchers at the TCF Center meaningful access to view ballot handling, processing, or counting and lockedcredentialedchallengersoutofthe counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots wereprocessed;

C. Engaged in a systematic pattern of harassment, intimidation and even physical removal of Republican election challengers or locking them out of the TCF Center;

D. Systematically discriminated against Republican poll watchers and favored Democratic poll watchers;

E. Ignored or refused to record Republican challenges to the violations outlined herein;

F. Refused to permit Republican poll challengers to observe ballot duplication and other instances where they allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate;

G. Unlawfully coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and to vote a straight Democrat ballot, including by going overtothevotingboothswithvotersinorder to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote;

H. As a result of the above, Democratic election challengers outnumbered Republicans by 2:1 or 3:1 (or sometimes 2:0 at voting machines); and

I. Collaborated with Michigan State, Wayne County and/or City of Detroit employees (including police) in all of the above unlawful and discriminatory behavior.

 

Second, election workers illegally forged, added, removed or otherwise altered information on ballots, the Qualified Voter File (QVF) and Other Voting Records, including:

 

A. Denied Republican election challengers access to the TCF Center, where all Wayne County, Michigan ballots were processed and counted;

B. Denied Republic poll watchers at the TCF Center meaningful access to view ballot handling, processing, or counting and lockedcredentialedchallengersoutofthe counting room so they could not observe the process, during which time tens of thousands of ballots wereprocessed;

C. Engaged in a systematic pattern of harassment, intimidation and even physical removal of Republican election challengers or locking them out of the TCF Center;

D. Systematically discriminated against Republican poll watchers and favored Democratic poll watchers;

E. Ignored or refused to record Republican challenges to the violations outlined herein; Case 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.6 Filed 11/25/20 Page 6 of 75 7

F. Refused to permit Republican poll challengers to observe ballot duplication and other instances where they allowed ballots to be duplicated by hand without allowing poll challengers to check if the duplication was accurate;

G. Unlawfully coached voters to vote for Joe Biden and to vote a straight Democrat ballot, including by going overtothevotingboothswithvotersinorder to watch them vote and coach them for whom to vote; H. As a result of the above, Democratic election challengers outnumbered Republicans by 2:1 or 3:1 (or sometimes 2:0 at voting machines); and I. Collaborated with Michigan State, Wayne County and/or City of Detroit employees (including police) in all of the above unlawful and discriminatory behavior.

 

Third, election workers committed several additional categories of violations of the Michigan Election Code to enable them to accept and count other illegal, ineligible or duplicate ballots, or reject Trump or Republican ballots, including:

A. Permitting illegal double voting by persons that had voted by absentee ballot and in person;

B. Counting ineligible ballots – and in many cases – multiple times;

C. Counting ballots without signatures, or without attempting to match signatures, and ballots without postmarks, pursuant to direct instructions from Defendants; 

D. Counting “spoiled” ballots;

E. Systematic violations of ballot secrecy requirements; F. Unsecured ballots arrived at the TCF Center loading garage, not in sealed ballot boxes, without any chain of custody, and without envelopes, after the 8:00 PM Election Day deadline, in particular, the tens of thousands of ballots that arrived on November 4, 2020; and G. Accepting and counting ballots from deceased voters.

 

Expert Witness Testimony Regarding Voting Fraud

 

16. In addition to the above fact witnesses, this Complaint presents expert witness testimony demonstrating that several hundred thousand illegal, ineligible, duplicate or purely fictitious votes must be thrown out, in particular: (1) a report from Russel Ramsland, Jr. showing the “physical impossibility” of nearly 385,000 votes injected by four precincts/township on November 4, 2020, that resulted in the counting of nearly 290,000 more ballots processed than available capacity (which is based on statistical analysis that is independent of his analysis of Dominion’s flaws); (2) a report from Dr. William Briggs, showing that there were approximately 60,000 absentee ballots listed as “unreturned” by voters that either never requested them, or that requested and returned their ballots; and (3) a report from Dr. Eric Quinell analyzing the anomalous turnout figures in Wayne and Oakland Counties showing that Biden gained nearly 100% and frequently more than 100% of all “new” voters in certain townships/precincts over 2016, and thus indicated that nearly 87,000 anomalous and likely fraudulent votes from these precincts.

 

JURISDICTION ANDVENUE

 

“The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States.” 

 

Because the United States Constitution reserves for state legislatures the power to set the time, place, and manner of holding elections for Congress and the President, state executive officers, including but not limited to Secretary Benson, have no authority to unilaterally exercise that power, much less flout existing legislation

 

THE PARTIES

27. Plaintiff James Ritchard is a registered voter residing in Oceana County. He is the Republican Party Chairman of Oceana County.

28. Plaintiff James David Hooper is a registered voter residing in Wayne County. He is the Republican Party Chairman for the Wayne County Eleventh District.

29. Plaintiff Daren Wade Ribingh is a registered voter residing in Antrim County. He is the Republican Party Chairman of Antrim County. is

30. Defendant Gretchen Whitmer (Governor of Michigan) is named herein in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Michigan.

31. Defendant Jocelyn Benson (“Secretary Benson”) is named as a defendant in her official capacity as Michigan’s Secretary of State. Jocelyn Benson is the “chief elections officer” responsible for overseeing the conduct of Michigan elections.

32. Defendant Michigan Board of State Canvassers is “responsible for approv[ing] votingequipmentforuseinthestate,certify[ing]theresultofelectionsheldstatewide….”

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS

34. The United States Constitution sets forth the authority to regulate federal elections. With respect to congressional elections, the Constitution provides

 

35. The Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof; but the Congress may at any time by Law make or alter such Regulations, except as to the Places of choosing Senators. U.S. CONST. art. I, § 4 (“Elections Clause”).

 

the Constitution provides: Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the Case 2:20-cv-13134-LVP-RSW ECF No. 1, PageID.12 Filed 11/25/20 Page 12 of 75 13 State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector. U.S. CONST. art. II, § 1 (“Electors Clause”).

 

Under the Michigan Election Code, the Electors of the President and Vice President for the State of Michigan are elected by each political party at their state convention in each Presidential election year. See MCL §§ 168.42 & 168.43.

 

Neither Defendant is a “Legislature” as required under the Elections Clause or Electors Clause. The Legislature is “‘the representative body which ma[kes] the laws of the people.’

 

I. LEGAL BACKGROUND: RELEVANT PROVISIONS OF THE MICHIGAN ELECTION CODE AND ELECTION CANVASSING PROCEDURES.

 

A. Michigan law requires Secretary Benson and local election officials to provide designated challengers a meaningful opportunity to observe the conduct ofelections.

 

B. The canvassing process in Michigan.

 

The board of county canvassers shall correct obvious mathematical errors in the tallies and returns. The board of county canvassers may, if necessary for a proper determination, summon the election inspectors before them, and require them to count any ballots that the election inspectors failed to count, to make correct returns in case, in the judgment of the board of county canvassers after examining the returns, poll lists, or tally sheets, the returns already made are incorrect or incomplete, and the board of county canvassers shall canvass the votes from the corrected returns. In the alternative to summoning the election inspectors before them, the board of county canvassers may designate staff members from the county clerk’s office to count any ballots that the election inspectors failed to count, to make correct returns in case, in the judgment of the board of county canvassers after examining the returns, poll lists, or tally sheets, thereturns already made are incorrect or incomplete, and the board of county canvassers shall canvass the votes from the corrected returns

 

II. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND FACT WITNESS TESTIMONYREGARDINGMICHIGAN ELECTION CODE VIOLATIONS AND OTHER UNLAWFUL CONDUCT BY ELECTION WORKERS AND MICHIGAN STATE, WAYNE COUNTY AND/OR CITY OF DETROIT EMPLOYEES.

 

60. Wayne County used the TCF Center in downtown Detroit to consolidate, collect, and tabulate all of the ballots for theCounty.TheTCFCenterwastheonlyfacilitywithinWayneCountyauthorizedtocountthe ballots.

 

A. Republican Election ChallengersWere Denied Opportunity to Meaningfully Observe the Processing and Counting of Ballots.

 

61. There is a difference between a ballot and a vote. A ballot is a piece of paper. A vote is a ballot that has been completed by a citizen registered to vote who has the right to cast a vote and has done so in compliance with Michigan election law by, among other things, verifying their identity and casting the ballot on or before Election Day. It is the task of Secretary Benson and Michigan election officials to assure that only ballots cast by individuals entitled to cast a vote in the election are counted and to make surethatallballotscastbylawfulvotersarecountedandtheelectionisconductedinaccord with Michigan’s Election Code uniformly throughoutMichigan.

 

Challengers provide the transparency and accountability to assure ballots are lawfully cast and counted as provided in Michigan’s Election Code and voters can be confidenttheoutcomeoftheelectionwashonestlyandfairlydeterminedbyeligiblevoters.

 

WayneCountyexcludedcertifiedchallengersfrommeaningfullyobserving the conduct of the election in violation of the Michigan Election Code. This allowed a substantial number of ineligible ballots to be counted, as outlined in Section B. below. These systematic Michigan Election Code violations, and the disparate treatment of Republican vs. Democratic poll challengers, also violated the Equal Protection Clause and other provisions of the U.S. Constitution as detailed herein

 

 

 

If you want to know more, read the full complaint.

 

If you say there is no evidence you 1) did not read the complaint or 2) summarily dismissed the complaint without reading it. In a legal court, affidavits that are the sworn testimonies by individuals under threat of law of  perjury punishable by jail and/or fines and are admissible into record as evidence.

 

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Theseus Thanks,  Let the chips fall where they may....It's time to release the "Full Kracken" on some low down swamp cheating dumb arses.  Justice will prevail because of "Patriots" that are focused on the truth.   God Bless Them & Protect Them from the Evil that exist before us all...... 🙏🙏🙏👍👍💯💯

  • Thanks 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.