Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

And this is the best Trumps got?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Theseus said:

What country are you from? What Constitution have you been reading when you think it is up to the Federal Government to shore up the holes in our election system? In the US Constitution it is not only settled law (to use the left's language) and it is clear that each individual State's Legislature shall direct in a manner of their choosing electors for their state. Any attempt by the Federal Government or any other office, such as a Secretary of State, to change the law created by the Legislature of its state is unconstitutional. This is how the stats ran away with stealing the election. In many cases it was not the state legislature that changed the election law it was done by the SoS. To understand how this came about, you actually need to go back to Gore v Bush and look at the aftermath of what happened in the states. Yes it goes back to the hanging chad case to where we find ourselves today.  That is not conspiracy that is considered recent history. If you do not know what I am talking about then you need to research the Secretary of State Project. I know what the Secretary of State Project is. Am willing to bet most DVers probably know about it happening but never knew there was a concerted push for it and why it started. Secretary of States gets the reputation for being one of  those low hanging offices that are only important every so often and when people realize it is too late. Then they forget about it until something like this happens and speak out only to have their voices fade once a finalist is announced and forgotten about until the next election. Not only do we need to Mak America Great Again we need to weed out the chaff from the wheat.

Was talking about stopping a President from trying to steal an election 

Edited by caddieman
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 2
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, caddieman said:

Was talking about stopping a President from trying to steal an election 

There you go again.....you have those signals crossed one more time.....

 

How about....  all any of us should be wanting is a fair election.....and if there is evidence to the contrary....let the process play out......    CL

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, adhoc10 said:

Believe what works for you and makes your head a better place to live.

 

:facepalm3:   :facepalm3:   :facepalm3:

 

 :shakehead:     :shakehead:     :shakehead:

 

ACTAUL admission YOUR, @adhoc10, "cognition" IS EMBEDDED ENTIRELY IN YOUR, @adhoc10, "safe" "space" FROM YOU, @adhoc10!!!

 

NOW, pray tell, WHY, pray tell, WOULD ANYONE THINK THAT IS A "better place to live" FOR THEM???!!!

 

:facepalm3:   :facepalm3:   :facepalm3:

 

 :shakehead:     :shakehead:     :shakehead:

  • Sad 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Synopsis said:

NOW, pray tell, WHY, pray tell, WOULD ANYONE THINK THAT IS A "better place to live" FOR THEM???!!!

That would be my point symopsis, As a  society, it is my opinion,  we rely too much on information to determine our actions and thoughts. For many, that is the place where they exist and live, always weighing information to determine the best course of action for their lives, and deriving a state of happiness and satisfaction when  the information fits with the intellectual world they have found safety in, which is formulated from experiences and beliefs. I'm not claiming anything with what I wrote, just putting  it out for consideration since you asked.  Best of the rest of the day to you!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, coorslite21 said:

There you go again.....you have those signals crossed one more time.....

 

How about....  all any of us should be wanting is a fair election.....and if there is evidence to the contrary....let the process play out......    CL

It’s playing out CL.......over 30 lawsuits dropped or thrown out of court to date. And not one lawsuit claiming machines switching votes. Ya can’t bring a lawsuit to court with no evidence. 

  • Like 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, caddieman said:

It’s playing out CL.......over 30 lawsuits dropped or thrown out of court to date. And not one lawsuit claiming machines switching votes. Ya can’t bring a lawsuit to court with no evidence. 

Yes it is playing out. It is also showing us which judges are crooked and should be fired and replaced with men and women who will administer the law according to the Constitution not according to crooked politicians.

  • Upvote 3
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, nstoolman1 said:

Yes it is playing out. It is also showing us which judges are crooked and should be fired and replaced with men and women who will administer the law according to the Constitution not according to crooked politicians.

Lol you do know the judges aren’t even looking at the cases no evidence 

Edited by caddieman
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, caddieman said:

Lol you do know the judges aren’t even looking at the cases no evidence 

If they aren't looking at the cases then how do they know there isn't any evidence?

Are they prejudging them prior to hearing them?

Or are they assuming there isn't any evidence because of bias?

 

  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, nstoolman1 said:

If they aren't looking at the cases then how do they know there isn't any evidence?

Are they prejudging them prior to hearing them?

Or are they assuming there isn't any evidence because of bias?

 

Evidence is given to a judge, if he finds it credible the case moves forward so the other side can defend their side. If the judge considers the evidence frivolous or lacking it is dismissed. Most all of the lawsuits Trump has brought has been dismissed. Not even heard by the court.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, caddieman said:

Evidence is given to a judge, if he finds it credible the case moves forward so the other side can defend their side. If the judge considers the evidence frivolous or lacking it is dismissed. Most all of the lawsuits Trump has brought has been dismissed. Not even heard by the court.

UNLESS, you got an activist judge not willing to follow the evidence to its logical 

conclusion. Giving way to his/her political Communist agenda. 

  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, adhoc10 said:

That would be my point symopsis,

 

???!!!

 

Obviously, I DO NOT "want" "to" "live" IN YOUR "safe" "space", @adhoc10!!!

 

2 hours ago, adhoc10 said:

As a  society, it is my opinion,  we rely too much on information to determine our actions and thoughts.

 

Hmmm....................................

 

An interesting CULT recruiter AND practitioner statement.

 

Information is parsed into relevant and irrelevant with specific pieces of such information parsed.

 

Narratives, whatever they may be, should (and really must) be laid aside for ACTUAL facts AND associated TRUTH in the matter.

 

Some, such as YOURSELF, @adhoc10, are ENTIRELY given over the the False Narrative(s) "championing" the associated (false) information.

 

A Progressive approach to facilitating propaganda AND associated lies.

 

People should (really must) ask the basic questions with regard to Principle (s) as a, hopefully, pervasive and ubiquitous approach across society so that the RELEVANT Principle(s) is REASONABLY and universally the determination for society's actions and thoughts.

 

NOT stemming from CULT recruiter(s) AND practitioner(s) PROMOTING a False Narrative.

 

2 hours ago, adhoc10 said:

For many, that is the place where they exist and live, always weighing information to determine the best course of action for their lives, and deriving a state of happiness and satisfaction when  the information fits with the intellectual world they have found safety in, which is formulated from experiences and beliefs.

 

:facepalm3:   :facepalm3:   :facepalm3:

 

 :shakehead:     :shakehead:     :shakehead:

 

A Liberal / Leftist / Progressive / Socialist / Communist / Nazist / Fascist view of propagandizing the masses.

 

Happiness and satisfaction are person centered bases for a person centered provision by an autocratic authority to force uncontested control.

 

Sacrifice and paying it forward for future generations is what True The United States Of America Patriots past AND present have lived AND died for.

 

2 hours ago, adhoc10 said:

I'm not claiming anything with what I wrote, just putting  it out for consideration since you asked. 

 

Just saying???!!!

 

NO, substance. JUST an "advocation" to live and let live.

 

:facepalm3:   :facepalm3:   :facepalm3:

 

 :shakehead:     :shakehead:     :shakehead:

 

A lead in to WHY, prayed AND told, I post as I do.

 

In the environments of Public Discourse, unprincipled statements, practices, and associated actions occur ALL in the name of personal happiness and satisfaction typically at the expense of Decency, Reason, AND Common Sense based on Principle(s).

 

For reference, I (AND MANY OTHERS) have chosen the Four (4) Textual Cornerstones as the basis for Principle(s):

  1. The Bible.
  2. The Constitution Of The United States Of America TO INCLUDE The Ratified Bill Of Rights/Declaration Of Independence/Federalist Papers.
  3. Blackston English Common Low (stripped of the Crown Entity obliglations).
  4. Magna Carta.

 

CULT practice???!!!

 

I can NOT imagine THAT would be CULTIC in "nature".

 

Further, True The United States Of America Patriots support The True The United States Of America Patriot President Donald J Trump BASED ON PRICIPLE. Sure. NO QUESTION about SOME OF The True The United States Of America Patriot President Donald J Trump behaviors that have deviated from The Bible. The rest of The Four (4) Textual Cornerstones APPEAR TO BE practiced comprehensively for THE BENEFIT OF We The People.

 

SO.

 

NO CULT FIGURE ADHERENCE TO A PERSON LIKE The True The United States Of America Patriot President Donald J Trump WHILE ADHERENCE TO The Four (4) Textual Cornerstones.

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Synopsis said:

JUST an "advocation" to live and let live.

 

1 hour ago, Synopsis said:

A lead in to WHY, prayed AND told, I post as I do.

 

In the environments of Public Discourse, unprincipled statements, practices, and associated actions occur ALL in the name of personal happiness and satisfaction typically at the expense of Decency, Reason, AND Common Sense based on Principle(s).

 

For reference, I (AND MANY OTHERS) have chosen the Four (4) Textual Cornerstones as the basis for Principle(s):

  1. The Bible.
  2. The Constitution Of The United States Of America TO INCLUDE The Ratified Bill Of Rights/Declaration Of Independence/Federalist Papers.
  3. Blackston English Common Low (stripped of the Crown Entity obliglations).
  4. Magna Carta.

 

CULT practice???!!!

 

I can NOT imagine THAT would be CULTIC in "nature".

 

Further, True The United States Of America Patriots support The True The United States Of America Patriot President Donald J Trump BASED ON PRICIPLE. Sure. NO QUESTION about SOME OF The True The United States Of America Patriot President Donald J Trump behaviors that have deviated from The Bible. The rest of The Four (4) Textual Cornerstones APPEAR TO BE practiced comprehensively for THE BENEFIT OF We The People.

 

SO.

 

NO CULT FIGURE ADHERENCE TO A PERSON LIKE The True The United States Of America Patriot President Donald J Trump WHILE ADHERENCE TO The Four (4) Textual Cornerstones.

hey Synopsis,

 

Thank you for sharing that....It allows me a context to hear the things that you express. Have a great rest of your day....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, caddieman said:

It’s playing out CL.......over 30 lawsuits dropped or thrown out of court to date. And not one lawsuit claiming machines switching votes. Ya can’t bring a lawsuit to court with no evidence. 

Quick lesson in how courts work....in these cities... with 80% Democrat populations these lawsuits start at the district level.....District Judges are elected.....they generally roll with the general populations that elected them.....

 

Appeals then happen....eventually you get to the non biased courts....where they rule on the evidence and facts.... 

 

Who would really think Trump would get a fair hearing in Detroit or Philly?

Kind of delusional.....and of course the MSM promotes the concept so the uninformed can parrot it as if it was Gods own truth....

CL

  • Pow! 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, caddieman said:

It’s playing out CL.......over 30 lawsuits dropped or thrown out of court to date. And not one lawsuit claiming machines switching votes. Ya can’t bring a lawsuit to court with no evidence. 

This would require access to voting machines to which the states have not given authorization. The next step is to get authorization from the courts which is currently what is happening. You need to follow the news a little more carefully. Just because it isn't there at this exact moment doesn't mean it won't be there ever. Once again your Constitutional ignorance is borderline stupidity as is your lawsuit knowledge. Ever hear of circumstantial evidence? That is where there is no body so how can someone be charged with murder argument. It falls flat on its face. Lack of the production of evidence does not mean a crime was not committed. In this case the court has to grant the plantiff to discover the evidence from the defendant. Kind of like the Mueller investigation where there was absolutely no evidence. The dossier was not evidence unless you want to call fantasy fiction evidence. Meuller spent three years searching for evidence. The FBI went to the FISA court with fake evidence and yet you still want to see unicorns farting rainbows because you have a severe case of  OMB/TDS. So its okay when your side has no evidence to impeach a sitting President but think that same President has no evidence when accusations fly like they did in the House Impeachment hearings. Yeah you are full of unity and kumbaya moments. Let me give you one big ole Russian bear hug!  

  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.