Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

A Biden victory would be a loss for Iraq


yota691
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, Synopsis said:

SMACKDOWN From NewsMax!!!

 

Hey, go to 3:40 to 5:05 ESPECIALLY!!!

 

https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=emb_logo&v=a6vcGapr_A8

 

THEE GlowBullists ARE SCARED!!!

 

YYYEEEAAAHHH BBBAAABBBYYY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Keep Yer Powder DRY!!!

 

:flagsmiley:   :flagsmiley:   :flagsmiley:

 

THEE Dems WILL BE "upset" AND ARE COMING AFTER YOU WHEN THIS BABY DOES NOT GO THEIR CORRUPT VOTER FRAUD WAY THEY IMPLEMENTED!!!

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

Watching it now...America’s Mayor and Sidney Powell is breaking it off in their 4th point of contact!!👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 3
  • Pow! 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Pitcher said:

WE CAUGHT THEM! Part 6: Michigan and Georgia, Like in PA and VA, Caught in SAME PATTERN! — Once Biden Gained Lead with MASSIVE Vote Dumps, The Remainder of Votes All Possessed Same Biden to Trump Vote Ratio – THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE!

We’ve reported on multiple incidents of ‘glitches’ that people observed related to the 2020 Presidential Election. These incidents seem odd and so we sought out and found a data set from the 2020 Presidential election. A group of IT patriots analyzed a data set of election vote data and found millions of votes in the election that were either lost or transferred from President Trump to Joe Biden. We reported this and our post was retweeted by the President.

Captured in Real Time: That Moment in Virginia at 5:12 AM Where they Took 373,000 Votes Off the State Totals

Then in Pennsylvania we identified a strange pattern in vote percentages between President Trump’s Election Day votes and his mail-in votes that was basically impossible and suggested fraud:

SHOCKING EXCLUSIVE: WE CAUGHT THEM! Pennsylvania Results Show a Statistically Impossible Pattern Behind Biden’s Steal! WE CAUGHT THEM!

Then we reported on a pattern from a few select counties in Michigan that were consistent but made no sense other than to indicate fraud.  Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai using his approach identified 138,000 votes transferred from Trump to Biden in his study:

This day in historyJ

TRENDING: “Drop and Roll” -- How The 2020 Election Was Stolen From President Donald Trump (Video)

WE CAUGHT THEM! Part 2: Email Inventor Dr. Shiva Finds SAME IMPOSSIBLE BALLOT RATIO Feature in Michigan Results – WE CAUGHT THEM!

Then we used the same analysis used by Dr. Shiva on a data set from Milwaukee and found more votes transferred from President Trump to Biden.  This was enough to change the Wisconsin election to President Trump.

WOW! — The Steal Is On!… With Last Night’s Ballot Dump Wisconsin has 88% Voter Turnout or HIGHER! IT’S EITHER AN IMPOSSIBLE NEW RECORD OR IT’S HORSESH*T

We then re-performed Dr. Shiva’s work on one Michigan County he reviewed and materially agreed with Dr. Shiva’s result:

WE CAUGHT THEM! Part 4: We Were Able to Replicate SAME IMPOSSIBLE BALLOT RATIO Found in Michigan’s Kent County As Reported by Dr. Shiva – 20,000 Votes Switched from Trump to Biden

Next we reported on another unusual pattern in vote reporting in Virginia and Pennsylvania where after large entries were made which provided a lead for Joe Biden late in the election process, nearly all subsequent entries after that period of time had the exact same unusual ratio in Trump to Biden votes.

BREAKING EXCLUSIVE: Multiple Reversals and Proportional Vote Entries In Virginia on Election Night after 11 PM Indicate Election Fraud Occurred in This State Too

Tonight we can report we found the exact same virtually impossible activity in Georgia and Michigan.

Georgia

In Georgia President Trump was up by as much as a 57% to Biden’s 42% and with 50% of the votes counted Trump was still way ahead.  Then Biden was allocated batches of votes for hours, some with negative Trump votes and then with 89% of the votes in, Biden took the lead.  From that point on for the next 53 batches of votes counted, for EVERY SINGLE vote batch the batches had exactly a 50.05% to 49.95% victory margin for Biden and Trump cementing Biden’s lead.

Georgia-NYT-Vote-Batches-Showing-Bidens-

Not a single batch in our data set after the “lead switch event” varied from that margin for all new vote batches.  This too is inconceivable and indicates fraud.

Michigan

Next in Michigan we see a similar pattern as in Virginia, Pennsylvania and Georgia. 

Of the 530 entries in the New York Times of the Michigan votes for President at around 03:37:16Z, (10:36PM EST), with around 25% of the expected vote cast, Trump is ahead by a margin of 55% to 43%.  Up to that point, Trump was winning many of the batches 60%-40%, 70%-30%, and a few batches at even 75-25%!

From 25-53% of the expected vote cast, the incremental vote percentage is unusually consistent at 45% Biden, 55% Trump in 101 of the 160 incremental count batches, that’s in 63% of the batches.  Of the 59 batches that are NOT consistent with the pattern, we find the negative adjustments being made in those batches, and larger batches (more than 10,000 votes) going for Biden.

Then at 12:46 AM EST, with about 54% of the expected vote count in, the “consistent” percentage of batches is updated to 46% Biden and 54% Trump.  This is consistent until the total expected vote counts reach 88% of the vote cast.  (Note shortly before this time a reported approximate load of 120,000+ votes are reported to be brought into the TCF building in Detroit where votes are being counted.)  At 6:31 AM EST, we see a SINGLE batch reported of 141,258 votes for Biden, and only 5,968 for Trump, the batch goes 96% Biden, 4% for Trump!  Again, absolutely UNBELIEVABLE.  Presumably this is the start of what was delivered into the building around 4AM CST!

There are numerous batches after this point in time where the batches are reported at the EXACT same split, this time 50.254% Trump to 49.746% Biden, that’s right, precision to the THOUSANTH decimal.  At 9:02 AM EST, there are two more large Biden batches counted that give Biden the first lead of election, with 91% of the votes counted and at 9:15 AM EST, Biden leads 49,3% to 49.2%!  And from that point on, ALMOST EVERY BATCH is counted as 49% Trump, 50% Biden! 28 of 44 of them!

Michigan-NYT-Data-with-same-ratios-600x2

Again, it is completely INCONCEIVABLE mathematically and statistically that after the switch in the lead to Biden, batches of votes would have exactly the same distribution to both candidates.

What is going on with the data and the votes recorded in the 2020 election? These patterns observed in multiple states make no logical sense other than that data is being manipulated in the greatest election fraud in world history.

I am a Stats/Analysts guy and you are absolutely correct. 

  • Like 4
  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CSM (R) Thack said:

Watching it now...America’s Mayor and Sidney Powell is breaking it off in their 4th point of contact!!👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸

CSM - I read that and I starting laughing so hard. I was wondering how many people understood "4th Point of Contact". 

  • Haha 2
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tigergorzow said:

SYN, Great stuff....We are fully behind our PRESIDENT DJT and all of our supporters for MAGA 2.0.

 

GO JUSTICE 

 

GO 4 More Years

 

GO RV & RI

 

:twothumbs: Thank YOU, TigerGorZow, AND ALL The Very Best!!! :tiphat:

 

If the least among us falls with their six unguarded standing for what is right, then, at some point, the greatest among us will no longer be able to stand since their six will be unguarded, there is no one left to stand with, and there is nothing left to stand for.

 

- Synopsis

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, CSM (R) Thack said:

Watching it now...America’s Mayor and Sidney Powell is breaking it off in their 4th point of contact!!👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸

 

HOOAH, SIR!!!

 

🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍:salute:!!!CSM (R) Thack!!!:salute:👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸👍🇺🇸

 

Go Moola Nova!

:pirateship:

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ChuckFinley said:

CSM - I read that and I starting laughing so hard. I was wondering how many people understood "4th Point of Contact". 

CSM, CF.....Got it crystal clear been there done that got the "Be All You Can Be T-Shirt....👍👍😁😁.  The ole jargon we all still use even today...👍👍

 

 

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had to stop here: "With the presidential election over and Joe Biden’s victory beyond rational dispute". 

 

Both Dems and Rep have publicly stated that there was so much corruption that this election should be redone. I have posted a video directly related to this subject. You should also review the "Global Reset" - Karl Schwab 

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 6
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I definitely think the Republicans are right, this election has massive fraud, Trump likely won. I don't have perfect proof yet, it's just my intuition. As a Canadian I don't have any real say, but I try to be objective...and enjoy the Show 🍺

 

To the Republicans I say: If you are proven wrong, I hope you admit it, if Biden actually won.

 

To the Democrats I say: If you are proven wrong, I hope you admit it, if Trump actually won.

 

To both sides: fight like hell for the truth, till it comes out. Whoever wins, be a graceful winner. To whoever loses, if you supported the search for the truth, if you stand for truth itself, then you really are not a loser. You are a winner. You are a winner because you stood for the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. That makes you a winner. That's something to be proud of, win or lose.

 

To both sides: both should agree on the principles of honest and truth.

 

To both sides: One side is lying here...

 

To both sides: if your leaders are proven to be dishonest, turn on them and attack them, they are not your leaders, they are dishonest crooks, not worthy of you.

 

To both sides: Don't make up your mind, till you have weighed through the evidence.

 

To both sides: Be ready to admit you were wrong, if proven so.

 

To both sides: Make up your mind now, if you are going to follow your personal political biases and preferences, or if you are going to follow evidence and honesty in making up your mind.

 

To both sides: this is entertaining as hell, I like a good fight! 🤜🤛

 

To both sides: try to maintain class and avoid personal attacks.

 

To both sides: Even if your side wins, but you put personal bias over objective evidence, you are a sad case of a human being. :twocents::flagsmiley:⚔️

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ncc_amendment12.svg

12TH AMENDMENT

Election of President and Vice President

Passed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified June 15, 1804. The 12th Amendment changed a portion of Article II, Section 1. A portion of the 12th Amendment was changed by the 20th Amendment

The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate; -- The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.-- The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

  • Pow! 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, SocalDinar said:

And what is really happening?  

 

Look up Klaus Schwab and World Economic Forum, and then investigate their plans for agenda 21 or agenda 2030... they want to depopulate the planet... vaccinate everyone... lock down travel all over the globe. How do they do it? Get us all to fight each other rather than focus on the elite scum who perpetrate these evils on the globe 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NEPatriotsFan1 said:

Look up Klaus Schwab and World Economic Forum, and then investigate their plans for agenda 21 or agenda 2030... they want to depopulate the planet... vaccinate everyone... lock down travel all over the globe. How do they do it? Get us all to fight each other rather than focus on the elite scum who perpetrate these evils on the globe 

 

Klaus is Dr. Evil’s brother.  The next time these people meet in Davos an accidental missle strike would stop all this BS.  

  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Floyd County terminates election director after state audit uncovers uncounted votes

Brooke Zauner2 hours ago

Board of Elections fires director in Floyd County

Floyd County terminated its elections director after a state audit showed hundreds of votes not counted.

ROME, Ga. - Floyd County's Board of Elections voted Thursday to fire its executive director after elections officials discovered hundreds of ballots were left uncounted before the county's initial certification.

The Secretary of State's Office initially asked for Floyd Chief of Elections Clerk Robert Brady to step down after officials discovered the uncounted votes.

The board met for little more than an hour Thursday afternoon in a special meeting, which resutled in Brady's terminiation. Officials cited at least two reprimands that Brady received in the past six months as the reason for his firing.

RELATED: 2,600 votes not counted in Floyd County, elections director asked to step down

The board met for little more than an hour Thursday afternoon in a special meeting, which resulted in Brady's termination. Officials cited at least two reprimands that Brady received in the past six months as the reason for his firing.

"It really is a matter of human error not of some big fraud or conspiracy and people make mistakes, but unfortunately I think this one falls at the feet of our elections director who I've been critical of this entire elections cycle," said Rome City Commissioner, Wendy Davis.

Election officials discovered around 2,600 votes that were not counted in the county's total earlier this week during the statewide audit.
Election workers ultimately had to rescan more than 8,000 ballots to get to the bottom of the problem.

"There weren't the right double and triple checks right before certification to realize we hadn't counted as many numbers as the people that early voted." 

Election audit nears completion

Counties in Georgia are racing to finish the manual recount audit of the presidential election.

RELATED: Georgia election audit results expected to be released Thursday

Davis is glad the mistake was caught and believes the board made the right decision by terminating Brady.

Both Republicans and Democrats agree firing Brady was the right move, but they don't believe the mistake was made intentionally.

  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GOP lawmakers call for congressional hearings on integrity of 2020 election

Republican congressmen Jim Jordan of Ohio and James Comer of Kentucky are calling on New York Democratic Reps. Jerrold Nadler and Carolyn Maloney to hold hearings to look into the integrity of the recent election.

"We urge you to immediately convene hearings to examine the integrity of the 2020 election amid troubling reports of irregularities and improprieties," the Republican legislators wrote in their letter.

"Given your role as leaders of a political party that spent four years baselessly calling into question the legitimacy of the 2016 election with debunked allegations of Russian collusion, you owe it to all Americans to fully examine allegations of actual election errors and misconduct," they said.

Nadler serves as the chair of the House Judiciary Committee, while Jordan is the ranking member. Maloney serves as the chair of the House Committee on Oversight and Reform, while Comer is the ranking member of that committee.

  • Pow! 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump summons Michigan GOP leaders for extraordinary meeting

800.jpeg

DETROIT (AP) — President Donald Trump summoned Michigan’s Republican legislative leaders to the White House for an extraordinary meeting Friday amid a long shot GOP push to subvert the democratic process that handed the battleground state to Democrat Joe Biden.

Two people familiar with the matter told The Associated Press that Trump invited Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey and House Speaker Lee Chatfield. They agreed to go, according to a state official aware of the leaders’ plans. The two officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were discussing private conversations.

It was not immediately clear what the meeting would be about. Neither Shirkey nor Chatfield commented.

Trump’s campaign is openly floating the notion of trying to get friendly state legislatures to appoint electors who would overturn the will of the voters. The Michigan Legislature would be called to select electors if Trump succeeds in convincing the state’s board of canvassers not to certify Biden’s victory in the state.

Both Shirkey and Chatfield have indicated they will not try to overturn Biden’s win.

“Michigan law does not include a provision for the Legislature to directly select electors or to award electors to anyone other than the person who received the most votes,” Shirkey’s spokeswoman said last week.

Asked at a Lansing news conference about the plan for legislative leaders to visit Trump, Democratic Gov. Gretchen Whitmer said, “I hope they wear masks, and I hope they stay safe.”

“All the meetings in the world, though, can’t take away from the fact that Joe Biden won Michigan by over 150,000 votes,” Whitmer added. “That’s 14 times the margin that Donald Trump won by in 2016. ... So we will be sending a slate of electors that reflects the will of the people of Michigan at the end of this process.”

Also Thursday, state officials said Michigan’s largest county cannot revoke its certification of election results after two Republicans who approved Biden’s local landslide wanted to revert to their initial stance of refusing to bless the vote tally.

The GOP effort to change position represented another complication in what is typically a routine task. Monica Palmer and William Hartmann, the two Republican canvassers in Wayne County, said they only voted to certify the results after “hours of sustained pressure” and after getting promises that their concerns about the election would be investigated.

“We deserve better — but more importantly, the American people deserve better — than to be forced to accept an outcome achieved through intimidation, deception and threats of violence,” they said in a statement Wednesday night. “Wayne County voters need to have full confidence in this process.”

State officials said the certification of the Detroit-area vote will stand. Michigan’s chief election officer said a post-election audit will be performed, though not to check “mythical allegations” of fraud.

“There is no legal mechanism for them to rescind their vote. Their job is done, and the next step in the process is for the Board of State Canvassers to meet and certify,” said Tracy Wimmer, a spokeswoman for the Michigan secretary of state.

The four-member state board, which is expected to meet Monday, is split with two Democrats and two Republicans — the same makeup as the Wayne County board.

Trump’s campaign says the latest about-face by Palmer and Hartmann is legitimate. It withdrew a federal lawsuit challenging the Detroit-area results, attaching affidavits from the pair.

Palmer and Hartmann initially voted against certification Tuesday, leaving the county Board of Canvassers deadlocked at 2-2 along party lines. Palmer complained that certain Detroit precincts were out of balance, meaning that absentee ballot books did not match the number of ballots cast.

“This is not an indication that any votes were improperly cast or counted,” Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said.

The GOP move drew an immediate rebuke from the public and injected partisan politics into the business of an unsung panel that is supposed to confirm the will of the voters. A person familiar with the matter told the AP that Trump reached out to Palmer and Hartmann on Tuesday evening after the revised vote to express gratitude for their support.

In a statement, the pair reported being the target of threats, which they said they reported to law enforcement.

Trump “was checking to make sure I was safe after seeing/hearing about the threats and doxxing,” Palmer said in a text message to the Detroit Free Press, referring to the practice of publicly disclosing someone’s personal information.

Biden crushed Trump in Wayne County by a more than 2-1 margin on his way to winning Michigan by 153,000 votes, according to unofficial results. His victory reversed Trump’s 2016 gains in the industrial Midwest and put the Democrat on the path to achieving the 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the White House.

The county canvassers later voted again and certified the results, 4-0. Then, on Wednesday, Palmer and Hartmann signed affidavits saying they believe the vote should not be certified. 

Jonathan Kinloch, a Democratic canvasser, said he heard passion — not threats — during the stormy Tuesday night meeting when the audience on Zoom was allowed to speak after the 2-2 tie and before the unanimous vote.

“I heard people basically being very assertive in demonstrating their outrage, but it happens all the time,” Kinloch said. “This was a very important meeting to the city, the county, and it impacted a lot of folks.” 

Benson, a Democrat, said a post-election audit will be conducted in Wayne County and any other community with “significant clerical errors.” 

“Audits are neither designed to address nor performed in response to false or mythical allegations of ‘irregularities’ that have no basis in fact,” she said.

There has been no evidence of widespread voting fraud in Michigan or any other state. Federal and state officials from both parties have declared the 2020 election safe and secure. But Trump and his allies have spent two weeks raising false claims of fraud and refusing to concede to Biden.

 

  • Pow! 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FBI Agents Arrest Cincinnati Democrat For Accepting Bribes in Exchange For Votes

IMG_6678.jpgP.G. Sittenfeld

FBI agents on Thursday arrested Cincinnati Democrat City Councilman P.G. Sittenfeld for accepting bribes in exchange for votes.

Thursday’s arrest of Sittenfeld marks the third arrest on the city council this year.

The US Attorney and FBI are holding a press conference regarding the arrest of Cincinnati City Councilman P.G. Sittenfeld for corruption allegations @FOX19 pic.twitter.com/Vu8vfgEeNx

— Joanna Bouras (@JoannaBouras) November 19, 2020

TRENDING: HUGE! Attorney Sidney Powell CONFIRMS Alleged Dominion Servers in Germany Were Confiscated -- VIDEO

Fox19 reported:

Charges unveiled against Sittenfeld in his 20-page indictment allege he schemed to funnel money from developers into a political action committee (PAC) that he secretly controlled, court records show.

The “developers” were really undercover FBI agents who handed a total of $40,000 in Sittenfeld checks on three different occasions, according to the indictment.

Sittenfeld, who could not be immediately reached for comment, is running to be Cincinnati’s mayor and considered by some as the front runner with thousands of dollars raised for his campaign.

He is now the third Cincinnati City Councilmember to be arrested on corruption charges this year and the second in the past week alone.

Federal authorities recently revealed in court records they were investigating corruption and bribery related to votes and development projects and said more prosecution were coming.

 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SocalDinar said:
ncc_amendment12.svg

12TH AMENDMENT

Election of President and Vice President

Passed by Congress December 9, 1803. Ratified June 15, 1804. The 12th Amendment changed a portion of Article II, Section 1. A portion of the 12th Amendment was changed by the 20th Amendment

The Electors shall meet in their respective states and vote by ballot for President and Vice-President, one of whom, at least, shall not be an inhabitant of the same state with themselves; they shall name in their ballots the person voted for as President, and in distinct ballots the person voted for as Vice-President, and they shall make distinct lists of all persons voted for as President, and of all persons voted for as Vice-President, and of the number of votes for each, which lists they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the seat of the government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate; -- The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the certificates and the votes shall then be counted; -- The person having the greatest number of votes for President, shall be the President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed; and if no person have such majority, then from the persons having the highest numbers not exceeding three on the list of those voted for as President, the House of Representatives shall choose immediately, by ballot, the President. But in choosing the President, the votes shall be taken by states, the representation from each state having one vote; a quorum for this purpose shall consist of a member or members from two-thirds of the states, and a majority of all the states shall be necessary to a choice. And if the House of Representatives shall not choose a President whenever the right of choice shall devolve upon them, before the fourth day of March next following, then the Vice-President shall act as President, as in case of the death or other constitutional disability of the President.-- The person having the greatest number of votes as Vice-President, shall be the Vice-President, if such number be a majority of the whole number of Electors appointed, and if no person have a majority, then from the two highest numbers on the list, the Senate shall choose the Vice-President; a quorum for the purpose shall consist of two-thirds of the whole number of Senators, and a majority of the whole number shall be necessary to a choice. But no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President of the United States.

Thanks Social Dinar. You will be surprised how many do not know this.

  • Upvote 1
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ivan Pentchoukov

1,433 views

18 Nov, 7 tweets, 3 min read
3rd monitor, a Democrat: "Hundreds of these ballots seemed impeccable, with no folds or creases. The bubble selections were perfectly made ... only observed selections in black ink, and all
happened to be selections for Biden."

Source: courtlistener.com/docket/1863278…Image
"Based on my observations, I believe there was fraud was committed in the presidential election and question the validity of the Georgia recount process."

 

4th witness, also a Democrat saw perfect black marks on a stack of ballots ... 500 in a row all for Biden.

Source: courtlistener.com/docket/1863278…Image
Same witness went to a different Georgia county the next day and observed the same anomaly during the recount.

"All of these ballots had the same two characteristics: they were all for Biden and had the same perfect black bubble." Image

I deleted tweets with the names of two witnesses in this thread because they reached out "terrified". Redoing both below without the names.

The 5th witness alleging the same anomaly: hundreds of mail ballots without creases and perfectly marked bubbles that appear to not have been mailed. (Mail ballots are folded in order to be placed in an envelope.)

 

The 6th witness saw perfectly marked mail-in ballots, with some batches 100% for Biden, which appear to have been printed rather than filled out by someone at home. 

Witness shared a spreadsheet of the box numbers in question.

courtlistener.com/docket/1863278…Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 
  • Pow! 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

96% Of Dominion Voting Systems Political Donations Went To Democrats

Of 96 political donations coming from employees of Dominion Voting Systems, nearly 96 percent of contributions were directed to Democratic candidates.

The company in question, Dominion Voting Systems, improperly counted ballots to create a fraudulent win for Joe Biden in Antrim County, Michigan and caused several other “glitches” that required extended voting hours and delayed results.

Federal Election Commission (FEC) records, however, reveal the company is overwhelmingly staffed by Democratic donors – perhaps contributing to the explanation as to how the machines malfunctioned exclusively to Biden’s benefit.

Screen-Shot-2020-11-12-at-12.32.18-PM-80 FEC Records.

From 2014 to 2020, nine individuals who list “Dominion Voting” or “Dominion Voting Systems” as their employer contributed money to national political campaigns, including the 2020 presidential election. Totaling 96 donations, the sum between employees amounts to $1,241.15.

Employees positions span the entirety of the voting system’s process from set-up to tabulation, including software developers, network engineers, software production specialists, and implementation managers.

Of the 96 donations, 92 in total – or 95.8 percent – went to Democratic candidate, predominantly via ActBlue. This means that of the $1,241.15, a total of $1,154.90 went to boost Democrats.

One donation, for example, from a Dominion software developer went to MoveOn.org – a leftist political action committee the describes itself as a “pillar” and “at the forefront” of the anti-Trump “resistance” movement.

In contrast, just four donations – equivalent to $86.25 – over the six-year period went to Republican candidates, specifically President Trump.

Dominion has also employed a host of Democratic party-linked lobbyists to assist on issues including “monitor[ing] federal legislation” and “issues related to election security.” For example, a former Chief of Staff for Nancy Pelosi and a director of vote protection for Obama’s 2012 campaign are currently retained by the voting company.

President Trump also raised red flags about the company’s potential to have swayed the 2020 election on Twitter:

  • Upvote 2
  • Pow! 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.