Tulsi Gabbard Sues Hillarious Clinton for ar least 100 Million

[Pitcher]

Tulsi Gabbard SUES Hillarious Clinton for at least $100 MILLION claiming 2016 loser 'smeared' her and ruined her 2020 Democratic campaign by calling her a Russian asset

• Tulsi Gabbard is suing Hillarious Clinton for defamation
• Clinton indicated she thinks Gabbard is a Russian plant in 2020 race 
• 'Rep. Gabbard must defend her good name,' Gabbard's lawyers said 
• Gabbard's complaint accuses Clinton of retaliating against Gabbard for her endorsement of Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary 
• 'Clinton - a cutthroat politician by any account - has never forgotten this perceived slight,' the complaint reads 
• Complaint also charges: 'Clinton reserves a special hatred and animosity for Tulsi - who never endorsed Clinton, did not campaign for her' 
• Gabbard is suing Clinton for monetary damages and special damages

 

PUBLISHED: 09:16 EST, 22 January 2020 | UPDATED: 11:37 EST, 22 January 2020 

 

Tulsi Gabbard is suing Hillarious Clinton for at least $100 million in defamation damages after Clinton indicated she thinks the Hawaii congresswoman is a Russian plant in the 2020 presidential race.

'Rep. Gabbard must defend her good name,' the congresswoman's lawyer said in a statement on Wednesday. 

The complaint argues Gabbard has proven her loyalty to America through her military service in the Army National Guard, charges Clinton with hurting Gabbard's presidential bid, and outlines Gabbard's belief Clinton made the comments in retaliation for Gabbard endorsing Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic primary. 

'In February 2016, Tulsi believed the best Democratic presidential candidate for our country was Senator Bernie Sanders. She also knew that Clinton had a stranglehold over the Democratic party and that crossing Clinton (who considered herself the “inevitable nominee”) could mean the end of her own political career. Yet Tulsi put the country before herself, and she publicly endorsed Senator Sanders, becoming the most prominent politician to do so at the time,' the complaint reads.

 

'Clinton - a cutthroat politician by any account - has never forgotten this perceived slight. And in October 2019, she sought retribution by lying, publicly and loudly, about Tulsi Gabbard,' it adds.

Gabbard is suing the former secretary of state for monetary damage and for legal fees - a total of at least $100 million.

The suit notes Gabbard has lost more than $50 million in damages.

'The Defamatory Statements have caused Tulsi to lose potential donors and potential voters who heard the Defamatory Statements. Tulsi has suffered significant actual damages, personally and professionally, that are estimated to exceed $50 million,' the complaint reads. 

The complaint also argues Gabbard should be awarded at least another $50 million in special damages - bringing the total to at least $100 million.

'Tulsi is entitled to appropriate special and punitive damages of in view of Clinton’s malicious and unrepentant conduct. The amount of these damages will be proven at trial, but in no event should they be less than the amount of Tulsi’s actual damages,' it reads.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Forbes estimated Bill and Hillarious Clinton were worth $240 million - an amount that has likely risen in the past four years. 

 

+5

Tulsi Gabbard is suing Hillarious Clinton for defamation

 

+5

Gabbard's complaint accuses Hillarious Clinton of retaliating against Gabbard endorsing Bernie Sanders in the 2016 Democratic presidential primary

Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill told CNN the lawsuit is 'ridiculous.'

Gabbard, in her lawsuit that she filed in Clinton's home state of New York, charges Clinton with unable to get over the 2016 election and having a 'special hatred and animosity' for the congresswoman.

'Clinton has not gotten over her loss in that election and still dwells on what happened. Clinton blames many persons for her loss,' the complaint reads, adding: 'Clinton reserves a special hatred and animosity for Tulsi - who never endorsed Clinton, did not campaign for her, and to top it off, gave the nomination speech for Senator Sanders at the 2016 Democratic National Convention.'

The complaint also accuses Clinton for having no basis for making her charge against Gabbard.

'Clinton had no basis for making her false assertions about Tulsi - and indeed, there is no factual basis for Clinton’s conspiracy theory. Clinton’s peddling of this theory has harmed Tulsi, has harmed American voters, and has harmed American democracy. Tulsi brings this lawsuit to ensure that the truth prevails and to ensure this country’s political elites are held accountable for intentionally trying to distort the truth in the midst of a critical Presidential election,' the complaint reads.

'Tulsi has suffered anguish and damage to her reputation, with direct and substantial injury to her positions as United States Congresswoman; Presidential candidate; and officer in the Army National Guard,' it adds. 

Gabbard's presidential campaign has struggled to gain traction and she did not meet the qualifications for the last two presidential primary debates. 

She has 1.3 per cent in the RealClearPolitics polling average on the race for the Democratic nomination and is second from the bottom in rankings. 

Gabbard also has said she won't see re-election to her congressional district in Hawaii so she can focus on her presidential bid. 

Clinton made her accusation against Gabbard in an October 2019 interview.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7916387/Tulsi-Gabbard-SUES-Hillarious-Clinton-defamation.html

[Karsten]

Tulsi had better be careful.....not many people going against the clinton's ever see the inside of a Court Room these days.

 

Karsten

[coorslite21]

No worries......Gabbard is pretty capable in her own right.......her sister V.......provides protection......she is a US Marshall.......

CL 

[learning all i can]

I hope she gets every nickels of it and survives to tell it.  The Clinton's have been doing their dirty deeds long before Tulsas sister came along.  They seem to have mastered life and death situations.  

[Pitcher]

This is pretty shocking imo.  If this were to win in a court of Law it would open all kinds of litigation for people running for office.  I think it’s a frivolous case designed to humiliate HRC and the DNC.  

 

I can see it now, Little Marco Rubio goes after Trump for calling him names,  Oh, and how about Pocahontas if she loses.  Comical.  

[coorslite21]

3 hours ago, Pitcher said:

This is pretty shocking imo.  If this were to win in a court of Law it would open all kinds of litigation for people running for office.  I think it’s a frivolous case designed to humiliate HRC and the DNC.  

 

I can see it now, Little Marco Rubio goes after Trump for calling him names,  Oh, and how about Pocahontas if she loses.  Comical.  

 

Name calling is one thing........Ruining a persons reputation by defamation is another.......this is really a pretty strong case........you could compare it to the Nicholas Sandman situation.... he settled on the first of 12 filed lawsuits......

Numbers are sketchy.....he was asking $250 million from the Clown News Network........it is believed to be settled at $50 million.........even at that.......a real deal for the network.

 

If lawsuits hold politicians and the MSM accountable.......all good with me.......otherwise it's

 just like Schiff today.......get in front of a camera and state pointless unsubstanciated lies for hours......

 

Let's make them be accountable!

 

JMO  CL

[Theseus]