Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

The House of Representatives votes on the Financial Management Law


yota691
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 hours ago, Pitcher said:

All good points Utah, if you are an Obama supporter.  I voted for Obama the first time, I liked the hope and change message.  When he and his fellow Democrats crammed the healthcare bill down America’s throat, I became an instant non supporter.  How about the shovel ready work bill they crammed through Congress his first month.  980B shovel ready jobs, remember.  Mmm. That was a slight of hand to put that in the budget and then he and his Dems never submitted a budget, for 8 years!!  Once that money is in the budget it’s there unit it is taken out. No budget, it stays and it became a piggy bank for Dem causes and payback for his supporters.  Reps do the same BS.  

 

The first thing I disagree with you is. “Obama is not the reason why we are in the situation we are in today”.  When Obama moved our troops out of Iraq, Isis moved in.  

That is the reason Iran was allowed to enter Iraq, to help Iraq fight Isis.  Nice Trojan Horse Utah.  The Nuclear Deal was an appeasement and showed great weakness which Iran took advantage of.  We have plenty of Allies,  Saudi, Jordan, UAE, Kuwait, Israel,  Egypt, and more.  Obama all but abandoned our oldest ally, Israel.  

 

The Obama Administration stableized the economy with the help of QE, 1-4 and running up a 9 trillion dollar debt.  His policies were anti business.  His recovery could have been very good but they put burdensome taxes and ridiculous regulations on companies that made many many companies bolt for overseas locations.  As a result he is the only President to not have a 3% growth for at least 1 quarter.  Under Obama we hit the highest number of people on disability and unemployment.  Housing starts were at 50 year lows, and could go on and on.  

 

I could care care less what books Obama read, he didn’t read his bible, and insulted Christians with his famous quote about us holding onto our guns and bibles.  

 

I appreciate your service, anyone who puts on a uniform and serves our country is ok in my book.  I served as well.  I don’t hate you, Obama, or anyone really. That’s bad mojo and I don’t have time for it.  I respect your views and you coming on to tell me your thoughts.  I think you take my dislike of Dems personally. Don’t, I don’t like most Reps either.  I’ve worked in both Political Parties, especially Clinton’s in the 90’s.  

 

I call things the way I see em.  Yes I’m full of it from time to time and I get a little nutty when it comes to politics, mostly because I know the inter workings of campaigns and I know the dirt.  I’ll try to tone down my rants but I’m not going to stop disliking what the Dems are preaching, Socialism, sanctuary cities, illegals invading our country, etc.

 

I’m not a huge fan of Trump, especially his tweets but the Dems are not giving me a choice the way I see it.

 

Thats enough for now.  We can continue later.  Thanks for speaking up in a civil manner.   

 

 

 

 

All good Pitcher, I enjoy the perspective. I'm not going to list the things Obama did that I believe to be great, that's not my point, it just can get old at times the way he is always demonized and scapegoated yet there are those he did represent extremely well and it seams like the concept of compromise has been lost in our society. I know this is not a political forum so I will be short, most of the time I am on here I can do a good job of letting so much negativity directed at a group of people (demarcates) go but some times I can't help myself. Yesterday was one of those days, I have zero ill will toward anyone and respect all that can back their words with facts to support their opinion even if I don't agree with them. I find it troubling at times how negative we Americans can be, when we are living some of the best lives ever lived on this planet. We are always looking for the bad when there is so much positive going on around us. We all have way more in common than what separates us yet we are so divided at this time.

I'm an independent, though have always voted democratic because they represent my ideals the best up to this point. As for Trump, he scares the ever living shities out me and I believe, through his actions, he is of low character and only cares about money and his own interests. He's uninformed and has a serious problem with the truth. His attitude toward minorities, including women, is prehistoric and he is divisional and toxic. 

Thank you for your thoughts, I wish you the best. 

  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 4
  • Downvote 10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, utah rock said:

All good Pitcher, I enjoy the perspective. I'm not going to list the things Obama did that I believe to be great, that's not my point, it just can get old at times the way he is always demonized and scapegoated yet there are those he did represent extremely well and it seams like the concept of compromise has been lost in our society. I know this is not a political forum so I will be short, most of the time I am on here I can do a good job of letting so much negativity directed at a group of people (demarcates) go but some times I can't help myself. Yesterday was one of those days, I have zero ill will toward anyone and respect all that can back their words with facts to support system" rel="">support their opinion even if I don't agree with them. I find it troubling at times how negative we Americans can be, when we are living some of the best lives ever lived on this planet. We are always looking for the bad when there is so much positive going on around us. We all have way more in common than what separates us yet we are so divided at this time.

I'm an independent, though have always voted democratic because they represent my ideals the best up to this point. As for Trump, he scares the ever living shities out me and I believe, through his actions, he is of low character and only cares about money and his own interests. He's uninformed and has a serious problem with the truth. His attitude toward minorities, including women, is prehistoric and he is divisional and toxic. 

Thank you for your thoughts, I wish you the best. 

Are you Mormon? 

  • Confused 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do it by the GOI constitution, and if there is a quorum or it ain't legal. This can be chest pounding so as Iran won't blame Iraq and hurt them. Or it can be the by product of many Iraqi politicians graduating from the Nancy Pelosi skrool of politics . Should we leave Iraq, I wonder what will happen with the country of Iraq ? Hmm.

Edited by new york kevin
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DinarThug said:


No - But At Least 3 Of His Wives Are ! :o 

 

 

High Quality Utah Stick Figure Family Blank Meme Template

:D  :D  :D 

That wasn't the subject I wanted to talk about with he or she. I went to highschool  there. Grew up a Army brat. Oh never mind. Im going to let it go. I wasn't going to bring it to him, but since it is you Thugster I will. I went to my class reunion and people I played football and basketball with all of sudden were ***. WTF

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, utah rock said:

As for Trump, he scares the ever living shities out me and I believe, through his actions, he is of low character and only cares about money and his own interests. He's uninformed and has a serious problem with the truth. His attitude toward minorities, including women, is prehistoric and he is divisional and toxic. 

Thank you for your thoughts, I wish you the best. 

 

Oh man you were doing great until that last paragraph. Haha, I now know were you are coming from and I respect your honesty.  No one should be negged for their views if done in a civil manner.  I too get quite angry at the constant degregation and untrue reporting on President Trump.  It’s one thing to oppose, it’s another thing to obstruct, out right lie, and rebel.  I never did that with Obama when I very much disliked many of his policies.

 

To do what is happening to President Trump will only weaken the Executive Branch of our Government in the future, and that won’t be good for any of us.  What happened during Schiff’s Inquiry and the subsequent Partisan Impeachment will probably be revisited by Republicans in the future.  Our country doesn’t need that hysteria, not when there are so many issues Congress could be working on like Healthcare, Border Security/Immigration/ DACA, Social Security, Education, Drug Inforement, Etc, etc.  

 

Being a once card carrying Democrat I often wonder what happened to the Party that used to care about the American worker.  Sanctuary cities, open borders, Socialism,  Anti Gun,  New Green Deal, Medicare for all.  Sorry I don’t get it and I won't support that.  Those are not the things that made America great.  I could go on but I’ll stop and just say, I’m still going to push back as I’m sure you will.  We are going to disagree but let’s try to keep it civil. If I  get out of bounds let me know.  I really like the discourse and exchange of views without the acrimony, name calling, and snarky I’m right you’re not dialog.  That serves no one.  

 

When this thing RV’s I’ll buy you a few beers and we can share war stories.  We both loved our country enough to defend it for that I’m in your debt and I say Thank you. 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Al-Tamimi: Abdul-Mahdi cannot remove the US forces, as he is resigned
07-01-2020 01:31 AM
image.php?token=21d2e99b112073d7cc264a8aa5f3d474&c=7255450&size=
 


 


Baghdad / Al-Akhbariya:
Legal expert, Ali Al-Tamimi, confirmed on Tuesday that Prime Minister Adel Abdul-Mahdi cannot cancel the agreement with the United States of America and withdraw its forces from Iraq, since he is resigning and head of the caretaker government.
Al-Tamimi said in a statement to "Al-Akhbaria" that "the first agreement between Iraq and America in 2008 regarding the exit of American forces in Iraq no later than 1.1.2011 and was implemented ... and organized by law 51 for the same year."
He added, "The second agreement was in 2008 with a strategic framework, which is specific to cooperation in all fields. According to Article 24, paragraph 4, it is permissible to remove American forces from Iraq whenever the Iraqi government wishes."
Al-Tamimi added, "In 2014, the coalition forces were formed in accordance with Security Council Resolution 2170, led by America ... and at the request of Iraq."
He pointed out that "we must differentiate between the presence of these forces that Iraq can ask to leave and the agreement that has nothing to do with this presence."
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

06-01-2020 08:11 PM
image.php?token=abdbf4a19a41df504ad9e512dd4c2549&c=8086727&size=
 


 

Baghdad - news

Today, Monday, the news agency publishes a leaked record from inside the "secret" parliament session yesterday, in which Parliament Speaker Mohamed Al-Halbousi appears, warning about the repercussions of the decision to end the foreign presence in the country and the occurrence of an economic collapse as a result.

The recording showed, Speaker of Parliament Muhammad Al-Halbousi sitting between deputies, after he assigned the presidency of the session to his first deputy, Hassan Al-Kaabi, in the presence of the head of the caretaker government, Adel Abdul-Mahdi.

Addressing members of the council, Al-Halbusi said, asking that his speech not be recorded: "Today the attendance is Shiite, I wish it would be as we used to in previous periods, that the decision be Iraqi, today you are the older brother and bear the responsibility of everyone, you bear the responsibility of your children and your brothers and sisters from the Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds And minorities from all over Iraq. "

He added, "We are now proceeding with a decision, whether written in front of the session chairman or requests related to ending the presence of foreign forces in general through urgent procedures and making arrangements for that, or returning to a draft decision that was proposed regarding the number of troops and their tasks and the details mentioned in the message."

Al-Halbousi directed his speech to the Presidency of the Council: "The President, one of the steps that the international community may take is to stop financial dealings with Iraq, and I hope that it will be clarified to the deputies, we may not be able to fulfill our financial obligations to our citizens at any moment."

To watch the video of Halbousi's speech in the secret session, click here

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

06-01-2020 07:55 PM
image.php?token=949dfb126df13f52583c2933b5a2b4f3&c=5664095&size=
 


 

Baghdad - news

On Monday, Nada Shaker Jawdat, a member of the victory coalition, considered the House of Representatives decision regarding the removal of foreign forces in Iraq binding on the government, whether it was for the conduct of business or full powers.

Jawdat told Al-Akhbaria that the decision to withdraw foreign forces from Iraq, including the American forces, was issued by the highest legislative authority in the country, and therefore this decision is enforceable by the government, whether it is conducting business or full authority without restriction or condition.

She added, "The decision is related to submitting an application and not making a new agreement. If the decision is a requirement to make a new agreement, the parliament has recommended that the implementation be made exclusively with a full-fledged government."

She pointed out that "the current government is obligated to implement the decision of the House of Representatives, and work to limit the American forces," noting that "the Ministry of Foreign Affairs is the body concerned with informing European countries that Iraq has no foreign forces present on its soil, and informing them of the contents of the decision voted by the House of Representatives."

 
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pitcher said:

 

Oh man you were doing great until that last paragraph. Haha, I now know were you are coming from and I respect your honesty.  No one should be negged for their views if done in a civil manner.  I too get quite angry at the constant degregation and untrue reporting on President Trump.  It’s one thing to oppose, it’s another thing to obstruct, out right lie, and rebel.  I never did that with Obama when I very much disliked many of his policies.

 

To do what is happening to President Trump will only weaken the Executive Branch of our Government in the future, and that won’t be good for any of us.  What happened during Schiff’s Inquiry and the subsequent Partisan Impeachment will probably be revisited by Republicans in the future.  Our country doesn’t need that hysteria, not when there are so many issues Congress could be working on like Healthcare, Border Security/Immigration/ DACA, Social Security, Education, Drug Inforement, Etc, etc.  

 

Being a once card carrying Democrat I often wonder what happened to the Party that used to care about the American worker.  Sanctuary cities, open borders, Socialism,  Anti Gun,  New Green Deal, Medicare for all.  Sorry I don’t get it and I won't support system" rel="">support that.  Those are not the things that made America great.  I could go on but I’ll stop and just say, I’m still going to push back as I’m sure you will.  We are going to disagree but let’s try to keep it civil. If I  get out of bounds let me know.  I really like the discourse and exchange of views without the acrimony, name calling, and snarky I’m right you’re not dialog.  That serves no one.  

 

When this thing RV’s I’ll buy you a few beers and we can share war stories.  We both loved our country enough to defend it for that I’m in your debt and I say Thank you. 

I don't drink any more but I would grab a Root-beer float, lol and try to bring you back to the light ha ha. 

As for Trump, the process may be off and viewed unfair unless he is guilty. I do get my information from the other CNN and NPR and it very well maybe those are propaganda, left leaning forums. I would love to be wrong about him, that would be great with me but he sure do smell, feel, sound, taste and  look like a donkey.

3 hours ago, DinarThug said:


No - But At Least 3 Of His Wives Are ! :o 

 

High Quality Utah Stick Figure Family Blank Meme Template

:D  :D  :D 

lol, no, not a big fan either but the people are great!!! Don't like the institution for multiple reasons, though I'm great full for the lesson in tolerance that faith helped me learn while I lived there. 

  • Thanks 2
  • Downvote 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%AD%D9%84%D9%88%D9%

In an extraordinary session held by the Iraqi Council of Representatives, last Sunday, with the participation of the outgoing Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi, the representatives present and belonging to only one political spectrum voted on a decision requiring the Iraqi government to cancel the request for assistance to the "International Alliance" to fight the terrorist organization ISIS , And to end the foreign military presence in Iraq, and to prevent the use of its airspace, as well as to file a formal complaint with the United Nations Security Council and the United Nations against Washington, against the background of recent attacks in the cities of Al-Qaim and Baghdad, which resulted in the killing of the Iranian commander of the "Quds Force" Qassem Soleimani Abu Mahdi Al-Muhandis, deputy leader of the “Popular Mobilization” factions.

This decision angered US President Donald Trump, who on Monday night threatened to impose "severe sanctions" on Iraq if American forces were forced to leave his territory, hours after the Iraqi parliament asked the government to "end the presence" of foreign forces in the country.
"If they really asked us to leave (...), we would impose sanctions on them they had not seen before," Trump said on the Air Force One presidential plane back to Washington after a two-week vacation in Florida. He pointed out that these sanctions, which he threatened to impose on Iraq, would make those imposed on Iran insignificant compared to them.
"We have an exceptionally expensive air base there ... It has cost billions of dollars to build, and we will not leave if they do not make up for us," he added.

 It was not an exceptional session only in terms of the decisions taken by that great political spectrum, taking advantage of the absence of the two political spectrums that boycotted the parliament’s session, had they not boycotted the session, and the draft resolution was presented to a vote for failure would have been its fate, but also exceptional when Adel Abdul Mahdi ignored the resigned Iraqi Prime Minister The important questions that the Speaker of Parliament, Mohamed Al-Halbousi, addressed to him, as if nothing had happened, and in order not to deviate from the goal of the session.

 The exit of the American forces from Iraq is a strategic gain for this political spectrum, this spectrum was - and still is - accusing the United States of supporting the protest movement that erupted in the beginning of last October, and spread across most of the governorates of Iraq, starting with the capital Baghdad and the provinces of the Central Euphrates and reaching the province Basra in southern Iraq, but perhaps some or most of the supporters of that political spectrum have been forgotten that the reason for these protests was not because of the American presence in Iraq, but because of their wrongful practices in governing Iraq!

This spectrum looks at the American presence as a source of threat to its interests in Iraq, as it is from time to time that its military wing attacks the American interests “diplomatic mission, military bases” in Iraq, and because Washington does not want a military escalation with that spectrum and its military wing was constantly sending warning messages Not to repeat the attacks.

But she misunderstood those messages, and they continued their military operations until they were ordered to bomb the "Kiwan" base, wounding a number of American soldiers, and the death of a civilian contractor, who was responsible for securing Iraqi oil transport lines from Kirkuk governorate. Washington responded to By targeting the headquarters of the Iraqi Hezbollah Brigades in the Al-Qa’im region in Anbar, and in the Syrian depth, the response to the targeting was the storming of supporters of the Iraqi factions affiliated with the Popular Mobilization Organization, the outer wall of the headquarters of the fortified American embassy in the Green Zone in Baghdad for the first time since its construction after the American invasion of Iraq in 2003. And they raised the flags of «Hezbollah Iraq» on the walls, come to blows American Drunz and destroys the commander of the «Quds Force» Soleimani, in charge of the militia, who was coming from a business trip, from Syria and Lebanon. Instead of the response to the assassination of Soleimani coming from Iran, he came from Iraq !!
Politically, the Iraqi parliament voted on the exit of US forces from Iraq.
Militarily: Re-targeting the American embassy in Baghdad and the American military bases deployed in Iraq.
But the question that arises in this context: What are the implications of the decision to remove US forces from Iraq?
Militarily: According to special information obtained by the Links Center for Research and Strategic Studies, the United States of America withdrew its forces from its bases in Balad, Al-Kiyara and Al-Muthanna Airport, “Baghdad International Airport, Military”, as they are loose rules that are easy to target, but their importance lies in providing logistical support to the force Iraqi Air, and some Iraqi military sectors in the field of training and coordination. These forces will move to Erbil, the capital of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq and the State of Qatar.

It is useful to note here that these bases during their operation, and with the support of the United States of America constitute 40% of the combat power, and there is no doubt that after the departure of the American forces, that the combat capacity of the Iraqi security forces will diminish to 20%, and over time, will continue to diminish Until it reaches zero.

 Economically: Donald Trump threatened to impose harsh sanctions on Iraq if American forces were forced to leave, and immediately this political impact greatly affected the Iraqi dinar exchange rate against the US dollar, and harsh penalties can be applied against Iraq, for Iraq for the first time since Saddam’s regime was punished On the occupation of Kuwait, he now produces 4 million barrels of oil per day, and is granted great facilities, all of which may disappear, and Iraq will return to a poor besieged country, and chaos will prevail, as a result of his involvement in confronting Washington in line with Iran.
At a time when Baghdad is losing its relationship with its main protector, Tehran, otherwise, has begun negotiations with Washington in the hope of ending the economic blockade.
The division of the three political spectrums around the decision of the Iraqi parliament, means that Iraq is living an identity crisis and a geographical crisis, and with this division, voices in the East and West began to ask: Is Iraq on the way to sectarian and ethnic division?

The three political spectrum, especially the large political spectrum, should magnify the interests of Iraq, and it must be deeply aware that the United States of America is a superpower not dealing with it with the logic of emotions, but with a logic governed by rational options. However, until this moment, rationality has prevailed in dealing with the United States of America, because it is very deeply aware that it is not easy to confront the United States directly.

Therefore, the Iraqi Studies Unit believes in the center of ties, that Iraq will lose a lot if that political spectrum continues on its stance towards the United States of America, and the stage of retreat that may affect the present and future of Iraq begins.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, yota691 said:
06-01-2020 08:11 PM
image.php?token=abdbf4a19a41df504ad9e512dd4c2549&c=8086727&size=
 


 

Baghdad - news

Today, Monday, the news agency publishes a leaked record from inside the "secret" parliament session yesterday, in which Parliament Speaker Mohamed Al-Halbousi appears, warning about the repercussions of the decision to end the foreign presence in the country and the occurrence of an economic collapse as a result.

The recording showed, Speaker of Parliament Muhammad Al-Halbousi sitting between deputies, after he assigned the presidency of the session to his first deputy, Hassan Al-Kaabi, in the presence of the head of the caretaker government, Adel Abdul-Mahdi.

Addressing members of the council, Al-Halbusi said, asking that his speech not be recorded: "Today the attendance is Shiite, I wish it would be as we used to in previous periods, that the decision be Iraqi, today you are the older brother and bear the responsibility of everyone, you bear the responsibility of your children and your brothers and sisters from the Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds And minorities from all over Iraq. "

He added, "We are now proceeding with a decision, whether written in front of the session chairman or requests related to ending the presence of foreign forces in general through urgent procedures and making arrangements for that, or returning to a draft decision that was proposed regarding the number of troops and their tasks and the details mentioned in the message."

Al-Halbousi directed his speech to the Presidency of the Council: "The President, one of the steps that the international community may take is to stop financial dealings with Iraq, and I hope that it will be clarified to the deputies, we may not be able to fulfill our financial obligations to our citizens at any moment."

To watch the video of Halbousi's speech in the secret session, click here

This guy gets it. At least it seems that he does. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

07-01-2020 11:44 AM

A political analyst describes the House of Representatives decision as a "hasty" .. and warns of its repercussions

image.php?token=93f44a31fe10fab129a001259a94fa34&c=8456910&size=
 


 

Baghdad / news

Political analyst Yahya al-Bakri confirmed today, Tuesday, that the House of Representatives decision to obligate the government to end the security agreement with the United States is a "hasty" decision and does not serve the interests of Iraq.

Al-Bakri said in a press statement, "The parliament session was hasty and a decision will not be in the interest of Iraq."

He added, "It is assumed that extensive discussions will take place before taking a decision whose results may lead to serious repercussions on the Iraqi reality. Therefore, there is a violation of Iraqi sovereignty by the United States of America, but it can be dealt with by other things that do not harm the Iraqi people."

He pointed out that "there are dangers and threats to Iraq and we must take them seriously because if they are implemented there will be significant repercussions on the citizen and the state."

And that "there is a clear polarization of political entities by Iran, so the Iraqi arena is a battlefield for America and Iran since 2003 until this moment, and the political vision of this conflict is missing, therefore these conflicts are reflected directly on the Iraqi people."

 

http://www.ikhnews.com/index.php?page=article&id=206468

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

141087.jpg?width=750&&height=375

 

 
01/20/2020 13:40
  • Views 352
  • Section: Iraq
  •  
  •  

Can Iraq cancel the security agreement with America?

 

 Baghdad / Obelisk: Legal expert, Ali Al-Tamimi, confirmed on Tuesday, January 7, 2020, that the caretaker government headed by Adel Abdul Mahdi is not entitled to cancel the strategic agreement with America.

Al-Tamimi told Al-Masalla that the government of Abdul-Mahdi does not have the right to cancel the strategic agreement with America, because it is a caretaker government and has no right to conclude agreements or cancel them. This agreement was ratified by Parliament 2008 and Law 52.

Al-Tamimi added: This agreement can be canceled by the Council of Ministers, which will be formed later, after giving a notice to the American side, and it will implement the cancellation after a year of notification.

And the leader of the Sadrist movement, Muqtada al-Sadr, called on Monday to unify the ranks to get the "American occupier" out, while he warned that he would not allow Iraq to turn the square of settling accounts.

The member of the Kurdistan Democratic Party, Repin Salam, revealed the position of his party, as he sees "the necessity of the continued presence of the American forces due to the urgent need of Iraq."

And considered the Parliamentary Security and Defense Committee, the order to remove the American forces from Iraq by force and a unilateral decision taken by Baghdad, is incorrect, indicating that he would make Iraq an enemy of the United States as is the case with Iran now.

A deputy from the Al-Fath Coalition, Saad Al-Husseini, said that Iraq has a parliament and the American presence can be rejected by law and the removal of the American forces by legal and constitutional means.

 Obelisk

http://almasalah.com/ar/news/185092/هل-يستطيع-العراق-إلغاء-الاتفاقية-الأمنية-مع-أمريكا

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I see we have a coward immature person who decided to pass out 10 plus rubies on my posts.  I know who you are and will be reporting your fine negative work.  If you think it upsets me, it doesn’t.  If you think it will make me stop posting, it won’t.  Grow up or grow a pair and let’s debate your issues.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Butifldrm said:

-Mahdi does not have the right to cancel the strategic agreement with America, because it is a caretaker government and has no right to conclude agreements or cancel them. This agreement was ratified by Parliament 2008 and Law 52.

So they aren't sovereign yet? 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to The House of Representatives votes on the Financial Management Law

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.