Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content

  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

LIVE: President Trump Impeachment Hearing - House Judiciary

yota691
 Share

Recommended Posts

Shabibilicious Mentor

Shabibilicious

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Karsten said:

They still have nothing Credible, no Facts, no 1st hand Witnesses so Now 3 Liberal professors and their Biased Opinions are what they are going to run on.

 

xZxaLi.jpg

 

Karsten

 

 

 

 

 

The facts went uncontested....not one witness came forward to suggest otherwise....Due process was offered to and denied by Trump.  It's a slam dunk toward impeachment.  Innocent men have nothing to hide.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
new york kevin Experienced

new york kevin

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

The facts went uncontested....not one witness came forward to suggest otherwise....Due process was offered to and denied by Trump.  It's a slam dunk toward impeachment.  Innocent men have nothing to hide.

 

GO RV, then BV

Ahh hem. Shabs didn't that one Law Professor , a Dem, say something to the effect that  ... if they went forward with this impeachment that impeachment would be viable for abuse of power. Their , the Congressional Dems on the Judiciary Committee panel, their abuse of power.  A heretofor unseen version of due process was offered Pres Trump this time around. The Judiciary Comm was going off of the product of Schiff's Intell Comm. In which zerondue process was provided as was provided to Clinton and Nixion. No counsel for the Pres, no subpoena power for his lawyers, no ability to cross examine plaintiff witness, flat out denial of calling defendent witnesses as is done in all fair trials. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shabibilicious Mentor

Shabibilicious

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, new york kevin said:

Ahh hem. Shabs didn't that one Law Professor , a Dem, say something to the effect that  ... if they went forward with this impeachment that impeachment would be viable for abuse of power. Their , the Congressional Dems on the Judiciary Committee panel, their abuse of power.  A heretofor unseen version of due process was offered Pres Trump this time around. The Judiciary Comm was going off of the product of Schiff's Intell Comm. In which zerondue process was provided as was provided to Clinton and Nixion. No counsel for the Pres, no subpoena power for his lawyers, no ability to cross examine plaintiff witness, flat out denial of calling defendent witnesses as is done in all fair trials. 

 

Nixon and Clinton, I remember them, they provided their tax returns.....Precedent, one might say.  Innocent men have nothing to hide.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
nstoolman1 Grand Master

nstoolman1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

The facts went uncontested....not one witness came forward to suggest otherwise....Due process was offered to and denied by Trump.  It's a slam dunk toward impeachment.  Innocent men have nothing to hide.

 

GO RV, then BV

It is a little tough to contest facts when no first hand facts were presented to suggest that trump did anything wrong.

Plenty of innuendos and hearsay opinions were presented. That does not make those facts. Wish list maybe. 

Every person brought before the committee that was asked if they had first hand knowledge of the phone calls or meeting all had to say no.

If you want Trump convicted on those grounds then you have no clue what the Constitution stands for or means. 

The burden of proof is on the accusers. So far the dog and pony show the Dems are putting on is only going to get Trump re elected. 

When this goes to the senate, all the senator running for election will have to come off the campaign trail and sit as jurors. They will fall from the memory of the voters. 

On top of that everybody involved with this farce will be called in to testify and the truth will be found out about the coup perpetrated on this administration. 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites
new york kevin Experienced

new york kevin

Posted
Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

Nixon and Clinton, I remember them, they provided their tax returns.....Precedent, one might say.  Innocent men have nothing to hide.

 

GO RV, then BV

Yeah, true those guy gave their tax returns . Unless it's your intention to conflate the issues, which would be so unlike you, he is not being impeached for not providing his tax returns. As I understand it , which may change again , he is accused of quid-pro-quo ; asking for a favor least I hang up the phone and you don't  get your military aid. Which the transcript shows was never asked for. He did ask Zelinski/Solensky to do him a favor and do what he ran on, which was anti-corruption in the Ukraine. Get rid of the corruption in the Ukraine , like the corruption that got the Birisma Biden investigation vaulted. If anyone abused their position of power it was Biden who bragged about the quid-pro-quo he did to get said investigation shut down, on tape in a interview. All this is the Dems weaponizing the Impeachment process, the very things our founding Fathers anticipated and did not want to ever have happened. Also, in my opinion, the Dems are getting back at the Republicans for impeaching Bill (Chester the Molester) Clinton. I believe his charges were for lying to the Congress and abuse of power. Lying to Congress, just like Flynn was forced to plea guilty to lying to the FBI. I believe Flynn's charges were the Dems getting back at the Repubs also for WJC charges. Thou with the facts out that FBI Agents doctored Flynn's testimony on his transcripts. His plea deal will get thrown out on appeal of FBI falsifying evidence , creating evidence, making it fruit of the poisoned tree and therefore in admissible as evidence. Also, the Senate trial will be set on accepted standards of due process and witnesses and cross examination on Plaintiff/Defendent sides. No hearsay admissible also. The Congresses "evidence" may also be thrown out as inadmissible and or simply by reasonable doubt. Boom-innocent. Since arogence is not a crime.

Edited by new york kevin
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shabibilicious Mentor

Shabibilicious

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, nstoolman1 said:

It is a little tough to contest facts when no first hand facts were presented to suggest that trump did anything wrong.

Plenty of innuendos and hearsay opinions were presented. That does not make those facts. Wish list maybe. 

Every person brought before the committee that was asked if they had first hand knowledge of the phone calls or meeting all had to say no.

If you want Trump convicted on those grounds then you have no clue what the Constitution stands for or means. 

The burden of proof is on the accusers. So far the dog and pony show the Dems are putting on is only going to get Trump re elected. 

When this goes to the senate, all the senator running for election will have to come off the campaign trail and sit as jurors. They will fall from the memory of the voters. 

On top of that everybody involved with this farce will be called in to testify and the truth will be found out about the coup perpetrated on this administration. 

 

 

Innocent men have nothing to hide.....blocking witnesses from speaking is obstruction, plain and simple.  As always, just my opinion.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MyLadiesDaddy Grand Master

MyLadiesDaddy

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

Innocent men have nothing to hide.....blocking witnesses from speaking is obstruction, plain and simple.  As always, just my opinion.

 

GO RV, then BV

Man you have a strange way of thinking. It's called executive privilege. And you will see EVERYONE testifie in the Senate. 

 

I CAN'T wait to see that psycho bimbo Pi$$losy and her equally psychotic brother Shiffty Schiff brought to testify in the Senate. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shabibilicious Mentor

Shabibilicious

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said:

Man you have a strange way of thinking. It's called executive privilege. And you will see EVERYONE testifie in the Senate. 

 

I CAN'T wait to see that psycho bimbo Pi$$losy and her equally psychotic brother Shiffty Schiff brought to testify in the Senate. 

 

Easy, that's a Catholic sister, brother.

 

GO RV, then BV

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

    Take This Quiz

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

  I accept