Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

GUTFELD: The Better Trump Does, The More Insane The LEFT Acts


Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

You have a problem with welfare,eh....You've convinced yourself that everybody on welfare is scamming the system, I suppose.   It's naive to think the church can replace welfare, considering the number of "Godly" people who believe ALL welfare recipients are lazy deadbeats...plus the love of money gets in the way.  

 

GO RV, then BV 

 

 

 

Great post....Thanks

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

Of course DV has it's own "lefty force"......

End Quote

 

 

Hello CL....But you do concede that's a minimal "force" compared to the righty troops here.....An absolute minority which nonetheless has the right to exist...So it is to me somehow unexplainable how some Individuals feel like complaining or better whining about too much leftism going on around here...Please ...Whoever you are thinking that....check posts and tell me if about 95% or more are "leftist"  or absolutely right-wing....Hint: it's the latter

 

And when one becomes member on DV...There's no rule ( as far as I know)  stating you have to absolutely be a right-wing individual if you wanna be a Member here and even moreso if you want to get in the political thread...I didn't see that written anywhere

 

I'm actually much surprised at some people's surprise here  that not everybody thinks / believes / likes the same when it comes to Politics or any other thing for that matter.....

 

Why should ALL think exactly the same?...On Politics, food, travel, liquors, sports, music, men, women etc??????' Diversity is one of the beautiful, stimulating, inspiring things belonging to us humans

 

All thinking alike ( the idea is already somehow monstruous imo...It would all get so boring...)...That has always been impossible as we are all different one from the other ( God created us that way...even different etnicities, races, languages etc)...It will NEVER be possible to have a total uniformity on everything.....Unless you program folks since their birth just like robots

Edited by umbertino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, coorslite21 said:

 

Perhaps you, Shabs and Caddie could create a 3rd party.....the 3 Stooges Party...

 

I'll even volenteer (pro bono) to be your campaign manager......it couldn't be any worse than what we have....you guys would have to battle it out for the top spot....

 

 

Not nice...If one of those you wrote about above had done the same thing by mentioning a few  right-wingers.....Some here would have asked for removal from Forum....

  • Haha 2
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, umbertino said:

 

 

Not nice...If one of those you wrote about above had done the same thing by mentioning a few  right-wingers.....Some here would have asked for removal from Forum....


Long as it’s against someone who is against Trump they can say anything they want. Just the way it is umbertino. 

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Shabibilicious said:

I wish enlightening you folks on the truth and the verbatim text of the U.S. Constitution paid 10 bucks an hour....I'd consider turning that cash into a VIP!" rel="">VIP membership perhaps.

 

That is not my red but you know you deserve one for that sarcastic dribble. Come on Shabbs you can do better.  

 

I know now everything that Trump has been accused of but it doesn’t matter to me anymore just like whatever the Dems do doesn’t matter to you.  You never said anything about the hard drive destruction, Biden’s Ukraine quid pro quo, or Barry’s spying.  When the Dems are honestly reported on then maybe I will let you educate me some more on our President, President Trump.  

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, umbertino said:

 

 

Not nice...If one of those you wrote about above had done the same thing by mentioning a few  right-wingers.....Some here would have asked for removal from Forum....

 

Your "not nice" comment is just a little too politically correct for me......it didn't involve you as I know you're pretty sensitive...

It's called humor....I even offered to be the campaign manager......Caddieman understood.....and B/A usually shares a flare for dry humor.....Shabs.....can be a wild card.....

 

No one is going to ban you....let it fly......I'll even start..... 

  

"Your Mother wears Army Boots".......let er rip......"who's ur Daddy?"

 

CL

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Pitcher said:

The goal is to shred the Constitution and take the country Socialist.   

 

And your go to guy called the Emoluments Clause "phony"....an actual clause from the U.S. Constitution penned by the founders for the eventual appearance of someone like Trump.  "Phony"...let that sink in, and tell me again who has a problem with the U.S. Constitution and that you could care less.

 

GO RV, then BV 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

And your go to guy called the Emoluments Clause "phony"....an actual clause from the U.S. Constitution penned by the founders for the eventual appearance of someone like Trump.  "Phony"...let that sink in, and tell me again who has a problem with the U.S. Constitution and that you could care less.

 

GO RV, then BV 

 

Because I am your campaign manager can you help me with this aspect of the constitution...?

I have often questioned this one.....

 

The Contract Clause appears in the United States Constitution, Article I, section 10, clause 1:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

Although the clause recognizes people's right to form contracts, it allows the government to create laws barring contracts offending public policy, such as contracts for sex or for child labor.

The clause immediately follows Article I section 9, which prohibits the federal government from passing bills of attainder and ex post facto laws, or granting titles of nobility, adding a number of restrictions to the states.

 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, coorslite21 said:

 

Because I am your campaign manager can you help me with this aspect of the constitution...?

I have often questioned this one.....

 

The Contract Clause appears in the United States Constitution, Article I, section 10, clause 1:

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

Although the clause recognizes people's right to form contracts, it allows the government to create laws barring contracts offending public policy, such as contracts for sex or for child labor.

The clause immediately follows Article I section 9, which prohibits the federal government from passing bills of attainder and ex post facto laws, or granting titles of nobility, adding a number of restrictions to the states.

 

 

 

As you've started a thread on the matter, it appears you've reconciled your own question concerning the restriction of states rights.  You think Donald has ever scanned through the constitution to glean the do's and don'ts of his station...particularly that "phony" Emoluments Clause?

 

GO RV, then BV 

Edited by Shabibilicious
  • Haha 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

 

As you've started a thread on the matter, it appears you've reconciled your own question concerning the restriction of states rights.  You think Donald has ever scanned through the constitution to glean the do's and don'ts of his station...particularly that "phony" Emoluments Clause?

 

GO RV, then BV 

 

Try reading it yourself......very straight forward......has Trump committed an impeachable Emolument offense......not that I can see.....CL

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, coorslite21 said:

 

Try reading it yourself......very straight forward......has Trump committed an impeachable Emolument offense......not that I can see.....CL

 

He was talked off the ledge by just about everybody but his base in regards to Doral.....Trump Hotel Washington is another story altogether.

 

GO RV, then BV

  • Upvote 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.