bostonangler Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Pitcher said: Rules, NOW you’re going to show us the rules. WHAT ABOUT HRC, Biden, Obama, and Warren. They have all been in on the Pay for play, peddling influence schemes. I've said it many times... Anyone who is found guilty of breaking the law, should go down. This is not a question of politics or party, or it shouldn't be. It should be justice for all... Unlike so many here who refuse to admit or accept Trump is a criminal and has been in life for many years and call him out, I would accept prosecution for anyone in any party. So people here who want to rag me, need to be honest and admit if they are willing to accept criminals to control their government. If cannot admit you accept criminal activity, then you really shouldn't say much. JMHO B/A 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Pitcher said: That is just not true BA, Go check out Project Veritas for some truth on Government workers. Sorry Pitcher, but I'm more likely to believe aliens planted us here on earth, than the idea millions of government workers are in on a conspiracy to take down America. The idea of government workers wanting to destroy their means of making a living is as unlikely as my dog saying no to that T-Bone left over from dinner last night. B/A 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coorslite21 Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 B/A......says... "I'm implying, the grand conspiracy concept is laughable. " Perhaps it's not "grand conspiracy"..... especially when they were saying before he was even elected they would impeach him.....seems straight forward.....they are following though on what the said the would do......which is rare... And no......none of this is laughable.... CL 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 "Justice for all", BA....? Like the crap the left pulled on Kavanaugh... Like that delusional crap read before Congress before the actual call transcript was read...? Like KILLary still running loose after destroying & laying waste to e-mails & devices...? Like Hunter the druggie making Billions riding around in We The People's plane all over the world..? Like Auntie Maxine calling for violence against We The People..? ETC, ETC, ETC. PUH-LEEZE ! 1 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitcher Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, bostonangler said: This is not a question of politics or party, or it shouldn't be. It should be justice for all... Unlike so many here who refuse to admit or accept Trump is a criminal and has been in life for many years and call him out, I would accept prosecution for anyone in any party. So people here who want to rag me, need to be honest and admit if they are willing to accept criminals to control their government. If cannot admit you accept criminal activity, then you really shouldn't say much. I have to agree with Rules should be applied equally. You can accuse Trump of whatever you want but I’ve not seen evidence yet to indict him. I have seen, read and heard evidence on HRC ( destroying hard drives), Biden, ( on tape saying exactly what the Dems are trying to Impeach Trump on) Obama ( bribing Iran and Europe with tax dollars). Warren ( received campaign money illegally). Why don’t these people get Investigated. 1 6 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coorslite21 Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, Pitcher said: I have to agree with Rules should be applied equally. You can accuse Trump of whatever you want but I’ve not seen evidence yet to indict him. I have seen, read and heard evidence on HRC ( destroying hard drives), Biden, ( on tape saying exactly what the Dems are trying to Impeach Trump on) Obama ( bribing Iran and Europe with tax dollars). Warren ( received campaign money illegally). Why don’t these people get Investigated. Amen! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, coorslite21 said: B/A......says... "I'm implying, the grand conspiracy concept is laughable. " Perhaps it's not "grand conspiracy"..... especially when they were saying before he was even elected they would impeach him.....seems straight forward.....they are following though on what the said the would do......which is rare... And no......none of this is laughable.... CL BA doesn't get it, COORS.... he's too far gone to be reasoned with. His kool-aid consumption has rendered him an inert tool for the left. Either that, or he's intentionally stoking the flames here in an attempt to remain relevant. You know, like SHABS & the Italian fascist do.... same m.o. . 1 3 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pitcher Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 4 minutes ago, bostonangler said: Sorry Pitcher, but I'm more likely to believe aliens planted us here on earth, than the idea millions of government workers are in on a conspiracy to take down America. Th It doesn’t have to be millions of Government workers. Just a few thousand in key leadership roles. People like Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Strozck, Orr, leakers in the WH, and complicit National Media. Go look up Project Veritas. 2 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coorslite21 Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Pitcher said: It doesn’t have to be millions of Government workers. Just a few thousand in key leadership roles. People like Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Strozck, Orr, leakers in the WH, and complicit National Media. Go look up Project Veritas. It doesn't take a village......often times it only takes one village idiot......to get the ball rolling.... CL 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SgtFuryUSCZ Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 minute ago, Pitcher said: It doesn’t have to be millions of Government workers. Just a few thousand in key leadership roles. People like Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Strozck, Orr, leakers in the WH, and complicit National Media. Go look up Project Veritas. If BA gets near a Project Veritas truth... his head will explode. 1 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karsten Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 POTUS Trump is the 1st President in a Long Time to actually take the Job Seriously and even attempt to ferret out the Evil and Corruption that has been Ruling this country for a very long time. That is why everyone seems to hate him....They all know he is a threat to the way the swamp runs and the Moneys Flow. They all know what they have done and been doing for a every long time and all the laws they have broken that would land anyone else in Prison or worse. Had Hillarious won the WH we would never know what all had happened to put her their....Poof, it would all be gone, Bleach Bit, Smashed Phones and Servers, and the corruption would have Sky Rockets destroying the Country and the Dream America Was Build On. It would have been obama's 3rd term and his chance to continue his plan to ruin the American Life, destroy Christianity and Assure in Islam and Sharia Law. Guns of all kinds would be Banned, Ammo Taxed to the point the Gun were useless, all excess ammo taken to the desert and Burned just like under obama to create a shortage, gas would again skyrocket and all over people would be losing jobs again. That is the real reason they hate Trump....The Liberals are losing control and they know it and there isn't a damn thing they can do to stop it. Karsten 3 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caddieman Posted October 3, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 hour ago, Indraman said: Isn't it interesting that the whole Trump-Russia Collusion was based on the theory that we needed to expose the interference by Russia in our 2016 elections? When the net did not fall far enough to ensnare Trump, they then reverted to fabricating evidence and spying on Trump, his campaign, and his Administration. When Trump then proposes that we look at the true conspirators who fabricated the Trump-Russia Collusion HOAX, the LEFT, the Media, and our Marxist Comrades in Arms on this forum follow suit with condemning this as an impeachable offense. Well, most Americans see this for what it is, and Trump will be reelected in 2020 because of this and many other instances of injustice. Indy Bad form Indy..........just sayen. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coorslite21 Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 Ooopps gotta go....my pay master in Reno just informed me that the pink dragon family from China headed by black hat Joe Biden is releasing funds to be flown in by OKIE on his biplane... can't tell you the rate......but I'm sure it will be soooooon.......over and out! CL 9 minutes ago, Pitcher said: I have to agree with Rules should be applied equally. You can accuse Trump of whatever you want but I’ve not seen evidence yet to indict him. I have seen, read and heard evidence on HRC ( destroying hard drives), Biden, ( on tape saying exactly what the Dems are trying to Impeach Trump on) Obama ( bribing Iran and Europe with tax dollars). Warren ( received campaign money illegally). Why don’t these people get Investigated. Amen! 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveh12 Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 I did'nt know Archie Buker was Here? Kommie, you forgot Pinko, Meat Head!! 😝 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 39 minutes ago, coorslite21 said: The story has been around since 2013....so it'snot new......that's when both Joe and Hunter visited China when Joe was VP.... Sorry, CL....I meant "new" in the sense of Donald's willingness to add help from China to his impeachment resume'. GO RV, then BV 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shabibilicious Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 20 minutes ago, SgtFuryUSCZ said: BA doesn't get it, COORS.... he's too far gone to be reasoned with. His kool-aid consumption has rendered him an inert tool for the left. Either that, or he's intentionally stoking the flames here in an attempt to remain relevant. You know, like SHABS & the Italian fascist do.... same m.o. . Ooh...like split personalities from the zone. GO RV, then BV 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caddieman Posted October 3, 2019 Author Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 It all comes down to this 35% of the nation thinks Trump can do and has not done anything wrong. It’s all made up. It’s the deep state. Etc etc. On this form I’d say it’s about 70%. About 35% of the nation think he should have been impeached years ago. But the other 30% of the nation is going to decide the next election. And I don’t think Trump is winning any of them over. 1 1 1 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 1 hour ago, Pitcher said: It doesn’t have to be millions of Government workers. Just a few thousand in key leadership roles. People like Comey, McCabe, Brennan, Clapper, Strozck, Orr, leakers in the WH, and complicit National Media. Go look up Project Veritas. Most of those people are Trump people.. Some are from before, but it seems he didn't do a good job vetting... B/A 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 WASHINGTON Fox News' senior judicial analyst, Andrew Napolitano, said Thursday that the summary released by the White House of a July 25 phone call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky demonstrates "both criminal and impeachable behavior" by Trump. Though the president has said it was a "perfect call" and that the summary exonerates him, Napolitano said in an opinion piece that the call showed that Trump was guilty of violating campaign finance law, bribery and intimidating witnesses. The former New Jersey judge's opinion made a social media splash because he works for a cable news networkthat is home to pro-Trump media figures like Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, Jeanine Pirro and the hosts of "Fox & Friends." The article repeated several points Napolitano has made on-air since the scandal broke. Napolitano has bucked his conservative colleagues before, particularly with his viewthatspecial counsel Robert Mueller also revealed impeachable offenses. Perilous times for Trump: By 45%-38%, Americans support impeaching him over Ukraine allegations, poll finds "The criminal behavior to which Trump has admitted is much more grave than anything alleged or unearthed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and much of what Mueller revealed was impeachable," Napolitano wrote Thursday about Trump's call toZelensky. The call is at the center of an impeachment inquiry after a whistleblower complaint accusedTrump of"using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election." Trump is alleged to have used approved military aid as leverage to demand that Ukraine investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, who has generally led in Democratic primary polling. Though the president and his defenders have denied evidence of a "quid pro quo" in the phone call,Napolitano said that Trump's request for a "favor" afterZelensky spoke of his need for anti-tank missiles was a "clear unmistakable inference" that approved military aid "would be held up until the favor was delivered." "The favor he sought was dirt on Biden." Impeachment pressure: Trump says China should investigate Joe Biden, family Napolitano also said the "president need not have committed a crime in order to be impeached, but he needs to have engaged in behavior that threatens the constitutional stability of the United States or the rule of law as we have come to know it." The judge decried Trump's verbal attacks on the whistleblower and "suggesting that the whistleblower and those who have helped him are spies and ought to be treated as spies were in 'the old days'(Trumps phrase) that is, by hanging." He called Trump's "allusions to violence are palpably dangerous" and said they "will give cover to crazies who crave violence, as other intemperate words of his have done." And he said that Trump's retweet of a pastor's suggestion that impeachment could lead to civil war was "a dog whistle to the deranged." Napolitano expressed shock that Trump would try to engage a country to interfere in the 2020 election immediately after Mueller's investigation, which outlined a "sweeping and systematic" Russian campaign to sway the 2016 election. "Now he has attempted in one phone call to bring the Ukrainian government into the 2020 election! Does he understand the laws he has sworn to uphold?" Napolitano asked. "It was to remedy just such reckless, constitutionally destructive behavior that impeachment was intended." Napolitano's opinion sparked the ire of many Fox News viewersas well as Fox News contributor and former U.S. AttorneyJoe DiGenova who calledNapolitano "a fool" during an appearance on "Tucker Carlson Tonight." "Nothing that the president said on that call or what we think he said on that call constitutes a crime,"DiGenova said. "And even if he had said you're not going to get the money it would not be a crime." Says the constitutional expert. B/A 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nstoolman1 Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 2 hours ago, Indraman said: Isn't it interesting that the whole Trump-Russia Collusion was based on the theory that we needed to expose the interference by Russia in our 2016 elections? When the net did not fall far enough to ensnare Trump, they then reverted to fabricating evidence and spying on Trump, his campaign, and his Administration. When Trump then proposes that we look at the true conspirators who fabricated the Trump-Russia Collusion HOAX, the LEFT, the Media, and our Marxist Comrades in Arms on this forum follow suit with condemning this as an impeachable offense. Well, most Americans see this for what it is, and Trump will be reelected in 2020 because of this and many other instances of injustice. Indy Good form Indy. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 NEW YORK (Reuters) - The number of Americans who believe President Donald Trump should be impeached rose by 8 percentage points over the past week as more people learned about allegations that Trump pressured Ukraine to smear his top Democratic political rival Joe Biden, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Monday. The Sept. 26-30 opinion poll found that 45% of adults believe Republican Trump "should be impeached," compared with 37% in a similar poll that ran last week. Another 41% said that Trump should not be impeached and 15% said they "don't know." Among Democrats, 74% said Trump should be impeached, up 8 points over the past week, while 13% of Republicans said they supported impeachment, up 3 points. It was unchanged among independents at 37%. The poll findings mirror several other recent opinion polls, which have shown that public support has increased recently for an impeachment inquiry into Trump. Full poll results: https://tmsnrt.rs/2n3AYWx The American public has been increasingly focused on the question of impeachment following a whistleblower complaint about a July phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy. The U.S. House of Representatives initiated an impeachment inquiry of Trump last week after a whistleblower report raised concerns that Trump tried to leverage nearly $400 million in U.S. aid in exchange for a political favor from Zelenskiy involving an investigation of Joe Biden, the former vice president and leading Democratic presidential contender. The poll of more than 2,200 U.S. adults found that 34% had heard “a great deal” about the Ukraine scandal this week, about twice the number of people who had been paying close attention when compared with last week. Another 30% said they have heard “some” details about the Ukraine call. When asked what they thought about the news, 43% said “president Trump is trying to smear Joe Biden ahead of the 2020 presidential campaign,” up 4 points from last week. The poll also found that 66% of American adults said any elected official "should be removed" from office if they work with a foreign government to attack a political rival. That included 46% of Republicans, 88% of Democrats and about two-thirds of independents. The fact that a smaller number of respondents - 45% - said that Trump should be impeached, however, suggests that many of them did not believe allegations against Trump or had yet to conclude Trump had indeed worked with Ukraine to damage Biden. Public opinion may continue to shift as more information is revealed. But University of Michigan political scientist Nicholas Valentino said that support for Trump’s impeachment should level off unless Republican leaders join Democrats in publicly criticizing the president. “People aren’t constitutional scholars,” Valentino said. “They trust their elected officials from their party to know the rules of politics. And when members of their own party say that someone has broken the rules, that’s when public opinion will really begin to change.” The Reuters/Ipsos poll was conducted online, in English, throughout the United States. It gathered responses from 2,234 adults, including 944 Democrats and 855 Republicans. It has a credibility interval, a measure of precision, of 4 percentage points. 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyLadiesDaddy Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 We're all making a mistake here, B/A, Shabbs and Cadiman understand the truth. It's just that they must tow the party agenda. No possible way they don't get it. 1 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 5 minutes ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said: We're all making a mistake here, B/A, Shabbs and Cadiman understand the truth. It's just that they must tow the party agenda. No possible way they don't get it. Post of the day for comic relief... Thanks for the chuckles... B/A 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coorslite21 Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 31 minutes ago, bostonangler said: WASHINGTON Fox News' senior judicial analyst, Andrew Napolitano, said Thursday that the summary released by the White House of a July 25 phone call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky demonstrates "both criminal and impeachable behavior" by Trump. Though the president has said it was a "perfect call" and that the summary exonerates him, Napolitano said in an opinion piece that the call showed that Trump was guilty of violating campaign finance law, bribery and intimidating witnesses. The former New Jersey judge's opinion made a social media splash because he works for a cable news networkthat is home to pro-Trump media figures like Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, Jeanine Pirro and the hosts of "Fox & Friends." The article repeated several points Napolitano has made on-air since the scandal broke. Napolitano has bucked his conservative colleagues before, particularly with his viewthatspecial counsel Robert Mueller also revealed impeachable offenses. Perilous times for Trump: By 45%-38%, Americans support system" rel="">support impeaching him over Ukraine allegations, poll finds "The criminal behavior to which Trump has admitted is much more grave than anything alleged or unearthed by Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and much of what Mueller revealed was impeachable," Napolitano wrote Thursday about Trump's call toZelensky. The call is at the center of an impeachment inquiry after a whistleblower complaint accusedTrump of"using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election." Trump is alleged to have used approved military aid as leverage to demand that Ukraine investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, who has generally led in Democratic primary polling. Though the president and his defenders have denied evidence of a "quid pro quo" in the phone call,Napolitano said that Trump's request for a "favor" afterZelensky spoke of his need for anti-tank missiles was a "clear unmistakable inference" that approved military aid "would be held up until the favor was delivered." "The favor he sought was dirt on Biden." Impeachment pressure: Trump says China should investigate Joe Biden, family Napolitano also said the "president need not have committed a crime in order to be impeached, but he needs to have engaged in behavior that threatens the constitutional stability of the United States or the rule of law as we have come to know it." The judge decried Trump's verbal attacks on the whistleblower and "suggesting that the whistleblower and those who have helped him are spies and ought to be treated as spies were in 'the old days'(Trumps phrase) that is, by hanging." He called Trump's "allusions to violence are palpably dangerous" and said they "will give cover to crazies who crave violence, as other intemperate words of his have done." And he said that Trump's retweet of a pastor's suggestion that impeachment could lead to civil war was "a dog whistle to the deranged." Napolitano expressed shock that Trump would try to engage a country to interfere in the 2020 election immediately after Mueller's investigation, which outlined a "sweeping and systematic" Russian campaign to sway the 2016 election. "Now he has attempted in one phone call to bring the Ukrainian government into the 2020 election! Does he understand the laws he has sworn to uphold?" Napolitano asked. "It was to remedy just such reckless, constitutionally destructive behavior that impeachment was intended." Napolitano's opinion sparked the ire of many Fox News viewersas well as Fox News contributor and former U.S. AttorneyJoe DiGenova who calledNapolitano "a fool" during an appearance on "Tucker Carlson Tonight." "Nothing that the president said on that call or what we think he said on that call constitutes a crime,"DiGenova said. "And even if he had said you're not going to get the money it would not be a crime." Says the constitutional expert. B/A Napolitano is a smart guy......or perhaps he's related to someone.......7 years as a State Judge in NJ......last on the bench 20 years ago.......and as a part time expert on FOX he draws north of 500 K a year. More interesting is that he farms Blueberries......very successfully......guess that makes him a Earthy legal expert..... FOX is experiencing change.....Conservative old man Rupert is in his mid nineties......his 2 very liberal sons are transitioning FOX in the direction of a CNN........Watch the weekend line up.....you'll see the direction their taking.......add the Donna Brazille hire.......the fill in DNC head who forwarded the CNN debate questions ahead of time to HRC........and the direction FOX is headed is pretty clear......CL 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bostonangler Posted October 3, 2019 Report Share Posted October 3, 2019 2 minutes ago, coorslite21 said: Napolitano is a smart guy......or perhaps he's related to someone.......7 years as a State Judge in NJ......last on the bench 20 years ago.......and as a part time expert on FOX he draws north of 500 K a year. More interesting is that he farms Blueberries......very successfully......guess that makes him a Earthy legal expert..... FOX is experiencing change.....Conservative old man Rupert is in his mid nineties......his 2 very liberal sons are transitioning FOX in the direction of a CNN........Watch the weekend line up.....you'll see the direction their taking.......add the Donna Brazille hire.......the fill in DNC head who forwarded the CNN debate questions ahead of time to HRC........and the direction FOX is headed is pretty clear......CL So you're saying they are balancing.. Fair and balanced... That would be refreshing for all the media outlets. B/A 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.