Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.



  • Similar Content

    • By bigwave
      PROFESSOR FIRED OVER DOCUMENTING INCREASES IN POLAR BEAR POPULATIONS
      Nobody has done more to sink the claim that climate change is endangering polar bears than zoologist Susan Crockford — and she may have paid for it with her job.
       
      After 15 years as an adjunct assistant professor, Ms. Crockford said the University of Victoria rejected without explanation in May her renewal application, despite her high profile as a speaker and author stemming from her widely cited research on polar bears and dog domestication.
       
      Ms. Crockford accused officials at the Canadian university of bowing to “outside pressure,” the result of her research showing that polar bear populations are stable and even thriving, not plummeting as a result of shrinking Arctic sea ice, defying claims of the climate change movement.
       
      Her dismissal, which she announced Wednesday in a post on her Polar Bear Science blog, has spurred alarm over the implications for academic freedom and the rise of the “cancel culture” for professors and scientists who challenge climate catastrophe predictions.
       
      “When push came to shove, UVic threw me under the bus rather than stand up for my academic freedom,” said Ms. Crockford, who earned a Ph.D. in interdisciplinary studies, specifically biology and anthropology, in 2004.
       
      Ms. Crockford cited numerous instances of the university promoting her interviews and work, including her participation in a 2007 PBS “Nature” documentary about dog domestication and evolution, as well as her appearances at K-12 schools and adult groups for 10 years through the University of Victoria Speakers Bureau.
       
      That supportive climate changed two years ago. In May 2017, her lectures were shut down after the speakers bureau received a complaint about her “lack of balance,”
       
      “The speakers’ bureau incident made it clear the administration had no intention of protecting my academic freedom against complaints from outside the university,” Ms. Crockford said in an email to The Washington Times.
       
      UVic Associate Vice President Michele Parkin responded with a letter challenging the assertion that Ms. Crockford was let go for “telling school kids politically incorrect facts about polar bears.” She was referring to a recent headline in the National Post of Toronto.
       
      “There is no evidence to suggest that Dr. Crockford’s adjunct appointment was not renewed for ‘telling school kids politically incorrect facts about polar bears,’” said Ms. Parkin. “The University of Victoria, in both word and deed, supports academic freedom and free debate on academic issues.”
      The statement fell short of denying that Ms. Crockford’s dismissal was linked to her polar bear scholarship, which almost single-handedly blew up the climate change movement’s promotion of the bears as iconic victims of anthropogenic global warming.
       
      Her books include “The Polar Bear Catastrophe That Never Happened,” published in February, in which she said the bears are not threatened. She noted that the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s 2015 Red List of Threatened Species puts polar bear numbers at 22,000 to 31,000 despite a widespread belief that the population has dropped to a few thousand.
      Read full story here…https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/75262/professor-fired-over-documenting-increases-in-polar-bear.html
    • By bigwave
      Physicists Discover CO2 Cannot Cause Global Warming
      October 20, 2019 by IWB Physicists: CO2 Molecules Retain Heat Just 0.0001 Of A Second, Meaning CO2-Driven Warming ‘Not Possible’   Mainstream climate science claims CO2 molecules “slow down the rate of heat-loss from the surface” like a blanket does. And yet the rate at which a CO2 molecule retains or slows down heat loss is, at most, a negligible 0.0001 of a second. A CO2 concentration of 300 ppm versus 400 ppm will
      therefore have no detectable impact.
       
      SkepticalScience, a blog spearheaded by climate science “consensus” advocate John Cook, is widely considered the explanatory guidebook for the anthropogenic global warming movement.
      The blog claims CO2 molecules, with a representation of 4 parts in 10,000 in the atmosphere (400 parts per million, or ppm), collectively function like a blanket does in slowing down the rate at which the human body cools.

      The rate or time lapse involved in this “slowing” of heat loss is problematic to the paradigm that says CO2 drives global warming, however.
       
      Professor Nasif Nahle has mathematically assessed the rate at which heat is retained by CO2 molecules; his work was endorsed by the Faculty of Physics of the University of Nuevo Leon (Mexico).
      Nahle found the “mean free path” for a quantum wave to pass through the atmosphere before colliding with a CO2 molecule is about 33 meters (Nahle, 2011a). Such a wide chasm between molecular collisions would appear to undermine a visualization of CO2 functioning like a blanket does.
       
      Even more saliently, Nahle determined that the rate at which CO2 molecules can retain heat at the surface may only last about 0.0001 of a second (Nahle, 2011b).
      If heat-loss is slowed down at a rate of 0.0001 of a second by CO2 molecules, the atmospheric CO2 concentration – whether it’s 300 ppm or 400 ppm – effectively doesn’t matter. The time lapse differential would be immaterial for either concentration.
       
      Consequently, Nahle concludes “carbon dioxide has not an effect on climate changes or warming periods on the Earth”.
       
      notrickszone.com/2019/10/17/phys…-possible/
      There has never been any evidence that CO2 caused warming on any time period. The Antarctic and Greenland Ice cores show CO2 rise always follows warming and does not cause it:
      New research in Antarctica shows CO2 follows temperature “by a few hundred years at most”
      Anthony Watts / July 23, 2012

      The question of “which comes first, the temperature or the CO2 rise?” has been much like the proverbial “which came first, the chicken or the egg?” question. This seems to settle it – temperature came first, followed by an increase in CO2 outgassing from the ocean surrounding Antarctica.
      “Our analyses of ice cores from the ice sheet in Antarctica shows that the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere follows the rise in Antarctic temperatures very closely and is staggered by a few hundred years at most,” –

      wattsupwiththat.com/2012/07/23/n…s-at-most/
      joannenova.com.au/global-warming-…ore-graph/
      If CO2 caused warming why are present temperatures so low? 8,000 years ago at the Holocene climate optimum temperatures were at least 3 degrees Celsius warmer, but CO2 was almost half what it is today:

      The elite pushing global warming want money, YOUR money, and they want to control energy to enslave the world. Don’t buy it, look into the fraud.
       
      edmhdotme.wordpress.com/2015/06/…warming-2/
      For 600 million years CO2 has varied widely from 200 PPM to 20 times what it is today. Here is a chart of temperature and CO2 over that period. As you can see there is no relation between the two. In fact in the last 65 million years CO2 has declined as the Cretaceous warmed. This chart alone shows the lie that is modern climate theory. CO2 has no warming ability AT ALL!
      For the rest see: https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/physicists-discover-co2-cannot-cause-global-warming/
    • By bigwave
      https://www.accuweather.com/en/weather-news/historic-allout-blizzard-to-bury-huge-swath-of-central-us-unleash-punishing-cold-blast/598076
    • By bigwave
      https://www.iflscience.com/environment/it-snowed-in-the-arizona-desert-and-the-photos-are-beautiful/
    • By bigwave
      Pikes Peak isn’t the only high-country mountain starting to turn white before the aspens turn yellow. It snowed on top of the appropriately-named Snowmass Mountain near Aspen on Aug. 23.
        Snowfall at the end of summer isn’t unusual for Colorado’s highest elevations, according to the National Weather Service in Pueblo, although the heavier snows that bring inches and even feet of accumulation to the mountain peaks probably won’t start until October.
      Once the snowfall starts, visitors to Colorado’s fourteeners should expect snow at the top until April or even May.
      https://theknow.denverpost.com/2018/09/06/snow-colorado-14ers/194703/
      278
  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.