Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

Iraq: The judiciary calls for the speedy completion of the investigation into the killing of demonstrators


 Share

Recommended Posts

Jaafar: The decision of the Federal Court on Article 140 is intriguing

11:17 - 04/08/2019
0
%D9%83%D8%B1%D9%83%D9%88%D9%83-696x409.j

Information / Baghdad ..

The Secretary General of the Islamic Union of the Turkmen Iraq Jassem Mohammed Jafar, on Sunday, that the Federal Court's decision to extend Article 140 on Kirkuk has become a discord at this time, calling on the Prime Minister to resolve the issue of Kirkuk and disputed areas during a meeting of all components of the province.

Jaafar said in a statement to the information, that "the Turkmen are part of the political process and believe in the Constitution and that any decision issued by the Federal Court must be adhered to, but the issuance at this time provoke sedition as he preferred to impose the will of one component."

He added that “Article 140 originally concerns the province of Kirkuk only and I was one of the attendees and contributors in writing at the time, but the Kurdish component exploited the expansion of the claim through the phrase in the article, which is (disputed areas),” indicating that “no one of the components in Kirkuk, including the Kurds from the application of the article at the present time because there are differences between the Arab and Turkmen component on the one hand and the Kurdish component on the other hand and even the Kurdish component has differences as well.

Jaafar pointed out that "the timing of the decision is incorrect and will cause sedition among the components because he preferred to impose the will of one component on the rest of the components," calling on the Prime Minister to "resolve the issue of Kirkuk and disputed areas during a meeting of all components of the province." Ends / 25 m

https://www.almaalomah.com/2019/08/04/421519/

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Christian MP reveals who is blocking the vote on the Federal Court Law

parlaman.jpeg

 

 

Politics ofYonadam We werethe Federal Court Act of thePuritansWilayat al-Faqih

 2019/08/04 06:13:43

 

The deputy of the Christian component in the Iraqi parliament, Yonadim Kanna, on Sunday, that religious militants are blocking the vote on the law of the Federal Court.

"Religious extremists want to give veto power to the jurists, who are members of the federal court," Kanna told Shafaq News.

"It is not possible to make the Federal Court, like (Fakih Wilayat), which is in Iran, the cleric is in control of the highest judicial authority in the country, and this dispute has been going on for about 12 years."

Kanna explained that "this law and this controversial paragraph has been on the table since 2007, and religious militants, are the reason for the disruption of the vote on the law."

Partisan parties in Iraq are seeking to impose their authority on the judiciary.

Although this move towards the judiciary is pushed towards them under the slogan "religious jurisprudence", but its motives and motives remain political, an attempt to subjugate the judiciary under the name of "religion", to be the authority of religious lawmakers, who have the influence to pass and disrupt the decision .

https://www.shafaaq.com/ar/سیاسة/نائب-مسيحي-يكشف-عن-الجهة-المعرقلة-للتصويت-على-قانون-المحكمة-الاتحادية/

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Parliamentary Legal: Do not concede the "jurists" in the Federal Court

Parliamentary Legal: Do not concede the "jurists" in the Federal Court

 
Baghdad / Shaima Rashid
 
 
The parliamentary legal committee confirmed that the presence of clerics and jurisprudence from within the federal court system is very important and stipulated in the Constitution and will not give up their presence there, noting that the rejection of the Iraqi Fiqh Academy and some quarters to involve Sharia scholars in the components of the Federal Court "expresses their opinion and does not express an opinion Other components of society. "
A member of the Legal Committee Hussein al-Oqabi in a statement to "morning": "The rejection of the jurisprudence of the existence of scholars in the Federal Court, expresses his point of view and does not reflect the rest of the components of society, and the Constitution is clear and clear and provides that experts of Islamic jurisprudence are part of the composition of the Court Federal. "
He added, "We will not give up the existence of scholars of jurisprudence in the Federal Court because then it would be a violation and a clear violation of the Constitution," noting that "the draft law of the Federal Court received from the government as well as the opinion of the Supreme Judicial Council with the presence of scholars."
He continued: "We are talking about a federal court to consider the constitutionality of laws, and the constitutional system in Iraq historically and since the founding of the modern Iraqi state stipulates that (Islamic law be part of it)."
Al-Oqabi explained that "the conditions of religious scholars elected in the court in accordance with articles II and III of the Federal Court Law stipulate that they are experienced and personalities who adhere to the principles of Islam and legislation that does not conflict with him and have experience in scientific fields related to humanitarian issues, as well as experience no less than He added that "the nomination of the jurists will be from the Sunni and Shiite endowments and the Ministry of Awqaf in the region and their number as determined by the law four jurists," noting that "the law is still in the stage of discussions and study."
The Iraqi Fiqh Council announced its rejection of the inclusion of legal scholars in the Federal Court, pointing out that "the provisions of the current court law is a time bomb that would break up the national fabric."
A member of the Fiqh Council and preacher of Abu Hanifa al-Nu'man Abdul Wahab al-Samarrai said: "There is another problem facing Iraq is to seek to pass the law of the Federal Supreme Court, which is the highest legal authority to resolve the problems in the Constitution of disputes." He warned the member of the Fiqh Academy, "from turning constitutional differences into sectarian disputes that divide the Iraqi public and the fragmentation of the people, which brings the lineups to the stage of conflict," stressing that "the authorization of the jurisprudential side in this matter will necessarily turn into a cause that divides the differences of doctrines."
The talk of the Iraqi Fiqh Academy last Friday comes with the widening of the campaign launched by jurists and intellectuals to preserve the legal environment of the Federal Court and prevent the inclusion of clerics and jurists in the Federal Court Law, which adds a new division of society, according to the objectors of the law, and we present the most important positions objected in the past days. 
The head of the Chaldean Church in Iraq and the world, Louis Saco, recently called on the Iraqi parliament to stop discussing the law of the Federal Supreme Court, and redrafting it to suit 
With the Constitution.
Sako said in a statement received "morning": "We ask the President of the Parliament Mohammed Halbousi to stop the discussion of the draft law of the Federal Supreme Court, and redraft it in accordance 
With the constitution, he added, "we were surprised by a draft submitted to the House of Representatives to give a religious character to the Federal Supreme Court, appointing experts in Islamic law, who are nominated by the Office of the Shiite and Sunni Endowment, while the Office of Endowments of Christian, Yezidi and Sabean Mandaean."
Yazidi scholar Khaldoun al-Nisani said: "The draft law of the Federal Court is misplaced. It sends a message of insecurity to the religious minorities in Iraq and is concerned about the interference of clerics from the Sunni and Shiite waqfs in the work of the Supreme Court and its future independence."
For his part, Judge Zuhair Kazim Abboud said: "The addition of Islamic jurisprudence experts to the court, contrary to the constitutional provision (Article 92, paragraph 2 of the Constitution), which provides that the composition of the Federal Court of a number of judges, and experts in Islamic jurisprudence and jurists, The expert is not a member, and the expert provides his expertise to the court in matters within his competence, but his opinion does not bind or restrict the court in all cases, and the court can take from his report the reason for the ruling, and make a number of jurists in the law or jurisprudence members of the Federal Supreme Court Violates the constitution. "
In his view, former President of the Commission on Integrity Judge Rahim al-Okaili that "the design of the court in such a distorted form a harsh stab at the heart of the civil state and put the bayonets of the guardians of Sharia at the forefront of any attempts to adopt the concept of citizenship rather than different sectarian identities." 
In parallel with these objections, activists on social networking sites launched a campaign "jurisprudence of the court", to amend the draft law of the Federal Court as it provides for the inclusion of jurists in Islamic affairs as members of the Federal Court. 
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

101834.jpg?width=750&&height=375

 
2019/08/06 09:22
  • Number of readings 92
  • Section: Iraq
  •  
  •  

Legal Committee: The Federal Court operates in accordance with Law 30 by a non-elected authority

BAGHDAD / The obelisk: The Legal Committee in the House of Representatives, on Tuesday, 6 August 2019, that the Federal Court, is currently operating under Law "30", which was launched in 2005, by an un elected authority.

"The legislation of the Federal Court Law is a very important and strategic subject in the structure of the Iraqi state, and we must proceed to vote on it as soon as possible," said Hussein al-Aqabi, a member of the committee. "The delay in voting on the law is a serious imbalance in the structure of the legislative Iraqi state, , Especially after the delay of legislation law for nearly 15 years. "

"The Federal Court is currently operating, according to law" 30 "which was initiated in 2005, by an un elected authority, by the government of Iyad Allawi, which was taking legislative and executive work.

The member of the Legal Committee in the House of Representatives, that "the legislation of the Federal Court Act, according to the Iraqi Constitution is an imperative," noting that "some members of the Federal Court, they are very old age, and there are some gaps and imbalances and lack of Law 30, Through the legislation of the Federal Court Act. " 

Follow the obelisk

http://almasalah.com/ar/news/176103/اللجنة-القانونية-المحكمة-الاتحادية-تعمل-وفق-قانون-30-من-قبل-سلطة-غير-منتخبة

 
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

40431.jpg?watermark=w4

Disclosure of differences between Zidane and Mahmoud delay the adoption of the Federal Court Act

 06 Aug

 

0

 

 Number of readings:

  

BAGHDAD: Sumer News Iraqi politician Laith Shubar revealed the existence of a dispute between the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Supreme Court Zaidan and Federal Court President Medhat al-Mahmoud delays the adoption of the Federal Court law, likely to reach a "compromise" to pass the law. "There is a legal political conflict between the Judicial Council and the Federal Court," Shubar said in televised remarks followed by Sumer News. "The dispute between Fayek Zaidan and Medhat al-Mahmoud delays the adoption of the Federal Court Law." He preferred to reach a "compromise solution to the dispute on the law of the Federal Court," asserting that "the law of the Federal Court will be approved during the next chapter." "The political hype contributed to the delay of the House of Representatives in approving the laws," said Shubar, who is close to Prime Minister Adel Abdul Mahdi.

https://sumer.news/ar/news/40204/الكشف-عن-خلافات-بين-زيدان-والمحمود-تؤخر-إقرار-قانون-المحكمة-الاتحادية

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/30/2019 at 12:32 PM, Laid Back said:

GREAT NEWS.!!!

After today’s federal court decision Diyala, Kirkuk, Salah ad Din and Ninawa will become part of the Iraqi Kurdistan region. 

I bet the Kurds are very happy. This will help to pass HCL.

 

Go Art 140

Go HCL

Go RV

Go $1:1

 

Hey lb.  This is part of the 1969 Sykes pico agreement. ;)

  • Thanks 4
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mylilpony said:

 

Hey lb.  This is part of the 1969 Sykes pico agreement. ;)

Thanks for your input  mylilpony, 

Very interesting my friend, It dates back when the British and French governments pertaining to the partition of the Ottoman Empire among the Allied Powers.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Legal clarifies the decision of the Federal Court on the entry into force of Article 140 of the Constitution

Legal clarifies the decision of the Federal Court on the entry into force of Article 140 of the Constitution

Political | 01:51 - 17/08/2019

 
image
 
 


 BAGHDAD - Mawazine News 
, a legal expert explained the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court on the entry into force of Article (140) of the Constitution, pointing out that the time limits provided for in the Constitution include the obligation on the bodies responsible for the implementation of those articles, pointing out that the withdrawal of any text of the Constitution requires an amendment in accordance with For official mechanisms. 
"The ruling issued by the Federal Supreme Court on the validity of Article (140) of the Constitution is true and binding on all authorities," said Mohammed Sharif. 
Sharif added that "the abolition of any article of the Constitution requires an amendment in accordance with the mechanisms provided for in the Constitution itself." 
He pointed out that "a number of questions are being asked about the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court on this article and the first timing of the issuance of this ruling, and why the judicial decision coincided with the political movement between the federal government and the Kurdistan region."
Al-Sharif said, "The court did not issue its verdict on its own, but this came upon an explanatory request received from the House of Representatives dated (15/7/2019), and therefore became necessary for the judiciary to decide." 
He continued, "The timing must be asked by the interpreter, although the right of access to justice is guaranteed to everyone in accordance with Article (19 / III) of the Constitution, and at any time." 
He added, "The court issued its interpretative judgment a few days after receiving the request after it completed its study of all formal and substantive aspects with a view to issuing the verdict in it, on (28/7/2019)." 
He stressed that "when the court issued the verdict was in accordance with Article (92 / second) of the Constitution, in accordance with its interpretative jurisdiction, which ruled in many judgments, including on (the age of the electoral cycle and the largest parliamentary bloc and the opposition bloc and the unity of Iraq and territorial integrity)." .
According to Sharif, that "demand expository ensure inquiries and clear can be found in the form of numbered rule (71 / Federal / 2019), which is ((kindly interpretation of the text of Article 140 of the Constitution in terms of validity or not ..)). 
The Al - Sharif, The interpreter of the request, the Chamber of Deputies, confined his request to know whether this article is still in force or not ?, and the court according to legal contexts is obliged to answer that question whenever the correct formal and objective conditions for the request for interpretation exist and otherwise it will place itself before the responsibility. to refrain from the realization of the right)). " 
He cited Al - Sharif, the" pretext cited by the objectors in criticism for How the Federal Supreme Court is having a time limit in Article 140 of the Constitution, is (31/12/2007) to implement a maximum. " 
And added that"
Sharif pointed out that "the examination of article (140) of the Constitution, paragraphs (first and second) shows that it begins with the words ((the executive authority takes steps)) ... and ends with ((not later than the thirty-first of December in the year two thousand and seven) ). " 
He continued, "This period, as stated in the constitutional text, imposes an obligation on the executive authority to accomplish its task during that period and not to drop the article, that is, if the executive authority lags in the completion of this constitutional task will be subject to accountability in accordance with the mechanisms provided for in the Constitution." 
Sharif stressed that "the omission of an article in the Constitution means that we are making an amendment to it, and this amendment can be obtained only through the mechanisms provided for in the Constitution itself."
He pointed out that "the constitutional legislator, if he wanted to exclude article (140) of the Constitution from the rules of amendment of the Constitution stipulated in its articles, to mention it explicitly, as his intention was clear that that period was designed to oblige the executive authority to a certain task, and that skipping it will make it vulnerable For accounting. " 
Al-Sharif stated, "The position of the Federal Supreme Court on this matter is not the first of its kind, but it went in the same position in the interpretation of Article (142) of the Constitution by virtue of the number (54 / Federal / 2017) issued on 21/5/2017 on the mechanisms of amendment the Constitution". 
He continued, "Article 142, which is also included in the transitional provisions and provides for time limits for amendments, but the court said in its interpretative ruling that that article is still valid as well."
He added, "The same position with regard to Article (137) of the Constitution, which talked about the formation of the Council of the Union (the second wing of the legislative authority), after the end of the first electoral cycle for the years (2006-2010), but the Federal Supreme Court ruled in many of its judgments This council, even though we are in the fourth electoral cycle now. " 
"The summary of the above shows us that exceeding the constitutional deadlines is not intended to drop its articles because this requires an amendment in accordance with the mechanisms set forth in the Constitution itself, but to determine the responsibility of the body that is responsible for implementing them and if they exceed them are held accountable in accordance with the constitutional contexts of the concerned authorities 29 / p

  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 
 
 2019/08/17 06:53:37
 

A legal expert confirmed the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court on the validity of Article (140) of the Constitution, pointing out that the time limits provided for in the Constitution include the obligation on the bodies responsible for the implementation of those articles, pointing out that the withdrawal of any text of the Constitution requires an amendment in accordance with mechanisms Official.

"The ruling issued by the Federal Supreme Court regarding the validity of Article (140) of the Constitution is true and binding on all authorities," said expert Mohammed Sharif, noting that "the abolition of any article of the Constitution requires an amendment in accordance with the mechanisms provided for in the Constitution itself."

He pointed out that "a number of questions are being asked about the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court on this article and the first time of the issuance of this ruling, and why the judicial decision coincided with the political movement between the federal government and the Kurdistan region."

Al-Sharif pointed out that the court did not issue its verdict on its own, but this came upon an explanatory request received from the House of Representatives dated (15/7/2019), and therefore became necessary for the judiciary to decide.

He added that "the timing must be asked by the interpreter, although the right of access to justice is guaranteed to everyone in accordance with Article (19 / III) of the Constitution, at any time."

Al-Sharif added that "the court issued its interpretative judgment a few days after receiving the request after it completed its study of all formal and substantive aspects in order to issue the verdict in it, on (28/7/2019)."

He stressed that "when the court issued the verdict was in accordance with Article (92 / second) of the Constitution, in accordance with its interpretative jurisdiction, which ruled in several judgments, including on the (age of the electoral cycle and the largest parliamentary bloc and the opposition bloc and the unity of Iraq and territorial integrity)."

Al-Sharif stated that "the explanatory request contained a clear inquiry which can be found in the form of provision numbered (71 / Federal / 2019), which is (kindly explain the text of article (140) of the Constitution as to whether it applies or not)."

He stressed that "the explanatory request, the House of Representatives, limited his request to know whether this article is still in force or not ?, The court according to legal contexts are obliged to answer that question whenever the correct formal and substantive conditions for the request for interpretation and otherwise will put itself before the responsibility ( Refrain from fulfilling the right). "

Sharif said that "the pretext mentioned by the objectors in their criticism of the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court is the existence of a time limit in Article (140) of the Constitution, is (31/12/2007) a maximum to implement."

He added that "resolving the issue requires a return to the philosophy of the existence of time limits in the constitutional articles, is that exceeding them is the birthplace of those articles."

Sharif pointed out that "the examination of article (140) of the Constitution paragraphs (first and second) shows that it begins with the words (the executive takes steps) ... and ends with the words (not later than the thirty-first of December in the year two thousand and seven)."

He continued, "This period, as stated in the constitutional text, imposes an obligation on the executive authority to accomplish its task during that period and not to drop the article, that is, if the executive authority lags in the completion of this constitutional task will be subject to accountability in accordance with the mechanisms provided for in the Constitution."

Sharif stressed that "dropping an article in the Constitution means that we are making an amendment to it, and this amendment can be obtained only through the mechanisms provided for in the Constitution itself."

He pointed out that "the constitutional legislator, if he wanted to exclude Article (140) of the Constitution from the rules of amendment of the Constitution stipulated in its articles, to mention it explicitly, as his intention was clear that this period was designed to oblige the executive authority to a certain task, and that skipping it will make it accountable ".

Al-Sharif stated that "the position of the Federal Supreme Court on this matter is not the first of its kind, but it went in the same position in the interpretation of Article (142) of the Constitution by virtue of the number (54 / Federal / 2017) issued on 21/5/2017 on the mechanisms to amend the Constitution ".

He added that "Article (142), which was also included in the transitional provisions and provided for time limits to make amendments to it, but the Court said in its interpretative ruling that that article is still valid as well."

Sharif added that "the same position with regard to Article (137) of the Constitution, which talked about the formation of the Council of the Union (the second wing of the legislative authority), after the end of the first electoral cycle for the years (2006-2010), but the Federal Supreme Court in many of its judgments on the formation of this Council even though we are in the fourth electoral cycle now. "

He pointed out that "the summary of the above shows us that exceeding constitutional provisions is not intended to drop its articles as this requires an amendment in accordance with the mechanisms provided for in the Constitution itself, but to determine the responsibility of the body responsible for its implementation and if exceeded are held accountable in accordance with the constitutional contexts of the concerned authorities."

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The appointment of two new presidents to resume Baghdad Rusafa and Babylon

Political | 01:09 - 18/08/2019

 
image
 
 

Baghdad - Mawazine News 
The presidents of the courts of appeal Baghdad Rusafa and Babylon, Sunday, 18/8/2019 sworn in front of the President of the Supreme Judicial Council Judge Fayeq Zidan. 
 A statement issued by the Media Center of the Supreme Judicial Council received (Mawazine News), a copy of it, that "Judge Imad Khudair and Judge Haider Jaber sworn in before the President of the Supreme Judicial Council, Judge Fayeq Ziden as presidents of the courts of appeal Baghdad Rusafa and Babylon on the occasion of the issuance of the Republican decree appointing them as president Appeal in the courts in which they work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

135913.jpg?width=750&&height=375

 
2019/08/20 09:41
  • The number of readings 259
  • Section: Iraq
  •  
  •  

In the document: Parliament lifted immunity from MP Talal Zobaie

BAGHDAD / Obelisk: The speaker of the House of Representatives decided on Tuesday, August 20, 2019, to lift the immunity of a representative at the request of the Supreme Judicial Council. 

According to a document obtained by the obelisk, that the Speaker of the House of Representatives Mohammed Halbousi agreed to lift the immunity of MP Talal Zobaie at the request of the judiciary on charges of extortion. 

Al-Halbousi called, according to the document, the Supreme Judicial Council to take the required measures against Zobaie and call the complainants to review the courts.

 

author_2642-2.jpg

Follow the obelisk

 

Edited by Butifldrm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

135917.jpg?width=750&&height=375

 
2019/08/20 11:05
  • The number of readings 597
  • Section: Iraq
  •  

Former President of Parliamentary Integrity was corrupting and extortion !! .. And the judiciary requests to lift the immunity from him ..

BAGHDAD / Obelisk: A parliamentary source said Tuesday, August 20, 2019, that the presidency of the parliament lifted the immunity of eight deputies, while sources said the lifting of immunity from MP Talal al-Zobaie at the request of the judiciary on charges of extortion.

The source said, "Speaker of the House of Representatives, Mohammed Halbousi lifted immunity from 8 deputies," pointing out that among the deputies, "Ahmed al-Jubouri" Abu Mazen, "and nights Bayati and Nahla al-Rawi."

The House of Representatives begins its third legislative term, early next month, by lifting the immunity of 21 of its members accused of criminal cases and financial corruption.

According to a document obtained by the obelisk, the Speaker of the House of Representatives Mohammed Halbousi agreed to lift the immunity from the member of the decision bloc MP Talal al-Zobaie at the request of the judiciary on charges of extortion and corruption during his tenure as former chairman of the Integrity Committee. 

Al-Halbousi called, according to the document, the Supreme Judicial Council to take the required measures against Zobaie and call the complainants to review the courts. 
The new step, if it yields results, is a step towards eliminating corruption and abuse of power in the legislature. 
  The Obelisk

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Expert clarifies the legality of lifting the speaker of the parliament immunity from deputies

13:54 - 20/08/2019
0
%D8%B7%D8%A7%D8%B1%D9%82-%D8%AD%D8%B1%D8

Information / Baghdad… 
Legal expert Tariq Harb, on Tuesday, the right of the President of the House of Representatives to lift the parliamentary immunity from deputies during the legislative recess provided that the crime or the request of the judiciary submitted during the recess. 
Harb said in a statement to the information that "Article 63 of the Constitution gives the President of the House of Representatives the right to lift the parliamentary immunity of the MP without reference to the vote in parliament provided that the lifting of immunity and request the judiciary during the legislative recess." 
Harb added that "in the case of the Judiciary Council to lift the immunity of the deputy during the official parliament, the speaker of the House of Representatives is obliged to submit a request to lift the immunity to parliament." 
Harb explained that "what happened between the Speaker of the House of Representatives Mohammed Halbousi and MP Talal Zobaie will be dissolved by the judiciary as it is the only body concerned with the implementation of the decision."

https://www.almaalomah.com/2019/08/20/424387/

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deputy launches an attack on Halbousi: not qualified to manage the sessions of Parliament

By Rudaw 4 minutes ago
Halbousi
Halbousi

Rudaw - Erbil

Talal al-Zobaie, a member of the Iraqi decision-making coalition, said Tuesday that he would lift his legal immunity by insulting the Iraqi parliament. He pointed out that the speaker of parliament, Mohamed Halbousi "is not qualified to manage the sessions of parliament." 

Al-Zobaie said in a statement received to Rudaw Media Network: "We regretted the legal breach by the Speaker of the House of Representatives (Mohammed Halbousi) by exceeding his constitutional powers during his response to a letter issued by the judiciary regarding the completion of legal proceedings with us in one case, as it was supposed To answer the book legally and according to what he was asked to violate the law by referring in his response to the existence of complaints against us. " 

He added that "this position is harmful to the House of Representatives because it puts the presidency in an inappropriate position for several reasons, including that it is not aimed at the application of the law, but aimed at liquidating opponents and opponents of Halbousi."

"We also make it clear to the public that this position coincided with the presence of more than 10 requests to lift immunity from deputies. Why did Al-Habloussi choose Talal Al-Zobaie and ignore the rest of the requests?" For legislative action. " 

He stressed that "this Halbousi position started from purely personal reasons after we explained to public opinion the direct reason for the failure of the work of the parliament in its first legislative chapter and we expected to repeat it in the current legislative session because the President does not have the" legal expertise "to manage the sessions of Parliament; . 

The speaker of the Iraqi Council of Representatives, Mohammed al-Halbousi, decided to lift the immunity from the representative of the decision coalition, Talal al-Zobaie.

According to a document seen by Rudaw Media Network, the speaker of the House of Representatives Mohammed Halbousi agreed to lift the immunity from the representative of the decision coalition, Talal Zobaie at the request of the judiciary on charges of extortion.

Al-Halbousi called on the Supreme Judicial Council to take the necessary measures against Zobaie and call the complainants to review the courts.

https://www.rudaw.net/arabic/middleeast/iraq/2008201910

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

135947.jpg?width=750&&height=375

 
2019/08/20 21:13
  • Number of readings 3092
  • Section: Iraq
  •  
  •  

Warrants of arrest, Interpol, the judiciary and security are pursuing deputies with the cover of immunity

Baghdad / Obelisk: The legal expert Ali al-Tamimi, said Tuesday, the decision to lift the immunity of some deputies outside Iraq gives the right to bring them through Interpol.

Tamimi told the "obelisk" that the decision to lift the immunity of any deputy comes after the issuance of an arrest warrant for the deputy being wanted for the judiciary.

He added that "MPs issued arrest warrants can be returned to Iraq through Interpol and activate Iraq's diplomatic relations."

He explained that after the lifting of immunity every security element has the right to arrest deputies at the entrance to any border or airport once they reach Iraq, stressing that "the second step legally after the lifting of immunity will be issued arrest warrants for all ports, airports and checkpoints."

The speaker of the House of Representatives issued a decision on Tuesday to lift the immunity of a number of deputies.

The coalition rejected the resolution, Tuesday, August 20, 2019, the request to lift the immunity from the deputy of the coalition Talal Zobaie, while calling on the Speaker of the House of Representatives Mohammed Halbousi to adopt legal methods.

The coalition said in a statement received to the "obelisk", "The Speaker of the House of Representatives ordered the lifting of immunity from MP Talal Khudair Zobaie against the back of a complaint against him by a citizen."

He continued that "this was a surprise to the Iraqi decision coalition, for the most prominent reasons, that the complaints filed against the gentlemen MPs, who asked to lift immunity from them exceeded thirty deputies, and the question why targeted Zobaie without others, and that the complaint against Zobaie does not amount to a clear criminal act with clear and consistent evidence ".

The Iraqi decision-making coalition that "the targeting of MP Zobaie is a political targeting in the first place, otherwise it was supposed to refer files submitted against the gentlemen MPs to a competent legal committee, and presented its opinion to the members of the Council to take the appropriate decision towards everyone, and in a professional manner away from personal targeting, and not limited It is on Zobaie. "

He explained that "it is clear that the decision was taken against the backdrop of political rivalry, and selectively, because the decision did not come within the context of clear legal and transparent", calling for "the adoption of legal methods."

The sources had confirmed earlier on Tuesday that the speaker of the House of Representatives agreed to lift the immunity of eight deputies, including MP Ahmed al-Jubouri "Abu Mazen", and nights Bayati and Nahla al-Rawi.

A document issued by the Speaker of the House of Representatives agreed to lift the immunity of MP Talal Zobaie at the request of the Supreme Judicial Council, on the back of his involvement in corruption files.

The Obelisk  

http://almasalah.com/ar/news/176845/مذكرات-القبض-والانتربول-والقضاء-والأمن-يلاحقون-النواب-المرفوع-عنهم-غطاء-الحصانة

 

 
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deputy: 38 deputies included in the lifting of immunity and the presidency of the parliament discreetly on the names

13:16 - 21/08/2019
0
%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%84%D9%85%D8%

Al-Maaloumeh / Baghdad .. 
MP on the victory coalition Nada Shaker Jawdat, on Wednesday, the existence of a judicial request to lift the immunity of 38 deputies in the coming days because of the presence of corruption charges and waste of public money against them, pointing to the presidency of the parliament discreetly on the names so far. 
Jawdat said in a statement to the information that "currently available information indicates the rise in the number of deputies required for the judiciary on various charges to about 38 deputies," noting that "the Judicial Council demanded the lifting of immunity from those names, but all deputies do not know the details of lifting the immunity as the presidency Parliament hushed over those names. ” 
Jawdat pointed out that "the Presidency of the House of Representatives can not courtesy in the case of selective lifting immunity as popular demands, especially accused of corruption and waste of public money."
The MP from the opposition movement wisdom Asaad al-Murshidi warned in a statement earlier to the information, from exploiting the issue of lifting immunity from deputies in the liquidation of personal differences, pointing out that lifting immunity is a healthy phenomenon must be activated on all deputies, especially those involved in corruption. Ended / 25 KD

https://www.almaalomah.com/2019/08/21/424597/

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Federal Court Law between Legislative Endeavors and Legal Obstacles

Federal Court Law between Legislative Endeavors and Legal Obstacles

 
Baghdad / Ahmed Mohammed 
 

 

While the Legal Committee in the House of Representatives is preparing to present the draft law of the Federal Court for the second reading after the start of the legislative chapter in the middle of next week after completing the amendments to the law, but it seems that there are loopholes are still an obstacle to proceed with the adoption of this law amid conflicting political views on the form of these The Court, the number of its members, the nomination mechanism, or even their age, has been an obstacle to the legislation for 15 years.
 Al-Sabah continues to present the views of specialists to highlight the most prominent observations on the said law for its importance in the formation of the Iraqi state and its direct impact on the political and administrative process in the country. Member of the Parliamentary Legal Committee Mohammed al-Ghazi in an exclusive interview with "morning": "The law of the Federal Court operates in accordance with international law no less important than the Constitution is the only interpretation of its provisions, so the House of Representatives to expedite the legislation of this long-awaited more than fifteen Years. ” Al-Ghazzi called for "uniting efforts among the members of the legal committee to rewrite the texts of the law to vote on it after the vote became the main obstacle to its legislation, in light of the different political consensus, as it needs two-thirds of the votes of the members of the House of Representatives to approve its passage." Amendments will be made to the government draft to limit the jurisdiction of the court to nine years and the member's age to 73 years. ”


Delay voting

A member of the Legal Committee high Nassif pointed out in an interview for "morning", that "the Federal Court Law was delayed to vote a lot because of the lack of consensus of the political blocs within the parliamentary dome on some of the material obtained by the difference, which revolves around the difference of Arab and Kurdish deputies in The Kurds want unanimity, not a majority, and this dispute still exists, and there is a dispute that has been resolved regarding the issue of the right of (jurists of Islam and experts) to vote with the judges of the Federal Court and their presence with The possibility of using the veto. ”
She adds, "The dispute that has been resolved is the subject of keeping part of the Federal Court Act as (yeast) for its new composition, but with regard to the number of members of the Federal Court and the designation of the first and second political process (Mahasasip) and therefore the number decreases or increases according to political consensus between the blocs." .
Nassif points out that “there is a need to determine the age of the members of the Federal Court, because the desire of the current members of the Court to remain open is unacceptable, as the human being may reach a stage where he can not understand anything, so there was a need to submit to the judge of the court To the current retirement law or to be extended by a number of years to be determined by a number of cycles regardless of age. For example, if he is 70 years old, he is sentenced to a number of cycles of six or two cycles of twelve years depending on his mental capacity. Also the subject of disagreement between members of the House of Representatives and has not been resolved to For now, so the subject of voting on this law was delayed due to the absence of political consensus on the materials that have been mentioned above. "
“We believe that there will be an amendment to Law No. 30, because the Federal Court abolished Article 3 of the Federal Court Law and thus created a kind of legislative vacuum that in the event of death and disability of a particular member of the court, we cannot We bring another because of the abolition of Article III of the current law, and the House of Representatives goes towards the amendment of the Federal Court Law in case of incompatibility with the original law.
 
Next chapter
For his part, member of the Legal Committee Hussein Al-Oqabi in an exclusive interview with the "morning", the need to "pass the law of the Federal Court during the next legislative term, as we can not be unable for 15 years to find a solution to a question of this magnitude, so the postponement is not Acceptable and we should be at the good of the people and try to reach a formula 
Compatibility ”.
Al-Oqabi believes that “there are certain parties that want to violate the normal state of the voting rates; This is also a pressure tool to expedite the legislation of the law, this legal vacuum negatively affects the issue of nomination.
He adds, “We are against amending the current Federal Court Law and with the enactment of a new law.
 Next. ”
 
Political consensus
The member of the House of Representatives Jassim Mohan Bukhati, confirmed in an interview with the "morning", that "supposed to agree on the draft law of the Federal Court in the third legislative chapter, and the most important challenges in this issue is the process of political agreements on the distribution of judges according to the whims of political blocs or be Nomination from within the blocs, so we go towards that the administrative and federal tribunals are independent and even elections must be far from the influences of the parties.
MP Bakhati expects, “Pass the law during the next legislative term, despite the potential bumps, we intend to resolve what we missed in the first and second legislative chapters, and are going with a package of important legislation related to the government curriculum and the executive branch that nominated more than 113 of these related projects Direct government and institutions
 The state".
 
Judicial vision
In turn, Judge Nasser Omran confirms to "morning", that "through the raised by the Federal Court Law in his draft submitted by the Presidency of the Council of Ministers to the House of Representatives at the current session and the subsequent reading of the first, and the resulting insights and ideas and parliamentary and political discussions, The remarks made by the Federal Court on the draft law, we see that there are constants to be achieved when the legislation of this law, the most important of which is the preservation of the independence of the judiciary, the Constitution resolved the Federal Court order and legal nature stipulated that (a judicial body, and that control The constitutionality of laws is judicial control) and g The Iraqi legislator has given the Federal Supreme Court the power to overturn laws, decisions, regulations, instructions, and decisions issued by any party that has the right to issue them when the Federal Court considers them unconstitutional. Not done
 the authorities".
Judge Omran explains, “The draft federal court law published on the website of the House of Representatives included interference in the judicial work when experts of Islamic jurisprudence and jurists in issues relating to religion and democratic principles were considered to be disruptive to the judiciary. Article 92 / Second: (The Federal Supreme Court shall be composed of a number of judges, experts in Islamic jurisprudence and jurists, whose number shall be determined, and the manner of their selection and the functioning of the Court shall be regulated by a law enacted by a two-thirds majority of the members of the Council of Representatives).
He explained, that “between the formation of the court during its response to the lawsuit and the issuance of its decisions; However, the Federal Court is made up of judges, experts in Islamic jurisprudence and jurists in the law. The mechanism of the judiciary and the principle of separation of powers. "
Judge Omran adds, “The term experts in the constitution for Islamic jurisprudence and jurists does not mean that they are members of the tribunal but are members of the tribunal as experts, the concept of the expert and the nature of his work is clear: to provide the required expertise in cases falling within the jurisdiction of their work as jurists In the Islamic religion or jurists in the law, the draft law includes in the selection of members of the Federal Court to take into account the components, a text that is inconsistent with the concept of equality between citizens and leads to (quotas), and the draft law also includes provisions that are inconsistent with the constitutional text and constitutional vision Rayya variation in the number of his example of Islamic jurisprudence experts and jurists in addition to disruption of judicial decisions on the approval of these scholars in their own constants of Islam and issues pertaining to rights and freedoms and the foundations of issues 
Democracy. ”
The judge stresses that “legal responsibility requires the enactment of a law of the Federal Court and the formation of a legal hierarchy established for the rule of law and the state of institutions and a real guarantee of rights and freedoms and the protection of ideological and personal privacy, and this can only be achieved through the independence of judicial work and the embodiment of judicial oversight. Spirit of the Nation The judiciary is the custodian of this spirit and the guarantor to ensure the rights and freedoms of the citizen and supporter of the rule of law
 Institutions). ”
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/17/2019 at 6:05 AM, yota691 said:
 
 
 2019/08/17 06:53:37
 

A legal expert confirmed the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court on the validity of Article (140) of the Constitution, pointing out that the time limits provided for in the Constitution include the obligation on the bodies responsible for the implementation of those articles, pointing out that the withdrawal of any text of the Constitution requires an amendment in accordance with mechanisms Official.

"The ruling issued by the Federal Supreme Court regarding the validity of Article (140) of the Constitution is true and binding on all authorities," said expert Mohammed Sharif, noting that "the abolition of any article of the Constitution requires an amendment in accordance with the mechanisms provided for in the Constitution itself."

He pointed out that "a number of questions are being asked about the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court on this article and the first time of the issuance of this ruling, and why the judicial decision coincided with the political movement between the federal government and the Kurdistan region."

Al-Sharif pointed out that the court did not issue its verdict on its own, but this came upon an explanatory request received from the House of Representatives dated (15/7/2019), and therefore became necessary for the judiciary to decide.

He added that "the timing must be asked by the interpreter, although the right of access to justice is guaranteed to everyone in accordance with Article (19 / III) of the Constitution, at any time."

Al-Sharif added that "the court issued its interpretative judgment a few days after receiving the request after it completed its study of all formal and substantive aspects in order to issue the verdict in it, on (28/7/2019)."

He stressed that "when the court issued the verdict was in accordance with Article (92 / second) of the Constitution, in accordance with its interpretative jurisdiction, which ruled in several judgments, including on the (age of the electoral cycle and the largest parliamentary bloc and the opposition bloc and the unity of Iraq and territorial integrity)."

Al-Sharif stated that "the explanatory request contained a clear inquiry which can be found in the form of provision numbered (71 / Federal / 2019), which is (kindly explain the text of article (140) of the Constitution as to whether it applies or not)."

He stressed that "the explanatory request, the House of Representatives, limited his request to know whether this article is still in force or not ?, The court according to legal contexts are obliged to answer that question whenever the correct formal and substantive conditions for the request for interpretation and otherwise will put itself before the responsibility ( Refrain from fulfilling the right). "

Sharif said that "the pretext mentioned by the objectors in their criticism of the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court is the existence of a time limit in Article (140) of the Constitution, is (31/12/2007) a maximum to implement."

He added that "resolving the issue requires a return to the philosophy of the existence of time limits in the constitutional articles, is that exceeding them is the birthplace of those articles."

Sharif pointed out that "the examination of article (140) of the Constitution paragraphs (first and second) shows that it begins with the words (the executive takes steps) ... and ends with the words (not later than the thirty-first of December in the year two thousand and seven)."

He continued, "This period, as stated in the constitutional text, imposes an obligation on the executive authority to accomplish its task during that period and not to drop the article, that is, if the executive authority lags in the completion of this constitutional task will be subject to accountability in accordance with the mechanisms provided for in the Constitution."

Sharif stressed that "dropping an article in the Constitution means that we are making an amendment to it, and this amendment can be obtained only through the mechanisms provided for in the Constitution itself."

He pointed out that "the constitutional legislator, if he wanted to exclude Article (140) of the Constitution from the rules of amendment of the Constitution stipulated in its articles, to mention it explicitly, as his intention was clear that this period was designed to oblige the executive authority to a certain task, and that skipping it will make it accountable ".

Al-Sharif stated that "the position of the Federal Supreme Court on this matter is not the first of its kind, but it went in the same position in the interpretation of Article (142) of the Constitution by virtue of the number (54 / Federal / 2017) issued on 21/5/2017 on the mechanisms to amend the Constitution ".

He added that "Article (142), which was also included in the transitional provisions and provided for time limits to make amendments to it, but the Court said in its interpretative ruling that that article is still valid as well."

Sharif added that "the same position with regard to Article (137) of the Constitution, which talked about the formation of the Council of the Union (the second wing of the legislative authority), after the end of the first electoral cycle for the years (2006-2010), but the Federal Supreme Court in many of its judgments on the formation of this Council even though we are in the fourth electoral cycle now. "

He pointed out that "the summary of the above shows us that exceeding constitutional provisions is not intended to drop its articles as this requires an amendment in accordance with the mechanisms provided for in the Constitution itself, but to determine the responsibility of the body responsible for its implementation and if exceeded are held accountable in accordance with the constitutional contexts of the concerned authorities."

 

 

Very important article here. Clearly stating that article 140 is not only constitutional but also the Federation council (which they call the council of the union). It is the upper legislative branch of the government that has had a second reading of the law but not passed yet. This completes the government. It is the representation of the provinces and made up of experts and technocrats. These are the biggies we are waiting on along with the federal supreme court law. ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Federal Court replaces MP Uday al-Zalimi with Zainab Rahim al-Jayashi as a member of Parliament

Political | 01:25 - 26/08/2019

 
image
 
 

BAGHDAD - Mawazine News 
The Federal Supreme Court decided on Monday, replacing MP Adi al-Zalimi with the new deputy Zainab Rahim al-Jayashi. 
A source in the court, told / Mawazine News /, "The Federal Court has replaced MP Uday al-Zalmi from the conquest of the new deputy Zainab Rahim al-Hayashi from the conquest of the conquest." 
Earlier, the Federal Court had decided to replace MP Rafah Al-Aridi with Deputy Khashan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to The Salahuddin Court of Appeal thanks the Association of Private Banks for setting up a workshop for the judges of its presidency
 
17081.jpg
 
  

 Banks


Economy News - Baghdad

The Presidency of the Court of Appeal of Salah al-Din, on Sunday, thanked the Association of Iraqi private banks for the establishment of a workshop for the judges of its presidency.

"In view of your efforts to invite the judges of this presidency to your workshop on money laundering and terrorist financing crimes and the satisfaction of the participating judges, we can only offer you sincerely," the court said in an official letter sent to the association. Our thanks and appreciation to God Almighty, and the success of God. "

It is noteworthy that the Association of Iraqi private banks held a few days ago a workshop for judges presidency of the Court of Appeal of Salah al-Din Federal, on crimes of money laundering and financing of terrorism.


Views: 23   Date Added: 15/09/2019

 
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Release date:: 9/15/2018 13:24 • 111 times read
The Federal Court documents more than 1,000 constitutional rulings and decisions with its principles
BAGHDAD: The Federal Supreme Court announced the documenting of more than a thousand judgments and a constitutional decision issued with its principles, pointing out that this procedure facilitates researchers to identify the judgments and decisions and get photocopies of them.
"The Federal Supreme Court continues to document its rulings and decisions to inform the public in full transparency," Iyas al-Samouk, a court spokesman, said in a statement received by the Euphrates News agency.
"The court has completed the analytical index of these judgments since its formation in 2005 until the end of 2018, and included more than a thousand judgments and constitutional decision issued during that period."
He pointed out that "this documentation included the development of principles of the provisions and decisions to help access through electronic search engines found on the website of the Federal Supreme Court" { www.iraqfsc.iq }.
"The researchers and those concerned with constitutional and legal affairs have access to the judgments and decisions issued by the Federal Supreme Court through its subjects, figures and principles, and then get photocopies of them."
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iraq's highest judicial authority ruled in favor of Haider al-Abadi not to dismiss him from parliament

abadi-hakim-1.jpg

 2019/09/16 03:16:32

 

The Supreme Federal Court of Iraq, the highest judicial authority in Iraq, on Monday dismissed a lawsuit to end the membership of the President of the Victory Coalition and former Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi in parliament.

The spokesman of the Federal Supreme Court, Eyas Al-Samouk, said the following: - The Federal Supreme Court held a session presided over by Judge Medhat Al-Mahmoud and the presence of all members of the judges.

((Upon audit and deliberation of the Federal Supreme Court found that the plaintiff and his agents have claimed that he had nominated the victory bloc for the elections of the House of Representatives for 2018 and after the announcement of the results of the Independent High Electoral Commission found that there were irregularities as a result of manipulation and fraud in the process of counting and manual counting and the mismatch of the result With the result of the electronic counting and counting despite the claim of the Commission to the contrary and has asked the referee to recount his votes and being a winning candidate.

 He also claimed that (MP) Haider Jawad Kazem al-Abadi did not take the oath of office during the first legislative session of the House of Representatives for the current session as required by paragraph (II) of Article (4) of the Law of the House of Representatives and its formations No. (13) of 2018, as well as what it is obliged Paragraph (1) of Article (10) of the same law, which is obliged to take the oath of office at the first session of the Council.

 Accordingly, the ruling demanded that the Council of Representatives be obliged to dismiss and terminate the membership of (MP) Haider al-Abadi, based on the above and to paragraph (III) of Article (11) of the Law of the House of Representatives The Council in the single legislative term after paragraph (IV) of which ruled that the deputy failed to take the oath without a legitimate excuse is considered an absence from attending the session.

 The Federal Supreme Court finds that the consideration of the first request of the plaintiff to recalculate his electoral votes due to the presence of fraud and fraud in the election process and the incompatibility of the results of manual counting and electronic counting of the results of electronic counting and counting out of its competence in this regard provided for in Article (93) of the Constitution and article. 4) of its Law No. (30) for the year 2005, because what the plaintiff requested in relation to this paragraph of his claim is to be considered by the Independent High Electoral Commission under Article (8) of its Law No. (11) for the year 2007, and that the decision issued on the occasion of complaints and appeals The appeal shall be before the Board Judiciary in the Federal Court of Cassation based on the provisions of paragraph (VIII) of the same article.

 As for the plaintiff's request to dismiss and terminate the membership of (MP) Haider al-Abadi as a result of his absence from attending the sessions and not being sworn in, the Federal Supreme Court finds that this requires access to the answer to the following question: which is when the winner of the elections for the House of Representatives? Back to the provisions of Article (50) of the Constitution, we find that it obliged the winner of the elections and before assuming his duties to take the oath mentioned in accordance with its rules, as stipulated in paragraph (IV) of Article (11) of the House of Representatives Law - before ruling unconstitutional - to succeed (Deputy) The Federal Supreme Court shall have the right to extrapolate the provisions of Article (50) of the Constitution and to refer to the judgments and decisions issued by the number. 140/141 / Federal / 2018 (on 23/12/2018, and 25 / Federal On 25/3/2010, and (45). S / 2014) on 11/8/2014, and (70 / federal / 2019) on 28/7/2019, has settled that the winner in the elections for the House of Representatives does not hold the status of (deputy) only after taking the oath of office as found that (MP) who is not sworn in as absent from the sessions as stipulated in paragraph (IV) of Article (11) of the Law of the Council of Representatives and its formations, this provision contradicts the provision of Article (50) of the Constitution because the absence to produce its effects must be The winner of the status of (MP) and that this was not achieved because he did not attend the sessions of the Council and did not take the oath of office, so the Federal Supreme Court ruled in the ruling issued by the number (140/141 / AT On 23/12/2018, this clause was unconstitutional, which considered the winner of the elections and did not attend or take the oath in absentia from the sessions of the Council.

Accordingly, the replacement provisions stipulated in the law of replacing the members of the House of Representatives No. 6 of 2006, as requested by the plaintiff in his case, may not be lowered for the winner who has not been sworn in and replaced. Since this case has not been dealt with in the law of the House of Representatives and its formations, nor has it been dealt with in the law of replacing the members of the House of Representatives, which is the case of winning a candidate in the elections of the House of Representatives and not attending the sessions and taking the constitutional oath. The winner, Dr. Haider al-Abadi and his replacement has no basis of the Constitution and the law.

 Based on the foregoing, the plaintiffs' lawsuit has become based on a reason from the Constitution and the law. (5) of the Federal Supreme Court Law No. (30) for the year 2005 and was publicly understood on 16/9/2019).

https://www.shafaaq.com/ar/سیاسة/اعلى-سلطة-قضائية-بالعراق-تحكم-لصالح-حيدر-العبادي-بعدم-اقالته-من-البرلمان/

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to Iraq's highest judicial authority ruled in favor of Haider al-Abadi not to dismiss him from parliament
%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE-640x445.jpg%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%AE%D8%

Parliamentary law participates in the discussions of the new draft penal code

The legal committee represented by deputies Wajih Abbas and Bahar Mohammed, on Thursday 19/9/2019 in the discussions of the legislation of the new penal code.

The meeting discussed with the committee formed by the Presidency the draft new penal code, sent by the Supreme Judicial Council, with the participation of a number of advisers to the Presidency, the Supreme Judicial Council and the House of Representatives, as well as a group of legal professionals and academics specialized in the field of law.

 

 

 

Information Service

Parliament

19/9/2019

http://ar.parliament.iq/2019/09/19/القانونية-النيابية-تشارك-في-مناقشات-م/

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • yota691 changed the title to In the document .. Federal issued clarification on the eligibility of members of the Court
  • yota691 changed the title to Iraq: The judiciary calls for the speedy completion of the investigation into the killing of demonstrators
  • Markinsa locked this topic
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.