Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

MUST READ: Mueller’s Reprehensible Ultimatum to General Flynn: Your Son or Your Country? Make Your Decision!


Recommended Posts

MUST READ: Mueller’s Reprehensible Ultimatum to General Flynn: Your Son or Your Country? Make Your Decision!

Jim Hoft by Jim Hoft May 18, 2019 
 

Guest post by Joe Hoft

 

Mike-Flynn-678x381-696x392-600x338.jpg

General Flynn was given an ultimatum by the corrupt Mueller team – choose either your son or your country!  This grotesque abuse of power and the legal system by the Mueller gang should never have happened and should not go unpunished!

General Flynn worked for the Obama Administration but at some point was fired by Obama for apparently disagreeing with his policies and actions and speaking out against his failed policies in Iraq and Syria.  Soon after, then candidate Trump ran for office and General Flynn supported the future President and introduced the candidate at rallies and then was offered a position on the Trump team.

Obama was upset with Flynn for supporting Trump and it appears that he had some sort of vendetta with Flynn for his comments on the growing threat of ISIS.  It’s also suspected that after Flynn parted ways with President Obama he was set up at a dinner with Russians where he was seated next to Russian President Putin in December 2015.

 

The American spy in England used often by the Deep State, Stefan Halper, seated Flynn next to Putin and then it is suspected used this information as an informant for the Obama administration to obtain a FISA warrant to spy on General Flynn.

Additional information on the framing of General Flynn was reported from a woman who said she was used as a Russian against the General –

Svetlana Lokhova, the Russian historian at the center of Michael Flynn investigation for ‘alleged contacts with Russians’, told Fox News in an exclusive interview with Catherine Herridge, that she is not a Russian spy and that she thought “there’s a high chance that is was coordinated, and believe it needs to be properly investigated.”

In 2017, American various media outlets framed her as a Russian operative and linked her to Michael Flynn. The allegations involved her contact with Flynn three years prior at a 2014 dinner at the University of Cambridge, England, when Flynn was Defense Intelligence Agency director.

General Flynn’s actions had nothing to do with collusion with Russia.  He was set up and spied on!

In October 2016, shortly before the election, based on a bogus and fake dossier financed by the Hillarious Clinton campaign and the DNC, Obama’s gang of corrupt Intel Heads filed for and eventually obtained a warrant to spy on fellow Americans.  The warrants were fraudulent due to their source and made up content.

 

 

Obama spied on the Trump team as well as President Trump’s leadership team, including General Michael Flynn for some time.  (When and for how long is still unknown.  Many suspect this is why Flynn was targeted by the Mueller gang – because Flynn was spied on illegally by the Obama Deep State for some time before the 2016 election most likely based on the phony reports that Flynn was working with Russians.  By indicting General Flynn the Deep State could say – see he was a Russian sympathizer and therefore their illegal spying was justified.)

General Flynn was participating in Trump rallies throughout the US and he also became an advisor for the campaign. At this same time the Obama administration was in full force beginning their efforts to frame candidate Trump as a compatriot with Russia to steal the election.  One way they did this was to set up Flynn with the Russians.

After Trump eventually won the election, the Deep State that represented and supported Obama was in a panic.  They feared that if Flynn looked into efforts to spy on the Trump campaign, they would be found guilty of their many illegal actions in spying on the incoming President, the opposition party and many others.

When President-elect Trump met with President Obama for the first time, Obama even recommended that the future President not select Flynn to be on the Trump administration team.  It’s suspected that Obama didn’t want Flynn on Trump’s team because Obama feared Flynn would uncover the illegal spying that the Obama team carried out during the 2016 campaign and before.

So the same FBI investigator who led the Hillarious Clinton email investigation –
– The same individual who led the Hillarious interview and neglected to take notes, put her under oath or record the meeting
– The same individual who assisted in drafting the memo months before the Hillarious was interviewed  that was presented by corrupt FBI Director Comey to explain why the FBI was not pressing charges against Hillarious
– The same individual who lead the Russia – Trump investigation
– The same individual who neglected to do anything when presented with information that China was hacking Hillarious’s emails real-time
– The same individual who personally reviewed over 300,000 Hillarious emails found on perp Anthony Weiner’s computer a week before the 2016 election
– The same individual that said all of Weiner’s emails were reviewed in less than a week and no criminally related information was found
– This individual, Peter Strzok, went to the White House a couple days after President Trump’s inauguration and entrapped General Flynn, President Trump’s National Security Advisor, in discussions related to Russia.

 

NEVER FORGET: The FBI agent that questioned General Flynn and determined he “lied” while the other FBI agents believed he was not being “misleading” failed his FBI polygraph. That FBI Agent’s name was Peter Strzok.

4:18 PM - 3 May 2019
 

 

Corrupt Strzok asked Flynn questions related to a call Flynn made to a Russian official before the inauguration – totally legal.  The rumor is that the FBI Agent with Strzok, Joe Pientka, said Flynn never lied.  Strzok and Pientka asked Flynn questions, did not tell him he was under investigation, did not read him his rights, did not allow him to have an attorney and then lied about what was said.  The location of the FBI’s original Form 302 recording this discussion is unknown.

After this meeting a few days later, then acting AG Sally Yates, an Obama holdover, went over to the White House and stated that General Flynn had lied to the FBI.  Eventually General Flynn resigned from his position at the White House on February 13, 2017.

A few months passed and then the corrupt Mueller investigation started.  Mueller’s first target was General Flynn.  Mueller had nothing on Flynn so he and his goons went after Flynn’s son, Michael Flynn, Jr.  Micheal Jr had a brand new baby and was grilled by the Mueller team.  Eventually, they used the General’s family against him.  It’s believed that the General could plea guilty to a bogus charge of lying to the FBI or he could watch Mueller’s goons put his son in prison for some bogus crime.

“Make a decision, either your country or your son?”

Mueller’s goons put the General in the worst position possible.  He chose his son.  The goons then placed the General under a gag order while the media persecuted him for months for a false crime, unrelated to Russia collusion.  They paraded him as a criminal.

The judge overseeing the case who took Flynn’s plea was a friend of corrupt cop Strzok and was also a FISA Court judge.  He was recused from the sentencing but to this day we don’t know why.  They never told Flynn that he was being spied on for months before the election.

The Mueller team and the Deep State and the Democrats didn’t stop with the General, they went after others including the President’s eldest son, Don Jr.

 

There are so many questions yet unanswered.  One question is why did Obama’s Deep State not tell the President that General Flynn was under investigation during his campaign?  Who made this decision?  This would have been the proper thing to do.  Were they afraid that illegitimate spying by the Obama team would be uncovered?

  • 1) Lost in this spat is that it ignores a bigger question. There were two outrageous aspects to that Jan. 2017 briefing. One is the subject of this dispute: Who pushed to include dossier in the briefing, clearly as a hook for media to then run with the dossier allegations?

    147 replies2,751 retweets5,872 likes
     
  •  

    2) But the other outrage of that briefing was the deliberate decision not to tell Trump the whole truth--that dossier was being used as a basis to investigate members of his campaign. If FBI had any reason to suspect anyone in Trump's orbit, incoming Prez needed to know

    36 replies1,062 retweets2,746 likes
     
  •  

    3) Especially if FBI was actively looking at Flynn, who was about to become NSA! There was no reason not to brief, since according to FBI, Trump was not a subject. Who decided not to give Trump a FULL briefing about dossier? To deliberately hide this from new commander in chief?

     
     
    Direct message
strasshedcut_bigger.jpgKimberley StrasselVerified account @KimStrassel
FollowingFollowing @KimStrassel
More

4) Comey alone? Clapper? Brennan? Obama White House? That's a question that is as big as this one. https://fxn.ws/2E9gPUc  #FoxNew

9:41 AM - 15 May 2019
 
249 replies1,950 retweets4,978 likes
Reply
 249
 
Retweet
 2.0K
 
 
Like
 5.0K
 
Direct message

General Flynn is a patriot.  He never should have been put in this situation.  He was illegally set up and lied to.  He was forced to choose between his family or his country.  General Flynn chose his family.  What would you have done?

Please donate to the Michael T. Flynn Legal Defense Fund.  This ordeal has cost him and his family millions.

 

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

You obviously did not read the article or chose to ignore it and made a statement not based on any facts.

Money was not involved. A mans family was being threatened. If a prosecutor has the facts necessary to convict they don't need to threaten a man with the loss of his family, business, home or job. The only thing Flynn was guilty of was standing up to Obama and for that he was railroaded. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎5‎/‎19‎/‎2019 at 12:27 AM, nstoolman1 said:

 

 

You obviously did not read the article or chose to ignore it and made a statement not based on any facts.

Money was not involved. A mans family was being threatened. If a prosecutor has the facts necessary to convict they don't need to threaten a man with the loss of his family, business, home or job. The only thing Flynn was guilty of was standing up to Obama and for that he was railroaded. 

 

This is not an article.. It is an opinion piece.. That is what is wrong with our society. People write whatever makes them feel good and others except it as news.... 

 

B/A

  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, nstoolman1 said:

It is an opinion piece, as you call it, based on known facts

B/A say in one line he made the decision. then on another note B/A say it just a opinion piece..The side effects of the Trump hatred on display for everyone to see...:lol:

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, nstoolman1 said:

It is an opinion piece, as you call it, based on known facts.

You may not like the facts because they don't fit you're hatred for Trump thinking but those are the facts. 

 

 

The facts are 34 people are indicted. 7 have pled guilty. This general is a disgrace to anyone who served. He wanted to play with the big boys and he got chewed up and spitted out. If he is such a good guy and didn't do anything wrong why hasn't Trump pardoned him? 

 

B/A

  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, bostonangler said:

 

The facts are 34 people are indicted. 7 have pled guilty. This general is a disgrace to anyone who served. He wanted to play with the big boys and he got chewed up and spitted out. If he is such a good guy and didn't do anything wrong why hasn't Trump pardoned him? 

 

B/A

 

Sure B/A.......your numbers are right......but really don't cover the story completely.....here is a left leaning article from VOX......

This "investgation" was initiated to find out if Trump or any of his people worked with the Russians to fix the elections.....conclusion....they didn't.....

3 Russian companies and over a dozen Russian agents were indicted for tampering with the election......they will never be prosecuted......heck.....indict Putin as the master mind.....

Manafort was tax evasion....long before his Trump involvement.....in fact he was aligned to the left when he was committing these crimes.......Popadopolis was set up.......wow....3 days in jail???.......Flynn......set up.....and well Cohen......now there is a train wreck......of course that Attorney for Stormy was even more of a train wreck.....

So a couple of years and $20-30 million spent......was it worth it????

 

Damn right it was......Mueller and his 17 angry Dems set the table for the criminal prosecution of the Obama DOJ.......and all of those involved.......CL

 

All of Robert Mueller’s indictments and plea deals in the Russia investigation

The investigation is now complete.

 
GettyImages_699354966.0.jpg
Alex Wong/Getty

Special counsel Robert Mueller’s team indicted or got guilty pleas from 34 people and three companies during their lengthy investigation, which is now complete.

 

That group is composed of six former Trump advisers, 26 Russian nationals, three Russian companies, one California man, and one London-based lawyer. Seven of these people (including five of the six former Trump advisers) have pleaded guilty.

If you also count investigations that Mueller originated but then referred elsewhere in the Justice Department, you can add a plea deal from one more person to the list.

It’s a sprawling set of allegations, encompassing both election interference charges against overseas Russians, and various other crimes by American Trump advisers.

 

However, Mueller did not allege any crimes directly connecting the two — that is, that Trump advisers criminally conspired with Russian officials to impact the election.

Other reported focuses of Mueller’s investigation — such as potential obstruction of justiceby the Trump administration — also did not result in any charges.

Justice Department officials toldreporters Friday that this is the final list, and that no more indictments are coming from the special counsel’s probe.

 

The full list of Mueller indictments and plea deals

1) George Papadopoulos, former Trump campaign foreign policy adviser, was arrested in July 2017 and pleaded guilty in October 2017 to making false statements to the FBI. He got a 14-day sentence.

2) Paul Manafort, Trump’s former campaign chair, was indicted on a total of 25 different counts by Mueller’s team, related mainly to his past work for Ukrainian politicians and his finances. He had two trials scheduled, and the first ended in a conviction on eight counts of financial crimes. To avert the second trial, Manafort struck a plea deal with Mueller in September 2018 (though Mueller’s team said in November that he breached that agreement by lying to them). He was sentenced to a combined seven and a half years in prison.

3) Rick Gates, a former Trump campaign aide and Manafort’s longtime junior business partner, was indicted on similar charges to Manafort. But in February 2018 he agreed to a plea deal with Mueller’s team, pleading guilty to just one false statements charge and one conspiracy charge.

 

4) Michael Flynn, Trump’s former national security adviser, pleaded guilty in December 2017 to making false statements to the FBI.

5-20) 13 Russian nationals andthree Russian companies were indicted on conspiracy charges, with some also being accused of identity theft. The charges related to a Russian propaganda effort designed to interfere with the 2016 campaign. The companies involved are the Internet Research Agency, often described as a “Russian troll farm,” and two other companies that helped finance it. The Russian nationals indicted include 12 of the agency’s employees and its alleged financier, Yevgeny Prigozhin.

21) Richard Pinedo: This California man pleaded guilty to an identity theft charge in connection with the Russian indictments, and has agreed to cooperate with Mueller. He was sentenced to 6 months in prison and 6 months of home detention in October 2018.

 

22) Alex van der Zwaan: This London lawyer pleaded guilty to making false statements to the FBI about his contacts with Rick Gates and another unnamed person based in Ukraine. He was sentenced to 30 days in jail and has completed his sentence.

23) Konstantin Kilimnik: This longtime business associate of Manafort and Gates, who’s currently based in Russia, was charged alongside Manafort with attempting to obstruct justice by tampering with witnesses in Manafort’s pending case last year.

24-35) 12 Russian GRU officers: These officers of Russia’s military intelligence service were charged with crimes related to the hacking and leaking of leading Democrats’ emails in 2016.

 

36) Michael Cohen: In August 2018, Trump’s former lawyer pleaded guilty to 8 counts — tax and bank charges, related to his finances and taxi business, and campaign finance violations — related to hush money payments to women who alleged affairs with Donald Trump, as part of a separate investigation in New York (that Mueller had handed off). But in November, he made a plea deal with Mueller too, for lying to Congress about efforts to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

37) Roger Stone: In January 2019, Mueller indicted longtime Trump adviser Roger Stone on 7 counts. He accused Stone of lying to the House Intelligence Committee about his efforts to get in touch with WikiLeaks during the campaign, and tampering with a witness who could have debunked his story.

Finally, there is one other person Mueller initially investigated, but handed over to others in the Justice Department to charge: Sam Patten. This Republican operative and lobbyist pleaded guilty to not registering as a foreign agent with his work for Ukrainian political bigwigs, and agreed to cooperate with the government.

 

That’s the full list, but we’ll delve into the charges in a bit more detail below.

The five ex-Trump aides who struck plea deals with Mueller

GettyImages_975252286__2_.jpg
Mark Wilson/Getty Images

So far, no Trump associates have been specifically charged with any crimes relating to helping Russia interfere with the 2016 election.

Yet five have pleaded guilty to other crimes. Manafort and Gates were charged with a series of offenses related to their past work for Ukrainian politicians and their finances. Papadopoulos and Flynn both admitted making false statements to investigators to hide their contacts with Russians, and Cohen admitted making false statements to Congress.

Papadopoulos: Back in April 2016, Papadopoulos got a tipfrom a foreign professor he understood to have Russian government connections that the Russians had “dirt” on Clinton in the form of “thousands of emails.” He then proceeded to have extensive contacts with the professor and two Russian nationals, during which he tried to plan a Trump campaign trip to Russia.

 

But when the FBI interviewed Papadopoulos about all this in January 2017, he repeatedly lied about what happened, he now admits. So he was arrested in July 2017, and later agreed to plead guilty to a false statements charge, which was dramatically unsealed in October 2017.

Initially, it seemed as if Papadopoulos was cooperating with Mueller’s probe. But we later learned that the special counsel cut off contact with him in late 2017, after he talked to the press. In the end, he didn’t provide much information of note, Mueller’s team said in court filing. His involvement with the investigation now appears to be over, and in September 2018, he was sentenced to 14 days incarceration.

Flynn: In December 2016, during the transition, Flynn spoke to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak about sanctions that President Barack Obama had just placed on Russia, and about a planned United Nations Security Council vote condemning Israeli settlements.

 

But when FBI agents interviewed him about all this in January 2017, Flynn lied to them about what his talks with Kislyak entailed, he now admits. In December 2017, Flynn pleaded guilty to a false statements charge and began cooperating with Mueller’s investigation. We haven’t seen the fruits of his cooperation yet, and he has not yet been sentenced.

Manafort and Gates: This pair worked for Ukrainian politicians (and, eventually, the Ukrainian government) for several years prior to the Trump campaign, and made an enormous amount of money for it. Mueller charged them with hiding their lobbying work and the money they made from it from the government, as well as other financial crimes and attempts to interfere with the investigation.

Gates was the first to strike a plea deal. In February, Mueller dropped most of the charges he had brought against him. In exchange, Gates pleaded guilty to two counts — one conspiracy to defraud the United Statescharge encompassing the overall Ukrainian lobbying and money allegations, and a false statements charge. (With the latter, Gates admitted lying to Mueller’s team during a meeting this February. A Dutch lawyer, Alex van der Zwaan, also pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI related to his Ukrainian work with Gates.)

 

Manafort, meanwhile, fought the charges in two venues, Washington, DC, and Virginia. His first trial was in Virginia, and in August, it ended with his conviction on eight counts — five counts of subscribing to false income tax returns, one count of failing to report his foreign bank accounts, and two counts of bank fraud. The jury deadlocked on another 10 counts, so for those, the judge declared a mistrial.

The conviction finally brought Manafort to the table, and on September 14, he and Mueller’s team struck a plea deal requiring his cooperation. Manafort pleaded guilty to just two more counts — conspiracy to defraud the United States, and an attempted obstruction of justice charge. But he admitted that the other allegations Mueller previously made against him were true as well. The cooperation element of his plea deal fell apart in November, though, as Mueller’s team accused Manafort of lying to them. Manafort ended up being sentenced to a combined seven and a half years in prison.

Cohen: Mueller’s team was investigating Trump’s former attorney in 2017, but at some point, they referred the Cohen probe to the US Attorney’s office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY). It was SDNY that authorized the FBI raid of Cohen’s residence and office in April.

 

In August, Cohen cut a deal with SDNY. He agreed to plead guilty to 8 counts. Six of them involved his own finances — 5 tax counts involving hiding various income related to his taxi medallion business and other financial transactions from the US government, and a bank fraud count. Cohen also admitted participating in a scheme to violate campaign finance laws in connection with hush money payments to women alleging affairs with then-presidential candidate Donald Trump.

Then, in November, Cohen made his deal with Mueller. Here, he agreed to plead guilty to making false statements to Congress, to try and cover up his work on behalf of a Trump Tower Moscow project during the campaign.

Cohen had told Congress that the Trump Tower Moscow project ended early in the campaign, that he hadn’t discussed it much with others at Trump’s company, and that he hadn’t successfully gotten in touch with the Russian government about it.

 

In fact, he now admits, the project was still active months later, he’d talked about it with Trump more than he’d admitted (and with unnamed Trump family members), and he’d talked about it with an assistant for Russian President Vladimir Putin’s press secretary.

Roger Stone was the final Trump associate indicted in the investigation

Then, on January 25, another political operative with a decades-long history with Trump — Roger Stone — was indicted.

Various statements by Stone, including many public ones, raised questions about whether he had some sort of inside knowledge about WikiLeaks’s posting of Democrats’ hacked emails during the 2016 campaign.

 

Stone has long denied having any such knowledge — and claimed that anything he knew about WikiLeaks came through an intermediary, radio host Randy Credico. Mueller’s indictment alleges that this story was false — and that Stone’s telling it to the House Intelligence Committee was criminal.

Mueller’s indictment of Stone alleges that the GOP operative gave a false story to explain his knowledge about WikiLeaks.

Stone has been accused of lying about this to the House Intelligence Committee in 2017, and trying to tamper with a witness — Credico — so that he would stick to that false story. Read this explainer for more.

 

About two dozen overseas Russians have been charged with election interference

Mueller has also filed two major indictments of Russian nationals and a few Russian companies for crimes related to alleged interference with the 2016 election: the troll farm indictment, and the email hacking indictment.

The troll farm indictment: In February, Mueller brought charges related to the propaganda efforts of one Russian group in particular: the Internet Research Agency. That group’s operations — which included social media posts, online ads, and organization of rallies in the US — were, the indictment alleges, often (but not exclusively) aimed at denigrating Hillarious Clinton’s presidential candidacy and supporting Donald Trump’s.

Mueller indicted the Internet Research Agency, two other shell companies involved in financing the agency, its alleged financier (Yevgeny Prigozhin), and 12 other Russian nationals who allegedly worked for it.

 

The specific charges in the case include one broad “conspiracy to defraud the United States” count, but the rest are far narrower — one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud, and six counts of identity theft. It is highly unlikely that the indicted Russian individuals will ever come to the US to face trial, but one company involved, Concord Catering, is fighting back in court.

No Americans have been charged with being witting participants in this Russian election interference effort. However, one American, Richard Pinedo of California, pleaded guilty to an identity fraud charge, seemingly because he sold bank account numbers created with stolen identities to the Russians. Pinedo agreed to cooperate with the probe as part of his plea deal. He was sentenced to 6 months in prison and 6 months home detention in October.

The email hacking indictment: Brought in July, here Mueller charged 12 officers of the GRU, Russia’s military intelligence agency, with crimes committed to the high-profile hacking and leaking of leading Democrats’ emails during the 2016 campaign.

 

Specifically indicted were nine officers of the GRU’s “Unit 26165,” which Mueller alleges “had primary responsibility for hacking the DCCC and DNC, as well as the email accounts of individuals affiliated with the Clinton Campaign” like John Podesta. Three other GRU officers, Mueller alleges, “assisted in the release of stolen documents,” “the promotion of those releases,” “and the publication of anti-Clinton content on social media accounts operated by the GRU.”

A trial here is unlikely, since all of the people indicted live in Russia.

Konstantin Kilimnik, a longtime Manafort associate, has been charged with obstruction of justice

Then, Konstantin Kilimnik — who worked with Manafort in Ukraine and is now based in Russia — was charged alongside Manafort with obstruction of justice and conspiracy to obstruct justice, in June.

Mueller argued that, earlier in 2018, Manafort and Kilimnik worked together to contact potential witnesses against Manafort and encourage them to give false testimony. He argues that this is attempted witness tampering, and qualifies as obstruction of justice.

 

The alleged tampering relates to the “Hapsburg group”— a group of former senior European politicians Manafort paid to advocate for Ukraine’s interests.

Both Manafort and Kilimnik tried to contact witnesses to get them to claim the Hapsburg group only operated in Europe (where US foreign lobbying laws don’t apply). But Mueller says there’s ample evidence that the group did work in the US too, and the witnesses thought Manafort and Kilimnik were trying to get them to commit perjury.

In Manafort’s September plea deal, he admitted to this. Kilimnik, however, is in Russia, and will likely remain there rather than face charges.

 

Sam Patten struck a plea deal after Mueller referred his investigation elsewhere

There’re another instance in which where Mueller surfaced incriminating information about someone, but handed off the investigation to elsewhere in the Justice Department.

Sam Patten: A GOP lobbyist who had worked in some of the same Ukrainian circles as Manafort and alongside Konstantin Kilimnik, Mueller’s team began investigating Patten, but at some point handed him off to the DC US attorney’s office. However, the plea deal Patten eventually struck obligated him to cooperate with Mueller.

According to a criminal information document filed by the DC US attorney’s office, Patten and Kilimnik (who is not named but referred to as “Foreigner A”) founded a lobbying and consulting company together. They did campaign work in Ukraine and lobbying work in the US, and were paid over $1 million between 2015 and 2017.

 

Specifically, the document claims that Patten contacted members of Congress and their staffers, State Department officials, and members of the press on behalf of his Ukrainian clients — all without registering under the Foreign Agents Registration Act, as required by law.

Patten also admits to helping his Ukrainian oligarch client get around the prohibition on foreign donations to Donald Trump’s inauguration committee. The oligarch sent $50,000 to Patten’s company, and then he gave that money to a US citizen, who bought the four tickets. The tickets were given to the oligarch, Kilimnik, another Ukrainian, and Patten himself.

Finally, Patten also admits to misleading the Senate Intelligence Committee and withholding documents from them during testimony this January. He pleaded guilty to one count of violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

 

For more on the Mueller probe, follow Andrew Prokop on Twitterand check out Vox’s guide to the Trump-Russia investigation.

Reserved

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shabibilicious said:

Everything a reasonable person needs to know about Flynn Jr.....  

 

Image result for flynn jr comet ping pong

 

GO RV, then BV

Flynn's son had nothing to do with the Russian Collusion narrative Mueller was chasing....

 

If you followed the Epstein pedophile story it might make you wonder..........there is a great deal of credible evidence indicating the swamp is crawling with pervs......

 

Flynn Jr was getting a little closer to exposing the truth than the bad guys were comfortable with....kind of surprised he's still kicking......

 

JMO.       CL

 

BTW.....this mess will also be exposed and handled in the future.......but first the corruption in the Obama DOJ will be exposed.....and dealt with........

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, coorslite21 said:

So a couple of years and $20-30 million spent......was it worth it????

 

At least it is paid for by Manafort. What about Ken Starr.... 3 years,, more money spent, for what? To find out the president was doing his intern? Disgusting yes, but money well spent I don't think so.

 

B/A

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bostonangler said:

 

At least it is paid for by Manafort. What about Ken Starr.... 3 years,, more money spent, for what? To find out the president was doing his intern? Disgusting yes, but money well spent I don't think so.

 

B/A

Not the point......stay on point....

 

I responded to your comment on all the indictments and charges coming from an investigation with no basis to begin with....CL

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, coorslite21 said:

Flynn's son had nothing to do with the Russian Collusion narrative Mueller was chasing....

 

If you followed the Epstein pedophile story it might make you wonder..........there is a great deal of credible evidence indicating the swamp is crawling with pervs......

 

Flynn Jr was getting a little closer to exposing the truth than the bad guys were comfortable with....kind of surprised he's still kicking......

 

JMO.       CL

 

BTW.....this mess will also be exposed and handled in the future.......but first the corruption in the Obama DOJ will be exposed.....and dealt with........

For those confused......start here......the deeper you go with the research.......the more disgusting it gets.....CL

 

https://nypost.com/2016/10/09/the-sex-slave-scandal-that-exposed-pedophile-billionaire-jeffrey-epstein/

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, coorslite21 said:

Not the point......stay on point....

 

I responded to your comment on all the indictments and charges coming from an investigation with no basis to begin with....CL

 

You asked a question... Was it worth it. Yes, we took 7 criminals out of the game and it was paid for. My question to you was Ken Starr worth the money. Like the recent investigation, it started looking for one thing and found many others. Ken Starr stared looking for one thing it wasn't there and ended up with an impeachment for lying about adultery. Again not a good day for the office but not any worse than the lying we are seeing today. So apples to apples, these are worse findings than Starr's and we didn't get reimbursed for that one. At least Mueller paid for himself with a few rotten criminals taken of the street. Unless people think Manafort's behavior or Cohen's lack of ethics is okay by today's standards.

The other thing this is leading to, is Trump's sketchy banking deals... He and Jared have some explaining to do about the money they moved to Russia even while Trump was in the White House. As an American, don't you want to know what type of dealings were going on with our president, his family and Russia?

 

B/A

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, bostonangler said:

 

You asked a question... Was it worth it. Yes, we took 7 criminals out of the game and it was paid for. My question to you was Ken Starr worth the money. Like the recent investigation, it started looking for one thing and found many others. Ken Starr stared looking for one thing it wasn't there and ended up with an impeachment for lying about adultery. Again not a good day for the office but not any worse than the lying we are seeing today. So apples to apples, these are worse findings than Starr's and we didn't get reimbursed for that one. At least Mueller paid for himself with a few rotten criminals taken of the street. Unless people think Manafort's behavior or Cohen's lack of ethics is okay by today's standards.

The other thing this is leading to, is Trump's sketchy banking deals... He and Jared have some explaining to do about the money they moved to Russia even while Trump was in the White House. As an American, don't you want to know what type of dealings were going on with our president, his family and Russia?

 

B/A

You are very good at dodging the issues.....yay that the fines Manafort may pay....will off set costs......but back to the boastful statement you and the MSM make about what a productive investigation Mueller conducted.......it wasn't productive.....look at each and every individual and Corp that this investigation found some dirt on......pretty pathetic for a million and a half pages......$20-30 million bucks and 2 plus years of holding government up.......that's the real crime.......and of course they had nothing to start with on Trump and his Campaign.....and found nothing.........with the exception that the dirty Obama DOJ set the whole investigation up.....Obama's swamp rats are on the run......soon to turn on one another.....all said and done history will likely judge the Obama years as the most corrupt in the history of the country........what J Edgar did is pale by comparison.......CL

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, coorslite21 said:

You are very good at dodging the issues.....yay that the fines Manafort may pay....will off set costs......but back to the boastful statement you and the MSM make about what a productive investigation Mueller conducted.......it wasn't productive.....look at each and every individual and Corp that this investigation found some dirt on......pretty pathetic for a million and a half pages......$20-30 million bucks and 2 plus years of holding government up.......that's the real crime.......and of course they had nothing to start with on Trump and his Campaign.....and found nothing.........with the exception that the dirty Obama DOJ set the whole investigation up.....Obama's swamp rats are on the run......soon to turn on one another.....all said and done history will likely judge the Obama years as the most corrupt in the history of the country........what J Edgar did is pale by comparison.......CL

 

Why is it Trump supporters are hanging on to the fantasy of some Obama conspiracy. Trump supporters really need to worry about who will replace Trump when he goes down for his financial woes... Will it be Mike Pence? Will Trump keep him as a running mate, or will Trump pick some crony who will be left holding the bag? At this time in history the Democrats should really have a solid candidate instead of a stable full of yahoos... Once again, looks like I'll be voting for an independent as opposed to either crime family party.

 

B/A

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, bostonangler said:

 

Why is it Trump supporters are hanging on to the fantasy of some Obama conspiracy. Trump supporters really need to worry about who will replace Trump when he goes down for his financial woes... Will it be Mike Pence? Will Trump keep him as a running mate, or will Trump pick some crony who will be left holding the bag? At this time in history the Democrats should really have a solid candidate instead of a stable full of yahoos... Once again, looks like I'll be voting for an independent as opposed to either crime family party.

 

B/A

Are you in Denver.....or just picking those shrooms off the cow pies in the pasture...?

 

Where are you getting the crazy notion  that Trump is going anywhere because of finances....

 

Pence is the VP.....obviously he would be next in line if anything ever happened to Trump...

 

Go ahead and waste your vote......wouldn't surprise me at all....CL

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Biden’s Son Caught With Crack Pipe, White Powder In Rental Car, Not Prosecuted

May 19, 2019

2019-05-19_21-08-11.jpg

Imagine for a minute if a crack pipe and a white powdery substance was found in a car rented by Donald Trump Jr. or Eric Trump.

Imagine, if you would, the frenzy of reports and exclusives and demands for answers from President Donald Trump and countless Republicans.

But there is no such media coverage of a 2016 police report that came to light last week about one Hunter Biden.

Hunter is the son of Democrat presidential front runner and former Vice President Joe Biden and that is what police found in his rental car, The Washington Examiner reported.

A police report said that Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden returned a rental car in Arizona that contained a cocaine pipe days before the 2016 presidential election, according to a new report.

Hunter Biden, whose legal first name is Robert, also left credit cards, a driver’s license, a Delaware attorney general badge, a cellphone, and a U.S. Secret Service business card in the car, according to the police report obtained by Breitbart News. He had rented the car from Hertz in California and it was returned in Prescott, Ariz., after hours. The car keys were not properly deposited in a drop box, but left in the car’s gas tank compartment.

In addition to “a small white and brown pipe approximately 3-4 inches long,” an officer also found “a small ziplock bag with a white powdery substance inside all sitting on the passenger seat.”

A man who called himself “Joseph McGee” called Hertz the next morning to tell the company where the keys were left, saying “his friend was feeling sick so they didn’t know what to do.”

Fingerprints were not found on the pipe, which officials determined was used to smoke cocaine.

Prescott Police Department officials were unable to reach Hunter Biden and, after an investigation, declined to prosecute.

One could make the case that it is a rental car and it was left by another occupant but this is not a one time incident with Hunter Biden, The Washington Examiner reported.

The 76-year-old former vice president’s daughter Ashley, now 37, was arrested for marijuana possession at age 17. Records show the prosecutor declined to pursue the charges. A decade later, a “friend” of Ashley Biden attempted to sell the New York Post a 43-minute hidden-camera video purportedly showing Ashley snorting cocaine. The police did not get involved.

Biden’s son Hunter, now 49, joined the Navy Reserves in 2012 after receiving two special waivers, one because he was three years over the age limit of 40 and another for a “drug-related incident when he was a young man.” A month into his service, he tested positive for cocaine during a random drug test and was discharged.

In 2017 divorce papers, Hunter Biden’s then-wife Kathleen stated he spent “extravagantly on his own interests (including drugs, alcohol, prostitutes, strip clubs, and gifts for women with whom he has sexual relations).” The same year, it emerged that Hunter Biden was in a relationship with his late brother Beau’s widow, Hallie. Hunter Biden separated from Kathleen five months after Beau’s death from brain cancer at age 46 in May 2015.

Did you know:

Authorities declined to prosecute Joe Biden’s son Hunter after they found drug paraphernalia and cocaine in his car

Meanwhile Don Jr is subjected to a massive witch hunt for a fake crime

There are 2 sets of laws in America:

One for Democrats

One for Republicans

— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) May 17, 2019

One more on Hunter Biden:

The Navy Reserve discharged Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter this year after he tested positive for cocaine. https://t.co/6W35MvIGOw

— Jessie Jane Duff (@JessieJaneDuff) May 18, 2019

Oh damn I didn't know this.

Given scrutiny @DonaldJTrumpJr receives, why isn't this dominating discussion?

Biden's son discharged from Navy after testing positive for cocaine.https://t.co/lpgHXWwUU2https://t.co/yW8H0v15vd

— Mike Cernovich (@Cernovich) May 18, 2019

One more on Hunter Biden:

The Navy Reserve discharged Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter this year after he tested positive for cocaine. https://t.co/6W35MvIGOw

— Jessie Jane Duff (@JessieJaneDuff) May 18, 2019

via Matt Boyle @BreitbartNews -> 2016 Police report: Hunter Biden left a cocaine pipe, id's, credit cards, and Delaware Attorney General badge in a rental car. Put the keys in the gas tank. https://t.co/syYcBiPz21

— Charlie Spiering (@charliespiering) May 17, 2019

Cocaine pipe and ‘white powdery substance’ found in Hunter Biden’s rental car in 2016 https://t.co/V60Iq6JBOW

— Strome Thornburn (@StromeThornburn) May 19, 2019

  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Feinstein In Deep After She’s Caught With Iranian Minister On Her Phone

 

Iran was likely behind the attack on four oil tankers in the Gulf last weekend, which led to the United States removing some of its diplomatic staff from Baghdad. They also sent U.S. destroyers through the Gulf in a show of force; The New York Times reports that the Iranians have unloaded missiles from several small boats in territorial waters, leading some to believe that tensions are ratcheting down. Still, the Iranians were saber-rattling as ever; Iranian state media quoted the chief of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps as saying that “Even our short-range missiles can easily reach (U.S.) warships in the Persian Gulf,” according to Reuters.

It’s clear that the situation is fairly tense, so when Politico reported, “SPOTTED: SEN. DIANNE FEINSTEIN (D-Calif.), who sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee, walking around the Capitol with her iPhone screen facing outward in full view, and Javad Zarif’s contact page on the screen. Zarif is the name of Iran’s foreign minister,” it was a big red flag.

Why, during a crisis like this one, would the head of the Senate Intelligence Committee be talking to Iran’s foreign minister

 

Fox News host Mark Levin stated during his radio show on Thursday, “He’s the foreign minister to an enemy state that seeks to attack American military personnel in the Middle East, that seeks to put nuclear warheads on ICBMs so they can reach the United States. It is a terrorist regime, an Islamo-Nazi regime in Tehran, that has killed Americans, that funds Hezbollah to kill Americans, that funds Hamas to kill, and is a threat to our national security, obviously.”

“What in the hell is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee doing talking on an iPhone around the Capitol to Javad Zarif?”

Feinstein issued a statement pushing Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to speak with Jarif, “In the last few days, the United States has moved additional military forces to the region and has signaled a willingness to reposition tens of thousands more. Iran-backed Houthis have claimed credit for a recent attack against Saudi Arabia’s oil infrastructure. And suspicions behind who attacked oil tankers moving through the Straits of Hormuz have fallen on Tehran.”

“War isn’t necessary to solve a problem when both sides want a solution. I urge Secretary Pompeo to reach out to Foreign Minister Javad Zarif, who I know doesn’t want to see a conflict with the United States. We should do everything possible to prevent an unnecessary war, beginning with immediately reopening diplomatic channels and toning down the rhetoric.”

“What is it with these Democrats fronting for this Islamo-Nazi regime that wants to kill Americans and Jews in Israel? You’ve got Frankenfeinstein, you’ve got … John Kerry — or the real Frankenstein — giving aid and comfort to the enemy!” Levin stated. “It’s not enough that they released $150 billion to this regime; now they’re giving it advice, against the president of the United States. You want to talk about the Logan Act? You want to talk about collusion?”

 

Levin went on, “So now she’s a mouthpiece for the enemy. A mouthpiece for the enemy. She sits on the Senate Intelligence Committee. For years, she had a driver who was a communist spy for Red China. Her husband has done business — a lot of business — with Communist China. They’ve made a lot of money doing business with Communist China. … Anybody going to subpoena her about her phone call? Anybody going to subpoena her about her driver? Anybody going to subpoena her husband about his business dealings with Red China?

“Of course not,” he declared. “It all goes one way. Anybody going to subpoena her and question her about her contacts with the foreign minister of Iran and any other contacts she may have had, undermining this administration? Can you imagine? It’d be like WWII: You have FDR, and then you have senators contacting the Third Reich!”

 

 

https://explainlife.com/feinstein-in-deep-after-shes-caught-with-iranian-minister-on-her-phone-14618/

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama officials should be 'terrified' by Barr's warning

Tuesday, May 21, 2019
 | 
Chad Groening, Billy Davis (OneNewsNow.com)
 
 

Loretta Lynch and Comey

A veteran of conservative politics says the U.S. attorney general appears to be serious about uncovering the plot against President Trump and the prime suspects have good reason to be terrified.  

Richard Viguerie, chairman of website Conservative HQ, says Democrats ought to be worried if they are paying attention to the straightforward warnings from Attorney General William Barr.

“I've been trying to get answers to questions and I found that a lot of the answers have been inadequate,” Barr told Fox News in an exclusive interview, OneNewsNow reported last week.

Such questions and answers would likely involve powerful Obama-era Department of Justice figures, but Barr went on to state that that “some of the explanations I’ve gotten don’t hang together.”

AG nominee William Barr (Jan2019)

“They're terrified,” says Viguerie, “at the fact that the American people might learn the truth about what caused the special counsel to be appointed in the first place.”

The public could also learn, he adds, that a “Deep State” operation, hatched at the DOJ, did indeed attempt to overthrow the election results after Trump defeated Hillarious Clinton.

Media outlets are now reporting that Obama officials such as former FBI Director James Comey and John Brennan, the former CIA director, are fighting behind the scenes over who authorized the so-called Steele dossier that was used as evidence to request a FISA warrant.

Comey claimed in a 2016 email that Brennan insisted on including the dossier but Brennan is reportedly denying that.

viguerie_mug.jpg
Viguerie

In more recent days, it was revealed that Loretta Lynch, the former attorney general, stated under oath before a House Judiciary Committee that she never told Comey to refer to the Clinton email case as a “matter” rather than an investigation. Comey has stated under oath she directed him to state that.

How high does Viguerie predict this could go?  

Trump and Hillary shaking hands

“Very high,” he replies. “It could go up to Hillarious Clinton.”

That is because it was the Clinton presidential campaign that paid for the opposition research which later became the “Steele dossier” that claimed Russian influence, he points out.

The origins of the Steele dossier were never disclosed to the FISA court judge even though DOJ officials were warned in 2016 by their own deputy attorney general that Steele’s political bias was obvious and it was a politicized document.

“So it looks like people from the highest levels of the Department of Justice,” Viguerie concludes, “were involved in trying to keep a duly elected person from being sworn in as president."

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.