Guest views are now limited to 12 pages. If you get an "Error" message, just sign in! If you need to create an account, click here.

Jump to content
  • CRYPTO REWARDS!

    Full endorsement on this opportunity - but it's limited, so get in while you can!

And the hits keep on coming


Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, yota691 said:

When Trump stated he hires the best prior to the elections in reference to his business. Which has a success rate of almost 98% regardless of a couple defaults. Come on B/A out of 500 business you gonna have some bad...When Trump went to Washington that a different scenario, so you can't include that with all of the Real Obstruction and Collusion from Capitol Hill since day one...You either have nothing but hate store up, or you are being played, just like the rest of the Never Trumpers. Either way 04/20/2019 Trump still POTUS...:lol:

Yes, and he had many deep state swamp things to work with.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey all you Conflater Haters out there , my bother BA you be one of them on this topic matter. You are conflating a crime of collusion was committed with those who did not recall what they spoke of with a person who was Russian and were convicted with the process crime of lying to the FBI. Two different legal points. The evidence developed in 4 individual Federal Investigations, including the Mueller Investigation proved that there was "no activity" that rose to a level of the crime of colluding with the Russian Government to influence the 2016 elections.  Well Now the HRC Campaign that is an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT FACT. There was plenty of evidence regarding how they colluded with Russians to give info to intermediaries who gave them to George Papadopolus, who gave it to the Australian President/Prime Minister.  Or the Russians who gave stuff to Chris Steele who gave it to the Clinton Campaign, and some how delivered it to John McCain who gave it to the FBI. Who then by default had given the corrupt leaders at the FBI, CIA, DOJ, NSI, and to be determined Obama White House cover to claim they did not get it from Mr Simpson; when in fact they did.

 

The dossier of research into President Trump’s connections to Russia is the product of a research firm founded by a former journalist, Glenn R. Simpson.

What is the dossier? It is a 35-page collection of research memos written by Christopher Steele, a respected former British intelligence agent, primarily during the 2016 presidential campaign. The memos, compiled by a research firm called Fusion GPS, allege a multifaceted conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government to help Mr. Trump defeat Mrs. Clinton. The memos also detail unsubstantiated accounts of encounters between Mr. Trump and Russian prostitutes, and real estate deals that were intended as bribes, among other claims about Mr. Trump’s businesses. 

The dossier of research into President Trump’s connections to Russia is the product of a research firm founded by a former journalist, Glenn R. Simpson. The dossier is a 35-page collection of research memos written by Christopher Steele, a formally respected former British intelligence agent, primarily during the 2016 presidential campaign. The memos, compiled by a research firm called Fusion GPS, allege a multifaceted conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russian government to help Mr. Trump defeat Mrs. Clinton. The memos also detail unsubstantiated accounts of encounters between Mr. Trump and Russian prostitutes, and real estate deals that were intended as bribes, among other claims about Mr. Trump’s businesses. No proof of what was alleged . Mr. Simpson founded Fusion GPS in 2010. The firm is paid to do research by a variety of clients, including political donors, corporations, hedge funds and law firms. During election years, the firm is mostly focused on political opposition research — digging up dirt (unsubstantiated and or pure fiction)on a client’s opponent. The firm’s website lists very few details — there is a two-paragraph description of what the firm does and a single email addresThey believes.

 

Sarah Sanders lies, and her Baptist Minister Dad. Christians are believers in Christ Jesus. We believe in His teachings . We believe the bible is the hand written, God inspired, word of God. No Christian is perfect even after they accept Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior, as you insinuate that they are with your statement. Every church in America is filled with former sinners. Some who may still be working on issues. What you fail to recognise is the fact that the bible says we all falls short of the target. But redemption is available for all which is why all who believe in Jesus as long as they ask for it, get it so long as they truthfully repent. Sarah must have asked for forgiveness (no I have no proof but I know the signs). If she followed the protocols for doing so ... in Jesus's name, she received it. Plain and simple. She just has to truly repent. Repeat process should you miss the mark again in some other way. If God forgives He holds no record of the offense. Its as thou they never sinned. If God forgives, it leaves only leaves Satan, evil doers, those in Isaiah 5:20

11 hours ago, Markinsa said:

Isaiah 5:20 (NASB)

20 Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil;
Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness;
Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!

 

 

and possibly you who will never forgive or forget ones failures because it does not fit their narrative . 

 

Bottomline, this will all be over around or before the end of June. The time frame that AG Barr said the investigation into the violations of law, FISA abuses, and obstruction on HRC part (destruction of subpoenaed materials etc) that is intent baby . The investigation will be over by then and charges will be applied. Then the actors and not just their satellite personnel will go to jail. As you know sitting Presidents cannot be charged with crimes while in office. While former Presidents, no longer sitting Presidents, can be charged with crimes. Basically all the false claims, Dem Congressmen and Senators claims of proof of collusion and obstruction, but never EVER producing any evidence, all that is obstruction. Obstruction designed with the intent to cover up the crimes they committed in their plans to rig the 2016 election so HRC and crew can get elected President. The Deep State actors, Democrats and Republicans alike, are shaking in their boots. As they should.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Pitcher said:

How about you BA, how about an apology to the board for continuing to promote a bogus story.

 

Bogus? Indictments abound... That's not fake. White House council said if they did what Trump asked they would breaking the law. Sadly our president thinks laws don't matter. The only thing bogus is that instead of worrying about draining the swamp, he's been filling it. He has increased spending to new heights thus more debt. He is breaking the backs of American farmers. He is handing out corporate welfare like he is a member of the Bush family. He is losing the trust of allies. He calls dictators good people. His staff is either indicted or refuse to do his dirty work and leak his kookie ideas to the world. What's bogus is that people still fall the ploys of a conman. People drink up the conspiracy Kool-Aid. How many actually believed the Pizza Gate fantasy? How many believe there is a secret coup in the works? How many believe the crazy fake news rhetoric, now that we see his own people saying most of the reporting has been accurate? 

Why do his supporters believe everything his people say one day and then all his best hires are liars and part of the Deep State the next day? What is truly bogus is that good honest people are being swindled by someone who says one thing today and the opposite tomorrow. 

 

So I don't apologize for calling a spade a spade. I don't apologize for posting news stories that are not fake according to members of the administration. And again I don't apologize for wondering why there is an abundance of evidence pointing to the Kommies infiltrating our election process and being pissed off our president thinks the most evil guy on the planet is our buddy and does nothing to stop the invasion. And I will not apologize for thinking that anyone who calls themselves a patriot should be outraged by the fact our democracy is under attack and they yet they support a guy who is hellbent on tearing down the foundation our country is built on. 

 

America doesn't need some egomaniac who's biggest concern is how this week plays out on SNL. And besides he cheats at golf...

Doesn't get much worse than that.

 

B/A

  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 2
  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, yota691 said:

When Trump stated he hires the best prior to the elections in reference to his business. Which has a success rate of almost 98% regardless of a couple defaults. Come on B/A out of 500 business you gonna have some bad...When Trump went to Washington that a different scenario, so you can't include that with all of the Real Obstruction and Collusion from Capitol Hill since day one...You either have nothing but hate store up, or you are being played, just like the rest of the Never Trumpers. Either way 04/20/2019 Trump still POTUS...:lol:

 

I said long ago Trump would finish his one term. So yes, 04/20/19 still there as I expected. But I can't give him a pass for at the very least not coming out and admitting his people broke laws and are criminals. I'm amazed at all these good people who are not disturbed to the continuing crooks of D.C.. I understand people supported Trump because they thought he was different, but we now see he is just one of them. I don't understand why people continue to believe him and more importantly trust him when he gets busted on lying on a daily basis. How many lies does it take for some to finally admit he is just another politician?

Image result for how many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop

 

B/A

  • Thanks 2
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ba are you real, you seem like a very intelligent person, it shocks me that you refuse to see Trump is here with all his bad habits because of all the really really terrible crap the Muslim Obama did. We came very close to losing this country. Don't you remember our credit rating lowered more than it ever was, GDP, 10 trillion more in debt, high unemployment, you can go on and on. Pres Trump might be a lying ass but he has it going the right way 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BA, you should apologize to the board for promoting a phony Russian Collusion Story.  You can twist it, turn or flip it, but the Russian Collusion story was NOT True.  You are a typical Democratic Hack.  Keep spewing the hate for that’s what Irrational Democrats do.  

 

i’m done with you. You are a dishonest person.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6944539/Trump-offers-rare-praise-New-York-Times-continues-rail-against-hit-job-against-him.html

'They got that one right!' Trump offers rare praise to the New York Times for an opinion piece written by a contributor as he continues to rail against Mueller's 'hit job' against him

  • Trump praised an opinion piece written by Christopher Buskirk, the editor of the American Greatness journal, who was on 'Fox & Friends' on Sunday morning
  • POTUS continued to rail against the 'hit job' against him by Robert Mueller
  • The president claims to be a victim of the probe, even as he claims the special counsel's report vindicated him of collusion and obstruction 

 

President Donald Trump offered rare praise for the New York Times on Sunday after publication of an opinion piece written by a contributor to the newspaper as he continued to rail against the 'hit job' against him by special counsel Robert Mueller. 

'Do you believe this? The New York Times Op-Ed: MEDIA AND DEMOCRATS OWE TRUMP AN APOLOGY. Well, they got that one right!,' he wrote on Twitter.  

The president was referring to an opinion piece written on Thursday entitled 'Barr Is Right About Everything. Admit You Were Wrong.' The author is Christopher Buskirk, the editor of the American Greatness journal and a contributing opinion writer to the newspaper.

President Donald Trump offered rare praise for the New York Times on Sunday

President Donald Trump offered rare praise for the New York Times on Sunday

12538144-6944539-image-a-2_1555851148520

 

12538142-6944539-image-a-3_1555851151753
Loaded
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  • Thanks 3
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Pitcher said:

Do you believe this? The New York Times Op-Ed: MEDIA AND DEMOCRATS OWE TRUMP AN APOLOGY. Well, they got that one right!,

 

You need to get it it right too BA!!!!! !!

 

Thats not my Red but You deserve a few for being so stubborn and WRONG!!!!

  • Thanks 3
  • Upvote 3
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obama DOJ has to fess up on FISA 'spying' after Mueller finds no collusion, GOP investigator says

 

 

A key Republican member of the House Judiciary Committee says the Obama Justice Department has some explaining to do.

 

Special counsel Robert Mueller's inability to find collusion between President Trump's campaign and Russia begs the question of why officials sought FISA warrants to wiretap one-time campaign adviser Carter Page, Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Texas, said Sunday on Fox News.

He said Attorney General William Barr, who recently testified "spying did occur" on Trump's campaign, needs to seek answers.

 

"I'm glad that he has focused on getting the Mueller report out in a redacted form that people can see, but now his focus needs to be answering his own question, as he said, there was spying, the Obama Justice Department and intelligence community did spy on the Trump campaign," Ratcliffe said on "Sunday Morning Futures."

"The question now that gis was there a predicate for that?" he added. "Particularly when the predicate was supposedly that there was collusion. Now we know there's no evidence of collusion. Again Bob Mueller didn't say if there was insufficient evidence of collusion. He said, 'No evidence.' He said, 'There isn't any evidence.' So if there wasn't any evidence of collusion what was the probable cause, what was the predicate for the Obama Justice Department to go to the FISA court and represent that there was probable cause of a crime of a conspiracy with Russia and the folks that made those verifications, they got some explaining to do."

Barr is expected to testify about the Mueller report in the next couple weeks. Barr, who sparked an uproar among Democrats earlier this month when he said "spying did occur" on the Trump campaign, is putting a team together to look into surveillance abuse

 
Ratcliffe, a former federal prosecutor, said he hopes both Barr and Mueller can illuminate Congress on why the infamous Trump dossier was left out of the report and explain the "troubling origin" of the FISA warrants taken out on Page.

"Remember that the Obama Justice Department didn't just go to the FISA court and represent there was probable cause of collusion that we now know didn't exist on a single occasion," Ratcliffe said. "They did so four times over a year, and so how is that allowed to happen and what steps is he taking, what investigations are underway, and what assurances can he give the American people that there will be accountability for folks who made false verifications about a dossier that was unverifiable because it was untrue."

The dossier, compiled by ex-British spy Christopher Steele, contained salacious and unverified claims about Trump's ties to Russia. It was used by the FBI obtain a series of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrants to wiretap Page. The first warrant application was submitted in October 2016, after which there were three renewals at three-month intervals, including in January, April, and June 2017. 

Page was investigated over his interactions with Russians but was never charged by Mueller.

 
Ratcliffe has been an integral GOP investigator questioning top brass in the Justice Department and FBI in an investigation examining possible political bias. Last week, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., sent a notification letter to Barr saying his team "identified several potential violations of the law" as part of an investigation into origins of the Trump-Russia investigation and hopes to set up a meeting with Ratcliffe and himself to discuss eight crimina
 
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Evidence of FBI-media 'corruption' coming out before DOJ inspector general report

 

Rep. Matt Gaetz says evidence of FBI officials improperly receiving incentives from the media in exchange for leaks will soon come out.

 

During an interview on Fox News late Saturday, the Florida Republican said the Justice Department inspector general is examining the FBI's relationship with some members of the press. But, he said some of this information will be made public before the watchdog report's release.

"One of the other nuggets that the inspector general is working on is the corruption that existed between the media and members of of the FBI," Gaetz said. "Where members of the mainstream media were giving concert passes and athletic tickets and other incentives to people in the FBI to leak to them so we'll be seeing that even before we see the inspector general's report on how this fraudulent investigation began."

 

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz announced the initiation of a FISA abuse investigation in March 2018 after requests from both then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Republican members in Congress. He is expected to wrap up by May or June.

It's unclear where Gaetz may have gotten his information. His office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

However, his fellow GOP colleagues Reps. Mark Meadows and Jim Jordan recently said they discussed the FISA investigation with Horowitz. The lawmakers claimed the Justice Department and FBI had abused the FISA process and misled the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in their investigation and surveillance of President Trump and his associates during the campaign, as well as during the Trump administration.

 
Gaetz questioned the voracity of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation, noting how he cited media reports "as if they're gospel when they clearly are not."

Mueller's report, which was released in redacted form on Thursday, found no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Mueller declined to make a conclusion about possible obstruction of justice by the president.

The DOJ inspector general released a report last summer that found many FBI officials talking to the press and attending "social events" with the media during the investigation into Hillarious Clinton's private emails, breaking with FBI policy limiting employees who are authorized to speak to the media.

In October, the inspector general released more information in a summary that said a senior FBI official, who had since retired, accepted tickets to a sports event from a television reporter who regularly covered the bureau.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/matt-gaetz-evidence-of-fbi-media-corruption-coming-out-before-doj-inspector-general-report

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Former George W. Bush aide: Obama failed to stop Russian election interference

 

A former member of the George W. Bush White House said the findings of special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation that Russia meddled in the 2016 presidential election are one person's fault: President Barack Obama. 

 

And that started with negotiations with Russian President Vladimir Putin over the Iran nuclear deal. 

“Obama wanted Putin in the [Iran nuclear] deal, and to stand up to him on election interference would have, in Obama's estimation, upset that negotiation. This turned out to be a disastrous policy decision,” Scott Jennings wrote in an opinion piece for CNN, where he is a commentator. 

 

President Trump withdrew the U.S. from the deal in 2018.

The Mueller report,released Thursdaywith redactions, revealed that Russia began interfering in American democracy in 2014. But in 2016, Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice told her staff to stand down and not strike against Putin. 

 

The “potential collusion narrative” was a smokescreen behind which Democrats could hide when they realized that Obama had failed to effectively address Russian meddling, Jennings said. 

“He arguably chose to prioritize his relationship with Putin vis-à-vis Iran over pushing back against Russian election interference that had been going on for at least two years,” Jennings said. 

President George W. Bush appointed Jennings, who worked on his 2000 campaign, special assistant to the president and deputy director of political affairs in 2005, where he served until 2007. Jennings, now a public relations executive, also worked on campaigns for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/former-george-w-bush-aide-obama-failed-to-stop-russian-election-interference

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Robert Mueller's team really was 'conflicted' and the special counsel report proves it

 

The special counsel report makes three things clear: First, there was never any evidence to back up the collusion conspiracy. Second, there was not enough evidence to accuse President Trump of obstruction.

 

Third, the lawyers that put together the report were really disappointed with both findings. Trump was right all along that Robert Mueller’s team was “conflicted.” 

Even though It specifically states that the investigation “did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated” with Russia, and that because “the evidence we obtained did not establish that the President was involved in an underlying crime,” it nudges House Democrats in the direction of impeachment anyway.

 

Attorney General William Barr accurately summarized the report Thursday morning when he repeated over and over again that the investigation uncovered no evidence to back up the ridiculous Russia conspiracy and that Mueller’s team deferred to his supervisors on the question of obstruction, which Barr and his deputy Rod Rosenstein settled themselves by saying there wasn't enough there, either.

But the full report still contains little hints for Democrats that it’s possible there in fact was collusion (despite the lack of evidence) and that they would be justified in pursuing their own corruption case. Did they let Maxine Waters edit this thing?

After meticulously documenting the events of the 2016 campaign and finding nothing that showed Trump or his campaign coordinated on any criminal level with Russia, Mueller’s team slipped in this gem: “While this report embodies factual and legal determinations that the Office [of Special Counsel] believes to be accurate and complete to the greatest extent possible … the Office cannot rule out the possibility [that] unavailable information would shed additional light on (or cast in a new light) the events describe in the report.”

 
They might as well have ended the report with, “To be continued, maybe ...” 

Given unlimited time, money and power, the special counsel found nothing. Adding that caveat undermines the whole reason that the investigation ended. The point of concluding an investigation is that it’s done!

On the obstruction question, the report acknowledges three crucial reasons that it declined to make a prosecutorial decision. One of them is a longstanding Justice Department policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted. But the other two reasons are more important: that there was no underlying crime in relation to Russia and the campaign, and that there was “substantial evidence” that any of Trump’s efforts to curtail the department’s investigations (including with the firing of James Comey) were undertaken because he honestly “believed that the erroneous perception he was under [personal] investigation harmed his ability to manage domestic and foreign affairs, particularly in dealings with Russia.” 

The report does lay out evidence to the contrary, suggesting it’s at least possible Trump was actually more concerned with the investigations turning up something criminal — such as when he told White House aides to say that Comey was fired over his handling of the Hillarious Clinton email controversy, a clear pretext from the beginning.

But what the report doesn’t say is that Trump would have very obvious political reasons in choosing not to be up-front about that. It doesn’t take mental strain to guess how Democrats would have reacted if Trump had said he was firing Comey because he wouldn’t publicly state that the president wasn’t under investigation. That would have put us in the exact same place we are today.

That he thought Democrats would believe he had fired Comey over the Clinton controversy speaks to Trump’s self-delusion, not to criminality. 

But in any case, the special counsel team admits there was no evidence of an underlying crime, and that there was “substantial evidence” that Trump’s actions in office regarding the investigation had a noncriminal motive. And yet the report includes a nice road map for Democrats who want to impeach him anyway, with a suggestion that even if Trump did not obstruct justice, he’s nonetheless corrupt.

“We concluded that in the rare case in which a criminal investigation of the President 's conduct is justified,” the special counsel team wrote, “inquiries to determine whether the President acted for a corrupt motive should not impermissibly chill his performance of his constitutionally assigned duties.” 

In case the point wasn't quite getting across, they added that Congress may still “apply the obstruction laws to the President's corrupt exercise of the powers of office” because it “accords with our constitutional system of checks and balances and the principle that no person is above the law.” 

Is that tortured cliche really something we needed to hear again? 

Democrats and liberals in the media threw a fit because Barr used the phrase “no collusion” in his press conference Thursday, because it’s the same one Trump has used. I’m sure they’re tickled pink, though, at seeing their own language -- “no person is above the law! — used in the report, justifying their impeachment fever-dreams. 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Devin Nunes: Mueller's report ignored abuses of power by the FBI

 

House Intelligence Committee ranking member Devin Nunes on Thursday knocked special counsel Robert Mueller's report for overlooking how the FBI conducted its probe into President Trump and his 2016 campaign.

 

Nunes' reaction reflects his efforts to supplement Attorney General William Barr's inquiry into why the FBI started examining Russian interference in the 2016 elections, with his own on Capitol Hill.

"The Mueller report ignored a wide range of abuses committed during the FBI’s investigation of the Trump campaign. And now, with the revelation that the Special Counsel was authorized at the outset to investigate Carter Page for allegedly colluding with Russians to hack the election, it’s clear that false allegations from the Steele dossier played a major role not only in the FISA warrant application on Page, but in the appointment of the Special Counsel as well," the California Republican wrote in a statement.

 

"The biggest takeaway from the entire Russia hoax is that our nation’s counter-intelligence capabilities should never again be abused to target an administration’s political opponents," he said. "Those who colluded in this effort — the media, Fusion GPS, Democratic Party leaders in Congress, the Clinton campaign, and partisan intelligence leaders — should apologize to the innocent people they maligned and to the American people they deceived."

[Related: RNC on Mueller report: Now investigate the investigators]

 

Fusion GPS hired former British spy Christopher Steele, who compiled the so-called Trump-Russia dossier that included unverified claims about the president's compromising ties to Russia. GOP lawmakers such as Nunes have alleged the FBI misled the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to obtain warrants to spy on ex-Trump campaign staffer Page by using the memos without mentioning its Democratic benefactors and Steele's anti-Trump bias.

 
Nunes' comments contradict his Democratic counterpart on the panel, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who moments earlier said the conduct of Trump and his associates as outlined in the Mueller report was "unquestionably dishonest, unethical, immoral, and unpatriotic."

However, his remarks were foreshadowed by Minority House Whip Steve Scalise, R-La., who on Thursday morning said, "Congress must push for accountability with the bad apples in our intelligence agencies."

Ahead of the release of Mueller's report, Nunes indicated he would be parsing the document for information on "some type of setup" on three subjects: former national security adviser Michael Flynn who was fired over lying about his contacts with Russians, Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud who told ex-Trump campaign aide George Papadopoulos Moscow had thousands of Hillarious Clinton's emails, and the infamous June 2016 Trump Tower meeting between top Trump campaign officials and a Kremlin-linked lawyer.

Nunes last week sent a notification letter to Barr, advising him that his team had "identified several potential violations of the law" as part of their investigation into origins of the Trump-Russia probe and inquiring into the possibility of discussing eight criminal referrals.

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/devin-nunes-muellers-report-ignored-abuses-of-power-by-the-fbi

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite Mueller report, Democrats won't stop until Trump is behind bars

 

The Mueller report was never going to be enough for those who want to see President Trump in jail. For many Democrats, anything less than that is seen as evidence of a cover-up.

 

Long before the redacted report was even released, Rolling Stoneasked, “Could Trump go to prison?”

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, D-Calif., speculated that President Trump may “face the real prospect of jail time,” and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said Trump “may not be a free person” by the 2020 election. The New York Times boldly proclaimed that President Trump “might well be a criminal.” 

 

These are clearly the rantings of the unhinged leaders of the #Resistance movement against Trump. Their teeth-gnashing won’t subside now that the redacted Mueller report has been released. They’re only going to get more hysterical based on their raw hatred of Trump.

The only option Mueller had in the eyes of Democrats, after all, was to throw a duly elected president behind bars — anything less would be dereliction of duty.

They wouldn’t even take the word of Attorney General William Barr when he delivered news that contradicted their expectations. When Barr released his summary of Mueller’s findings last month, leading Democrats rejected it outright, implying that Barr was covering for the president.

 
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., even stated flat-out that “I don’t trust Barr; I trust Mueller.”

When Barr subsequently stated the basic fact that “spying did occur” targeting the Trump campaign in 2016, Democrats became deliriously defensive and ramped up their attacks on the attorney general.

Pelosi declared that Barr was "going off the rails," Washington Post columnist Jennifer Rubin argued that Barr should be “impeached,” and CNN labeled the attorney general as a conspiracy theorist and a "flunky."

At the same time, though, some Democrats seemed prepared for the Mueller report to completely debunk the collusion hoax. Just days before the release of the full report, freshman socialist Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., began laying the groundwork for her party’s post-Mueller strategy, downplaying the significance of the collusion investigation and arguing that President Trump should be impeached for other, equally unfounded reasons.

Former Sen. Bob Kerrey, D-Neb., on the other hand, suggested a more humble approach, saying that those who were prosecuted for “obstructing” an investigation into a nonexistent crime should be set free.

“If there is a man or woman who was convicted and sentenced for not telling the truth about a collusion that never happened, I’d like them to be pardoned,” Kerrey told the Washington Times in an interview.

If that ever happens, though, Kerrey’s fellow Democrats will no doubt howl in outrage and try to revive their claims that Trump somehow obstructed justice by exercising his lawful presidential authority — just as they did when he fired former FBI Director James Comey for his grossly unprofessional conduct.

The Democrats have long taken it as a matter of faith that Mueller would find something they could use to send President Trump to jail, or at least impeach him. Mueller couldn’t provide them with evidence of crimes that were never committed, but even that won’t be enough to make them admit that they were wrong from the very beginning.

 

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last article clearly shows the Dems Stategy,

 

Deny Deny Deny

 

Deflect Deflect Deflect

 

Accuse Accuse Accuse

 

Attack Attack Attack

 

Litigate Litigate Litigate

 

It appears the Dems on this board got the memo.  The Dems have only one item on their Platform. “Get Trump”

 

 

  • Thanks 3
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Trump Conflater Haters. The "Crimes" that those Trumps associates were convicted of had nothing to do with collusion with Russia. They were process crimes. Crimes because they didn't recall exactly what they said to people. Because they didn't register their lobbyist jobs for foreign governments. What are you guys going to do when your peeps get indicted, tried, and convicted for their crimes during the 2016 election. Plus their pay to play regarding the sale of 20% of our Uranium to Russia while they were Secretary of State. A deal blest by then President Obama. What then folks? 

  • Thanks 2
  • Upvote 2
  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Flynn was a perjury trap. When Trump wins his second term I hope he pardons every last one of the indicted.  I also hope a Republican led Special Investigation arrests Wiseman with guns draw at 6am and threatens his family if he doesn’t spill the beans on HRC.  

 

I bet several posters on this on this board would cry foul with that activity.  It’s the same thing with Dems, a Dual Judiciary and unequal application of our Laws is ok as long as it’s against Conservatives.  

 

How about Waters and Cummings calling for impeachment.  That is pure straight up RACISM but no one will call it that.  If you called for Barry’s Impeachment because he wasn’t born in the US you’re a RACIST.  

 

I’ve had with these unlawful Socialist arrogant Democrats.  

 

jg1 you are 100% correct.  Time to get after it.  I’ve tried to be nice, tried to be reasonable but not anymore.  

  • Thanks 3
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Pitcher said:

Flynn was a perjury trap. When Trump wins his second term I hope he pardons every last one of the indicted.  I also hope a Republican led Special Investigation arrests Wiseman with guns draw at 6am and threatens his family if he doesn’t spill the beans on HRC.  

 

I bet several posters on this on this board would cry foul with that activity.  It’s the same thing with Dems, a Dual Judiciary and unequal application of our Laws is ok as long as it’s against Conservatives.  

 

How about Waters and Cummings calling for impeachment.  That is pure straight up RACISM but no one will call it that.  If you called for Barry’s Impeachment because he wasn’t born in the US you’re a RACIST.  

 

I’ve had with these unlawful Socialist arrogant Democrats.  

 

jg1 you are 100% correct.  Time to get after it.  I’ve tried to be nice, tried to be reasonable but not anymore.  

It's ok.  Breathe. It will all be good. Goozfaba,  goozfaba.  Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, stt said:

Ba are you real, you seem like a very intelligent person, it shocks me that you refuse to see Trump is here with all his bad habits because of all the really really terrible crap the Muslim Obama did. We came very close to losing this country. Don't you remember our credit rating lowered more than it ever was, GDP, 10 trillion more in debt, high unemployment, you can go on and on. Pres Trump might be a lying ass but he has it going the right way 

 

All you numbers are actually the result of the Bush years... The banking scandal. The economic collapse. The down markets. All that started after 2 terms of Bush... 

 

B/A

  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Pitcher said:

 

i’m done with you. You are a dishonest person.

 

And yet you support a president who lies for a living. I'm not dishonest at all. I post news (I know you think it is fake news because Trump says so, but even his own staff says the news has been accurate) and I give my opinions. If posting news and giving opinion is to be deemed dishonest, then every poster on this board would be dishonest by your standard...

 

B/A

  • Thanks 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



  • Testing the Rocker Badge!

  • Live Exchange Rate

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.