McCarthy was right

[bohica]

 McCarthy received a lot of flack when he made the statement that treason and communism had infiltrated into the highest levels of the nation. Trump is receiving a lot of flack because he is proving McCarthy was right. Trump is stripping away the masks of the political elite and Hollywood traitors. Never would it have been allowed that ANTIFA would be allowed and not arrested for sedition. The Congressman whose son is one of them now openly supposed the group. He would have been kicked out of Congress at one time. People like Kerry who was working behind the President's back to undermine sanctions against Iran would have been arrested. Someone like Hillarious Clinton with the mountain of evidence of selling Uranium to the Russian during a time in which it was not permitted. Never could there have been a time when there were masses of dead with a singular connection point which was Hillarious and the Clinton cartel and not have a SERIOUS investigation. Never would someone like Kerry who actively went behind the President's back to undermine sanctions against Iran have been permitted without repercussions. Never would the IRS and FBI be allowed to have been weaponized against the American people. Never would someone like Waters who openly calls for attacks upon people simply because of their political beliefs have been allowed. Trump is stripping off the mask from traitors and criminals and the protected and elite are going nuts. Personally, I wonder what all these people who are attacking Trump are trying to hide. These people must truly hate this country and our way of life. It is at time very hard for me to keep my militant side civil as I see people openly violating laws and receiving no punishment, burning cities and being encouraged like Obama did during the Ferguson riots and the blatant double standard in the media and Congress such as the 'investigation' of Russian influence verses the millions of illegal Mexicans who openly influence the elections and brag about it. McCarthy was right in that there have been people and groups infiltrate all aspects of society who have the direct goal of the destruction of the American way of life and sheep follow right behind them who have sold their soul for money to go out and protest about things they neither have any knowledge there of nor interest in except to be paid. It is these people, the Democrat party which is no longer the party of our grandfathers but merely a mask for old Communism and liberal ideology which is more concerned about not 'offending' people than they are rule of commonsense. If it was not for Trump all these things would have continued to grow in the background until, like a cancerous tumor, have choked the very life out of our nation.

 

 

 

 

[Synopsis]

34 minutes ago, bohica said:

McCarthy was right in that there have been people and groups infiltrate all aspects of society who have the direct goal of the destruction of the American way of life and sheep follow right behind them who have sold their soul for money to go out and protest about things they neither have any knowledge there of nor interest in except to be paid. It is these people, the Democrat party which is no longer the party of our grandfathers but merely a mask for old Communism and liberal ideology which is more concerned about not 'offending' people than they are rule of commonsense. If it was not for Trump all these things would have continued to grow in the background until, like a cancerous tumor, have choked the very life out of our nation.

 

Extremely well stated and to the point entire post with no valid exceptions to the statements made, Bohica, AND The Best Of Your Weekend To You!!! 

 

Unfortunately, the whackadoodles, with absolutely no Reason or Common Sense, will tear this up like a rag with no consideration to the solid nature, actual fact, and the implications to the current sad state of affairs due to the treasonous deeds of the subjects of Your post.

 

It could have been and could be now an entirely different desired and beneficial pervasive condition in The United States Of America if Rule Of Law is actually and necessarily applied by the True Patriots Of The United States Of America to especially include the actual Citizenry actually being True Patriots one and all.

[nstoolman1]

On what? He has not committed a crime much less been convicted of anything.

Any thing he has done as citizen Trump prior to being elected can not be used against him.

 

 

 

[Muleslayer]

1 hour ago, Botzwana said:

On Tucker tonight...he said if the dems win that they will impeach Trump.  that has me nervous

The Midterms.

Once more unto the breach, dear friends, once more; / Or close the wall up with our English dead.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[nstoolman1]

The Senate cannot impeach without having something impeachable done.

 

Impeachable offenses. The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States" who may be impeached and removed only for "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors".

 

High crimes and misdemeanors. ... The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct peculiar to officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, and refusal to obey a lawful order.

 

Almost all of the Senators and Congressman have done at least one of these. 

People in glass houses.....

[CSM (R) Thack]

Also needs a 2/3rds majority to pass in the senate...NOT gonna happen!!!🇺🇸

[umbertino]

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCarthyism

 

 

http://www.coldwar.org/articles/50s/senatorjosephmccarthy.asp

 

 

https://www.historychannel.com.au/articles/mccarthyism-joseph-mccarthys-witch-hunts/

 

 

http://gsite.univ-provence.fr/gsite/Local/dema/dir/docs_sem_E_F/Lit-Civ_US/McCarthyism.pdf

 

 

http://www.heroism.org/class/1950/heroes/mccarthy.htm

 

 

https://sites.google.com/site/johnsonthecrucible/group-one-witch-hunts-mccarthyism

 

 

https://learning.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/02/dec-2-1954-anti-communist-senator-joseph-mccarthy-is-condemned/

 

 

http://www.angelfire.com/tx/JoeMcCarthy/report.html

 

 

https://www.chipublib.org/from-salem-to-mccarthy/

[bohica]

All the posts and 'reports' cannot refute that the premise of what McCarthy was saying is happening and has happened for years.  Can anyone deny that treason and communism has infiltrated into the highest levels of government, media and entertainment?

[Synopsis]

2 hours ago, bohica said:

All the posts and 'reports' cannot refute that the premise of what McCarthy was saying is happening and has happened for years.  Can anyone deny that treason and communism has infiltrated into the highest levels of government, media and entertainment?

 

Very astute observations and Thank You, Bohica, Sir!

 

General George Patton wanted to go to war with the Soviet Union:

 

But his ambition to get to Berlin before Soviet forces was thwarted by supreme allied commander Dwight D. Eisenhower, who gave Patton's petrol supplies to the more cautious British General Bernard Montgomery.

Patton, who distrusted the Russians, believed Eisenhower wrongly prevented him closing the so-called Falaise Gap in the autumn of 1944, allowing hundreds of thousands of German troops to escape to fight again,. This led to the deaths of thousands of Americans during their winter counter-offensive that became known as the Battle of the Bulge.

In order to placate Stalin, the 3rd Army was also ordered to a halt as it reached the German border and was prevented from seizing either Berlin or Prague, moves that could have prevented Soviet domination of Eastern Europe after the war.

Mr Wilcox told The Sunday Telegraph: "Patton was going to resign from the Army. He wanted to go to war with the Russians. The administration thought he was nuts.

"He also knew secrets of the war which would have ruined careers.

I don't think Dwight Eisenhower would ever have been elected president if Patton had lived to say the things he wanted to say." Mr Wilcox added: "I think there's enough evidence here that if I were to go to a grand jury I could probably get an indictment, but perhaps not a conviction."

Charles Province, President of the George S. Patton Historical Society, said he hopes the book will lead to definitive proof of the plot being uncovered. He said: "There were a lot of people who were pretty damn glad that Patton died. He was going to really open the door on a lot of things that they screwed up over there."

 

But was assassinated instead:

 

The newly unearthed diaries of a colourful assassin for the wartime Office of Strategic Services (OSS), the forerunner of the CIA, reveal that American spy chiefs wanted Patton dead because he was threatening to expose allied collusion with the Russians that cost American lives.

 

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/3869117/General-George-S.-Patton-was-assassinated-to-silence-his-criticism-of-allied-war-leaders-claims-new-book.html

 

At the time of his death, Patton had been relegated to a desk job, overseeing the collection of Army records in Bavaria.  That he had been an outspoken critic of Stalin and a vocal proponent of liberating Berlin and the German people from certain communist aggression triggered his sudden removal from the battlefield.  In the aftermath of war, the Western powers sought to sideline the mercurial Patton and his incendiary views.

But Patton despised the politically driven circus and the media minions that carried out their dirty work.  Still, he continued to speak out against the Russians as an American witness to their brutality during and after the war.  As Stalin devoured Eastern Europe, Patton remarked, “I have no particular desire to understand them except to ascertain how much lead or iron it takes to kill them… …the Russian has no regard for human life and they are all out sons-of-*******, barbarians, and chronic drunks.”

In early May 1945, as the Allies shut down the Nazi war machine, Patton stood with his massive 3rd Army on the outskirts of Prague in a potential face off with the Red Army. He pleaded for General Eisenhower’s green light to advance and capture the city for the Allies, which also would have meant containment of the Russians. British Prime Minister Churchill also thought the move a crucial and beneficial one for post-war Europe and insisted upon it, but to no avail. Eisenhower denied Patton’s request, and the Russians took the region, which would pay dearly for years to come.  Earlier that year, at the February conference in Yalta, President Roosevelt, with Churchill at his side, extended the hand of friendship to “Uncle Joe” Stalin and signed his Faustian pact.  In so doing, the destiny of millions was reduced to mass starvation, blood revenge, and distant gulags. At the time, Patton understood the tragedy of this event and wrote, “We promised the Europeans freedom. It would be worse than dishonorable not to see that they have it. This might mean war with the Russians, but what of it?”

 

https://www.frontpagemag.com/fpm/234351/foresight-patton-robert-orlando

 

Yep, should have followed through with General George Patton's advice and defeated the USSR. Would have avoided the Cold War. Former The United States Of America Presidents Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Harry S. Truman (my fingers cringe as I type that name). Communists perhaps?

 

Or how about the Korean Peninsula?

 

China Enters the War

Over the weekend of October 15-17, President Truman flew to Wake Island in the Pacific to meet General MacArthur for the first time. The most important question that Truman asked MacArthur was whether he thought China would enter the war. The general confidently replied that the Chinese would not enter the fighting, and the war would be over by Christmas.

Anxious to wrap up the war, MacArthur ordered American and other U.N. troops to press on to the Yalu River. In doing this, he ignored the warnings of the Communist Chinese as well as a directive by military planners in Washington to send only South Korean troops into the provinces bordering China.

On November 25, 1950, nearly 200,000 Chinese soldiers poured across the Yalu River, forcing U.N. forces into a full retreat to the south. MacArthur demanded authority to bomb Chinese bases north of the Yalu in China itself. But fearing a widening of the war and possible entry of the Soviet Union, Truman and his advisors refused. Instead, they ordered him to organize a phased and orderly retreat. On December 29, Truman administration officials informed MacArthur that the United States had abandoned the goal of reunifying Korea.

MacArthur was infuriated at what he considered the Truman administration's sell-out of Korea. MacArthur proposed his own plan for victory. He wanted a complete blockade of the Communist Chinese coastline. He wanted to bomb industrial sites and other strategic targets within China. He wanted to bring Nationalist Chinese troops from Formosa to fight in Korea. Finally, he wanted the Nationalists to invade weak positions on the Communist Chinese mainland.

Appalled that MacArthur's plan could launch World War III, Truman and the top military leaders in Washington quickly rejected it. But MacArthur continued to publicly argue for his plan. He also criticized the "politicians in Washington" for refusing to allow him to bomb Chinese bases north of the Yalu River. He did all this in spite of an order from his superiors in Washington not to make any public statements on foreign or military policy without first getting approval from the Department of State or Defense. MacArthur was on a collision course with his commander in chief.

 

http://www.crf-usa.org/bill-of-rights-in-action/bria-17-3-b-truman-macarthur-and-the-korean-war.html

 

Could have had a unified Korean Peninsula and gotten the Chinese Communists to boot. So was former President Harry S. Truman (my fingers cringe as I type that name) a Communist? Harry S. Truman had two distinct chances to confront and overcome Communist Powers (the USSR and China) but did not and here we have the messes and their consequences today. Although categorically denied, my father, who has since passed on and a The United States Marine assigned State side during the Korean War, stated former President Harry S. Truman and Congress did indeed cut off the supplies to The United States Of America soldiers fighting in the Chosin Reservoir area. They had to fight their way back in the most dire of conditions. My blood boils at the thought of the Treasonous Harry S. Truman and the Congressional members to commit such an act against The United States Of America service personnel who took the Oath To Defend The Constitution and then were abandoned on the battle field. What were the 200,000 or so Chinese soldiers doing right at the Yalu River? Why were they so concerned? Were they coming to the aid of the USSR since they were pushed back? I talked to a Korean War veteran in the 1990s who actually saw all the Chinese Communists on the other side of the Yalu River and fought his way back. He was a well respected citizen living a quite life in a rural town. You could tell by his only stating certain things there was a whole lot more he wasn't going to talk about.

 

Five years after a world war has been won, men's hearts should anticipate a long peace, and men's minds should be free from the heavy weight that comes with war. But this is not such a period--for this is not a period of peace. This is a time of the "Cold War." This is a time when all the world is split into two vast, increasingly hostile armed camps--a time of great armaments race ...

Six years ago, at the time of the first conference to map out the peace — Dumbarton Oaks — there was within the Soviet orbit 180,000,000 people. Lined up on the antitotalitarian side there were in the world at that time roughly 1,625,000,000 people. Today, only 6 years later, there are 800,000,000 people under the absolute domination of Soviet Russia--an increase of over 400 percent. On our side, the figure has shrunk to around 500,000,000. In other words, in less than 6 years the odds have changed from 9 to 1 in our favor to 8 to 5 against us. This indicates the swiftness of the tempo of Communist victories and American defeats in the cold war. As one of our outstanding historical figures once said, "When a great democracy is destroyed, it will not be because of enemies from without, but rather because of enemies from within."

 

Further stating:

 

When Chiang Kai-shek was fighting our war, the State Department had in China a young man named John S. Service. His task, obviously, was not to work for the communization of China. Strangely, however, he sent official reports back to the State Department urging that we torpedo our ally Chiang Kai-shek and stating, in effect, that communism was the best hope of China.

Later, this man — John Service — was picked up by the Federal Bureau of Investigation for turning over to the communists Secret state Department information. Strangely, however, he was never prosecuted. However, Joseph Grew, the Undersecretary of State, who insisted on his prosecution, was forced to resign. Two days after Grew's successor, Dean Acheson, took over as Undersecretary of State, this man — John Service — who had been picked up by the FBI and who had previously urged that communism was the best hope of China, was not only reinstated in the State Department but promoted. And finally, under Acheson, placed in charge of all placements and promotions.

 

Further stating:

 

This brings us down to the case of one Alger Hiss who is more important not as an individual any more, but rather because he is so representative of a group in the State Department ...

If time permitted, it might be well to go into detail about the fact that Hiss was Roosevelt's chief advisor at Yalta when Roosevelt was admittedly in ill health and tired physically and mentally ...

According to the then Secretary of State Stettinius, here are some of the things that Hiss helped to decide at Yalta. (1) The establishment of a European High Commission; (2) the treatment of Germany — this you will recall was the conference at which it was decided that we would occupy Berlin with Russia occupying an area completely circling the city, which, as you know, resulted in the Berlin airlift which cost 31 American lives; (3) the Polish question; ... (6) Iran; (7) China — here's where we gave away Manchuria; (8) Turkish Straits question; (9) international trusteeships; (10) Korea....

I know that you are saying to yourself, "Well, why doesn't the Congress do something about it?" Actually, ladies and gentlemen, one of the important reasons for the graft, the corruption, the dishonesty, the disloyalty, the treason in high Government positions--one of the most important reasons why this continues is a lack of moral uprising on the part of the 140,000,000 American people. In the light of history, however, this is not hard to explain.

 

http://www.ushistory.org/us/53a.asp

 

During the Yalta Conference held February 4 - 11, 1945, I heard that Winston Churchill was furious that he was left out of discussions between Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Joseph Stalin where Joseph Stalin was pushing his agenda over Franklin Delano Roosevelt due at least in part to Franklin Delano Roosevelt's failing health. Franklin Delano Roosevelt passed away two months later on April 12, 1945.

 

For sure, Communism and Communists have gotten a pass for far too long and have had free reign in their agenda but should have never been allowed to do anything. Praise GOD the Communists were stopped from having Hilly elected as President Of The United States Of America!!!

Edited August 25, 2018 by Synopsis

[nstoolman1]

Patton wanted to arm the German prisoners and fight the Russians. 

[Synopsis]

Just now, nstoolman1 said:

Patton wanted to arm the German prisoners and fight the Russians. 

 

Sorta like a hybrid Proxy War. Cool. Better the Nazis dying fighting the Russians!

 

We'd of given the German Prisoners all the Pervitin and Benzedrine they needed!!!

 

https://allthatsinteresting.com/pervitin-nazi-drugs

 

http://lmharchive.ca/benzedrine-sulphate-used-in-war-operations-by-brook-durham/

[Shabibilicious]

I had no idea there were still so many McCarthy fans living in this country.  As they say, history is bound to repeat itself.    

 

GO RV, then BV

[bostonangler]

9 minutes ago, Shabibilicious said:

I had no idea there were still so many McCarthy fans living in this country.  As they say, history is bound to repeat itself.    

 

GO RV, then BV

 

It seems there is a love of fascism in a small part of the American population.

 

B/A

[Shabibilicious]

5 minutes ago, bostonangler said:

 

It seems there is a love of fascism in a small part of the American population.

 

B/A

 

Roy Cohn lives on through DJT.

 

GO RV, then BV

[nstoolman1]

If not wanting communist and subversives in my government and country is McCarthism, then count me in.

And yes I think the flag should have been left up longer. The Code does allow for the shorter term though.

[Charlie Echo]

Connecting the Dots Behind the Curtain.  This should answer with certainty any doubt this is all about covering the Corruption, Treason and conspiracy to commit.. Hang them all. 

 

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/corruption/connecting-the-dots-behind-the-curtain/

[MyLadiesDaddy]

I've been saying since the early 70s that McCarthy was right. The liberal demonic controlled left even baffled Hitler. And if you wanna 

know how this happened you need look no further than our own hate filled lefties that cannot ever accept that they lost a race. 

Ignorance is bliss and man are they a festering boil on  the backside of America. Unable to see all the wonderful good that has been 

done in the last year and a halve because of their indoctrinated blind hatred for all things American. These people only believe 

in the one world government. They want to see the complete Annihilation of America. They came to America via their comrade Woodrow Wilson. And they 

took control through their comrade F.D.R., they are a bunch of deceitful liars that will stop at nothing to achieve what they want.

And if we don't wake up to that fact and TOTALLY DESTROY them they WILL WIN. 

This is what they are counting on, our laziness. Our never failing ability to grow fat and happy and close our eyes and go to sleep while 

they silently move in for the kill. If the Demoncrats take control in November I'm telling you they will make Hitler look like a 

Sunday school teacher. Listen to what they are saying about Trump, this is EXACTLY what they want to do. It's called Projection. 

They will see nothing wrong with eliminating the opposition by any and all means 

necessary. Failure to see that is to call for your own destruction. Failure to vote for Conservatives only in Nov. is to call for the 

Genocide  of all Christians and Conservatives. 

[Shabibilicious]

I second LGD's call to vote in November.  Vote free of fear, vote your conscience....don't leave it up to somebody else.  

 

GO RV, then BV

[bostonangler]

11 hours ago, ladyGrace'sDaddy said:

Failure to vote for Conservatives only in Nov. is to call for the 

Genocide  of all  Conservatives. 

 

Let's hope so...

 

B/A

Edited August 28, 2018 by bostonangler

[MyLadiesDaddy]

44 minutes ago, bostonangler said:

 

Let's hope so...

 

B/A

You know I edited my comments to leave you and other liberals here mostly out of what I was saying. One of the lines that I 

cut, directly stated that you would whole heartily agree with the, "Genocide of all Christians and Conservatives". 

Thank you for proving my point, now I can only hope that sane folks are seeing this. 

Cause while you're pretending to joke, I know that your as serious as a heart attack. 

[Charlie Echo]

 

 

Blog/Corruption

Posted Aug 24, 2018 by Martin Armstrong

There is an interesting piece running around the internet that someone has put together. Other than Lisa H. Barsoomian, the connections are true. Indeed, the characters in the play are all incredibly connected and it certainly appears that there is a deep and dark conspiracy against Trump. But this is not against Trump simply because they do not like him personally. This is about removing an outsider from Washington. These are just the tip of the iceberg.

The New Yorker has revealed part of the conspiracy has been highlighted by a memo which has surfaced from an Obama aid who set up a war room to undermine Trump and his foreign policy. They are managing much of the media. A new report from The New Yorker reveals some details of a “conspiracy memo” that has been circulating behind the curtain for the past year. What seems to be operating is a massive campaign to actually disrupt the Trump Administration and prevent it from actually managing anything. This is far worse than pretend Russian hacking. This is a real covert ops to prevent the opposition from doing anything and this undermines the government – not just Trump. This is very strange and may be one reason in the years ahead we face a civil war.

Indeed, there is a lot more going on behind the curtain than people realize. Don’t forget, it was Lois Lerner who abused the IRS to target conservative groups who wanted to drain the swamp before Trump. Lerner argued that her testimony should be sealed and that she feared for her life if everyone she targeted using the IRS found out. She was given full paid leave from the IRS on May 23, 2013. In May 2014, Lerner was declared in contempt of Congress in connection with the invocation of her Fifth Amendment not to testify on the matter before a congressional committee. So she took the 5th claiming it might criminally expose here, and then Comey declares she committed no crime and would not prosecute her.

You have to understand that refusing to reform is why John Boehner was forced out of the Republicans. There was an internal revolution when the Tea Party was elected and this is who was targeted by Lerner. The revolution against Boehner took place because he tried to keep the status quo. Lerner used the IRS to go after the Tea Party and many believe that Boehner was behind that as well. He did remove every Congressman from any financial committee if they supported the Tea Party or Ron Paul. I know some of the people he retaliated against. When the Tea Party people arrived in Washington, Boehner told them they would vote how he directed. They said no way. They were elected for real reform. This is why Trump is where he is. This draining the swamp began before him. Boehner was retaliating against the same people Lerner targeted. Coincidence?

 

---

Connecting some dots

 

Here’s what it looks like when all the pieces are sewn together. It smells like conspiracy and treason. Everyone needs to read this. Slowly, and patiently, because it’s very important……

From 2001 to 2005 there was an ongoing investigation into the Clinton Foundation.

A Grand Jury had been impaneled.  Governments from around the world had donated to the “Charity”. Yet, from 2001 to 2003 none of those “Donations” to the Clinton Foundation were declared. Now you would think that an honest investigator would be able to figure this out.

Look who took over this investigation in 2005: None other than James Comey; Coincidence? Guess who was transferred into the Internal Revenue Service to run the Tax Exemption Branch of the IRS? None other than, Lois “Be on The Look Out” (BOLO) Lerner. Isn’t that interesting? But this is all just a series of strange coincidences, right?

Guess who ran the Tax Division inside the Department of Injustice from 2001 to 2005?

No other than the Assistant Attorney General of the United States, Rod Rosenstein.

Guess who was the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation during this time frame?

Another coincidence (just an anomaly in statistics and chances), but it was Robert Mueller.

What do all four casting characters have in common?  They all were briefed and/or were front-line investigators into the Clinton Foundation Investigation. Another coincidence, right?

Fast forward to 2009….

James Comey leaves the Justice Department to go and cash-in at Lockheed Martin.

Hillarious Clinton is running the State Department, official government business, on her own personal email server. The Uranium One “issue” comes to the attention of the Hillarious. Like all good public servants do, supposedly looking out for America’s best interest, she decides to support the decision and approve the sale of 20% of US Uranium to no other than, the Russians.

Now you would think that this is a fairly straight up deal, except it wasn’t, America got absolutely nothing out of it. However, prior to the sales approval, no other than Bill Clinton goes to Moscow gets paid 500K for a one-hour speech; then meets with Vladimir Putin at his home for a few hours.

Ok, no big deal right? Well, not so fast, the FBI had a mole inside the money laundering and bribery scheme.

Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during this time frame? Yep, He even delivered a Uranium Sample to Moscow in 2009.

Who was handling that case within the Justice Department out of the US Attorney’s Office in Maryland? None other than, Rod Rosenstein. And what happened to the informant?

The Department of Justice placed a GAG order on him and threatened to lock him up if he spoke out about it.

How does 20% of the most strategic asset of the United States of America end up in Russian hands when the FBI has an informant, a mole providing inside information to the FBI on the criminal enterprise? Very soon after; the sale was approved $145 million dollars in “donations” made their way into the Clinton Foundation from entities directly connected to the Uranium One deal.

Guess who was still at the Internal Revenue Service working the Charitable Division? None other than, – Lois Lerner. Ok, that’s all just another series of coincidences, nothing to see here, right?

Let’s fast forward to 2015.

Due to a series of tragic events in Benghazi and after the 9 “investigations” the House, Senate and at State Department, Trey Gowdy who was running the 10th investigation as Chairman of the Select Committee on Benghazi discovers that the Hillarious ran the State Department on an unclassified, unauthorized, outlaw personal email server. He also discovered that none of those emails had been turned over when she departed her “Public Service” as Secretary of State which was required by law. He also discovered that there was Top Secret information contained within her personally archived email.

Sparing you the State Departments cover-up, the nostrums they floated, the delay tactics that were employed and the outright lies that were spewed forth from the necks of the Kerry State Department, we shall leave it with this…… they did everything humanly possible to cover for Hillarious.

Now, this is amazing, guess who became FBI Director in 2013? None other than James Comey; who secured 17 no-bid contracts for his employer (Lockheed Martin) with the State Department and was rewarded with a six million dollar thank you present when he departed his employer? Amazing how all those no-bids just went right through at State, huh?

Now he is the FBI Director in charge of the “Clinton Email Investigation” after of course his FBI Investigates the Lois Lerner “Matter” at the Internal Revenue Service and he exonerates her. Nope…. couldn’t find any crimes there.

In April 2016, James Comey drafts an exoneration letter of Hillarious Rodham Clinton, meanwhile the DOJ is handing out immunity deals like candy. They didn’t even convene a Grand Jury!

Like a lightning bolt of statistical impossibility, like a miracle from God himself, like the true “Gangsta” Comey is, James steps out into the cameras of an awaiting press conference on July the 8th of 2016, and exonerates the Hillarious from any wrongdoing. Do you see the pattern?

It goes on and on, Rosenstein becomes Asst. Attorney General, Comey gets fired based upon a letter by Rosenstein, Comey leaks government information to the press, Mueller is assigned to the Russian Investigation sham by Rosenstein to provide cover for decades of malfeasance within the FBI and DOJ and the story continues.

FISA Abuse, political espionage….. pick a crime, any crime, chances are…… this group and a few others did it:

• All the same players.
• All compromised and conflicted.
• All working fervently to NOT go to jail themselves
• All connected in one way or another to the Clinton’s.

They are like battery acid; they corrode and corrupt everything they touch. How many lives have these two destroyed?

As of this writing, the Clinton Foundation, in its 20+ years of operation of being the largest International Charity Fraud in the history of mankind, has never been audited by the Internal Revenue Service.  Let us not forget that Comey’s brother works for DLA Piper, the law firm that does the Clinton Foundation’s taxes.

The person that is the common denominator to all the crimes above and still doing her evil escape legal maneuvers at the top of the 3 Letter USA Agencies? Yep, that would be Hillarious R. Clinton.

Now, who is LISA BARSOOMIAN? Let’s learn a little about Mrs. Lisa H. Barsoomian’s background.

Lisa H. Barsoomian, an Attorney that graduated from Georgetown Law, is a protégé of James Comey and Robert Mueller. Barsoomian, with her boss R. Craig Lawrence, represented Bill Clinton in 1998. She was a former assistant U.S. attorney and represented various people in government only from that position.

….

… Additionally, Lisa Barsoomian has specialized in opposing the Freedom of Information Act requests on behalf of the intelligence community. Although Barsoomian has been involved in hundreds of cases representing the DC Office of the US Attorney …

It’s a cover, no big deal right? What does one more attorney with ties to the US intelligence community really matter?  It deals with Trump and his recent tariffs on Chinese steel and aluminum imports, the border wall, DACA, everything coming out of California, the Uni-party unrelenting opposition to President Trump, the Clapper leaks, the Comey leaks, Attorney General Jeff Sessions recusal and subsequent 14 month nap with occasional forays into the marijuana legalization mix …. and last but not least Mueller’s never-ending investigation into collusion between the Trump team and the Russians. Clapper and Comey admitted that they were even spying on Trump during the election.

[MyLadiesDaddy]

So pathetic, I bet you can't even count to three. But I'm still not going to neg you because I feel really sorry for you. 

[Theseus]

On 8/25/2018 at 12:34 AM, nstoolman1 said:

On what? He has not committed a crime much less been convicted of anything.

Any thing he has done as citizen Trump prior to being elected can not be used against him.

 

 

 

Impeachment does not have to have a conviction for a crime because impeachment is a political tool found within the Constitution. The Articles of Impeachment are drafted in the House of Representatives which then vote on those Articles. If it passes the President is then technically Impeached. Two-thirds of the House of Representatives must vote "Aye". Should two-thirds of the House vote aye then the Articles are sent over to the Senate which then completes a trial based on the Articles of Impeachment. The Senate if they find the President guilty then decides on a punishment. Only two Presidents of the United States have been impeached - Andrew Johnson in 1862 remained in office and Bill Clinton 1998 remained in office. Nixon, although he faced impeachment, resigned before being so. Nixon is the only President to resign from office. Neither Johnson nor Clinton were convicted of a crime merely the accusation of a crime being committed. In Johnson's case it for violating the Tenure Act in which he removed the Secretary of War from office. In Clinton's case, it was for lying under oath.  While both are accused of the crime and strong case could be put forward that the crime was indeed committed, both Presidents were never adjudicated and found guilty of the crime in question. Meaning neither was found guilty by a judge and/or jury in a court of law for the crime committed. Something the Constitution has indicated cannot happen with a sitting President while tendering his duties of the office. Since no crime was ever adjudicated, this makes impeachment a political tool to oust a sitting President due to a mere accusation of High Crimes and Misdemeanors. Logically, if a strong enough case is put forward and a two-thirds vote in the House is approved, Trump can be Impeached. Then it falls on the Senate to try him and remove or not remove him from office. 

[Theseus]

  On 8/25/2018 at 12:34 AM, nstoolman1 said:

On what? He has not committed a crime much less been convicted of anything.

Any thing he has done as citizen Trump prior to being elected can not be used against him.

 

 

 

6 minutes ago, Theseus said:

Impeachment does not have to have a conviction for a crime because impeachment is a political tool found within the Constitution. The Articles of Impeachment are drafted in the House of Representatives which then vote on those Articles. If it passes the President is then technically Impeached. Two-thirds of the House of Representatives must vote "Aye". Should two-thirds of the House vote aye then the Articles are sent over to the Senate which then completes a trial based on the Articles of Impeachment. The Senate if they find the President guilty then decides on a punishment. Only two Presidents of the United States have been impeached - Andrew Johnson in 1862 remained in office and Bill Clinton 1998 remained in office. Nixon, although he faced impeachment, resigned before being so. Nixon is the only President to resign from office. Neither Johnson nor Clinton were convicted of a crime merely the accusation of a crime being committed. In Johnson's case it for violating the Tenure Act in which he removed the Secretary of War from office. In Clinton's case, it was for lying under oath.  While both are accused of the crime and strong case could be put forward that the crime was indeed committed, both Presidents were never adjudicated and found guilty of the crime in question. Meaning neither was found guilty by a judge and/or jury in a court of law for the crime committed. Something the Constitution has indicated cannot happen with a sitting President while tendering his duties of the office. Since no crime was ever adjudicated, this makes impeachment a political tool to oust a sitting President due to a mere accusation of High Crimes and Misdemeanors. Logically, if a strong enough case is put forward and a two-thirds vote in the House is approved, Trump can be Impeached. Then it falls on the Senate to try him and remove or not remove him from office. 

 

 

 

The last part is not actually accurate. A sitting President can be found to have lied to attain office and sway the vote of the people in his favor. Thus he fraudulently attained office before taking the Oath and therefore can be impeached and removed from office should Congress elect to do so. High Crimes and Misdemeanors is vague and there has not been a consensus on what those are entirely. Since this overly broad phrase is not explicit, nor will it ever be, Congress has the flexibility to try to impeach the President on pretty much anything they wish. It is up to the people to determine if this is acceptable or not. 

[nstoolman1]

2 hours ago, Theseus said:

Impeachment does not have to have a conviction for a crime because impeachment is a political tool found within the Constitution. The Articles of Impeachment are drafted in the House of Representatives which then vote on those Articles. If it passes the President is then technically Impeached. Two-thirds of the House of Representatives must vote "Aye". Should two-thirds of the House vote aye then the Articles are sent over to the Senate which then completes a trial based on the Articles of Impeachment. The Senate if they find the President guilty then decides on a punishment. Only two Presidents of the United States have been impeached - Andrew Johnson in 1862 remained in office and Bill Clinton 1998 remained in office. Nixon, although he faced impeachment, resigned before being so. Nixon is the only President to resign from office. Neither Johnson nor Clinton were convicted of a crime merely the accusation of a crime being committed. In Johnson's case it for violating the Tenure Act in which he removed the Secretary of War from office. In Clinton's case, it was for lying under oath.  While both are accused of the crime and strong case could be put forward that the crime was indeed committed, both Presidents were never adjudicated and found guilty of the crime in question. Meaning neither was found guilty by a judge and/or jury in a court of law for the crime committed. Something the Constitution has indicated cannot happen with a sitting President while tendering his duties of the office. Since no crime was ever adjudicated, this makes impeachment a political tool to oust a sitting President due to a mere accusation of High Crimes and Misdemeanors. Logically, if a strong enough case is put forward and a two-thirds vote in the House is approved, Trump can be Impeached. Then it falls on the Senate to try him and remove or not remove him from office. 

 

On 8/25/2018 at 9:42 AM, nstoolman1 said:

The Senate cannot impeach without having something impeachable done.

 

Impeachable offenses. The Constitution defines impeachment at the federal level and limits impeachment to "The President, Vice President, and all civil officers of the United States" who may be impeached and removed only for "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanors".

 

High crimes and misdemeanors. ... The charge of high crimes and misdemeanors covers allegations of misconduct peculiar to officials, such as perjury of oath, abuse of authority, bribery, intimidation, misuse of assets, failure to supervise, dereliction of duty, unbecoming conduct, and refusal to obey a lawful order.

 

Almost all of the Senators and Congressman have done at least one of these. 

People in glass houses.....

It is a tool found in the Constitution to be used when a crime has been committed. The mere accusation of a crime may work for the Dems but I think POTUS has more backbone and would make them prove it. The last thing the Dems want is a open court hearing where all their shenanigans would come to light. Like I said... People in glass houses,,,